Search

Background: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) has been associated with a greater incidence and mortality of cancer, although such findings are inconsistent. However, no large studies are currently available to investigate this association in patients with a specific type of cancer. This study seeks to assess potential relationships between SDB severity and aggressiveness markers of cutaneous melanoma., Methods: Four hundred and forty-three patients with a diagnosis of melanoma underwent a sleep study within 6 months of diagnosis. General demographics were collected, along with melanoma characteristics and polygraphic parameters consisting of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and indices of both continuous and intermittent night-time oxyhemoglobin desaturation (DI4%). An exploration of independent relationships between SDB and various objective melanoma aggressiveness markers (Breslow index, presence of ulceration, presence of regression, mitotic index, stage of severity, damage to the sentinel lymph, and spreading of the melanoma) was performed., Results: Patients in the upper tertiles of AHI or DI4% were 1.94 (95% CI, 1.14-3.32; P = .022) and 1.93 (95% CI, 1.14-3.26; P = .013) times more likely, respectively, to present with aggressive melanoma (Breslow index > 1 mm) than those in the lowest tertiles of these sleep attributes after adjustment for age, sex, tumor location, and BMI. This association was particularly prominent among patients < 56 years of age with Breslow index > 2 mm. The presence of the additional markers of aggressiveness was also associated with higher AHI and DI4% values., Conclusions: The severity of SDB was independently associated with greater aggressiveness of cutaneous melanoma, particularly among younger patients., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Home respiratory polygraphy may be a simpler alternative to in-laboratory polysomnography for the management of more symptomatic patients with obstructive sleep apnea, but its effectiveness has not been evaluated across a broad clinical spectrum., Objectives: To compare the long-term effectiveness (6 mo) of home respiratory polygraphy and polysomnography management protocols in patients with intermediate-to-high sleep apnea suspicion (most patients requiring a sleep study)., Methods: A multicentric, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial with two open parallel arms and a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed in 12 tertiary hospitals in Spain. Sequentially screened patients with sleep apnea suspicion were randomized to respiratory polygraphy or polysomnography protocols. Moreover, both arms received standardized therapeutic decision-making, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment or a healthy habit assessment, auto-CPAP titration (for CPAP indication), health-related quality-of-life questionnaires, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, and polysomnography at the end of follow-up. The main outcome was the Epworth Sleepiness Scale measurement. The noninferiority criterion was -2 points on the Epworth scale., Measurements and Main Results: In total, 430 patients were randomized. The respiratory polygraphy protocol was noninferior to the polysomnography protocol based on the Epworth scale. Quality of life, blood pressure, and polysomnography were similar between protocols. Respiratory polygraphy was the most cost-effective protocol, with a lower per-patient cost of 416.7€., Conclusions: Home respiratory polygraphy management is similarly effective to polysomnography, with a substantially lower cost. Therefore, polysomnography is not necessary for most patients with suspected sleep apnea. This finding could change established clinical practice, with a clear economic benefit. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01752556).

Rationale: Home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) may be a cost-effective alternative to polysomnography (PSG) for diagnosis and treatment election in patients with high clinical probability of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but there is conflicting evidence on its use for a wider spectrum of patients., Objectives: To determine the efficacy and cost of OSA management (diagnosis and therapeutic decision making) using (1) PSG for all patients (PSG arm); (2) HRP for all patients (HRP arm); and (3) HRP for a subsample of patients with high clinical probability of being treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and PSG for the remainder (elective HRP arm)., Methods: Multicentric study of 366 patients with intermediate-high clinical probability of OSA, randomly subjected to HRP and PSG. We explored the diagnostic and therapeutic decision agreements between the PSG and both HRP arms for several HRP cutoff points and calculated costs for equal diagnostic and/or therapeutic decision efficacy., Results: For equal diagnostic and therapeutic decision efficacy, PSG arm costs were 18% higher than HRP arm costs and 20% higher than elective HRP arm costs. HRP arm costs tended to be lower than elective HRP arm costs, and both tended to be lower than PSG arm costs if patient costs were omitted., Conclusion: Home respiratory polygraphy is a less costly alternative than polysomnography for the diagnosis and therapeutic decision making for patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea. We found no advantage in cost terms, however, in using home respiratory polygraphy for all patients or home respiratory polygraphy for the most symptomatic patients and polysomnography for the rest.

Automatic home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) scoring functions can potentially confirm the diagnosis of sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS) (obviating technician scoring) in a substantial number of patients. The result would have important management and cost implications. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic cost-effectiveness of a sequential HRP scoring protocol (automatic and then manual for residual cases) compared with manual HRP scoring, and with in-hospital polysomnography. We included suspected SAHS patients in a multicentre study and assigned them to home and hospital protocols at random. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for manual and automatic scoring. Diagnostic agreement for several cut-off points was explored and costs for two equally effective alternatives were calculated. Of 366 randomised patients, 348 completed the protocol. Manual scoring produced better ROC curves than automatic scoring. There was no sensitive automatic or subsequent manual HRP apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) cut-off point. The specific cut-off points for automatic and subsequent manual HRP scorings (AHI >25 and >20, respectively) had a specificity of 93% for automatic and 94% for manual scorings. The costs of manual protocol were 9% higher than sequential HRP protocol; these were 69% and 64%, respectively, of the cost of the polysomnography. A sequential HRP scoring protocol is a cost-effective alternative to polysomnography, although with limited cost savings compared to HRP manual scoring.

Rationale: Home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) is an alternative to polysomnography (PSG) for sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) diagnosis. However, therapeutic decision-making is a different process than diagnosis., Objectives: This study aimed to determine the agreement between HRP and in-hospital PSG for therapeutic decision-making in a large sample., Methods: Patients with an intermediate or high SAHS suspicion were included in a multicenter study (eight sleep centers) and assigned to home and hospital protocols in a random order. Therapeutic decisions (continuous positive airway pressure, no continuous positive airway pressure, or impossible decision) were made by an investigator in each center, based on using either HRP or PSG and a single set of auxiliary clinical variables. Patients and diagnostic methods (HRP and PSG) were assessed in random order using an electronic database. After a month the same therapeutic decision-making procedure was repeated with the same method., Measurements and Main Results: Of 366 randomized patients, 348 completed the protocol. The "impossible decision" case was not observed with either PSG or HRP. Therapeutic decisions using HRP had a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 77%, and an agreement level (sum of true positives and negatives) of 76%. Patients with higher HRP apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores (≥ 30; 41% of the total sample) had a sensitivity of 94%, a specificity of 44%, and the agreement level was 91%., Conclusions: The HRP-based therapeutic decision was adequate when AHI was high, but deficient in the large population of patients with mild to moderate AHI. Therefore, both selecting patients with a high suspicion and severity of SAHS and future prospective cost-effectiveness studies are necessary.

Introduction: Home respiratory polygraphy (HRP) may be a cost-effective alternative to polysomnography for the diagnosis of sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS), but stronger evidence is needed. Normally, patients transport HRP equipment from the hospital to home and back, which may create difficulties for some patients., Objectives: To determine both the diagnostic efficacy and cost of HRP (with and without a transportation service moving the device and telematic transmission of data) in a large sample compared with in-hospital polysomnography., Methods: Patients suspected of having SAHS were included in a multicentre study (eight hospitals). They were assigned to home and hospital protocols in random order. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed for manual respiratory polygraphy scoring protocol and different polysomnographic cut-off points. Diagnostic efficacies for several polysomnographic cut-off points were explored and costs for two equally effective alternatives were calculated., Results: Of 366 randomised patients, 348 completed the protocol. The best receiver operating characteristic curve was obtained with a polysomnographic cut-off of the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI)≥5. The sensitive HRP AHI cut-off point (<5) had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 57% and a negative likelihood ratio (LR) of 0.07; the specific cut-off (>10) had a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 86% and a positive LR of 6.25. The cost of HRP was half that of polysomnography. Telematic transmission costs were similar if the patients' costs were taken in to account., Conclusion: HRP is an alternative to polysomnography in patients with suspected SAHS. Telematic procedures may help patients with limited mobility and those who live a long way from the sleep centre.

Background: To improve the performance of simplified sleep studies, it is essential to properly estimate the sleep time., Objectives: Our aim is to estimate sleep efficiency on the basis of flow breathing signal characteristics., Methods: Twenty subjects with sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome diagnosed by polysomnography were studied. A characteristic pattern of flow signal defined our criteria for wakefulness and sleep. Sleep was analyzed in 2 different runs: (1) in the usual manner (neurological and respiratory variables), and (2) only the nasal cannula flow signal was displayed on the computer screen and the sleep and wakefulness periods were scored according to our criteria. At the end of the scoring process, all the signals were displayed on the screen to analyze the concordance., Results: Three thousand and sixty-nine screens were analyzed. The polysomnography sleep efficiency measured was 80.8%. The estimated sleep efficiency measured by nasal prongs was 78.9%. The detection and concordance of wakefulness had a sensitivity of 58.7%, a specificity of 96.4%, a positive predictive value of 81.3% and a negative predictive value of 89.6%., Conclusions: Our criteria for sleep and wakefulness based on airflow waveform morphology are a helpful parameter for estimating sleep efficiency in a simplified sleep study., (Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Obstructive nonapnoeic event (ONE) scoring is shrouded in confusion. This is important in patients with mild disease, in whom precision is crucial. The aims of the present study were: 1) to identify ONEs using oesophageal pressure (OP) (OP-ONEs) and a noninvasive (NI) method (NI-ONEs); 2) to compare both methods of scoring; and 3) to determine the contribution of ONE definitions to clinical findings. Patients with suspected sleep apnoeas (respiratory disturbance index

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, anthropometric, and polysomnographic characteristics of a broad group of patients with sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome according to sex., Patients and Methods: The study, conducted in 6 Spanish university hospitals, included consecutive patients attended from 2003 through 2005 with an apnea-hypopnea index greater than 5. Groups were formed according to sex and then stratified into age subgroups of younger (< or = 45 years) and older patients (> 45 years) for further comparison., Results: The study included 2464 men and 424 women. Women were older (mean [SD] age, 56 [12] years vs 51 [12] years), weighed more (body mass index, 31 [6] kg/m(2) vs 30 [5] kg/m2), and had a larger hip circumference (119 [15] cm vs 111 [12] cm) and smaller neck circumference (38 [3] cm vs 42 [9] cm) than men (P< .001 in all cases). The degree of daytime sleepiness (Epworth scale) and the apnea-hypopnea index were similar in both groups, although women had a longer sleep latency (23 [28] minutes vs 27 [32] minutes; P< .004) and a higher mean oxygen saturation (92% [4%] vs 91% [5%]) and minimum oxygen saturation (78% [11%] vs 75% [12%]; P< .0001) than men. On stratification by age, only weight differences between men and women were observed in the younger group whereas the older group also showed differences in oxygen saturation during sleep., Conclusions: Women with sleep apnea-hypopnea are more overweight than men and tend to seek medical attention at an older age. The clinical and polysomnographic variables were generally similar for men and womenthe only differences were that sleep latency was longer and hypoxemia during sleep was more accentuated in women.

Background: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is the major complaint in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). However, EDS is not universally present in all patients with OSAS. The mechanisms explaining why some patients with OSAS complain of EDS whereas others do not are unknown., Objective: To investigate polysomnographic determinants of excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in a large multicenter cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSAS)., Methods: All consecutive patients with an apnea-hypopnea index greater than 5h(-1) who were evaluated between 2003 and 2005. EDS was assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and patients were considered to have EDS if the ESS was >10., Results: A total of 1649 patients with EDS ((mean [+/-SD] Epworth 15+/-3) and 1233 without EDS (Epworth 7+/-3) were studied. Patients with EDS were slightly younger than patients without EDS (51+/-12 vs 54+/-13 years, p<0.0001), had longer total sleep time (p<0.007), shorter sleep latency (p<0001), greater sleep efficiency (p<0.0001) and less NREM sleep in stages 1 and 2 (p<0.007) than those without EDS. Furthermore, patients with EDS had slightly higher AHI (p<0.005) and arousal index (p<0.001) and lower nadir oxygen saturation (p<0.01)., Conclusions: Patients with OSAS and EDS are characterized by longer sleep duration and increased slow wave sleep compared to those without EDS. Although patients with EDS showed a mild worsening of respiratory disturbance and sleep fragmentation, these results suggest that sleep apnea and sleep disruption are not the primary determinants of EDS in all of these patients.