Search

Background: The usefulness of T-cell receptor gene rearrangement (TCR-GR) analyses for differentiating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) from benign inflammatory disorders (BID) has been insufficiently studied to date., Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic value of TCR-GR analyses, comparing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis and BIOMED-2 standardized protocol PCR with GeneScan analysis (BIOMED-2-GS)., Methods: Both types of PCR were performed in 157 patients evaluated for initial features suggestive of CTCL between 1996 and 2007. After clinical and histological review, the final diagnosis was CTCL in 77 cases and BID in 80 cases., Results: DGGE and BIOMED-2-GS had a similar diagnostic value for distinguishing CTCL from BID, with a sensitivity of 74% and 77%, respectively, and a specificity of 86%. The observed concordance between both methods was 90% and the kappa coefficient was 0.79. Positivity rates did not depend on the PCR method but varied according to the type of CTCL (73-75% in mycosis fungoides, 90-100% in Sézary syndrome, 40-60% in lymphomatoid papulosis and 100% in other types). The positivity rate in BID was 14% with both methods. The most frequent BID with a monoclonal pattern were drug-induced cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia, erythrodermic psoriasis and pityriasis lichenoides chronica., Conclusions: BIOMED-2-GS analysis of the TCRgamma gene is as sensitive and specific as DGGE for CTCL diagnosis. In addition, BIOMED-2-GS is less time-consuming and gives more information concerning the size and nature of TCR-GR.

Defects in the fusion of facial buds can result from an anomaly in tissue development or apoptosis, or both. Our working hypothesis was that anomalies in the development of tissues could be caused by a genetic angiogenic defect. Our main objective was to design a reproducible experimental model to study the expression of angiogenic genes in the borders of cleft lips with or without cleft palate. We therefore prospectively studied seven non-syndromic patients, three with a cleft lip (2 right, 1 left), and four with a cleft lip and palate (1 bilateral, 2 right, 1 left), with no CGH (comparative genomic hybridisation) array, who had primary operations to repair their clefts. We also used four controls (cultured fibroblasts from healthy skin samples). The mean (range) age at operation was 44 (13-77) days. We studied the lateral and medial borders histologically and did qPCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) analysis for gene expression with 22 genes of interest (and two housekeeping genes) involved in cleft lip and angiogenesis. The qPCR analysis found significant (p < 0.05) overexpression of eight genes in the medial border and seven in the lateral border, and underexpression of nine genes in the medial, and ten in the lateral border. The difference in expression between the two borders was not significant. This preliminary study has enabled us to develop a new method to analyse the expression of angiogenic genes in the borders of cleft lips. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]