Search

A cooperative study was conducted among six laboratories to compare the performance of the Cobas Amplicor (CA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system (Roche Molecular Systems, USA) for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with that of microscopy and culture in routine clinical laboratory diagnosis. A total of 5,221 decontaminated respiratory specimens were tested. The use of an internal control allowed detection of PCR inhibition in 144 (2.8%) specimens. Only two culture-positive samples were CA PCR inhibitory and therefore could not be detected by PCR testing. Of the 333 culture-positive specimens, 278 (83.5%) were positive by the CA PCR. Of the 4,744 culture-negative specimens, 52 (1.1%) were positive by the CA PCR. After analysis of discrepancies, 40 of the 52 culture-negative, CA PCR-positive specimens were classified as true positive. Thus, the overall sensitivities of culture, CA PCR and microscopy were 89.3%, 85.2% and 55.5%, respectively. The overall specificity of the CA PCR was 99.7%. Five of the six centers found similar performances for the CA PCR, with sensitivities ranging from 85.7 to 90.9%. The CA PCR was more sensitive for smear-positive samples, exhibiting overall sensitivities of 96.1% and 71.7% for smear-positive and smear-negative specimens, respectively. These results indicate that the Cobas Amplicor system enables microbiology laboratories with reasonable previous experience in molecular biology testing to perform PCR and to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in more than 70% of specimens obtained from infected patients.

The benefits shown by the recent introduction of PCR for the in vitro diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has prompted the development of standardized, ready-to-use assays that can be implemented in routine clinical laboratories. We have evaluated the clinical performance of COBAS AMPLICOR HCV (COBAS), the first instrument system that allows the automation of HCV RNA amplification and detection, to determine its performance in the routine laboratory setting. More than 2,000 specimens collected at five centers were analyzed in parallel by the COBAS and the manual AMPLICOR HCV (AMPLICOR) tests, and the results were compared with the results for biochemical and serological markers of HCV. In this study the two PCR systems showed the same accuracy, with a concordance rate of 99.8%. As expected, the correlation between serology and PCR was not absolute because the presence of anti-HCV antibodies may be associated with a latent or past infection. On the other hand, if the presence of confirmed anti-HCV antibodies and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels are taken as the "gold standard," indicating an active, ongoing infection, the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests show high and comparable sensitivities (100%) and specificities (98%), with positive and negative predictive values of 100 and 97%, respectively. During the study no false-positive reactions were detected. The use of an internal control allowed the identification of inhibitory substances that prevented amplification for 0.3 and 0.4% of samples tested by the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests, respectively. Compared to the manual system, the COBAS system allowed a significant reduction of hands-on time and could improve the overall laboratory work flow. In conclusion, these results support the use of the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests for the molecular diagnosis of active HCV infections.