Search

PARP enzymes transfer ADP-ribose from NAD+ onto proteins as a covalent modification that regulates multiple aspects of cell biology. Here, we identify an undiscovered catalytic activity for human PARP1: de novo generation of free PAR molecules that are not attached to proteins. Free PAR production arises when a molecule of NAD+ or ADP-ribose docks in the PARP1 acceptor site and attaches to an NAD+ molecule bound to the donor site, releasing nicotinamide and initiating ADP-ribose chains that emanate from NAD+/ADP-ribose rather than protein. Free PAR is also produced by human PARP2 and the PARP enzyme Tankyrase. We demonstrate that free PAR in cells is generated mostly by PARP1 de novo synthesis activity rather than by PAR-degrading enzymes PAR glycohydrolase (PARG), ARH3, and TARG1 releasing PAR from protein. The coincident production of free PAR and protein-linked modifications alters models for PAR signaling and broadens the scope of PARP enzyme signaling capacity. [Display omitted] • PARP1, PARP2, and Tankyrase directly produce protein-free poly(ADP-ribose), or PAR • Free PAR originates from NAD+ or ADP-ribose molecules docked in PARP acceptor site • HPF1 regulates the PARP1/PARP2 ratio of protein-free:protein-linked PAR in vitro • Cellular free PAR is synthesized de novo , not from glycohydrolases PARG/ARH3/TARG1 Langelier et al. discover that PARP1, PARP2, and Tankyrase catalyze de novo synthesis of protein-free poly(ADP-ribose), or PAR, in addition to canonical protein-linked PAR. Cellular free PAR did not result from glycohydrolase cleavage of protein-linked PAR but was synthesized directly from NAD+ or ADP-ribose molecules that seed free PAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2 enzymatic inhibitors (PARPi) are promising cancer treatments. But recently, their use has been hindered by unexplained severe anemia and treatment-related leukemia. In addition to enzymatic inhibition, PARPi also trap PARP1 and 2 at DNA lesions. Here we report that, unlike Parp2 −/− mice, which develop normally, mice expressing catalytically inactive Parp2 (E534A and Parp2 EA/EA ) succumb to Tp53 - and Chk2 -dependent erythropoietic failure in utero , mirroring Lig1 −/− mice. While DNA damage mainly activates PARP1, we demonstrate that DNA replication activates PARP2 robustly. PARP2 is selectively recruited and activated by 5′-phosphorylated nicks (5′p-nicks), including those between Okazaki fragments, resolved by ligase 1 (Lig1) and Lig3. Inactive PARP2, but not its active form or absence, impedes Lig1- and Lig3-mediated ligation, causing dose-dependent replication fork collapse, which is detrimental to erythroblasts with ultra-fast forks. This PARylation-dependent structural function of PARP2 at 5′p-nicks explains the detrimental effects of PARP2 inactivation on erythropoiesis, shedding light on PARPi-induced anemia and the selection for TP53/CHK2 loss. [Display omitted] • PARP2 is activated during normal erythroblastocyte replication by 5′p-nicks • Inactive PARP2 protein, but not the absence of PARP2, interferes with DNA replication • The presence of inactive PARP2 blocks erythropoiesis, leading to lethal anemia This work shows that the hematological toxicities associated with PARP inhibitors stem not from impaired PARP1 or PARP2 enzymatic activity but rather from the presence of inactive PARP2 protein. Mechanistically, these toxicities reflect a unique role of PARP2 at 5′-phosphorylated DNA nicks during DNA replication in erythroblasts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reaction of (ADP-ribosyl)ation catalyzed by DNA-dependent proteins of the poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) family, PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3, comprises the cellular response to DNA damage. These proteins are involved in the base excision repair (BER) process. Despite the extensive research, it remains unknown how PARPs are involved in the regulation of the BER process and how the roles are distributed between the DNA-dependent members of the PARP family. Here, we investigated the interaction of the PARP's family DNA-dependent proteins with nucleosome core particles containing DNA intermediates of the initial stages of BER. To do that, the nucleosomes containing damage in the vicinity of one of the DNA duplex blunt ends were reconstituted based on the Widom's Clone 603 DNA sequence. Dissociation constants of the PARP complexes with nucleosomes bearing DNA contained uracil (Native), apurine/apyrimidine site (AP site), or a single-nucleotide gap with 5′-dRp fragment (Gap) were determined. It was shown that the affinity of the proteins for the nucleosomes increased in the row: PARP3<

DNA strand breaks activate Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 and 2, which use NAD+ as the substrate to covalently conjugate ADP-ribose on themselves and other proteins (e.g., Histone) to promote chromatin relaxation and recruit additional DNA repair factors. Enzymatic inhibitors of PARP1 and PARP2 (PARPi) are promising cancer therapy agents that selectively target BRCA1- or BRCA2- deficient cancers. As immediate early responders to DNA strand breaks with robust activities, PARP1 and PARP2 normally form transient foci (<10 minutes) at the micro-irradiation-induced DNA lesions. In addition to enzymatic inhibition, PARPi also extend the presence of PARP1 and PARP2 at DNA lesions, including at replication forks, where they may post a physical block for subsequent repair and DNA replication. The dynamic nature of PARP1 and PARP2 foci made live cell imaging a unique platform to detect subtle changes and the functional interaction among PARP1, PARP2, and their regulators. Recent imaging studies have provided new understandings of the biological consequence of PARP inhibition and uncovered functional interactions between PARP1 and PARP2 and new regulators (e.g. , histone poly(ADP-ribosylation) factor). Here, we review recent advances in dissecting the temporal and spatial Regulation of PARP1 and PARP2 at DNA lesions and discuss their physiological implications on both cancer and normal cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To maintain tissue homeostasis, cell proliferation is balanced by cell death. PARP1 is an important protein involved in both processes. Upon sensing DNA damage, PARP1 forms poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains to recruit the repair proteins, ensuring genome integrity and faithful cell proliferation. In addition, PAR also regulates the activity of PARP1. Persistent DNA damage can signal the cell to progress toward programmed cell death, apoptosis. During apoptosis, proteolytic cleavage of PARP1 generates an N-terminal, ZnF1–2 PARP1 (DNA binding or regulatory fragment), and C-terminal, PARP1 ΔZnF1–2 (catalytic or PAR carrier fragment), which exhibits a basal activity. Regulation of the apoptotic fragments by PAR has not been studied. Here, we report that PAR inhibits the basal level activity of PARP1 ΔZnF1–2 , and ZnF1–2 PARP1 interacts with PARP1 ΔZnF1–2 to exhibit DNA-dependent stimulation and partially restores the PAR-dependent stimulation. Interestingly, along with the auto-modification domain of PARP1, the DNA-binding domains, ZnF1–2 PARP1 , also acts as an acceptor of PARylation; therefore, ZnF1–2 PARP1 exhibits a reduced affinity for DNA upon PARylation. Furthermore, we show that ZnF1–2 PARP1 shows trans-dominant inhibition of DNA-dependent stimulation of PARP2. Altogether, our study explores the regulation of the catalytic activity of PARP1 ΔZnF1–2 and PARP2 by the regulatory apoptotic fragment of PARP1. • PAR acts as an inhibitor of the catalytic apoptotic fragment of PARP1 PARP1 ΔZnF1-2. • Regulatory fragment (ZnF1-2 PARP1) and PARP1 ΔZnF1-2 can assemble independent of DNA. • ZnF1-2 PARP1 complements PARP1 ΔZnF1-2 for DNA-dependent activation. • ZnF1 is necessary for PAR-dependent stimulation of PARP1. • ZnF1-2 PARP1 trans-dominantly inhibits the DNA-dependent stimulation of PARP2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proteins of the Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) family modify target proteins by covalent attachment of ADP-ribose moieties onto amino acid side chains. In Arabidopsis, PARP proteins contribute to repair of DNA lesions and modulate plant responses to various abiotic and biotic stressors. Arabidopsis PARP1 and PARP2 are nuclear proteins and given that their molecular weights exceed the diffusion limit of nuclear pore complexes, an active import mechanism into the nucleus is likely. Here we use confocal microscopy of fluorescent protein-tagged Arabidopsis PARP2 and PARP2 deletion constructs in combination with site-directed mutagenesis to identify a nuclear localization sequence in PARP2 that is required for nuclear import. We report that in co-immunoprecipitation assays PARP2 interacts with several isoforms of the importin-α group of nuclear transport adapters and that PARP2 binding to IMPORTIN-α2 is mediated by the identified nuclear localization sequence. Our results demonstrate that PARP2 is a cargo protein of the canonical importin-α/β nuclear import pathway.

Proteins of the Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) family modify target proteins by covalent attachment of ADP-ribose moieties onto amino acid side chains. In Arabidopsis, PARP proteins contribute to repair of DNA lesions and modulate plant responses to various abiotic and biotic stressors. Arabidopsis PARP1 and PARP2 are nuclear proteins and given that their molecular weights exceed the diffusion limit of nuclear pore complexes, an active import mechanism into the nucleus is likely. Here we use confocal microscopy of fluorescent protein-tagged Arabidopsis PARP2 and PARP2 deletion constructs in combination with site-directed mutagenesis to identify a nuclear localization sequence in PARP2 that is required for nuclear import. We report that in co-immunoprecipitation assays PARP2 interacts with several isoforms of the importin- α group of nuclear transport adapters and that PARP2 binding to IMPORTIN-α2 is mediated by the identified nuclear localization sequence. Our results demonstrate that PARP2 is a cargo protein of the canonical importin-α/β nuclear import pathway. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases have shown true promise in early clinical studies due to reported activity in BRCA-associated cancers. PARP inhibitors may represent a potentially important new class of chemotherapeutic agents directed at targeting cancers with defective DNA-damage repair. In order to widen the prospective patient population that would benefit from PARP inhibitors, predictive biomarkers based on a clear understanding of the mechanism of action are required. In addition, a more sophisticated understanding of the toxicity profile is required if PARP inhibitors are to be employed in the curative, rather than the palliative, setting. PARP inhibitors have successfully moved into clinical practice in the past few years, with approval granted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) within the past two years. The United States FDA approval of olaparib applies to fourth-line treatment in germline BRCA-mutant ovarian cancer, and European EMA approval of olaparib for maintenance therapy in both germline and somatic BRCA-mutant platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This review covers the current understanding of PARP, its inhibition, and the basis of the excitement surrounding these new agents. It also evaluates future approaches and directions required to achieve full understanding of the intricate interplay of these agents at the cellular level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)-ation is a nonprotein posttranslational modification of proteins and plays an integral part in cell physiology and pathology. The metabolism of poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) is regulated by its synthesis by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) and on the catabolic side by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG). PARPs convert NAD+ molecules into PAR chains that interact covalently or noncovalently with target proteins and thereby modify their structure and functions. PAR synthesis is activated when PARP1 and PARP2 bind to DNA breaks and these two enzymes account for almost all PAR formation after genotoxic stress. PARG cleaves PAR molecules into free PAR and finally ADP-ribose (ADPR) moieties, both acting as messengers in cellular stress signaling. In this review, we discuss the potential of RNAi to manipulate the levels of PARPs and PARG, and consequently those of PAR and ADPR, and compare the results with those obtained after genetic or chemical disruption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 2 (PARP2) participates in base excision repair (BER) alongside PARP1, but its functions are still under study. Here, we characterize binding affinities of PARP2 for other BER proteins (PARP1, APE1, Polβ, and XRCC1) and oligomerization states of the homo- and hetero-associated complexes using fluorescence-based and light scattering techniques. To compare PARP2 and PARP1 in the efficiency of PAR synthesis, in the absence and presence of protein partners, the size of PARP2 PARylated in various reaction conditions was measured. Unlike PARP1, PARP2 forms more dynamic complexes with common protein partners, and their stability is effectively modulated by DNA intermediates. Apparent binding affinity constants determined for homo- and hetero-oligomerized PARP1 and PARP2 provide evidence that the major form of PARP2 at excessive PARP1 level is their heterocomplex. Autoregulation of PAR elongation at high PARP and NAD+ concentrations is stronger for PARP2 than for PARP1, and the activity of PARP2 is more effectively inhibited by XRCC1. Moreover, the activity of both PARP1 and PARP2 is suppressed upon their heteroPARylation. Taken together, our findings suggest that PARP2 can function differently in BER, promoting XRCC1-dependent repair (similarly to PARP1) or an alternative XRCC1-independent mechanism via hetero-oligomerization with PARP1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are enzymes that metabolize NAD+. PARP1 and PARP10 were previously implicated in the regulation of autophagy. Here we showed that cytosolic electron-dense particles appear in the cytoplasm of C2C12 myoblasts in which PARP2 is silenced by shRNA. The cytosolic electron-dense bodies resemble autophagic vesicles and, in line with that, we observed an increased number of LC3-positive and Lysotracker-stained vesicles. Silencing of PARP2 did not influence the maximal number of LC3-positive vesicles seen upon chloroquine treatment or serum starvation, suggesting that the absence of PARP2 inhibits autophagic breakdown. Silencing of PARP2 inhibited the activity of AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) and the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2). Treatment of PARP2-silenced C2C12 cells with AICAR, an AMPK activator, nicotinamide-riboside (an NAD+ precursor), or EX-527 (a SIRT1 inhibitor) decreased the number of LC3-positive vesicles cells to similar levels as in control (scPARP2) cells, suggesting that these pathways inhibit autophagic flux upon PARP2 silencing. We observed a similar increase in the number of LC3 vesicles in primary PARP2 knockout murine embryonic fibroblasts. We provided evidence that the enzymatic activity of PARP2 is important in regulating autophagy. Finally, we showed that the silencing of PARP2 induces myoblast differentiation. Taken together, PARP2 is a positive regulator of autophagic breakdown in mammalian transformed cells and its absence blocks the progression of autophagy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Emerging evidence indicates that Long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) play crucial roles in tumor progression, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, whether there is a crosstalk between LncRNA pituitary tumor-transforming 3 (PTTG3P) and miR-383 in HCC remains unknown. This study is designed to explore the underlying mechanism by which LncRNA PTTG3P sponges miR-383 during HCC progression.Methods: qPCR and Western blot were used to analyze LncRNA PTTG3P, miR-383 and other target genes' expression. CCK-8 assay was performed to examine cell proliferation. Annexin V-PE/PI and PI staining were used to analyze cell apoptosis and cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry, respectively. Transwell migration and invasion assays were used to examine cell migration and invasion abilities. An in vivo xenograft study was performed to detect tumor growth. Luciferase reporter assay and RNA pull-down assay were carried out to detect the interaction between miR-383 and LncRNA PTTG3P. RIP was carried out to detect whether PTTG3P and miR-383 were enriched in Ago2-immunoprecipitated complex.Results: In this study, we found that PTTG3P was up-regulated in HCC tissues and cells. Functional experiments demonstrated that knockdown of PTTG3P inhibited cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted cell apoptosis, acting as an oncogene. Mechanistically, PTTG3P upregulated the expression of miR-383 targets Cyclin D1 (CCND1) and poly ADP-ribose polymerase 2 (PARP2) by sponging miR-383, acting as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA). The PTTG3P-miR-383-CCND1/PARP2 axis modulated HCC phenotypes. Moreover, PTTG3P also affected the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.Conclusion: The data indicate a novel PTTG3P-miR-383-CCND1/PARP2 axis in HCC tumorigenesis, suggesting that PTTG3P may be used as a potential therapeutic target in HCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]