Search

As the costs of the Iraq War—in lives and money—continue to rise, public and political support continue to drop. Now is the time to find a way out.

(2003). THE ELECTIONS: War on terror wins. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 18-19.

Throwing more money at Defense will only postpone a solution to the problems at the Pentagon.

This article asserts that the conservative right wing of the Republican party is in the midst of an attack on arms control in general, intent on sabotage of the treaties at the core of the program - the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, and the 1991 and 1993 START treaties, and treaties in negotiation at present. The author argues that this part of the political party is far right of other conservatives, and is intent on unravelling all progress made to this pont in time.

Despite expectations to the contrary, the Ninety-eighth Congress has been less than consistent on arms control measures, first voting for a nuclear freeze and then releasing funds for the MX

The Reagan Administration's military requests might have survived the 1983 congressional budget debate, but further ambitious requests and the upcoming elections may enliven the 1984 debate.

(1985). Congress and the arms control paradox. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 9-10.