Search

S'il semble acquis que Bruxelles, comme Washington, est le lieu d'action privilégié du « lobbying européen », consistant pour des acteurs privés à infléchir les décisions publiques perçues comme sous influence, la théorie critique du lobbying entend réfuter ce lieu commun. Mobilisant une sociologie des groupes d'intérêts, cette enquête montre que l'identité promue par une organisation professionnelle résulte de plusieurs logiques : autant de luttes internes évolutives que d'actions qui en font des vecteurs de la Polity européenne oeuvrant aux décisions et projets européens.

This book presents the first large-scale study of lobbying strategies and outcomes in the United States and the European Union, two of the most powerful political systems in the world. Every day, tens of thousands of lobbyists in Washington and Brussels are working to protect and promote their interests in the policymaking process. Policies emanating from these two spheres have global impacts—they set global standards, they influence global markets, and they determine global politics. Armed with extensive new data, Christine Mahoney challenges the conventional stereotypes that attribute any differences between the two systems to cultural ones—the American, a partisan and combative approach, and the European, a consensus-based one.Mahoney draws from 149 interviews involving 47 issues to detail how institutional structures, the nature of specific issues, and characteristics of the interest groups combine to determine decisions about how to approach a political fight, what arguments to use, and how to frame an issue. She looks at how lobbyists choose lobbying tactics, public relations strategies, and networking and coalition activities. Her analysis demonstrates that advocacy can be better understood when we study the lobbying of interest groups in their institutional and issue context. This book offers new insights into how the process of lobbying works on both sides of the Atlantic.