Search

Aims:  To evaluate the evidence and produce a summary and recommendations for the most common heart and lung applications of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS)., Methods:  We reviewed 10 clinical domains/questions related to common heart and lung applications of PoCUS. Following review of the evidence, a summary and recommendation were produced, including assignment of levels of evidence (LoE) and grading of the recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). 38 international experts, the expert review group (ERG), were invited to review the evidence presented for each question. A level of agreement of over 75 % was required to progress to the next section. The ERG then reviewed and indicated their level of agreement regarding the summary and recommendation for each question (using a 5-point Likert scale), which was approved if a level of agreement of greater than 75 % was reached. A level of agreement was defined as a summary of "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale responses., Findings and Recommendations:  One question achieved a strong consensus for an assigned LoE of 3 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 1). The remaining 9 questions achieved broad agreement with one assigned an LoE of 4 and weak GRADE recommendation (question 2), three achieving an LoE of 3 with a weak GRADE recommendation (questions 3-5), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 6-8), and the remaining two were assigned an LoE of 2 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 9 and 10)., Conclusion:  These consensus-derived recommendations should aid clinical practice and highlight areas of further research for PoCUS in acute settings., Competing Interests: A number of authors have declared potential conflicts of interest from the past three years:Bøetker, M.T. [royalties received from e-learning platform USabcd.org]; Connolly, J. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare, Terason Ultrasound, EchoNous]; Gargani, L. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare & Caption Health]; Jarman, R.D. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare]; Kim, D. [medical advisor for Clarius Mobile Health]; Liu, R. [honoraria received from Philips Healthcare]; Olusanya, O. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare & Sonosite FujiFilm UK]; Peck, M. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare]., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective:  To evaluate the evidence and produce a summary and recommendations for the most common heart and lung point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS)., Methods:  We reviewed 10 clinical domains/questions related to common heart and lung applications of PoCUS. Following review of the evidence, a summary and recommendations were produced, including assigning levels of evidence (LoE) and grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). 38 international experts, the expert review group (ERG), were invited to review the evidence presented for each question. A level of agreement of over 75 % was required to progress to the next section. The ERG then reviewed and indicated their level of agreement of the summary and recommendation for each question (using a 5-point Likert scale), which was approved in the case of a level of agreement of greater than 75 %. A level of agreement was defined as a summary of "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale responses., Findings and Recommendations:  One question achieved a strong consensus for an assigned LoE of 3 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 1), the remaining 9 questions achieved broad agreement with an assigned LoE of 4 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 2), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a weak GRADE recommendation (questions 3-5), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 6-8) and the remaining two were assigned an LoE of 2 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 9 and 10)., Conclusion:  These consensus-derived recommendations should aid clinical practice and highlight areas of further research for PoCUS in acute settings., Competing Interests: A number of authors have declared potential conflicts of interest from the past three years.Bøetker, M.T. [royalties received from e-learning platform USabcd.org];Connolly, J. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare, Terason Ultrasound, EchoNous]; Gargani, L. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare, Philips Healthcare & Caption Health]; Jarman, R.D. [honoraria received from Sonosite FujiFilm UK, equipment loans from Canon Healthcare];Kim, D. [medical advisor for Clarius Mobile Health]; Liu, R. [honoraria received from Philips Healthcare];Olusanya, O. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare & Sonosite FujiFilm UK];Peck, M. [honoraria received from GE Healthcare]., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)