Search

Ecosystem structure, especially vertical vegetation structure, is one of the six essential biodiversity variable classes and is an important aspect of habitat heterogeneity, affecting species distributions and diversity by providing shelter, foraging, and nesting sites. Point clouds from airborne laser scanning (ALS) can be used to derive such detailed information on vegetation structure. However, public agencies usually only provide digital elevation models, which do not provide information on vertical vegetation structure. Calculating vertical structure variables from ALS point clouds requires extensive data processing and remote sensing skills that most ecologists do not have. However, such information on vegetation structure is extremely valuable for many analyses of habitat use and species distribution. We here propose 10 variables that should be easily accessible to researchers and stakeholders through national data portals. In addition, we argue for a consistent selection of variables and their systematic testing, which would allow for continuous improvement of such a list to keep it up‐to‐date with the latest evidence. This initiative is particularly needed not only to advance ecological and biodiversity research by providing valuable open datasets but also to guide potential users in the face of increasing availability of global vegetation structure products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most ground filtering algorithms are primarily designed for airborne LiDAR point cloud processing and their successful use in identifying ground points from photogrammetric point clouds remains questionable. We compared six ground filtering algorithms implemented in Metashape, ArcGIS, CloudCompare, LAStools, and PDAL. We used UAV photogrammetry-based (acquired under leaf-off conditions) and airborne LiDAR (leaf-on) point clouds of the same area to: (i) compare accuracy of generated DTMs; (ii) evaluate the effect of vegetation density and terrain slope on filtering accuracy; and (iii) assess which algorithm parameters have the greatest effect on the filtering accuracy. Our results show that the performance of filtering algorithms was affected by the point cloud type, terrain slope and vegetation cover. The results were generally better for LiDAR (RMSE 0.13–0.19 m) than for photogrammetric (RMSE 0.19–0.23 m) point clouds. The behavior in varying vegetation and terrain conditions was consistent for LiDAR point clouds. However, when applied on photogrammetric point clouds, the algorithms' behavior was inconsistent, especially in areas of steep slope (except for the Progressive Triangulated Irregular Network in LAStools). Parameters related to the selection of the initial minimum elevation ground points were the most influential in all algorithms and point clouds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]