Search

Southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber, is a severe pest of St. Augustinegrass throughout the southern United States. Host plant resistance is an environmentally friendly method to manage chinch bug infestations and is increasingly important, as the southern chinch bug develops resistance to insecticides. In this study, in an effort to understand resistance mechanisms in two varieties of St. Augustinegrass ('FX-10' and 'NUF-76'), we used the electrical penetration graph method to quantify stylet probing behaviors in two resistant and two susceptible St. Augustinegrass varieties. Overall, chinch bugs spent less time probing on resistant FX-10 and NUF-76 than on susceptible 'Floratam' and 'Palmetto', and individual probes were shorter in average duration but more numerous in resistant varieties than in susceptible varieties. During probing, chinch bugs spent more time in pathway-associated stylet activities (i.e., penetration through epidermal and mesophyll tissue) in the resistant varieties than in the susceptible varieties, likely indicating difficulty in finding and accessing an ingestion site. As a consequence, chinch bugs spent proportionately much less time engaged in xylem ingestion in both resistant varieties than in susceptible varieties but only in FX-10 were phloem-associated activities significantly reduced compared with those in susceptible varieties. We conclude that there is evidence for non-phloem-associated chinch-bug resistance factors in both NUF-76 and FX-10, and phloem-associated factors in FX-10., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.)

Southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae), is a serious insect pest of St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze, a turfgrass commonly grown in the southeastern United States. Resistance to southern chinch bug has been identified in the polyploid St. Augustinegrass varieties 'Floratam' and 'FX-10', and the diploid 'Captiva'. However, southern chinch bug in Florida and elsewhere has overcome Floratam's resistance. This research investigated the potential role of selected plant oxidative enzymes in resistance/susceptibility to southern chinch bug in two polyploid varieties (FX-10 and Floratam) and two diploid varieties (Captiva and Palmetto). Oxidative enzyme activity was estimated spectrophotometrically from plant samples collected 1, 3, 5, and 8 days after southern chinch bug infestation and from uninfested control plants. Resistant FX-10 and Captiva had significantly higher peroxidase activity, while Captiva had significantly higher polyphenol oxidase activity 5 and 8 days after infestation compared to uninfested controls. FX-10 had higher lipoxygenase activity 3, 5, and 8 days after infestation compared to uninfested controls. Catalase activities did not differ between infested and control plants in any of the varieties tested. Native gels stained for peroxidase indicated that certain isozymes in FX-10 and Captiva were induced 5 and 8 days after infestation. Isozyme profiles of polyphenol oxidase and lipoxygenase did not differ between control and infested FX-10, Floratam, Captiva, and Palmetto. Potential mechanisms to explain the correlation of resistance to southern chinch bug in FX-10 and Captiva with higher activities of oxidative enzymes are discussed.

Southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae), is the most serious insect pest of St. Augustinegrass Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walter) Kuntze, a common lawngrass grown in southeastern U.S. states. Host plant resistance to southern chinch bug has been identified in the polyploid St. Augustinegrass 'FX-10' and the diploid 'Captiva'. The objective of this research was to identify possible physical mechanism(s) explaining chinch bug resistance in these cultivars. We studied the distribution of chinch bug salivary sheaths in the preferred tissue for feeding (the axillary shoot) of the two resistant cultivars and two susceptible cultivars, paired for ploidy ('Floratam', polyploid, and Palmetto, diploid). We also investigated the potential role of axillary shoot lignification and anatomy in chinch bug resistance. Salivary sheaths were more abundant on the outermost leaf sheath of axillary shoots of resistant cultivars compared with susceptible cultivars. In contrast, fewer salivary sheaths reached the innermost meristematic tissue in the axillary shoots of resistant St. Augustinegrass cultivars than in the two susceptible cultivars. The polyploid cultivars FX-10 and Floratam had higher total lignin in axillary shoots compared with the diploid cultivars Captiva and Palmetto. However, total lignin content was not correlated with resistance to southern chinch bug. Light microscopic studies found no differences in epidermal layer thickness among resistant and susceptible St. Augustinegrass cultivars. However, transmission electron microscopic studies revealed that the cell walls of the sclerenchyma cells around the vascular bundle of southern chinch bug-resistant FX-10 and Captiva were significantly thicker than the cell walls in susceptible Floratam and Palmetto. Our research suggests that the thick-walled sclerenchyma cells around the vascular bundle play a role in southern chinch bug resistance in St. Augustinegrass, possibly by reducing stylet penetration to the vascular tissue.

The southern chinch bug, Blissus insularis Barber (Hemiptera: Blissidae), is the most important insect pest of St. Augustinegrass, Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze, in Florida and other Gulf Coast states. Resistance to southern chinch bug was identified previously in St. Augustinegrass lines 'FX-10' and NUF-76. Choice and no-choice tests and ovipositional and developmental studies were conducted to determine the categories of resistance in FX-10 and NUF-76 to southern chinch bug. When adult chinch bugs had a choice among attached stolons of three susceptible lines ('Floratam', 'Bitter Blue', and 'Palmetto') and the two resistant lines, chinch bugs were found significantly more often over a 5-d period on the susceptible lines. This result indicates the presence of antixenosis in the resistant lines FX-10 and NUF-76. In a no-choice study, chinch bugs produced less than half as many excretory spots on FX-10 as on the susceptible lines. Significantly fewer excretory spots produced by chinch bugs confined on NUF-76 accumulated by days 3 and 5 after release; however, on the first 2 d, the accumulative number of excretory spots was not significantly less than that found on susceptible lines. The no-choice study confirmed a high level of antixenosis in FX-10, a moderate level of antixenosis in NUF-76, and possible antibiosis in NUF-76. Ovipositional and developmental studies were conducted using only Floratam (a widely planted cultivar that was formerly resistant to B. insularis) and the two resistant lines. Adults released on Floratam produced 11 and 5 times more eggs and 18 and 9 times more offspring than adults on FX-10 and NUF-76, respectively. Plant anatomical and biochemical studies are required to investigate the exact cause of antixenosis in FX-10 and NUF-76 and possible antibiosis in NUF-76.