Search

Monte Carlo simulations allow prediction and comparison of concentration-time profiles arising from different dosing regimens in a defined population, provided a population pharmacokinetic model has been established. The aims of this study were to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of imipenem in critically ill patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) using EUCAST data. A two-compartment model based on a data set of 19 subjects was employed. Various dosage regimens at 0.5-h and 3-h infusion rates and as continuous infusion were evaluated against the pharmacodynamic targets of 20%fT >MIC , 40%fT >MIC and 100%fT >MIC . For the target of 40%fT >MIC , all 0.5-h infusion regimens achieved optimal exposures (CFR ≥ 90%) against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, with nearly optimal exposure against Klebsiella pneumoniae (CFR ≥ 89.4%). The 3-h infusions and continuous infusion exceeded 97% CFR against all pathogens with the exception of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., where the maximum CFRs were 85.5% and 88.4%, respectively. For the 100%fT >MIC target, only continuous infusion was associated with nearly optimal exposures. Higher PTAs for the targets of 40%fT >MIC and 100%fT >MIC were achieved with 3-h infusions and continuous infusion in comparison with 0.5-h infusions; however, continuous infusion carries a risk of not reaching the MIC of less susceptible pathogens in a higher proportion of patients. In critically ill patients with HAP with risk factors for Gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria, maximum doses administered as extended infusions may be necessary., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

In critically ill patients, pathophysiological changes alter the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics. Imipenem exhibits primarily time-dependent killing. Its administration by prolonged infusion may increase the time for which its plasma concentration exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of suspected pathogens. The objectives of this study were to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of imipenem administered by standard short infusion (1g imipenem/1g cilastatin over 30min three times daily) and by extended infusion with a reduced total dose (0.5g imipenem/0.5g cilastatin over 3h four times daily) and to compare the target pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices, namely percentage of the dosing interval for which the free plasma concentration of imipenem exceeds the MIC and 4× MIC (%fT>MIC and %fT>4×MIC) of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4mg/L, for these two regimens in critically ill adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia on Day 2 of empirical antibiotic therapy. The study included 22 patients. Whilst no significant differences were found between both groups for %fT>MIC, %fT>4×MIC was 87.4±12.19%, 68.6±15.08%, 47.31±6.64% and 27.81±9.52% of the 8-h interval in the short infusion group for MICs of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4mg/L, respectively, and 85.15±17.57%, 53.14±27.27%, 13.55±24.47% and 0±0% of the 6-h interval for the extended infusion group. In conclusion, administration of 0.5g of imipenem by a 3-h infusion every 6h does not provide sufficient drug concentrations to treat infections caused by pathogens with a MIC of ≥2mg/L., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The identification of the optimal agent for administration via the respiratory tract when treating pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)., Methods: A murine model of acute CRAB pneumonia was established by intratracheal (i.t.) inoculation with 2.5 × 10⁷ colony-forming units (CFU) of A. baumannii strain Ab396 plus 10% porcine mucin. After 4h the infected BALB/c mice were treated intratracheally with 25μl of either 0.85% saline (control group), colistimethate sodium (CMS) (166 666 U/kg, CMS group), imipenem/cilastatin (30/30 mg/kg, imipenem group), or meropenem (20mg/kg, meropenem group), every 8h. The therapeutic efficacy of these agents was examined., Results: A. baumannii strain Ab396 was susceptible to CMS only. However, meropenem treatment did give a significantly superior survival rate (100%) compared to treatment with imipenem (50%), CMS (33%), or saline (0%) (p<0.001 vs. the control and CMS groups, p=0.006 vs. the imipenem group, by log-rank test). Furthermore, compared to the other groups, the meropenem group demonstrated significantly more favorable results in terms of tissue penetration of the antibiotic, bacterial clearance, normalization of the wet lung-to-body weight ratio, and down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine levels in the lungs., Conclusions: Administration of meropenem via the respiratory tract proved to have the best therapeutic efficacy among the antibiotics tested when treating advanced murine CRAB pneumonia., (© 2011 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare doripenem with imipenem and meropenem in an experimental rabbit model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia and then to compare different doripenem doses and methods of intravenous administration., Methods: Using a rabbit experimental model of pneumonia, efficacy was assessed following 2 days of treatment by colony counts of different tissues (lung, spleen and blood culture)., Results: Mean pulmonary bacterial loads were 3.17 ± 0.53, 3.42 ± 0.61 and 2.75 ± 0.59 log(10) cfu/g for imipenem, doripenem (0.5 g three times daily) and meropenem, respectively, compared with 7.57 ± 0.99 cfu/g for control animals. At a higher dose (1 g three times daily), doripenem showed significantly better efficacy (2.70 ± 0.65 log(10) cfu/g) than the standard regimen of doripenem. Sterilization of spleen cultures was achieved with standard regimens of imipenem (1 g three times daily) and a higher dose of doripenem., Conclusions: In this model of P. aeruginosa pneumonia, doripenem had an efficacy equivalent to that of meropenem and imipenem at a high dose of 1 g three times a day and lower efficacy at a standard dose (0.5 g three times daily) than the other two agents in terms of bacteria cultivated from spleens. Doripenem is a new drug that offers new therapeutic options, especially for difficult-to-treat infections such as pneumonia due to non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria.

The in vivo activity of tigecycline was evaluated in an experimental pneumonia model (C57BL/6 mice) by Acinetobacter baumannii. Two clinical strains were used: minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem and tigecycline 1 and 2 microg/mL (imipenem-susceptible, IPM-S), and 8 and 2 microg/mL (imipenem-intermediate, IPM-I), respectively. For imipenem (30 mg/Kg), T/CMI (h) were 1.04 and 0.51 for IPM-S and IPM-I, respectively. For tigecycline (5 mg/Kg), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC(0-24 h) (serum and lung) were 9.24 and 4.37 (for the two strains), respectively. In the efficacy experiments with the IPM-S, imipenem (log CFU/g 3.59 +/- 0.78, p = 0.006) and tigecycline (2.82 +/- 1.2, p = 0.054) decreased the bacterial counts in lungs with respect to its controls; with the IPM-I, both imipenem (1.21 +/- 0.52, p = 0.002) and tigecycline (3.21 +/- 0.28, p = 0.035) decreased the bacterial counts with respect to the controls. In the survival experiments, with the IPM-S, the mortality was the same in the control (67%) and in the tigecycline (77%) groups, and imipenem reduced it (21%, p = 0.025); with the IPM-I, the mortality was the same in the control (87%) and in the tigecycline (85%) groups, and imipenem (0%) reduced it (p < 0.001). In summary, the present study shows that tigecycline is less efficacious than imipenem in the treatment of experimental A. baumannii pneumonia caused by IPM-S and IPM-I strains.

The in vivo activities of imipenem, meropenem, and cefepime were studied in a model of rat pneumonia caused by a plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase ACT-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strain (K. pneumoniae strain 12) and a derivative porin-deficient mutant (K. pneumoniae strain 12dp). No differences between these activities were seen with K. pneumoniae 12. Only meropenem showed an activity slightly better than that of imipenem with K. pneumoniae 12dp.

Previous studies have shown decreased in vitro activity of zwitterionic cephalosporins and carbapenems against porin-deficient Klebsiella pneumoniae expressing a plasmid-mediated AmpC-type beta-lactamase (PACBL). The in vitro and in vivo activities of cefepime and imipenem were evaluated against the porin-deficient strain K. pneumoniae C2 and its CMY-2-producing derivative [K. pneumoniae C2(pMG248)]. The MICs (in micrograms/milliliter) of cefepime and imipenem against K. pneumoniae C2 were 0.125 and 0.25, respectively, while the corresponding values against K. pneumoniae C2(pMG248) were 8 and 16. Cefepime showed a greater inoculum effect than imipenem against both strains. Imipenem showed a significant postantibiotic effect (>2 h) against K. pneumoniae C2(pMG248) at 1x, 2x, 4x, 6x, and 8x MIC. The maximum concentrations of drug in serum of cefepime and imipenem in a pneumonia model using mice were 124.1 and 16.9 mug/ml, respectively. DeltaT/MIC for K. pneumoniae C2 and C2(pMG248) were 1.29 h and 0.34 h for imipenem and 2.96 h and 1.27 h for cefepime. Both imipenem (30 mg/kg of body weight every 3 h) and cefepime (60 mg/kg every 4 h), administered for 72 h, increased the survival rate (86.6% and 100%) compared with untreated control animals (26.6%, P < 0.003) infected with K. pneumoniae C2. For the CMY-2-producing strain, imipenem, but not cefepime, increased the survival rate compared to the controls (86.6% and 40% versus 40%, P < 0.01). Bacterial concentration of the lungs was significantly decreased by both antimicrobials. In conclusion, imipenem was more active in terms of survival than cefepime for the treatment of murine pneumonia caused by a porin-deficient K. pneumoniae expressing PACBL CMY-2.

The in-vivo activities of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem against the porin-deficient strain Klebsiella pneumoniae C2 and its derivative K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252) coding for the AmpC-type beta-lactamase FOX-5 were determined. Bactericidal activities were determined with the kill-curve method. A pneumonia model in guinea-pigs was developed, and Cmax, t(1/2) and DeltaT/MIC were calculated for the three agents tested. Animals were treated for 72 h with sterile saline (control group) or with cefepime, imipenem or meropenem (240 mg/kg/day, intramuscularly, three times daily). Bacterial counts in lungs (log10 CFU/g tissue) were determined by serial dilution. MICs (mg/L) of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem against K. pneumoniae C2/K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252), determined by macrodilution, were: 0.5/4, 0.5/0.5 and 0.25/0.5, respectively. Bacterial counts in the lungs of animals infected with K. pneumoniae C2 and treated with antimicrobial agents were always lower than in the control group (cefepime, 4.4 +/- 0.5; imipenem, 4.6 +/- 0.4; meropenem, 4.7 +/- 0.5; control group, 5.6 +/- 0.8; p <0.01). No significant differences were observed among the groups receiving therapy (p >0.05). Bacterial lung clearance was higher in treated animals than in control animals following infection with K. pneumoniae C2(pMG252) (cefepime, 4.5 +/- 0.4; imipenem, 4.0 +/- 0.3; meropenem, 4.6 +/- 0.4; control group, 6.1 +/- 0.6; p <0.01), with imipenem producing better clearance than either cefepime or meropenem (p <0.05). Thus, in the guinea-pig pneumonia model, cefepime, imipenem and meropenem were each effective against the porin-deficient K. pneumoniae strain C2 and its derivative expressing the plasmid-mediated AmpC type beta-lactamase FOX-5.

Background and Methods: We compared the bacteriological, pharmacological and histopathological effects of parenterally administered ciprofloxacin (CPFX) to those of imipenem/cilastatin (IMP/CS) and cefozopran (CZOP) in a murine model of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia mimicking ventilator-associated pneumonia., Results: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CPFX, IMP and CZOP were 1.0, 1.0 and 4.0 mg/l, respectively. Treatment with CPFX resulted in a significant decrease in the number of viable bacteria [control, IMP/CS, CZOP and CPFX (mean +/- SEM): 5.02 +/- 0.20, 4.96 +/- 0.38, 5.44 +/- 0.13 and 3.27 +/- 0.02 log(10) colony-forming units lung, respectively]. Histopathological examination revealed that inflammatory changes in the CPFX-treated group were less marked than in other groups. Of the drugs analyzed, the pharmacokinetic parameters of area under the time-concentration curve (AUC)/MIC, AUC exceeding MIC and the time that lung concentrations of drug remained above the MIC were highest for CPFX., Conclusion: Our results suggest that parenterally administered ciprofloxacin is effective in ventilator-associated P. aeruginosa pneumonia., (Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Acinetobacter baumannii is a common cause of nosocomial pneumonia and other nosocomial infections. Multiresistant A. baumannii has also a high prevalence, which can make effective treatment difficult. We designed a new model of A. baumannii experimental pneumonia using C57BL/6 immunocompetent mice. This model was used to compare the efficacy of imipenem, doxycycline and amikacin in monotherapy, and the combination of imipenem plus amikacin and doxycycline plus amikacin. Doxycycline plus amikacin were synergic in vitro after 24 h incubation, whereas imipenem plus amikacin showed no in vitro synergy. The number of sterile lungs and the lung clearance of A. baumannii were greater in the group treated with imipenem than in those treated with amikacin or doxycycline in monotherapy (P < 0.05). The combination of imipenem plus amikacin and doxycycline plus amikacin was no more effective than imipenem alone in the clearance of organisms from lungs (2.42 +/- 1.46 cfu/g versus 2.7 +/- 1.5 cfu/g versus 1.23 +/- 1.02 cfu/g). These results suggest that the addition of amikacin does not improve the results obtained by imipenem monotherapy. Doxycycline plus amikacin is an alternative to imipenem in the therapy of A. baumannii pneumonia.

Acinetobacter baumannii is responsible for severe nosocomial pneumonia. To evaluate new therapeutic regimens for infections due to multiresistant strains and to study the pharmacodynamic properties of various antibiotics, we developed an experimental mouse model of acute A. baumannii pneumonia. C3H/HeN mice rendered transiently neutropenic were infected intratracheally with 5 x 10(6) CFU of A. baumannii. The mean log10 CFU/g of lung homogenate (+/- the standard deviation) were 9 +/- 0.9, 9.4 +/- 0.8, 8.6 +/- 1.2, and 7.7 +/- 1.4 on days 1, 2, 3, and 4 postinoculation. The lung pathology was characterized by pneumonitis with edema and a patchy distribution of hemorrhages in the peribronchovascular spaces of both lungs. Abscesses formed on days 3 and 4. Four days after inoculation, subacute pneumonitis characterized by alveolar macrophage proliferation and areas of fibrosis was observed. The cumulative mortality on day 4 was 85%. This new model was used to study the effects of 1, 2, or 3 50-mg/kg doses of imipenem. Imipenem concentrations in lungs were above the MIC for 2 h after the last dose. The in vivo postantibiotic effect (PAE) was determined during the 9-h period following the last dose; it decreased in duration with the number of doses: 9.6, 6.4, and 4 h after 1, 2, and 3 50-mg/kg doses, respectively. In contrast, no in vitro PAE was observed. This model offers a reproducible acute course of A. baumannii pneumonia. The presence of a prolonged in vivo PAE supports the currently recommended dosing intervals of imipenem for the treatment of human infections due to A. baumannii, i.e., 15 mg/kg three times a day.

Study Objective: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of aztreonam and imipenem in critically ill trauma patients with pneumonia., Methods: Trauma patients in intensive care units who were intubated within 3 days of hospital admission were eligible for the study. Patients with the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia were consecutively randomized to receive either aztreonam plus vancomycin or imipenem-cilastatin. Serial blood samples were taken and sputum was collected to determine aztreonam and imipenem concentrations after 2-3 days and 7-8 days of therapy. Pharmacokinetics of both agents were estimated and compared with estimates from healthy volunteers., Results: Twenty patients were enrolled in the study, 10 patients received imipenem-cilastatin, and 10 received aztreonam plus vancomycin. Steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) for aztreonam at 2-3 days and 7-8 days was significantly greater in patients than in historical controls, whereas the Vss for imipenem was greater at 2-3 days. The beta-half-life for aztreonam at both sampling periods was significantly greater in patients than in controls. No significant changes in pharmacokinetics occurred over time for either antibiotic. Sputum concentrations of aztreonam and imipenem were highly variable when sampled 2 hours after the infusion., Conclusion: Larger volumes of distribution were observed for both aztreonam and imipenem in trauma patients than in volunteers, suggesting that standard initial dosages of the antibiotics may result in lower concentrations in these critically ill patients. Both antibiotics penetrated into the sputum of most patients; however, the degree of penetration was highly variable in relation to serum concentrations.