Search

Pleural disease is common. Radiological investigation of pleural effusion, thickening, masses, and pneumothorax is key in diagnosing and determining management. Conventional chest radiograph (CXR) remains as the initial investigation of choice for patients with suspected pleural disease. When abnormalities are detected, thoracic ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) can each play important roles in further investigation, but appropriate modality selection is critical. US adds significant value in the identification of pleural fluid and pleural nodularity, guiding pleural procedures and, increasingly, as "point of care" assessment for pneumothorax, but is highly operator dependent. CT scan is the modality of choice for further assessment of pleural disease: Characterising pleural thickening, some pleural effusions and demonstration of homogeneity of pleural masses and areas of fatty attenuation or calcification. MRI has specific utility for soft tissue abnormalities and may have a role for younger patients requiring follow-up serial imaging. MRI and PET/CT may provide additional information in malignant pleural disease regarding prognosis and response to therapy. This article summarises existing techniques, highlighting the benefits and applications of these different imaging modalities and provides an up to date review of the evidence., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common clinical problem with described investigation pathways. While thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has been shown to be accurate in pleural fluid detection, its use in the diagnosis of malignant pleural disease has not been assessed. A study was undertaken to assess the diagnostic accuracy of TUS in differentiating malignant and benign pleural disease., Methods: 52 consecutive patients with suspected MPE underwent TUS and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). TUS was used to assess pleural surfaces using previously published CT imaging criteria for malignancy, diaphragmatic thickness/nodularity, effusion size/nature and presence of hepatic metastasis (in right-sided effusions). A TUS diagnosis of malignant or benign disease was made blind to clinical data/other investigations by a second blinded operator using anonymised TUS video clips. The TUS diagnosis was compared with the definitive clinical diagnosis and in addition to the diagnosis found at CECT., Results: A definitive malignant diagnosis was based on histocytology (30/33; 91%) and clinical/CT follow-up (3/33; 9%). Benign diagnoses were based on negative histocytology and follow-up over 12 months in 19/19 patients. TUS correctly diagnosed malignancy in 26/33 patients (sensitivity 73%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 79%) and benign disease in 19/19. Pleural thickening >1 cm, pleural nodularity and diaphragmatic thickening >7 mm were highly suggestive of malignant disease., Conclusion: TUS is useful in differentiating malignant from benign pleural disease in patients presenting with suspected MPE and may become an important adjunct in the diagnostic pathway.

Background: Over 200000 pleural effusions are attributable to cancer in the UK and USA every year. Cytological examination of pleural fluid classifies about 60% of malignant effusions. Pleural biopsy needs to be done in the remaining cases. We aimed to assess whether CT-guided biopsy is an improvement over standard pleural biopsy in this setting., Methods: 50 consecutive patients with cytologically negative suspected malignant pleural effusions were recruited. All had a contrast-enhanced thoracic CT scan to assess pleural thickening. Patients were randomly allocated, stratified by baseline pleural thickening, to either Abrams' pleural biopsy (standard care; n=25) or CT-guided cutting needle biopsy (n=25). Sensitivity for pleural malignancy from the biopsy specimen was the primary endpoint, with the patient's clinical outcome after 1 year being the diagnostic gold standard. Analysis was per protocol., Findings: Three patients did not undergo biopsy. Abrams' biopsy correctly diagnosed malignancy in eight of 17 patients (sensitivity 47%, specificity 100%, negative predictive value 44%, positive predictive value 100%). CT-guided biopsy correctly diagnosed malignancy in 13 of 15 (sensitivity 87%, specificity 100%, negative predictive value 80%, positive predictive value 100%; difference in sensitivity between Abrams' and CT-guided 40%, 95% CI 10-69, p=0.02). Diagnostic advantage was similar in patients proving to have mesothelioma., Interpretation: Primary use of CT-guided biopsy would avoid doing at least one Abrams' biopsy for every 2.5 CT-guided biopsies undertaken. In cytology-negative suspected malignant pleural effusions, CT-guided pleural biopsy is a better diagnostic test than Abrams' pleural biopsy.

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous image-guided cutting-needle biopsy of pleural thickening in the presence of a suspected malignant pleural effusion., Materials and Methods: Thirty-three adult patients with diffuse or focal pleural thickening (median, 1.0 cm; range, 0.2-6.0 cm), pleural effusion, and suspected pleural malignancy underwent percutaneous image-guided cutting-needle biopsy. Biopsy guidance was performed with computed tomography in 24 patients and ultrasonography in nine patients. A final diagnosis of benign or malignant disease was established with radiologic and clinical follow-up findings and with other histologic or cytologic findings, when available., Results: A correct histologic diagnosis of malignant disease was made in 21 of 24 patients (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 100%), including 13 of 14 patients with mesothelioma (sensitivity, 93%). A correct histologic diagnosis of benign pleural disease was made in nine patients. Positive and negative predictive values for malignant disease were 100% and 75%, respectively. The overall accuracy was 91%. Complications comprised a chest wall hematoma in one patient., Conclusion: Image-guided percutaneous cutting-needle biopsy of pleural thickening in the presence of a pleural effusion is a safe procedure, with an overall accuracy of 91% in the diagnosis of malignancy.

Aim: To assess the role of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) prospectively in patients with suspected malignant pleural effusions., Materials and Methods: Forty consecutive patients referred for the investigation of a suspected malignant pleural effusion had contrast-enhanced thoracic CT, thoracoscopy, thoraco-centesis and pleural biopsy, either percutaneously or at thoracoscopy. Final diagnoses were based on histopathological or cytological analysis (n = 30), autopsy findings (n = 3) or clinical follow-up (n = 7). The pleural surfaces were classified at contrast-enhanced CT as normal or abnormal and, if abnormal, as benign or malignant in appearance using previously established CT criteria for malignant pleural thickening by two observers unaware of the pathological diagnosis., Results: Pleural effusions were malignant in 32 patients and benign in eight patients. Pleural surfaces assessed at CT showed features of malignancy in 27 out of 32 patients with a malignant effusion (sensitivity 84%, specificity 100%). Overall, CT appearances indicated the presence of malignancy in 28 of 32 (87%) patients. All eight patients with benign pleural disease were correctly diagnosed by CT., Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced CT is of value in patients with suspected malignant pleural effusions. The previously established criteria for malignant pleural thickening of nodularity, irregularity and pleural thickness >1 cm are reliable in the presence of a pleural effusion.

Objective: Pleural effusions are a frequent complication of malignancy and cause considerable morbidity from dyspnea. The drainage and control of malignant effusions relieve symptoms and maintain quality of life but these are difficult in patients with multiloculated effusions in whom drainage usually fails. This observational series reports the use of intrapleural streptokinase (IPSK) in the management of malignant multiloculated pleural effusions resistant to standard chest tube drainage., Methods: Ten consecutive patients with malignant multiloculated pleural effusions, aged 39 to 89 years, were given 250,000-IU doses of IPSK twice daily after failure to drain the effusions with a standard chest tube because of multiloculation and multiseptation, as demonstrated by CT or ultrasound scanning. Outcome was assessed by radiographic improvement and symptom control., Results: All 10 patients responded to between 500,000 and 1,500,000 IU of streptokinase. There was an increase in pleural fluid drained (mean volume+/-SD; pre-IPSK, 843+/-690 mL; post-IPSK, 2,368+/-1,051 mL; p < 0.001, paired t test), and radiographic improvement was seen in all 10 patients. All subjects tolerated the instillation of streptokinase well. One subject required opiate analgesia for transient chest pain, and there were no hemorrhagic or allergic complications. One patient died of unrelated septicemia., Conclusions: This series suggests that IPSK may be useful in the drainage of malignant multiloculated pleural effusions in patients who fail to drain adequately with a standard chest tube. Malignant pleural effusions should not be considered a contraindication to IPSK.