Search

In the late 1990s, the antithrombotic antiplatelet agent, clopidogrel, a P2Y12 inhibitor, was introduced. Around the same time, there was an increase in a number of new methods to measure platelet function (e.g., PFA-100 in 1995), and this has continued. It became evident that not all patients responded to clopidogrel in the same way and that some patients had a relative "resistance" to therapy, termed "high on-treatment platelet reactivity." This then led to some publications to advocate platelet function testing being used for patients on antiplatelet therapy. Platelet function testing was also suggested for use in patients awaiting cardiac surgery after stopping their antiplatelet therapy as a way of balancing thrombotic risk pre-surgery and bleeding risk perioperatively. This chapter will discuss some of the commonly used platelet function tests used in these settings, particularly those that are sometimes referred to as point-of-care tests or that require minimal laboratory sample manipulation. The latest guidance and recommendations for platelet function testing will be discussed following several clinical trials looking at the usefulness of platelet function testing in these clinical settings., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are often treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with insertion of coronary artery stents and a majority receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), usually a combination of a COX-1 inhibitor (aspirin) and a P2Y 12 inhibitor (eg ticagrelor). Not seldom the question arises as to when DAPT should be discontinued prior to interventional surgery. This study was done with the primary aim of investigating thrombocyte function immediately prior to and after discontinuation of ticagrelor., Materials and Methods: In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study including 24 patients, venous blood was obtained from patients on day 0, before stopping maintenance dose of 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily, and then on days 1, 3, 5, and 8, after discontinuation. Samples were analyzed using Multiplate ® and VerifyNow ® ., Results: Prior to urgent surgery platelet aggregation >30 aggregation units (Multiplate ® ) and >208 P2Y 12 reaction units (VerifyNow ® ) have been shown to correlate with reduced risk of peri- and postoperative bleeding risk. On day 3 after ticagrelor discontinuation, 100% (P = .016) and 67% (P=<.001) of patients had reached these levels on Multiplate ® and VerifyNow ® , respectively. On day 5, the corresponding figures were 100% (P = .016) and 78% (P=<.001)., Conclusion: Discontinuation of ticagrelor for 3 days resulted in return of adequate platelet function in all patients on Multiplate ® and in a majority of patients on VerifyNow ® , indicating a lower bleeding risk. A bedside test for platelet function may be considered if time to anticipated surgery is less than 5 days after ticagrelor discontinuation., (© 2019 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Measurement of P-selectin on activated platelets as a means of measuring platelet function utilizing the technology described here has the advantage of not requiring immediate access to specialist equipment and expertise. Blood samples are activated, fixed, stored, and transported to a central laboratory for flow cytometric analysis. Here we have compared P-selectin with other more traditional approaches to measuring platelet function in blood and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from patients with acute coronary syndromes on treatment for at least 1 month with either aspirin and clopidogrel or aspirin with prasugrel. The comparators were light transmission aggregometry (LTA), VerifyNow and Multiplate aggregometry (for determining the effects of aspirin) and LTA, VerifyNow and Multiplate together with the BioCytex VASP phosphorylation assay (for the P2Y 12 antagonists). The P-selectin Aspirin Test revealed substantial inhibition of platelet function in all but three of 96 patients receiving aspirin with clopidogrel and in none of 51 patients receiving aspirin and prasugrel. The results were very similar to those obtained using LTA. There was only one patient with high residual platelet aggregation and low P-selectin expression. The same patients identified as "non-responders" to aspirin also presented with the highest residual platelet activity as measured using the VerifyNow system, although not quite as well separated from the other values. With the Multiplate test only one of these patients clearly stood out from the others. The results obtained using the P-selectin P2Y 12 Test in 102 patients taking aspirin and clopidogrel were similar to the more traditional approaches in that a wide scatter of results was obtained. Generally, high values seen with the P-selectin P2Y 12 Test were also high with the LTA, VerifyNow, Multiplate, and BioCytex VASP P2Y 12 Tests. Similarly, low residual platelet function using the P2Y 12 test was seen irrespective of the testing procedure used. However, there were differences in some patients. Prasugrel was always more effective than clopidogrel in inhibiting platelet function with none of 56 patients (P-selectin and VerifyNow), only 2 of 56 patients (Multiplate) and only 3 of 56 patients (Biocytex VASP) demonstrating high on-treatment residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) defined using previously published cut-off values. The exception was LTA where there were 11 of 56 patients with HRPR. It remains to be seen which experimental approach provides the most useful information regarding outcomes after adjusting therapies in treated patients.

Background: Platelet function testing was suggested to help tailor P2Y 12 -inhibitor therapy; however, the lack of proper standardization is still a limitation., Methods: In a prospective study, we enrolled clopidogrel-treated and P2Y 12 -inhibitor naive patients to investigate the influence of (1) time from blood collection, (2) stability of the stored Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) reagent, and (3) the use of enoxaparin on results of the Multiplate assay. Measurements were performed from samples kept for 0, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes at room temperature before processing. To determine the impact of the reagent stability, freshly thawed ADP was compared with ADP kept for 3 to 5 or 8 to 13 days at 2°C to 8°C. Finally, samples containing enoxaparin at therapeutic or prophylactic doses were compared with enoxaparin-free blood., Results: A total of 180 measurements were performed. ADP-stimulated platelet reactivity values decreased significantly over time (67 ± 40 U to 68 ± 37 U to 58 ± 37 U to 45 ± 33 U to 35 ± 33 U; P < .0001). Consequently, a dramatic reduction was observed in the proportion of patients with high platelet reactivity ( P < .0001). A significant drop in platelet reactivity was observed with ADP stored for 8 to 13 days as compared to freshly thawed ADP ( P = .011). Enoxaparin triggered a slight, concentration-dependent increase in platelet reactivity ( P < .05)., Conclusion: Test conditions may have profound impacts on the obtained results with the Multiplate assay. Our findings highlight the large influence of the time from sample collection until testing, suggesting that measurements should be performed within an hour of blood collection.

This study aimed to validate a loading and maintenance clopidogrel dosing scheme for the inhibition of platelet function, measured by whole blood impedance aggregometry in healthy adult horses. Ten Warmblood horses received oral clopidogrel once daily. Doses were based on 50 kg weight categories and resulted in one loading dose of 6-6.5 mg/kg bodyweight and maintenance doses of 1.2-1.4 mg/kg over the next 4 days. Platelet function was measured via whole blood multiple electrode impedance aggregometry prior to (T0) and at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 144, 192 and 240 h following the loading dose. Aggregometries for collagen (COLtest), arachidonic acid (ASPItest), adenosine diphosphate (ADPtest) and ADP with prostaglandin E1 (ADPtestHS) were performed. Statistical analyses included one way repeated measures ANOVAs and subsequent Dunnett's tests. Platelet aggregation induced by collagen remained unchanged. There were significant inhibitions in the ASPItest (P <0.01 at 192 h, and P <0.05 at 240 h) and the ADPtest and ADPtestHS (P < 0.01, with the exception of 240 h). The loading dose of clopidogrel induced rapid inhibition of platelet function within hours, and the low dose was suitable for maintaining the inhibition over the 4 days of therapy. Recovery of platelet function was restored 6 days after the cessation of medication, determined with the ADPtest and ADPtestHS, but remained inhibited with the ASPItest. The prolonged effect of clopidogrel may indicate differences in the activation of platelets between horses and humans that were previously unknown., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is associated with poor prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The antiplatelet effect and safety of prasugrel was compared to that of double-dose clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) exhibiting HTPR on clopidogrel and treated with PCI, using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) to assess platelet reactivity. Of 923 patients screened, 237 (25.7%) exhibited HTPR. Of these, 106 were eligible for participation in a randomized trial comparing two intensified antiplatelet regimen: 52 were assigned to double maintenance-dose clopidogrel and 54 to standard-dose prasugrel. At 1 month, tailoring antiplatelet therapy improved platelet inhibition to a level considered as therapeutic in 73.1% of patients. Prasugrel entailed greater platelet inhibition (p = 0.02) and a lower rate of persisting HTPR at follow-up compared to double-dose clopidogrel (HTPR persisted in 20.4% and 42% respectively, p = 0.02). Within the 30-day follow-up, no major bleeds were observed and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar in the two treatment arms. Prasugrel demonstrated superiority to double-dose clopidogrel in overcoming HTPR and reducing platelet activity. Intensifying antiplatelet therapy in both ACS and stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients exhibiting HTPR prior to PCI was well tolerated.

Platelet dysfunction is a suggested driver of trauma-induced coagulopathy. However, there is still a paucity of data regarding the impact of injury pattern on platelet function and the association of platelet dysfunction on transfusion requirements and mortality. In this retrospective cohort study, patients were grouped into those with isolated severe traumatic brain injury (TBI group), those with major trauma without TBI (MT group), and a combination of both major trauma and traumatic brain injury (MT + TBI group). Platelet function was assessed by whole blood impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®, MP). Three different platelet activators were used: adenosine-diphosphate (ADP test), arachidonic acid (ASPI test), and thrombin activated peptide-6 (TRAP test). Blood transfusion requirements within 6 h and 24 h and the association of platelet dysfunction on mortality was investigated. A total of 328 predominantly male patients (75.3%) with a median age of 53 (37–68) years and a median ISS of 29 (22–38) were included. No significant difference between the TBI group, the MT group, and the MT + TBI group was detected for any of the investigated platelet function tests. Unadjusted and adjusted for platelet count, the investigated MP assays revealed no significant group differences upon ER admission and were not able to sufficiently predict massive transfusion, neither within the first 6 h nor for the first 24 h after hospital admission. No association between platelet dysfunction measured by MP upon ER admission and mortality was observed. Conclusion: Injury pattern did not specifically impact platelet function measurable by MP. Platelet dysfunction upon ER admission measurable by MP was not associated with transfusion requirements and mortality. The clinical relevance of platelet function testing by MP in trauma patients not on platelet inhibitors is questionable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Multiplate is a popular instrument that measures platelet function using whole blood. Potentially considered a point of care instrument, it is also used by hemostasis laboratories. The instrument is usually utilized to assess antiplatelet medication or as a screen of platelet function. According to the manufacturer, testing should be performed within 0.5-3 hours of blood collection, and preferably using manufacturer provided hirudin tubes. We report time-associated reduction in platelet aggregation using the Multiplate and hirudin blood collection tubes, for all the major employed agonists. Blood for Multiplate analysis was collected into manufacturer supplied hirudin tubes, and 21 consecutive samples assessed using manufacturer supplied agonists (ADP, arachidonic acid, TRAP, collagen and ristocetin), at several time-points post-sample collection within the recommended test time period. Blood was also collected into EDTA as a reference method for platelet counts, with samples collected into sodium citrate and hirudin used for comparative counts. All platelet agonists showed a diminution of response with time. Depending on the agonist, the reduction caused 5-20% and 22-47% of responses initially in the normal reference range to fall below the reference range at 120min and 180min, respectively. Considering any agonist, 35% and 67% of initially “normal” responses became ‘abnormal’ at 120 min and 180 min, respectively. Platelet counts showed generally minimal changes in EDTA blood, but were markedly reduced over time in both citrate and hirudin blood, with up to 40% and 60% reduction, respectively, at 240 min. The presence of platelet clumping (micro-aggregate formation) was also observed in a time dependent manner, especially for hirudin. In conclusion, considering any platelet agonist, around two-thirds of samples can, within the recommended 0.5-3 hour testing window post-blood collection, yield a reduction in platelet aggregation that may lead to a change in interpretation (i.e., normal to reduced). Thus, the stability of Multiplate testing can more realistically be considered as being between 30-120 min of blood collection for samples collected into hirudin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There is ongoing controversy concerning the clinical value of platelet function monitoring in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Patients at risk of high on-treatment platelet aggregation (HPR) may benefit most from such monitoring. Aim: To define the factors related to HPR on aspirin and clopidogrel, looking at a wider spectrum of variables than those assessed in some previous studies. Material and methods: We assessed platelet function in 908 patients on clopidogrel and aspirin after PCI using the multielectrode aggregometry system Multiplate to define which clinical, procedural and laboratory factors are related to on-treatment platelet aggregation in response to aspirin and clopidogrel either as linear values or using established cutoff values for HPR. Results: We found that in PCI patients on clopidogrel and aspirin, age (OR per year 1.06; 95% CI: 1.024-1.097; p = 0.001), gender (OR = 0.319; 95% CI: 0.139-0.731; p = 0.007), active smoking (OR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.29-5.15; p = 0.008), diabetes (ß = 37.6; 95% CI: 16.5-58.8; p = 0.001) and hypertension (ß = 26.9; 95% CI: 6.73-47.1; p = 0.009) are independently linked to platelet aggregation values treated as linear values and as dichotomous variables at the accepted cutoffs. The same is true for stented segment length (OR per mm 1.033; 95% CI: 1.010-1.057; p = 0.009) and stent inflation pressure (OR per atmosphere 0.862; 95% CI: 0.772-0.963; p = 0.002). Conclusions: The study shows that, contrary to some earlier data, in the tested cohort women are better clopidogrel responders, but more often aspirin low-responders. Older age, active smoking, diabetes and hypertension all predispose to HPR. A novel finding is that stented segment length is an independent predictor of lower response both to aspirin and clopidogrel, possibly as a marker of more diffuse atherosclerosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Antiplatelet (AP) medication use is common among trauma patients and is associated with poor outcomes. Management options for platelet dysfunction in trauma patients are controversial, expensive, and potentially harmful. Although light transmission platelet aggregometry is considered the standard test to assess platelet function, it is cumbersome and not generally available. Currently, there are no widely accepted platelet function point-of-care tests for acute trauma. Study design Prospective observational study from 2014 to 2015. Baseline Multiplate aggregometry aspirin area under the platelet aggregation curve (ASPI AUC), Thrombelastography Platelet Mapping percent inhibition of arachidonic acid (TEG-PM AA), and VerifyNow Aspirin Test (ARU) were compared for ability to detect any AP medication use (aspirin or clopidogrel), platelet dysfunction, and identify patients at risk for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) progression by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Adenosine diphosphate assays were similarly evaluated. Results Sixty-four patients were enrolled, 25 were taking AP medications. AP patients were older (71.6 versus 35.0 y, P < 0.001) and received more platelet transfusions, but other baseline characteristics were similar. Median ASPI AUC (22.0 versus 53.5 P < 0.001) and VerifyNow ARU (503.5 versus 629.0, P < 0.001) were lower, whereas TEG-PM AA (51.8% versus 18.3%, P < 0.001) was higher in AP patients. Multiplate ASPI AUC, TEG-PM AA percent inhibition, and VerifyNow ARU could identify AP medication use (AUC: 0.90, 0.77, and 0.90, respectively). Adenosine diphosphate assays did not correlate with AP medication use in this population. TEG-PM AA percent inhibition and VerifyNow ARU correlated well with Multiplate ASPI AUC to identify platelet dysfunction (AUC: 0.78, 0.89, respectively). ICH occurred in 29 patients; 12 of which had progression of their injury. ASPI AUC (AUC: 0.50) and VerifyNow ARU (AUC: 0.59) did not correlate, and TEG-PM AA percent inhibition (AUC: 0.66) minimally correlated with progression. Conclusions Multiplate, TEG-PM, and VerifyNow are useful point-of-care tests which identify AP medication use and platelet dysfunction in trauma patients. Initial TEG-PM AA percent inhibition may be associated with risk for ICH progression. However, additional large, prospective studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Postoperative bleeding is one of the most serious complications of cardiac surgery and requires transfusion of blood or blood products. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel (CLO) are the two most commonly used antiplatelet agents; when used in combination (i.e., as dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]), they exert a synergistic effect. Dual antiplatelet therapy, however, significantly increases the risk of postoperative bleeding. The effect of antiplatelet therapy can be monitored by platelet aggregation testing. One of the most commonly methods used for assessing platelet reactivity is multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) which can be performed with the use of Multiplate analyzer. Although the method has long been used in interventional cardiology to assess the effect of antiplatelet therapy, it is not available at cardiac surgery departments as a standard diagnostic procedure. The aim of the study was to establish the frequency of bleeding complications following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in patients on single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) and patients on DAPT and to determine the usefulness of routine measurement of platelet responsiveness before CABG surgery in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy. Material and methods: A consecutive cohort of 200 patients referred for elective surgical treatment of stable coronary artery disease was enrolled (100 consecutive patients on SAPT [ASA 75 mg/day] and 100 consecutive patients on DAPT [ASA 75 mg/day + CLO 75 mg/day]). All subjects continued their antiplatelet therapy until the day before surgery. For each subject, platelet aggregation testing in the form of an ASPI test and an ADP test was performed on the Multiplate analyzer. Each subject underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. For the primary and secondary endpoints in our study we adopted the definition provided in 'Standardised Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium' ('Circulation', 2011) for BARC type 4 bleeding (i.e. CABG-related bleeding). Results: An ROC curve was constructed for the ASPI test and ADP test for a total of 200 patients. No significant correlations were demonstrated between the ASPI test results and either the primary endpoint or the secondary endpoints. A correlation was found between the ADP test results and the composite primary endpoint and each of the secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint of major postoperative bleeding occurred in 16 subjects. From the ROC curve, we established the optimal cut-off value for the ADP test of 26 U at sensitivity of 72%, specificity of 69%, positive predictive value of 69.90%, and negative predictive value of 71.13%. Conclusions: In patients on antiplatelet therapy, an ADP test result of < 26 U is strongly predictive of serious bleeding complications after CABG surgery. The MEA ADP test allows to identify the group of patients at an increased risk of postoperative bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Objective platelet function assessment after cardiac surgery can predict postoperative blood loss, guide transfusion requirements and discriminate the need for surgical re-exploration. We conducted this study to assess the predictive value of point-of-care testing platelet function using the Multiplate® device. Methods: Patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively recruited (n = 84). Group A (n = 42) patients were on anti-platelet therapy until surgery; patients in Group B (n = 42) stopped anti-platelet treatment at least 5 days preoperatively. Multiplate® and thromboelastography (TEG) tests were performed in the perioperative period. Primary end-point was excessive bleeding (>2.5 ml/kg/h) within first 3 h postoperative. Secondary end-points included transfusion requirements, re-exploration rates, intensive care unit and in-hospital stays. Results: Patients in Group A had excessive bleeding (59% vs. 33%, P = 0.02), higher re-exploration rates (14% vs. 0%, P < 0.01) and higher rate of blood (41% vs. 14%, P < 0.01) and platelet (14% vs. 2%, P = 0.05) transfusions. On multivariate analysis, preoperative platelet function testing was the most significant predictor of excessive bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3, P = 0.08), need for blood (OR: 5.5, P < 0.01) and platelet transfusion (OR: 15.1, P < 0.01). Postoperative "ASPI test" best predicted the need for transfusion (sensitivity - 0.86) and excessive blood loss (sensitivity - 0.81). TEG results did not correlate well with any of these outcome measures. Conclusions: Peri-operative platelet functional assessment with Multiplate® was the strongest predictor for bleeding and transfusion requirements in patients on anti-platelet therapy until the time of surgery. Study registration: ISRCTN43298975 (http:// www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN43298975/). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: The aim of this study was to describe platelet aggregation characteristics by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and to evaluate MEA for its potential to detect platelet dysfunction and response to anti-aggregatory drugs in patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). Methods: We compared the platelet response to arachidonic acid (ASPI test), adenosine diphosphate (ADP test) and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP test) in hirudin-anticoagulated blood of 55 patients with polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia and 75 controls. Results: Comparing MPD patients and controls no statistically significant difference indicative of platelet dysfunction was found in MPD patients. Analysis of covariance revealed platelet- and leukocyte count as a significant influencing factor on MEA function. Furthermore we could demonstrate that ASA and clopidogrel treatment results in a statistically significant lower ASPI (Controls: p<0.0001, MPD: p<0.0001) and ADPtest value (MPD: p=0.00125) compared to untreated patients thereby validating the method for monitoring of anti-aggregatory therapy. Conclusion: In this study MEA was confirmed as a valid method for monitoring of ASA and clopidogrel treatment in patients with MPD and normal control subjects. The platelet and leukocyte count were identified as major influencing factors on MEA aggregation tests both in MPD patients and controls. No functional platelet abnormalities were detected in MPD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The increasing demand for therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy has been paralleled by the development of instruments and tests whose clinical usefulness is still under debate. We devised a laboratory approach to detect patients with antiplatelet resistance at risk to develop thrombotic events. Methods: One hundred and eighty patients, under aspirin and clopidogrel after angioplasty and stent implantation, were studied by PFA100® with collagen/epinephrine (CoEPI, cutoff 165s) cartridge and by Multiplate® using arachidonic acid (ASPItest, pos < 862AUC), ADP (ADPtest, pos < 417AUC), and collagen (COLtest, pos < 607AUC). Results: Only 67 of 173 patients with ASPI < 862 displayed a prolonged CoEPI and up to 65 patients had normal CoEPI despite ASPI < 300. Patients with ASPI < 300 had significantly lower COL than patients with ASPI > 300. One hundred and thirty-eight patients displaying ADP < 417 had significantly lower COL than those with ADP > 417. Association between COL and ADP remained after ASPI stratification: in patients with suboptimal (ASPI 300-892) or maximal (ASPI < 300) response to aspirin, having ADP < 417 (clopidogrel responsive) increased COL positivity, respectively, from 9.5 to 58.8% and from 47.6 to 82.7%. Conclusion: A combination of specific tests may be useful in identifying higher-risk patients with poor compliance or drug resistance who potentially may benefit from therapy change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]