Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of cangrelor and prasugrel on the pharmacodynamic effects of each agent., Background: The development of an intravenous P2Y12 antagonist necessitates transition between intravenous and oral therapy., Methods: Patients (n=15) with stable coronary artery disease who were taking 81 mg aspirin daily were recruited. On study day 1, they received a bolus plus 2-h infusion of cangrelor plus a 60 mg dose of prasugrel at 1 h (n=3), 1.5 h (n=6), 2 h (n=3), or 2.5 h (n=3). Pharmacodynamic effects (light transmission platelet aggregation in response to 20 μmol/l ADP, VerifyNow, and flow cytometry) were assessed during and after the cangrelor infusion. Patients took 10 mg of prasugrel daily for either 5 days (n=6) or 6 days (n=6). On study day 8, pharmacodynamic effects were assessed before and during a bolus plus 2-h infusion of cangrelor., Results: During cangrelor infusion (days 1 and 8), extensive inhibition of platelet function, reflected by limited residual platelet reactivity, was apparent. On day 1, transient (limited to the first hour after cangrelor was stopped) but substantial (>50%) recovery of platelet reactivity was observed. This recovery was attenuated when prasugrel was given at 1.5 h (30 min before cangrelor was stopped)., Conclusion: Prasugrel did not alter the antiplatelet effects of cangrelor, but transient recovery of platelet reactivity was apparent during the transition from cangrelor to prasugrel. Recovery of platelet reactivity was limited when prasugrel was administered 30 min before the end of the cangrelor infusion.

Objectives: This study sought to determine pharmacodynamic effects during transition from intravenous cangrelor to oral ticagrelor and from oral ticagrelor to intravenous cangrelor., Background: Cangrelor is an intravenous antagonist of P2Y12 and its use will require transition to and from oral agents., Methods: Patients (n = 12) with stable coronary artery disease who were taking aspirin 81 mg daily were recruited. On study day 1, they received a bolus plus 2-h infusion of cangrelor plus a 180-mg dose of ticagrelor at either 0.5 h (n = 6) or 1.25 h (n = 6). Pharmacodynamic effects (light transmission platelet aggregation in response to 20 and 5 μmol/l adenosine diphosphate, VerifyNow, P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, California), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein index, and flow cytometry) were assessed during and after the cangrelor infusion. Patients took 90 mg of ticagrelor twice daily for either 6 (n = 6) or 7 (n = 6) doses. On study day 5, pharmacodynamic effects were assessed before and during a bolus plus 2-h infusion of cangrelor., Results: During cangrelor infusion, extensive inhibition of platelet function reflected by limited residual platelet reactivity was apparent. After cangrelor was stopped, the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor were preserved despite a modest increase in platelet reactivity., Conclusions: Ticagrelor given before or during infusion of cangrelor did not attenuate the pharmacodynamic effects of cangrelor. The pharmacodynamic effects of ticagrelor were preserved when ticagrelor was given during infusion of cangrelor. Consistent with the reversible binding of ticagrelor, this oral P2Y12 antagonist can be administered before, during, or after treatment with cangrelor., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We assessed the effect of the intercellular mediator of inflammation, platelet activating factor (PAF), on platelet function. The interaction between PAF and the platelet agonists ADP, thrombin and convulxin was analyzed in vitro in whole blood with the use of flow cytometry and was further characterized with the use of receptor antagonists to PAF (ABT-491), P2Y1 (MRS-2179), and P2Y12 (cangrelor) as well as a monoclonal anti-PSGL-1 antibody (anti-CD162). Low concentrations of PAF (0.1 nM) synergistically augmented platelet activation induced by other agonists (P < 0.01). Augmentation by PAF was receptor mediated and did not require platelet-leukocyte interaction. With >99% inhibition of P2Y receptor-mediated platelet activation, greater than additive activation was still observed with the combination of ADP plus PAF. Accordingly, PAF synergistically augments platelet activation in response to ADP and thrombin, and the extent of inhibition exerted by P2Y receptor antagonists is decreased in the presence of PAF.

Objectives: Both tirofiban and eptifibatide release rapidly from glycoprotein IIb-IIIa but have different dissociation constants (KD of tirofiban=15 nmol/l, of eptifibatide=120 nmol/l). Binding of fibrinogen to glycoprotein IIb-IIIa is biphasic, forming an initial reversible complex (KD=155-180 nmol/l) and a second more stable complex (KD=20-70 nmol/l). Diabetes is known to alter platelet function. To determine the influence of affinity on inhibitory effects in blood from patients with (n=20) and without (n=20) diabetes mellitus, we characterized the extent of inhibition as a function of time., Methods: Blood was added to reaction tubes containing tirofiban 100 ng/ml or eptifibatide 1.7 microg/ml (concentrations previously defined to be optimal) plus a platelet agonist (1 micromol/l adenosine diphosphate or 25 micromol/l thrombin receptor agonist peptide), and fluorochrome-labeled fibrinogen before analysis by flow cytometry., Results: The extent of inhibition early on (30 s to 3 min) was similar (>85%) with either agent in blood from those with and without diabetes mellitus, whereas the extent of inhibition 10-15 min later was maintained more effectively with tirofiban than with eptifibatide (difference in slope P<0.01). After 15 min, the extent of inhibition in response to adenosine diphosphate in those with diabetes mellitus was 95+/-6% for tirofiban and 70+/-15% for eptifibatide (P<0.001); in those without diabetes mellitus, it was 91+/-9% for tirofiban and 73+/-19% for eptifibatide (P<0.001)., Conclusion: For glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists with a rapid rate of release, the biphasic binding of fibrinogen influences to a similar extent their ability to maintain inhibitory effects in blood from patients with and without diabetes mellitus.

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) derive enhanced benefit from treatment with glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitors. To determine mechanisms potentially responsible we characterized the binding of fibrinogen to platelets from patients with and without diabetes in the presence and absence of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists., Methods: GP IIb-IIIa antagonists (tirofiban, eptifibatide, and abciximab) were added in vitro to blood from patients with and without diabetes. Binding of fibrinogen to activated GP IIb-IIIa was assessed with the use of flow cytometry. The kinetics of binding of I(125)-abciximab and I(125)-fibrinogen to washed platelets from subjects with and without diabetes mellitus were determined. Glycation of platelet membrane proteins was measured with the fructosamine assay., Results: In the presence of GP IIb-IIIa antagonists, activation-induced binding of fibrinogen to platelets was reduced to a greater extent (p<0.02) in blood from patients with diabetes. The greater inhibition in blood from patients with diabetes was seen with pharmacologic concentrations of tirofiban (50 ng/ml, by 27%), eptifibatide (1.5 microg/ml, by 24%), and abciximab (2 mg/ml, by 12%). Whereas the binding of I(125)-abciximab was similar to platelets from patients with diabetes and those without, the rate of binding of I(125)-fibrinogen was decreased with platelets from patients with diabetes. Binding after 5 min was reduced by 46% in those with diabetes (p<0.05). Platelet membrane proteins from patients with diabetes were glycated to a greater extent compared with those without diabetes., Conclusion: GP IIb-IIIa antagonists inhibit platelet activation to a greater extent in blood from patients with diabetes. The decreased rate of binding of fibrinogen early after activation of platelets appears to be a consequence of glycation and may promote inhibition by GP IIb-IIIa antagonists.