Search

Patients' response to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is subject to variations and its monitoring allows to individualize this therapy. In this study, we evaluated if a strategy of tailored DAPT after platelet function testing could reduce high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and improve outcome of patients treated with stent implantation. In 257 patients undergoing percutaneous angioplasty, platelet function was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) using 10 µM/L adenosine-diphosphate (ADP) and 1 mM arachidonic acid (AA) as agonists. Patients with HPR by ADP (≥70%) were switched to double-dose clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel or ticagrelor; in patients with HPR by AA (≥20%) acetylsalicylic acid dose was increased if not contraindicated. Platelet function analysis was repeated 48 hours after therapy variation. At 20-month follow-up major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleedings were assessed. HPR was detected in 97/257 (37.7%) patients: 69/257 (26.8%) had HPR by ADP and 71/257 (27.6%) had HPR by AA. In patients with HPR by ADP or by AA, tailored DAPT determined a significant reduction in residual platelet reactivity. No significant difference in MACE or bleeding occurrence was documented in HPR patients treated with tailored DAPT vs. those without HPR. HPR patients treated with tailored DAPT had significant lower follow-up MACE and deaths vs. 139 HPR patients not switched, even after propensity score analysis. These results suggest that a DAPT tailored on platelet testing can improve antiplatelet response in HPR patients, possibly reducing their thrombotic events to a level similar to non-HPR patients, without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the efficacy of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in clopidogrel nonresponders., Background: Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness is a strong marker of the risk of cardiac death and stent thrombosis after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is unknown whether clopidogrel nonresponsiveness is a nonmodifiable risk factor or whether prasugrel with more potent and predictable platelet inhibition as measured by ex vivo techniques is associated with a positive effect on clinical outcome., Methods: The RECLOSE-3 (REsponsiveness to CLOpidogrel and StEnt thrombosis) study screened clopidogrel nonresponders after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel nonresponders switched to prasugrel (10 mg/day) the day of the PCI, and an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) test (10 μmol/l of ADP) was performed 6 days after the PCI. The primary endpoint was 2-year cardiac mortality. Patient outcome was compared with the RECLOSE-2-ACS study., Results: We screened 1,550 patients, of whom 302 were clopidogrel nonresponders. The result of the ADP test was 77.6 ± 6.2%. After switching to prasugrel, the ADP test result decreased to 47.1 ± 16.8%. The 2-year cardiac mortality rate was 4% in the RECLOSE-3 study and 9.7% in nonresponders of the RECLOSE-2-ACS study (p = 0.007). The definite and probable stent thrombosis rates were 0.7% and 4.4%, respectively (p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, prasugrel treatment was related to the risk of 2-year cardiac death (hazard ratio: 0.32, p = 0.036)., Conclusions: Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness can be overcome by prasugrel (10 mg/day), and optimal platelet aggregation inhibition on prasugrel treatment is associated with a low rate of long-term cardiac mortality and stent thrombosis., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Limited data are available on the natural history of high on treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) by arachidonic acid and ADP - markers of unfavorable prognosis in acute coronary syndrome patients -., Material and Methods: In a cohort of acute coronary syndrome male patients (n=101), we evaluated the time-course of HPR by ADP (platelet aggregation by 10μM ADP≥70%) and arachidonic acid (platelet aggregation by 1mmol arachidonic acid≥20%) measuring platelet function in the acute phase (T0), at 6months (T1) and 1year (T2)., Results: We identified persistent (HPR at T0,T1 and T2), acute non persistent (HPR only at T0), and late (HPR only at T1 or T2). Patients with persistent HPR by ADP were more frequently with higher values of BMI. Patients carrying CYP2C19*2 variant were more prevalent in the group of persistent HPR (33%). Significant higher values of immature platelet fraction and high immature platelet fraction at 6 and 12months and mean platelet volume were present in patients with late HPR. Immature platelet fraction was the only variable significantly associated with late HPR by ADP at multivariate analysis (OR=1.6 (1.08-2.3), p=0.016). Patients with persistent HPR by arachidonic acid were more frequently diabetics. Immature platelet fraction at 6months and high immature platelet fraction at 6 and 12months were the parameters associated with late HPR by AA (OR=1.4 (1.0-1.9), p=0.036; OR=1.5 (1.08-2.4), p=0.05; OR=4.9 (1.3-18.8), p=0.018, respectively)., Conclusions: About 25% of 101 patients has persistent HPR; they are more frequently diabetics, overweight or carriers of CYP2C19*2. The occurrence of an inflammatory state, indicated by the increase of immature platelet fraction, is associated with the occurrence of late HPR., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In physiological hemostasis a prompt recruitment of platelets on the vessel damage prevents the bleeding by the rapid formation of a platelet plug. Qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects promote bleeding, whereas the high residual reactivity of platelets in patients on antiplatelet therapies moves forward thromboembolic complications. The biochemical mechanisms of the different phases of platelet activation - adhesion, shape change, release reaction, and aggregation - have been well delineated, whereas their complete translation into laboratory assays has not been so fulfilled. Laboratory tests of platelet function, such as bleeding time, light transmission platelet aggregation, lumiaggregometry, impedance aggregometry on whole blood, and platelet activation investigated by flow cytometry, are traditionally utilized for diagnosing hemostatic disorders and managing patients with platelet and hemostatic defects, but their use is still limited to specialized laboratories. To date, a point-of-care testing (POCT) dedicated to platelet function, using pertinent devices much simpler to use, has now become available (ie, PFA-100, VerifyNow System, Multiplate Electrode Aggregometry [MEA]). POCT includes new methodologies which may be used in critical clinical settings and also in general laboratories because they are rapid and easy to use, employing whole blood without the necessity of sample processing. Actually, these different platelet methodologies for the evaluation of inherited and acquired bleeding disorders and/or for monitoring antiplatelet therapies are spreading and the study of platelet function is strengthening. In this review, well-tried and innovative platelet function tests and their methodological features and clinical applications are considered.

Background: In acute coronary syndrome (ACS), inflammation and redox response are associated with increased residual platelet reactivity (RPR) on clopidogrel therapy. We investigated whether clopidogrel interaction affects platelet function and modulates factors related to inflammation and oxidation in ACS patients differently responding to clopidogrel., Material and Methods: Platelet aggregation was measured in 29 ACS patients on dual (aspirin/clopidogrel) antiplatelet therapy. Nonresponders (NR) were defined as RPR ≥70% by ADP. Several inflammatory and redox parameters were assayed and platelet proteome was determined., Results: Eight (28%) out of 29 ACS patients resulted NR to clopidogrel. At 24 hours, the levels of Th2-type cytokines IL-4, IFNγ, and MCP-1 were higher in NR, while blood GSH (r-GSHbl) levels were lower in NR than responders (R). Proteomic analysis evidenced an upregulated level of platelet adhesion molecule, CD226, and a downregulation of the antioxidant peroxiredoxin-4. In R patients the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 decreased, while the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-1Ra increased., Conclusions: In patients with high RPR on clopidogrel therapy, an unbalance of inflammatory factors, platelet adhesion molecules, and circulatory and platelet antioxidant molecules was observed during the acute phase. Proinflammatory milieu persists in nonresponders for a long time after the acute event while antioxidant blood factors tend to conform to normal responsiveness.

Although the female gender is generally less represented in cardiovascular studies, observational and randomized investigations suggest that-compared with men-women may obtain different benefits from antiplatelet therapy. Multiple factors, including hormonal mechanisms and differences in platelet biology, might contribute to such apparent gender peculiarities. The thrombotic and bleeding risks, as well as outcomes after a cardiovascular event, appear to differ between genders, partly in relation to differences in age, comorbidities and body size. Equally, the benefits of antiplatelet therapy may differ in women compared with men in different vascular beds, during primary or secondary prevention and according to the type of an antiplatelet agent used. This document is an attempt to bring together current evidence, clinical practices and gaps of knowledge on gender-specific platelet function and antiplatelet therapy. On the basis of the available data, we provide suggestions on current indications of antiplatelet therapy for cardiovascular prevention in women with different clinical features; no strong recommendation may be given because the available data derive from observational studies or post hoc/subgroup analyses of randomized studies without systematic adjustments for baseline risk profiles., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2014. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Unlabelled: In ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, residual platelet reactivity soon after a loading dose (LD) of prasugrel or ticagrelor is higher than that reported for healthy volunteers or subjects with stable coronary artery disease; and the majority of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) procedures with bivalirudin monotherapy are performed without proper platelet inhibition. However, ticagrelor LD is just the daily dose, whereas prasugrel LD is 6-fold the long-term daily dose. We hypothesized that an increased ticagrelor LD may result in a faster and more effective platelet inhibition as compared with the standard prasugrel LD., Methods: Fifty patients with STEMI, pretreated with intravenous aspirin, undergoing PPCI were randomized to receive prasugrel 60-mg LD (n = 25) or ticagrelor 360-mg LD (n = 25). Residual platelet reactivity was assessed by VerifyNow at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 12 hours after drug LD., Results: At the time of LD, 90% of enrolled patients had an aspirin reactivity unit value <550. P2Y12 reaction units 1 hour after the LD (study primary end point) were 236 (129-289) and 248 (115-304) in the prasugrel and ticagrelor group, respectively (P = .899). High residual platelet reactivity (P2Y12 reaction units ≥240) was found in 43% and 56% of patients (P = .386) at 1 hour and in 30% and 32% of patients (P = .907) at 2 hours, respectively. There was no significant difference in bleeding, arrhythmias, or dyspnea episodes in the 2 groups., Conclusions: In patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, double (360 mg) ticagrelor LD failed to achieve a faster and more intense platelet inhibition as compared with the standard prasugrel LD. Intravenously administered aspirin allowed to achieve a very early inhibition of acid arachidonic pathway., (Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with impaired platelet response to clopidogrel. In patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) while on standard-dose clopidogrel, high-dose atorvastatin enhances the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of double-dose clopidogrel. It is unknown if similar effects are achieved in patients with DM. This study compare the PD effects of high-dose atorvastatin associated with double dose clopidogrel in HTPR patients with and without DM undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This is a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized PD study that compared double-dose (150 mg) clopidogrel associated with high-dose (80 mg) atorvastatin to double-dose clopidogrel alone in statin naïve patients with HTPR undergoing elective PCI. In this analysis, patients were divided in two groups according to DM (n = 27) and non-DM (n = 49) status. Platelet reactivity was evaluated immediately before PCI and at 30 days using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. HTPR was defined as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) ≥235. Administering high-dose atorvastatin in addition to high-dose clipodogrel, the 30 days absolute PRU changes (106 ± 75 vs 100 ± 42, p = 0.7) and optimal response rates (83 vs 84%; p = 0.9) were similar in DM and non-DM patients. The baseline variables significantly associated with 30-day optimal response to high-dose clopidogrel were: atorvastatin treatment (OR = 7.5 [95% CI 1.19-47]; p = 0.032) in DM patients; PRU values (OR = 0.9 [95% CI 0.95-0.99]; p = 0.031) and creatinine clearance (OR = 1.07 [95% CI 1.008-1.13]; p = 0.025) in non-DM patients. High-dose atorvastatin significantly improved the PD effects of double-dose clopidogrel in DM patients with HTPR undergoing elective PCI.

Cardiovascular diseases actually remain the leading cause of death and morbidity in Western countries, and it is the most common cause of death in American women accounting for about one third of all deaths. Women remain underrepresented in published trial literature relative to their disease prevalence. Strong evidence do exists demonstrating gender differences in efficacy (ischemic risk) and safety (bleeding risk) associated with antithrombotic treatment, mostly related to different values of body mass, and renal function in women than men. Several data show a higher platelet reactivity in females and a higher prevalence of high platelet reactivity on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy. In primary prevention, the use of aspirin is associated with a higher reduction of risk for ischemic stroke in females and for myocardial infarction in males. In the setting of ACS, female gender is associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding. In summary, there are some gender-related aspects of guidance in the complex spectrum of the net clinical benefit related to antithrombotic treatment.

The everolimus-eluting stent (EES) performs better than the first generation drug-eluting stent. Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes treated invasively is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased risk of stent thrombosis. The aim of the study was to compare the clinical outcome and degree of platelet aggregation inhibition of patients treated with EES for unprotected left main disease (ULMD) and receiving clopidogrel or prasugrel. Patients receiving an EES for ULMD and with low residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel or prasugrel treatment were included in the analysis. The primary end point of the study was the composite of cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction at 1 year. The secondary end point was the degree of platelet aggregation inhibition as assessed by light transmittance aggregometry. From January 2009 to December 2011, 252 patients with low residual platelet reactivity on thienopyridine treatment were treated with EES for ULMD. Of these, 104 patients received clopidogrel and 148 received prasugrel. The primary end point rate was lower in the prasugrel group compared with clopidogrel group: 1.3% and 9.6%, respectively (p = 0.002). Residual platelet reactivity was less in the prasugrel group compared with clopidogrel group (adenosine diphosphate 10 μmol/L 37 ± 17% and 45 ± 15%, respectively, p <0.001). At multivariate analysis, prasugrel treatment was related to the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.77, p = 0.022). In conclusion, in patients treated with EES for ULMD, prasugrel compared with clopidogrel is associated with increased platelet aggregation inhibition and a better clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: High platelet reactivity (HPR) on dual antiplatelet therapy is a risk factor for adverse vascular events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. Several studies have shown that reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be involved in modulating platelet function., Methods: In Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients (n = 132) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on dual antiplatelet therapy blood samples were collected within 24 h from 600 mg clopidogrel loading dose. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry using 10 μM ADP, 1 mM arachidonic acid (AA) and 2 μg/ml collagen. ROS production and lipoperoxidation of circulating cells were determined. by FACSCanto flow cytometry. In these patients, we investigated: 1) the relationship between the amount of cellular ROS production/lipoperoxidation and platelet reactivity; 2) the association of cellular ROS production with the presence of high platelet reactivity to ADP and arachidonic acid (AA)., Results: Significantly higher levels of platelet and leukocyte-derived ROS were detected in 49 dual HPR (with platelet aggregation by AA ≥ 20% and by ADP ≥ 70%) compared to non-HPR patients (n = 49) [Platelet-derived ROS: +142%; Leukocyte-derived ROS: +14%, p < 0.0001]. Similarly, dual HPR patients had significantly higher platelet and leukocyte lipoperoxidation than non-HPR patients [Platelet lipoperoxidation: +131%; Leukocyte lipoperoxidation: +14%, p < 0.001]. After adjustment for several potential confounders, platelet-, leukocyte-derived ROS and platelet and leukocyte lipoperoxidation remained significantly associated to dual HPR. The significant predictors of ADP, AA, and collagen platelet aggregation at multiple linear regression analysis, after adjusting for age, cardiovascular risk factors, procedural parameter, medications, leukocyte number and MPV, were platelet-, leukocyte-derived ROS and platelet and leukocyte lipoperoxidation (p < 001)., Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that in NSTEMI patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, ROS production by and lipoperoxidation of platelets are strictly correlated to the different pathways of platelet aggregation and that ROS production and lipoperoxidation of platelets and leukocytes are predictors of non responsiveness to dual antiplatelet treatment., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of high-dose atorvastatin on the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of double-dose clopidogrel in statin-naive patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) while on standard-dose clopidogrel before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: Patients with HTPR are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events after PCI. High-dose statins improve prognosis in high-risk patients by lipid- and nonlipid-related mechanisms, including antithrombotic effects., Methods: The ACHIDO (Atorvastatin and Clopidogrel HIgh DOse in stable patients with residual high platelet activity) study was a randomized PD study of high-dose (80 mg) atorvastatin in addition to double-dose (150 mg) clopidogrel (atorvastatin group, n = 38) versus double-dose clopidogrel alone (control group, n = 38) in patients with HTPR. HTPR was defined as P2Y(12) reaction units (PRU) ≥235 by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Platelet reactivity was evaluated immediately before PCI and at 10 and 30 days., Results: Patients randomized to atorvastatin had lower PRU values (188 ± 48 vs. 223 ± 53 PRU, p < 0.01; primary endpoint) and HTPR rates (16% vs. 42%, p < 0.01) at 30 days than patients in the control group. Statin treatment (odds ratio [OR]: 3.8, p = 0.011), baseline PRU <298 (OR: 10.7, p = 0.0001), noncarrier status of CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function allele (OR: 2.9, p = 0.043), and age (OR: 0.94, p = 0.032) were variables significantly associated with optimal PD response (PRU <235) at 30 days. No correlations were found between PRU and lipid fractions., Conclusions: High-dose atorvastatin significantly improved the PD effects of double-dose clopidogrel in our stable CAD patients with HTPR undergoing PCI (Atorvastatin and Clopidogrel HIgh DOse in stable patients with residual high platelet activity [ACHIDO]; NCT01335048)., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Context: High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) in patients receiving clopidogrel has been associated with high risk of ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Objective: To test the hypothesis that HRPR after clopidogrel loading is an independent prognostic marker of risk of long-term thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing an invasive procedure and antithrombotic treatment adjusted according to the results of platelet function tests., Design, Setting, and Patients: Prospective, observational, referral center cohort study of 1789 consecutive patients with ACS undergoing PCI from April 2005 to April 2009 at the Division of Cardiology of Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy, in whom platelet reactivity was prospectively assessed by light transmittance aggregometry., Interventions: All patients received 325 mg of aspirin and a loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel followed by a maintenance dosage of 325 mg/d of aspirin and 75 mg/d of clopidogrel for at least 6 months. Patients with HRPR as assessed by adenosine diphosphate test (≥70% platelet aggregation) received an increased dose of clopidogrel (150-300 mg/d) or switched to ticlopidine (500-1000 mg/d) under adenosine diphosphate test guidance., Main Outcome Measures: The primary end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, any urgent coronary revascularization, and stroke at 2-year follow-up. Secondary end points were stent thrombosis and each component of the primary end point., Results: The primary end point event rate was 14.6% (36/247) in patients with HRPR and 8.7% (132/1525) in patients with low residual platelet reactivity (absolute risk increase, 5.9%; 95% CI, 1.6%-11.1%; P = .003). Stent thrombosis was higher in the HRPR group compared with the low residual platelet reactivity group (6.1% [15/247] vs 2.9% [44/1525]; absolute risk increase, 3.2%; 95% CI, 0.4%-6.7%; P = .01). By multivariable analysis, HRPR was independently associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.05; P = .02) and with cardiac mortality (hazard ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.18-2.76; P = .006)., Conclusion: Among patients receiving platelet reactivity-guided antithrombotic medication after PCI, HRPR status was significantly associated with increased risk of ischemic events at short- and long-term follow-up., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01231035.

Light transmission aggregation (LTA) is considered the reference method to identify residual platelet reactivity (RPR) in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease on clopidogrel treatment. An international standardization of this technique is still ongoing and different concentrations of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as the agonist for LTA have been used to evaluate the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel treatment. To evaluate RPR, LTA was performed using different ADP concentrations (2, 5, 10, and 20 μmol/L) in 466 high-risk patients with coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and in 46 healthy subjects. A VerifyNow P2Y12 assay was assessed as a point-of care system. Imprecision studies showed higher coefficients of variation for LTA by 2 and 5 μmol/L ADP (healthy subjects: 4.7% and 3.9%; patients: 6.8% and 5.2%, respectively) in comparison with those obtained determining LTA using 10 and 20 μmol/L ADP (healthy subjects: 2.2% and 2.3%; patients: 2.7% and 3.1%, respectively). In patients, a significant difference (P < 0.0001) between mean values of LTA obtained with all ADP concentrations was found, even if LTA data were significantly correlated (at least: rho = 0.88, P < 0.0001). However, data from 10 and 20 μmol/L ADP LTA were very similar and highly concordant (k = 95.9%). All agreements were significant (for all P < 0.0001), in particular the agreement between 10 and 20 μmol/L ADP LTA was very good (k = 0.86, P < 0.0001). A moderate agreement between VerifyNow and both 10 and 20 μmol/L ADP LTA was observed. LTA by 10 and 20 μmol/L ADP gave equivalent percentages of aggregation and highly concordant results in terms of RPR in patients with coronary artery disease on clopidogrel. Significant concordant results were observed between both 10 and 20 μM ADP LTA and VerifyNow. This suggests that a concentration of 10 μmol/L ADP may be considered adequate for the identification of RPR of patients on clopidogrel and should be preferred for standardization LTA.

There is some data available on the role of high on-treatment platelet reactivity by ADP whereas, as regards arachidonic acid or other agonists, there is no proof of the best cut-off for identifying populations with a different cardiovascular outcome by the construction of appropriate receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curves. We enrolled 1,108 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation and followed them up for 12 months. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) using 10 microM ADP, 1 mM arachidonic acid (AA) and 2 microg/ml collagen. At a 12-month follow-up, we found 37 cardiovascular deaths (3.3%), 54 non-fatal myocardial infarctions (MI) (4.8%) and 154 target vessel revascularisations (TVR) (13.8%). ROC analysis demonstrated that 10 microM ADP LTA, 1 mM AA and 2 microg/ml collagen LTA were able to distinguish between patients with and without subsequent cardiovascular death and non-fatal MI (area under the curve for 10 microM ADP 0.63 (0.55-0.71), p<0.001; for 1 mM AA 0.68 (0.61-0.76), p<0.0001; for 2 microg/ml collagen 0.62 (0.52-0.73), p<0.0111), whereas no association was demonstrated with the occurrence of TVR. Ten microM ADP LTA>or=55%, 1 mM AA LTA>or=15% and 2 microg/ml collagen LTA>or=31% were identified as the optimal cut-off to predict cardiovascular death and non-fatal MI at 12-month follow-up. The contemporary platelet hyperreactivity to more than one agonist was associated with a higher risk of 12-month cardiovascular death and MI, whereas isolated platelet hyperreactivity to only one agonist had not a predictive value [10 microM ADP LTA>or=55% + 1 mM AA LTA>or=15%: odds ratio [OR]=3.6(2.4-6.1), p<0.0001; ADP LTA>or=55% + 1 mM AA LTA>or=15% + 2 microg/ml collagen LTA>or=31%: OR=4.7(2.9-7.7), p<0.0001]. In this prospective study on a large number of acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing stent implantation, we have found that high on-treatment platelet reactivity measured by LTA induced by more than one agonist--AA, ADP, collagen--is an independent risk factor for 12-month cardiovascular death and non-fatal MI. Isolated platelet hyperreactivity to only one agonist has not a predictive value for clinical recurrences.

Cardiovascular events are more frequent in high-risk coronary artery disease (CAD) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy with a residual platelet reactivity (RPR) than in those showing inhibition of ADP-inducible platelet activation. It is known that post-interventional RPR is a clinically important entity confirming it as a risk factor for thrombo-ischaemic events. Multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA) on whole blood has been recently proposed as a rapid tool to evaluate RPR in high-risk CAD patients on clopidogrel therapy. It was the aim of this study to detect RPR in 801 high-risk CAD patients on dual antiplatelet therapy comparing MEA with the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay on whole blood and classical light transmission aggregation (LTA) on platelet-rich plasma. ADP (10 microM) was employed as agonist for MEA and LTA. The prevalence of RPR was 20.6% by MEA, 16.1% by LTA and 30.8% by VerifyNow. MEA showed a significant correlation (rho=0.62, p<0.0001) with VerifyNow and a moderate agreement (k=0.52, p<0.001) with 81.5% of concordant values. A significant correlation was found between MEA and LTA (rho=0.71, p<0.001) with a good agreement (k=0.63, p<0.001) and 88.8% of concordant values. MEA in relation to LTA showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 91%. MEA might represent a reliable method and valid alternative in comparison with other available platelet function assays. It might help to guide antiplatelet therapy and thus improve clinical outcome of high-risk CAD patients.

We performed this meta-analysis to update the clinical evidences on the relation between clopidogrel non-responsiveness and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. An electronic literature search through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library and bibliographies of retrieved articles up to January, 2009 was conducted. Studies were included if they had a cohort prospective design, if they analysed clopidogrel responsiveness in CAD patients in relation to death and/or occurrence of adverse coronary events during follow-up, and if they reported an adequate statistical analysis. Fourteen studies, totalling 4,564 CAD patients followed for a time ranging from 14 days to one year, were included. The cumulative analysis reported that residual platelet reactivity despite clopidogrel treatment was significantly associated with an increased risk of death and/or thrombotic recurrences (odds ratio [OR] 5.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.97 to 10.84; p<0.00001). However, four studies contributed to a consistent heterogeneity of the model and evidenced a significant risk of publication bias, so were excluded from the analysis. This exclusion, however, did not influence the overall result, by confirming the increased risk of cardiovascular recurrences for patients with a poor response to clopidogrel treatment (OR 3.58, 95%CI 2.54 to 5.05; p<0.00001). The present updated meta-analysis documents a significant association between residual platelet reactivity under clopidogrel treatment and recurrent cardiovascular events, so suggesting the relevance of ongoing interventional studies aimed at tailoring the antithrombotic therapy in CAD patients.

Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin is the recommended standard of care for reducing the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes; these protective effects of clopidogrel have been shown both in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in those treated with medical therapy alone. However, significant shortcomings still exist, including a delayed onset of action in platelet inhibition, individual response variability (with some patients being frankly hyporesponsive), and a prolonged time to recovery of platelet function following cessation of treatment. Among these, clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness seems to be particularly important, as a growing body of evidence suggests that residual platelet reactivity on clopidogrel is associated with a significant increase in the risk of developing adverse clinical events. Prasugrel is a novel, third-generation oral thienopyridine that is a specific, irreversible antagonist of the platelet adenosine 5'-diphosphate P2Y12 receptor. Prasugrel has more potent antiplatelet activity, faster onset of action, and less interpatient variability as compared to clopidogrel. These pharmacodynamic properties led prasugrel to be more effective in preventing ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI in the setting of the recent TRITON-TIMI 38 study. However, the greater protective effects toward ischemic events were partially counterbalanced by an increased risk of bleeding, particularly in patients with history of transient ischemic attack/stroke, in those with body weight <60 kg and in those older than 74 years. A favorable net clinical benefit of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel has been shown.

Background: No data exist about the impact of high residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) after clopidogrel loading on long-term clinical outcome in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for unprotected left main disease (ULMD)., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ULMD had prospective platelet reactivity assessment by light transmittance aggregometry after a loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel. The primary end point of the study was cardiac mortality, and the secondary end point was stent thrombosis. From January 2005 to September 2008, 215 consecutive patients were treated with DES for ULMD. The incidence of HRPR after clopidogrel loading was 18.6%. The median follow-up was 19.3 months. The overall estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year cardiac mortality rate was 3.9+/-1.3%, 7.5+/-2.2%, and 12.2+/-3.4%, respectively. The 3-year cardiac mortality rate was 8.0+/-3.1% in the low residual platelet reactivity (LRPR) group and 28.3+/-10.4% in the HRPR group (P=0.005). The 3-year stent thrombosis rate was 4.2+/-1.8% in the low residual platelet reactivity group and 16.0+/-7.3% in the HRPR group (P=0.021). By forward stepwise regression analysis, HRPR after clopidogrel loading was the only independent predictor of cardiac death (hazard ratio, 3.82; 95% confidence interval,1.38 to 10.54; P=0.010) and stent thrombosis (hazard ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.12 to 12.09; P=0.031)., Conclusions: HRPR after 600-mg clopidogrel loading is a strong marker of increased risk of cardiac death and DES thrombosis in patients receiving DES stenting for ULMD. Routine assessment of in vitro residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading in patients with ULMD potentially suitable for DES-supported percutaneous coronary intervention should be considered to guide patient care decisions.

Nitric Oxide (NO) plays a relevant role in regulating platelet recruitment and eNOS is the major isoform known to be expressed in platelets. Polymorphisms in the eNOS gene with a reduced NO availability might affect platelet phenotype. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of eNOS-786T > C, 894G > T and 4a/4b polymorphisms in modulating platelet phenotype in 1442 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on dual antiplatelet therapy, previously investigated in relation to platelet function. Platelet aggregation on platelet-rich plasma after collagen (2 microg/mL), ADP (10 microM) and arachidonic acid (AA) (1 mM) stimuli and the genetic analysis of eNOS polymorphisms were assessed. In subjects carrying the eNOS 4a and -786C alleles a significantly higher maximal platelet aggregation value after AA was found (p = 0.02 and p = 0.047, respectively). eNOS 4a but not -786C allele weakly influenced platelet aggregation after collagen stimulus (p = 0.05). eNOS 4a allele significantly and independently influenced AA-induced platelet aggregation (p = 0.01). A significantly higher percentage of patients with AA-induced high residual platelet reactivity (RPR) was found in subjects carrying both eNOS 4a and -786C allele (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). At logistic multivariate analysis, the eNOS 4a allele significantly influenced the AA-induced high residual platelet reactivity (p = 0.02). This study evidences a role for eNOS gene in moderately, but significantly, modulating platelet phenotype in a high-risk population on dual antiplatelet treatment.

Residual platelet reactivity (RPR) to adenosine 5' diphosphate (ADP) was an independent predictor of stent thrombosis (ST) in patients receiving drug-eluting stents on dual-antiplatelet treatment and was associated with the cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C19*2 polymorphism. The aim was to evaluate the role of the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism in the occurrence of ST or the composite end point of ST and cardiac mortality within a 6-month follow-up in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions with drug-eluting stent implantation on dual-antiplatelet treatment enrolled in the RECLOSE trial. Seven hundred seventy-two patients were studied for the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism and RPR (using 10-muM ADP-induced platelet aggregation). Patients with ST or the composite of ST and cardiac mortality showed a higher prevalence of carriers of the rare allele (54.1% vs 31.3%; p = 0.025 and 51.7% vs 31.2%; p = 0.020, respectively). At multivariate logistic regression analysis with ST or ST and cardiac mortality as dependent variables and the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism, ADP RPR, and additional previously shown clinical and procedural risk factors for ST as independent variables, the CYP2C19*2 allele (ST odds ratio [OR] 3.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 12.78, p = 0.047; ST and cardiac mortality OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.00 to 8.42, p = 0.049) and ADP RPR (ST OR 3.08, 95% CI 1.23 to 7.72, p = 0.016; ST and cardiac mortality OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.08 to 12.98, p = 0.019) were independent risk factors. Subjects with the contemporary presence of the CYP2C19*2 allele and ADP RPR showed a strong risk of ST or ST and cardiac mortality (OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.04 to 39.01, p = 0.033 and OR 11.45, 95% CI 1.84 to 71.27, p = 0.009, respectively). In conclusion, the CYP2C19*2 allele was associated with the occurrence of ST or ST and cardiac mortality in high-risk vascular patients on dual-antiplatelet treatment. These findings could impact on the future design of pharmacogenetic antiaggregant strategies.

A higher rate of clinical events in poor clopidogrel and/or aspirin responders was documented by using different methods to measure platelet function, but no conclusive data about the appropriate methodology to explore platelet reactivity are available. A total of 746 patients included in the cohort of the RECLOSE trial who had successful drug-eluting stent implantation were assessed for post-treatment residual platelet reactivity (RPR) in platelet-rich plasma by 10 microM adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP), 1 mM arachidonic acid (AA) and 2 microg/ml collagen-induced platelet aggregation and in whole blood by the PFA-100 system. At six-month follow-up, RPR by two stimuli (ADP and AA or ADP and collagen) and by three stimuli (ADP, AA and collagen) is significantly associated with higher percentage of primary (definite or probable stent thrombosis) and secondary (cardiac mortality and stent thrombosis) end-points than RPR by ADP, AA, collagen and PFA-100 system. According to the primary and secondary end points, the specificity values for RPR identified by two (ADP and AA:94%; ADP and collagen:97%) and three stimuli were higher with respect to RPR by ADP (88%), or RPR by AA (83%) or RPR by collagen (90%). The positive likelihood ratio values of RPR by three stimuli (9.55) or of RPR by ADP and collagen (8.08) were higher than those of RPR by ADP (2.59), by AA (2.05), by collagen (4.73), or by PFA-100 (2.63). This prospective study documents that the evaluation of platelet reactivity addressed to identify patients at risk of thrombotic events on dual antiplatelet treatment has to be carried out by methods able to explore different pathways.

Objectives: This study sought to determine the incidence of aspirin nonresponsiveness in addition to clopidogrel nonresponsiveness and whether this association identifies patients at an increased risk of drug-eluting stent (DES) thrombosis., Background: Nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel is a predictor of DES thrombosis. No prospective data exist about the possible association of dual nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel and aspirin with DES thrombosis., Methods: Platelet function was assessed after a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel in 746 patients who had successful DES implantation followed by 6-month dual-antiplatelet therapy. Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry using adenosine 5'-diphosphate, arachidonic acid, and collagen. The primary end point was definite/probable DES thrombosis at 6 months. The secondary end point was the composite of cardiac mortality and DES thrombosis., Results: The incidence of dual nonresponsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel was 6%. Definite/probable DES thrombosis was significantly higher in dual aspirin and clopidogrel nonresponders (11.1%) than in clopidogrel and aspirin responders (2.1%, p < 0.001), isolated clopidogrel nonresponders (2.2%, p < 0.05), or aspirin nonresponders (2.3%, p < 0.05). The incidence of the secondary end point was 4.4% in isolated clopidogrel nonresponders, 2.3% in isolated aspirin nonresponders, and 13.3% in dual aspirin and clopidogrel nonresponders. Dual clopidogrel and aspirin nonresponsiveness was an independent predictor of DES thrombosis (hazard ratio: 3.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.14 to 8.83, p = 0.027) and the composite of cardiac mortality and DES thrombosis (hazard ratio: 2.94, 95% confidence interval: 1.16 to 7.41, p = 0.022)., Conclusions: Dual nonresponsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel is a relatively infrequent condition that identifies patients at a very high risk of DES thrombosis or death.

Background: Recently, a growing body of evidence on the possible role of residual platelet reactivity (RPR) in affecting clinical events has accumulated. The aim of this study was to systematically assess the relationship between RPR on acetylic salicylic acid (ASA) therapy and the occurrence of recurrent events in a meta-analysis of prospective studies., Methods: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, the Cochrane Systematic Review Database and bibliographies of retrieved articles through May 2007 was conducted. Studies were included if they analysed RPR in coronary heart disease patients in relation to the occurrence of adverse coronary events during follow-up., Results: Eleven prospective studies, incorporating 1952 patients with coronary heart disease followed for a time ranging from 6 days to 4 years, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significantly increased relative risk of adverse clinical events during follow-up for patients with RPR on ASA therapy (RR: 3.11, 95%CI 1.88-5.15; p<0.0001). Moreover, the association between RPR and cardiovascular recurrences remained to be statistically significant even when subgroup analyses performed according to the duration of follow-up, ASA dosage, characteristics of the study population, and laboratory method were conducted., Conclusions: The present meta-analysis documents a significant association between RPR on ASA treatment and recurrent cardiovascular events. More prospective studies are needed to determine the independent prognostic importance of RPR during aspirin therapy and possible benefit of individually tailored anti-platelet treatment strategies in these patients.

A high platelet turnover rate produce a population of immature reticulated platelets (RP) that could confer, despite of antiplatelet drugs, a residual platelet reactivity (RPR) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. To assess the influence of RP on platelet reactivity in CAD patients on dual antiplatelet therapy we measured RP in 372 patients by using the Sysmex XE-2100 haematology analyzer and platelet function by optical platelet aggregometry (PA) on platelet-rich-plasma induced by 1 mmol arachidonic acid (AA-PA) and 10 microM ADP (ADP-PA). RPR was defined as either AA-PA>20% or ADP-PA>70%. RP were expressed as a percentage of RP of the total optical platelet count (immature platelet fraction; IPF) and as the percentage of RP highly fluorescent (highly fluorescent immature platelet fraction; H-IPF). Moderate but significant positive correlations between PA, IPF, H-IPF, and mean platelet volume (MPV) were found. According to tertiles of IPF, H-IPF and MPV, a significant trend for an increase of platelet aggregation by AA and ADP was evidenced. Furthermore, a significant difference for IPF, H-IPF and MPV between patients with and without RPR was observed. A linear regression analysis showed that IPF, H-IPF and MPV significantly affected PA measured by AA and ADP. At multivariate linear regression analysis these associations were confirmed. Moreover, a logistic regression analysis demonstrated that IPF, H-IPF and MPV significantly influenced the risk of RPR, and in the multivariate model these results remained significant. This study indicates that a high rate of platelet turnover is a new mechanism associated with platelet reactivity in high risk CAD patients on dual antiplatelet therapy.

Response variability to antiplatelet treatment has been described and the widespread use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel requires clarification of the residual platelet reactivity (RPR). Various glycoprotein Ia (GpIa) polymorphisms have been investigated, but their influence on platelet reactivity in myocardial infarction (MI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on dual antiplatelet treatment is not still elucidated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of C807T, G873A and T837C polymorphisms of GpIa on modulating platelet function in MI patients on dual antiplatelet treatment undergoing PCI. We measured platelet function by both a point-of-care assay (PFA100) and platelet-rich-plasma aggregation in 289 MI patients undergoing PCI and receiving dual antiplatelet treatment. Our data show that C807T/G873A polymorphisms, but not T837C, are associated with higher platelet reactivity. Carriers of the 807T/873A allele had significantly higher platelet aggregation values after arachidonic acid (AA) and collagen stimuli and, even if they did not reach the statistical significance, after 2 and 10 microM ADP stimuli; 807T/873A allele carriers had also significantly shorter closure times on PFA100/epinephrine membranes. At the multiple analyses, C807T/G873A polymorphisms resulted an independent risk factor for RPR defined by both AA induced platelet aggregation (OR=3.0, 95%CI 1.17-7.89, p=0.022) or by PFA100/epinephrine (OR=4.1, 95%CI 1.53-10.89, p=0.005). In conclusion, this study shows the 807T/873A allele of the GpIa gene is an independent risk factor for the RPR on dual antiplatelet treatment, and extends, in a larger acute coronary syndrome population, the observation that the 807T/873A allele is associated with higher platelet reactivity.

Background: The pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to residual platelet reactivity (RPR) on antiplatelet therapy, a condition high prevalent in patients with acute coronary syndrome, are not yet elucidated. In the acute phase of coronary artery disease large amounts of ultra large VWF multimers (ULVWF) are released and cleaved by the activity of ADAMTS-13., Objective: Aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) levels, collagen binding activity of VWF (VWF:CB), ADAMTS-13 and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in affecting platelet response to dual antiplatelet treatment., Methods: In 159 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions we measured platelet function by platelet aggregation with two agonists [1 mM arachidonic acid (AA) and 10 microM ADP]. We defined patients with RPR those with platelet aggregation by AA >20% and/or ADP (10 micromol) >70%., Results: We found significantly lower ADAMTS-13 activity, elevated IL-6, VWF:Ag and VWF:CB levels in patients with RPR. A lower ADAMTS-13 activity was present in patients with VWF:Ag and VWF:CB in the upper tertile. At the multivariate analysis ADAMTS-13 activity and IL-6 were independent risk factors for RPR., Conclusion: Our results indicate that ADAMTS-13 activity and IL-6 levels independently affect RPR and suggest that, by different pathways, both are involved in the variable response to antiplatelet therapy.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of polymorphisms affecting the clopidogrel metabolism (CYP3A4 IVS10+12G/A and CYP2C19*2) and the P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12 T744C) on modulating platelet function in acute coronary syndrome patients on dual antiplatelet treatment., Background: Residual platelet reactivity (RPR) phenomenon on antiplatelet therapy requires clarification. P2Y12 T744C, CYP3A4 IVS10+12G/A and, in healthy individuals only, CYP2C19*2 polymorphisms have been investigated; however, the influence on platelet reactivity in a large population of high-risk vascular patients on dual antiplatelet treatment has not yet been elucidated., Methods: A total of 1419 acute coronary syndrome patients on dual antiplatelet treatment were studied. Platelet function was evaluated by platelet-rich plasma aggregation. Electronic nanochips and restriction-fragment length polymorphism were used for analysis of polymorphisms., Results: Only CYP2C19*2, out of the three investigated polymorphisms, is associated with higher platelet reactivity. Carriers of the *2 allele had significantly higher platelet aggregation values after arachidonic acid (AA; P=0.043), 2 micromol/l adenosine 5' diphosphate (ADP; P<0.0001) and 10 micromol/l ADP (P=0.001) stimuli. The genotype distribution of CYP2C19*2 polymorphism significantly differed between patients with and without RPR, as evaluated by 10-micromol/l ADP-induced platelet aggregation (P=0.002) and by AA-induced platelet aggregation (P=0.045). At the multivariate linear regression analysis, the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism remained a significant and independent risk factor for dual antiplatelet treatment variability., Conclusions: This study demonstrates, for the first time, that the *2 CYP2C19 allele is associated with higher platelet aggregability and RPR in high-risk vascular patients on dual antiplatelet treatment. These findings can have a significant impact on the future design of pharmacogenetic antiaggregant strategies for high-risk vascular patients on dual antiplatelet treatment.

A residual platelet reactivity (RPR) on antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) has been reported to be associated with adverse clinical events by some Authors. However, scarce data are present on the clinical parameters associated with this phenomenon. No study, at our knowledge, was designed with the specific aim to examine the relationship between clinical characteristics and RPR. We sought to evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics associated with RPR in patients with IHD undergoing coronary revascularization on dual (aspirin plus clopidogrel) antiplatelet therapy. We included in the study 868 patients undergoing a coronary angiography: 386 with acute coronary syndromes undergoing a primary coronary revascularization and 482 IHD patients scheduled to undergo an elective coronary angiography. We measured platelet function by both platelet aggregation with two agonists [0.5 mg/mL arachidonic acid (AA); 2 and 10 microM adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)] and a point-of-care assay (PFA-100) on venous blood samples collected within 24 h from the end of the procedure. In patients with acute coronary syndromes and elective PCI diabetes is independently associated with RPR [group A: OR=2.9 (1.5-5.7) by 10 microM ADP, OR=5.3 (1.1-27.8) by PFA-100; group B: OR=4.0 (1.6-10.0) by 10 microM ADP]; reduced left ventricular systolic function [OR=3.7 (2.2-6.5) by AA-PA, OR=2.7 (1.6-4.6) by PFA-100], chronic use of aspirin [OR=0.2 (0.1-0.4) by AA-PA, OR=0.3 (0.2-0.5) by PFA-100] and loading dose of clopidogrel [OR=0.2 (0.06-0.5) by 10 microM ADP] were independent variables significantly associated with RPR in patients undergoing elective PCI. In addition, inflammatory status was found to be significantly associated with RPR in both groups of patients. These results provide indications for the selection of patients for whom the evaluation of platelet reactivity could be useful.

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) receiving aspirin therapy with a residual platelet reactivity (RPR) may be at increased risk of ischemic vascular events. Point-of-care (POC) methods PFA-100 (Dade-Behring, Marburg, Germany) and VerifyNow (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA) assays have been suggested as rapid tools to evaluate RPR. We compared PFA-100 closure times by collagen/epinephrine and VerifyNow Aspirin assays with light transmission aggregation (LTA) induced by 1 mmol/L of arachidonic acid in 484 patients with CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. RPR was detected in 30.0% of patients by LTA, in 32.4% by PFA-100, and in 14.3% by VerifyNow. Significant correlations were found among 3 methods (all P < .0001). In relation to the presence or absence of RPR by LTA and PFA-100, by LTA and VerifyNow, and by PFA-100 and VerifyNow, samples were significantly concordant (all P < .0001). Assuming LTA as the reference method, PFA-100 and VerifyNow showed sensitivity of 62.1% and 39.3% and specificity of 80.2% and 96.4%, respectively. The cutoff values for POC methods need to be defined for clinical use.

Objectives: We sought to determine whether nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel as revealed by high in vitro post-treatment platelet reactivity is predictive of drug-eluting stent (DES) thrombosis., Background: No data exist about the impact of nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel on the risk of DES thrombosis., Methods: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study from July 2005 to August 2006 in an academic hospital. A total of 804 patients who had successful sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation were assessed for post-treatment platelet reactivity after a loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel. Patients with platelet aggregation by 10 mumol adenosine 5'-diphosphate > or =70% were defined as nonresponders. All patients received chronic dual antiplatelet treatment (aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg daily) for 6 months. The primary end point was the incidence of definite/probable early, subacute, and late stent thrombosis at 6-month follow-up., Results: The incidence of 6-month definite/probable stent thrombosis was 3.1%. All stent thromboses were subacute or late. Of 804 patients, 105 (13%) were not responsive to clopidogrel. The incidence of stent thrombosis was 8.6% in nonresponders and 2.3% in responders (p < 0.001). By multivariate analysis, the predictors of stent thrombosis were as follows: nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR] 3.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32 to 7.16; p = 0.009), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98; p = 0.001), total stent length (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02; p = 0.010), and ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.04 to 5.63; p = 0.041)., Conclusions: Nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel is a strong independent predictor of stent thrombosis in patients receiving sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents.

Gaseous mediators such as nitric oxide (NO) play a major regulatory role in the cardiovascular system homeostasis, including platelet aggregation. Here, we investigated whether hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S), a newly recognized endogenous mediator, can affects aggregation of human platelets, using sodium hydrogen sulfide (NaHS) as H(2)S-donor. NaHS inhibited platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen, epinephrine, arachidonic acid, thromboxane mimetic, U46619, and thrombin. H(2)S effect was not dependent by cAMP/cGMP generation, NO production or potassium-channels opening. NaHS concentrations (up to 10 mM) did not exert toxic effects on platelet viability. The possible protective role of endogenous H(2)S in cardiovascular system is discussed.

p-Coumaric acid (3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-propenoic acid; 4CA), is a ubiquitous plant metabolite with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. The antiplatelet activity of this compound was analysed both ex vivo and in vitro. 4-CA, administered to rabbits for 2 weeks at the dose of 5 mg/kg, mixed with food, inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation without affecting blood coagulation. This effect was associated with a marked increase in plasma antioxidant activity, measured as ferric reducing ability of plasma, and with the reduction of thromboxane B2 production. The antiplatelet effect was confirmed by in vitro experiments on human blood: 4CA (500 microM and 1 mM) reduced ADP-induced platelet aggregation (55 x 2 (se 4 x 01) % and 35 x 6 (se 2 x 35) % relative to basal level, respectively). 4CA was able to modify platelet function, measured with PFA-100, a shear-inducing device that simulates primary haemostasis. 4CA interfered also with arachidonic acid cascade, reducing thromboxane B2 production and lipopolysaccharide-induced prostaglandin E2 generation (ic50 371 and 126 microM, respectively). The data show that 4CA is an antioxidant compound with good antiplatelet activity at doses that can be obtained with dietary intervention, suggesting possible applications for primary prevention of vascular disease.

Recently, great interest has focused on the phenomenon of aspirin resistance, which may be defined as clinical or laboratory resistance. Monitoring the antiplatelet effect appears to be relevant in the presence of clinical implications, but no data are available on the possible clinical implications of the failure of aspirin to inhibit tests of platelet function in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. This study evaluated the role of aspirin resistance in the occurrence of 1-year major adverse coronary events (MACEs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prospectively evaluated 146 patients (115 men and 31 women; median age 65 years, range 30 to 84) with AMI who underwent primary PCI. Exclusion criteria were the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, hematocrit

Recently the phenomenon of aspirin resistance has been object of several studies, but no data are available on the possible role of the haemorheologic parameters in affecting platelet function and resistance to antiplatelet agents. Aim of our study was to evaluate platelet function and haemorheology in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), receiving double antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. The study population included 301 (231M/70F; age: 66 +/- 13 yrs) consecutive adult patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit of the Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, with diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. We assessed: whole blood viscosity (WBV) at shear rates of 0.512 s(-1) and 94.5 s(-1), plasma viscosity (PLV) at 94.5 s(-1) shear rate, erythrocyte deformability index (DI) and PFA-100 closure times with ADP (PFA/ADP) and epinephrine (PFA/EPI). We considered any PFA-100-EPI result < 203 sec (95th percentile of control distribution) to be indicative of aspirin resistance. 104/301 patients (34.5%) had PFA/EPI CTs in the reference range (group 1) whereas the remaining had values higher than 203 sec (group 2). WBV at 94.5 sec (-1) s.r. was similar in group 1 and 2 (WBV: 4.43 +/- 0.25 vs 4.45 +/- 0.61 mPa.sec, respectively). PLV and WBV at 0.512 sec (-1) s.r. were slightly higher, but not significantly, in group 1 than in group 2 (PLV: 1.47+/-0.13 vs 1.44 +/- 0.15 mPa.sec; p = 0.08 and WBV: 23.37 +/- 4.6 vs 22.54 +/- 3.90 mPa.sec; p = 0.07). DI was significantly lower in group 1 with respect to group 2 (4.05 +/- 2.93 vs 5.71 +/- 3.30, p < 0.0001). White blood count (WBC) was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (11464 +/- 3504 vs 7867 +/- 2162, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, these results demonstrate that in patients with acute coronary syndromes the antiaggregant effect of aspirin is modulated not only by the direct action on platelets, but also by erythrocyte deformability and white blood cell count.

Objectives: This study sought to compare the action of prasugrel and ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Background: It has been documented that prasugrel and ticagrelor are able to provide effective platelet inhibition 2 h after a loading dose (LD). However, the pharmacodynamic measurements after prasugrel and ticagrelor LD have been provided by assessing only healthy volunteers or subjects with stable coronary artery disease. Methods: Fifty patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI with bivalirudin monotherapy were randomized to receive 60 mg prasugrel LD (n = 25) or 180 mg ticagrelor LD (n = 25). Residual platelet reactivity was assessed by VerifyNow at baseline and 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after LD. Results: Platelet reactivity units (PRU) 2 h after the LD (study primary endpoint) were 217 (12 to 279) and 275 (88 to 305) in the prasugrel and ticagrelor groups, respectively (p = NS), satisfying pre-specified noninferiority criteria. High residual platelet reactivity (HRPR) (PRU ≥240) was found in 44% and 60% of patients (p = 0.258) at 2 h. The mean time to achieve a PRU <240 was 3 ± 2 h and 5 ± 4 h in the prasugrel and ticagrelor groups, respectively. The independent predictors of HRPR at 2 h were morphine use (odds ratio: 5.29; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 19.49; p = 0.012) and baseline PRU value (odds ratio: 1.014; 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.03; p = 0.046). Conclusions: In patients with STEMI, prasugrel showed to be noninferior as compared with ticagrelor in terms of residual platelet reactivity 2 h after the LD. The 2 drugs provide an effective platelet inhibition 2 h after the LD in only a half of patients, and at least 4 h are required to achieve an effective platelet inhibition in the majority of patients. Morphine use is associated with a delayed activity of these agents. (Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs Study, NCT01510171) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies have explored the association between hemorheologic alterations and aspirin resistance, pointing out the possible interaction between hematologic components and platelet responsiveness to antiplatelet drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between hemorheologic variables and residual platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on dual antiplatelet therapy. The study population included 528 patients with ACSs. Hemorheologic studies were performed by assessing whole blood viscosity at 0.512 and 94.5/second, plasma viscosity, and erythrocyte deformability index. Post-treatment platelet reactivity was investigated by measuring platelet aggregation by adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP) 10 μmol and a value >70% was defined as high ADP platelet reactivity. Significantly (p <0.01) lower values of hematocrit and erythrocyte deformability and higher values of whole blood viscosity at 94.5/second were found in patients with high ADP platelet reactivity. At multivariate analysis, lower values of hematocrit and erythrocyte deformability index and higher values of whole blood viscosity at 94.5/second and leukocytes (highest vs lowest tertile) also resulted in an independent association with high platelet reactivity, except for leukocytes, after simultaneous adjustment for hematocrit, leukocyte count, and erythrocyte deformability index. In conclusion, these results demonstrate the influence of hematocrit and of erythrocyte deformability on ADP platelet reactivity. These variables could be considered to optimize treatment with antiplatelet therapy in these patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]