Search

Background: Light transmission aggregation (LTA) is used widely by the clinical and research communities. Although it is a gold standard, there is a lack of interlaboratory harmonization., Objectives: The primary objective was to assess whether sources of activators (mainly adenosine diphosphate [ADP], collagen, arachidonic acid, epinephrine, and thrombin receptor activating peptide6) and ristocetin contribute to poor LTA reproducibility. The secondary objective was to evaluate interindividual variability of results to appreciate the distribution of normal values and consequently better interpret pathologic results., Methods: An international multicenter study involving 28 laboratories in which we compared LTA results obtained with center-specific activators and a comparator that we supplied., Results: We report variability in the potency (P) of activators in comparison with the comparator. Thrombin receptor activating peptide 6 (P, 1.32-2.68), arachidonic acid (P, 0.87-1.43), and epinephrine (P, 0.97-1.34) showed the greatest variability. ADP (P, 1.04-1.20) and ristocetin (P, 0.98-1.07) were the most consistent. The data highlighted clear interindividual variability, notably for ADP and epinephrine. Four profiles of responses were observed with ADP from high-responders, intermediate-responders, and low-responders. A fifth profile corresponding to nonresponders (5% of the individuals) was observed with epinephrine., Conclusion: Based on these data, the establishment and adoption of simple standardization principles should mitigate variability due to activator sources. The observation of huge interindividual variability for certain concentrations of activators should lead to a cautious interpretation before reporting a result as abnormal. Confidence can be taken from the fact that difference between sources is not exacerbated in patients treated with antiplatelet agents., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests M.L. has received speaker fees from Bayer, participated in industry-funded trials from Idorsia, served on advisory boards for Servier and JAMP/Orimed Pharma, and received in-kind support for investigator-initiated grants from Fujimori Kogyo. M.C.A. has received fees from Novo Nordisk, participated in industry-funded trials from Agrobio, participated in PIA-funded project in collaboration with Stago and Agrobio, and served on advisory boards for Novo Nordisk. U.J.S. has received research grants from Octapharma; consulting fees from Bayer, SOBI, CSL Behring, and Pfizer; and travel support from Bayer, SOBI, CSL Behring, Biotest, Takeda, and Leo Pharma. D.F. has received honorarium and travel support from Viatris. S.V. has received travel support from Stago. F.M. has received speaker fees from Fresenius, Technoclone, and Werfen. P.F. has received travel support from SOBI and Novo Nordisk. A.G. reports personal fees from Aspen, Bayer Vital, Chromatec, Instrumentation Laboratory, Portola, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, and GTH e.V.; grants from Ergomed, Boehringer Ingelheim, Rovi, Sagent, Biokit, Fa. Blau Farmaceutics, Prosensa/Biomarin, DRK-BSD Baden-Würtemberg/Hessen, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Robert-Koch-Institut, Dilaflor, and GIZ Else-Körner-Stiftung; grants and personal fees from Macopharma; grants and other fee from DRK-BSD NSTOB; and nonfinancial support from Veralox, Vakzine Projekt Management GmbH, AstraZeneca, and Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V. outside the submitted work. In addition, A.G. has a patent—screening methods for transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI)—with royalties paid to EP2321644, 18.05.2011. M.C. has received research grant from Agios Pharmaceuticals, Genentech Inc, and Novartis Inc; consulting fees from Novo Nordisk; and honoraria for board participation with Novo Nordisk, Takeda Inc, Genentech Inc, BPL Inc, CSL Behring Inc, and Genzyme Corp Agios Pharmaceuticals. C.P. has received research grant from Stago. I.D. has received travel support from Sobi, Takeda, and Novonordisk and speaker fees from Novonordisk. A.B. has received fees from Aguettant, Alexion, and Viatris. J.R. has received support from Instituto de Salud Carlos (PI20/00926 [ISCIII&Feder], PMP21/00052 [ISCIII&NG EU], and CB15/00055) and Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia (Ayuda a Grupo Español de Alteraciones Plaquetarias Congénitas). P.G. has received speaker’s fees from Sanofi and Roche, and honoraria for board participation with Viatris. M.R.C., M.C., C.L.-B., M.I.K., L.G., B.H., A.S., C.C., A.N.S., M.B., M.F., K.D., W.H., M.F.H., A.N.M., J.P.F., P.S., F.P., A.C., N.B., J.R., and D.L. have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Inflammatory mechanisms are activated, and thrombotic complications occur during the initial months after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Therefore, changes over time of platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte interactions after CABG are of interest. Whole-blood flow cytometry was performed before, and 4-6 days, one month, and three months after elective CABG in 54 men with stable coronary artery disease treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Single platelets and platelet-leukocyte aggregates (PLAs) among monocytes (P-Mon), neutrophils (P-Neu), and lymphocytes (P-Lym) were studied without and with stimulation by submaximal concentrations of ADP, thrombin, and the thromboxane analog U46619. White blood cell counts were increased during the initial postoperative course, and platelet counts were increased after one month. Platelet P-selectin expression was significantly enhanced at one month when stimulated by thrombin and U46619 and at three months with ADP and thrombin. All PLAs subtypes were increased at one month without stimulation in vitro . P-Mon and P-Neu stimulated by ADP, thrombin, or U46619 were significantly increased one month after the operation but decreased compared to baseline at three months. Agonist stimulated P-Lyms were increased at one month and remained increased at three months after ADP stimulation. There was significant platelet activation and formation of PLAs unstimulated and after agonist stimulation by ADP, thrombin, and a thromboxane analog after CABG in patients with stable coronary artery disease irrespective of ASA treatment. Changes observed up to three months after CABG support further studies of the clinical implications of protracted increases in platelet activation and platelet-leukocyte interactions.

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) treatment after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to reduce thrombotic vein graft occlusion. The optimal dosage of ASA is not known., Materials and Methods: Forty-two patients undergoing elective CABG were randomized to receive either ASA 75mg or 160mg once daily (OD) or 75mg twice daily (BID) after the operation. Platelet function testing was performed before, and one and three months after the operation., Results: White blood cell counts increased during the initial postoperative days whereas platelet counts were initially slightly reduced after the operation but increased after one month without any major changes of mean platelet volumes. Serum thromboxane B 2 was more effectively suppressed at one and three months after the operation with ASA 75mg BID or 160mg OD than with 75mg OD (p<0.001). ASA 75mg BID and 160mg OD were equally effective. Adenosine diphosphate stimulated platelet aggregation in whole blood (Multiplate®) was increased one and three months after the operation, and this was counteracted by ASA 75mg BID but not by 75 or 160mg OD. Arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was more effectively inhibited by 75mg BID or 160mg OD compared to 75mg OD at three months., Conclusions: Less effective inhibition of platelet activation was obtained with ASA 75mg OD than with ASA 160mg OD or 75mg BID up to three months after CABG. Especially the latter dose is of interest for further studies of efficacy and clinical outcomes after CABG., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is used worldwide for the investigation of heritable platelet function disorders (PFDs), but interpretation of results is complicated by the feedback effects of ADP and thromboxane A(2) (TxA(2)) and by the overlap with the response of healthy volunteers. Over 5 years, we have performed lumi-aggregometry on 9 platelet agonists in 111 unrelated research participants with suspected PFDs and in 70 healthy volunteers. Abnormal LTA or ATP secretion test results were identified in 58% of participants. In 84% of these, the patterns of response were consistent with defects in Gi receptor signaling, the TxA(2) pathway, and dense granule secretion. Participants with defects in signaling to Gq-coupled receptor agonists and to collagen were also identified. Targeted genotyping identified 3 participants with function-disrupting mutations in the P2Y(12) ADP and TxA(2) receptors. The results of the present study illustrate that detailed phenotypic analysis using LTA and ATP secretion is a powerful tool for the diagnosis of PFDs. Our data also enable subdivision at the level of platelet-signaling pathways and in some cases to individual receptors. We further demonstrate that most PFDs can be reliably diagnosed using a streamlined panel of key platelet agonists and specified concentrations suitable for testing in most clinical diagnostic laboratories.

Introduction: Intersubject variability in platelet response to aspirin could be related to genetic factors that regulate platelet enzymes or receptors. This study evaluates the impact of the selected polymorphisms in the COX-1 gene, the CYP5A1 gene, the P2RY1 receptor gene, and the GPIIbIIIa receptor gene on platelet response to aspirin and risk of suffering from major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)., Materials and Methods: 192 Caucasian patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with daily aspirin were recruited and followed for 3 years. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmission aggregometry with arachidonic acid (1.6 mM) and adenosine diphosphate (5, 10 or 20 μM) used as agonists. Genotyping was performed by standard PCR methods., Results: Arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was unaffected by the COX-1 22C/T and by the Pl(A1/A2) polymorphisms. However, carriers of the 1622 G/G genotype of the P2RY1 gene had significantly higher levels of arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation compared with non-carriers (AA 2.0%, AG 2.0% vs. GG 9.0%, p=0.047). Carrying the 1622 G/G genotype increased the risk of inadequate platelet response to aspirin, defined as arachidonic acid-induced aggregation ≥ 20%, by a factor of 8.5 (1.4 - 53.3, p=0.022) and the risk of 3-year MACCE by a factor of 7 (1.4 - 34.7, p=0.017)., Conclusion: The 1622A/G mutation of the P2RY1 gene could contribute to inadequate platelet response to aspirin and is associated with an increased risk of suffering from MACCE., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: When studying the efficacy of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation by light transmission aggregometry, technical decisions must be taken prior to assessment or during analysis, including, but not limited to, concentration of agonist to use and timing of the evaluation of the response on the aggregation curve obtained (peak ADP-stimulated platelet aggregation vs. late aggregation). We investigated how some of these technical modalities affected the results of platelet aggregation obtained after clopidogrel administration., Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty stable coronary artery disease patients requiring a diagnostic angiography were recruited prior to pre-treatment with clopidogrel. Blood samples were tested before clopidogrel initiation and immediately preceding coronary angiography using light transmission aggregometry with either 5 or 20 microM of ADP. Aggregation was measured at maximal amplitude (peak), and 5 minutes after agonist addition (late)., Results: While measurements of platelet aggregation as either peak or late aggregation were strongly correlated, peak platelet aggregation was significantly higher than late aggregation, by 10.8% and by 10.3% with ADP 5 and 20 microM, respectively. Moreover, the use of ADP 20 microM resulted in less spontaneous disaggregation than 5 microM in the absence of clopidogrel (11.8% and 4.8% with ADP 5 microM and 20 microM, respectively)., Conclusions: When assessing platelet aggregation following clopidogrel, measurement of late aggregation after addition of ADP 20 microM should be preferred. Large clinical trials should be conducted to assess which parameter between residual aggregation or inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel best predicts clinical efficacy of the drug.

This study sought to assess whether inadequate platelet responses to aspirin and clopidogrel are distinct phenomena caused by different mechanisms or different facets of the same phenomenon (i.e., general platelet hyperactivity). A total of 85 patients with stable coronary artery disease who were taking aspirin and clopidogrel daily for > or =3 months were enrolled in the present study. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) stimulated with 1.6 mM of arachidonic acid and 5, 10 and 20 microM of adenosine diphosphate, and by the VerifyNow Aspirin and VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care assays. An inadequate platelet response was defined as aggregation greater than or equal to the mean + 2 SDs. The prevalence of an inadequate platelet response varied greatly among the assays. For aspirin, the prevalence was 2.4% using arachidonic acid-induced LTA and 5.9% using the VerifyNow Aspirin assay. For clopidogrel, the prevalence varied from 1.2% to 3.9% using adenosine diphosphate-induced LTA and was 2.4% using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. The point-of-care assays did not select the same patients as LTA. No subject was unresponsive to both aspirin and clopidogrel, regardless of the assay used, suggesting that separate mechanisms govern platelet unresponsiveness to aspirin and clopidogrel. In conclusion, an inadequate platelet response to either aspirin or clopidogrel is rare, and the definition is dependent on the platelet function assay used. Because no subject was found to be unresponsive to both agents, the unresponsiveness is suspected to occur through distinct mechanisms of platelet activation.

Aims: We investigated the comparability of platelet function tests in quantifying platelet inhibition achieved by clopidogrel., Methods and Results: This pre-specified substudy of a randomized, double-blind trial included 116 patients with stable coronary artery disease requiring diagnostic angiography. Patients received clopidogrel for 1 (300 or 600 mg) or 7 days (300 + 75 or 150 mg daily) before the procedure. Blood samples obtained before clopidogrel initiation and before diagnostic coronary angiography were assayed using light transmission aggregometry [adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 5 and 20 microM as the agonist], whole-blood aggregometry (ADP 5 and 20 microM), PFA-100 (Collagen-ADP cartridge), and VerifyNow P2Y12. Although all assays studied were found sensitive to clopidogrel ingestion, none could distinguish categorically between patients who had, or not, ingested clopidogrel. Agreement between assays to identify patients with insufficient inhibition of platelet aggregation by clopidogrel was low., Conclusion: The assessment of platelet function inhibition by clopidogrel is highly test-specific. Decision to increase clopidogrel dosage may vary on the basis of the assay used, thus highlighting the need for unambiguous guidelines with respect to assay selection, as platelet function assays are not interchangeable. At present, platelet function testing evaluating clopidogrel efficacy cannot be recommended in routine clinical practice.