Search

Abstract: Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure performed to reconstruct cranial defects. The most common cranioplasty materials used today can be divided into 2 types: autologous bone and bone substitutes, such as polyetheretherketone, titanium mesh, poly-methyl methacrylate, and Hydroxyapatite (HA). Infection represents one of the most feared complications, ranging from 2.3% to 20%. Early implant infections occur within 30 days from the operation and are mostly due to pathogens from the skin and the paranasal cavity. The authors aim to demonstrate the efficacy of our preoperative antibiotic immersion protocol of custom-made HA prosthesis, to prevent early implant infections. The authors compare this population to cranioplasties without preoperative antibiotic elution and those with anonstandardized antibiotic elution. The authors retrospectively analyzed data from patients referred to 6 different hospitals in northern Italy, in the period 2000 to 2020. Inclusion criteria were patients requiring reconstruction of thecal bone with HA prosthesis after post-traumatic decompressive surgery; age more than 18 years; detailed patient history and clinical data; and follow-up of minimum 6 months. A total of 77 cranioplasties were included in the study, along with 120 retrospective cases in comparison. Infections occurred in 2.6% of cranioplasties with antibiotic immersion compared to 7.8% of cranioplasties without. Even if nonsignificant, these results support our hypothesis that pretreatment of HA implants with antibiotic appears to prevent cranioplasty infections and could be a viable option to improve cranioplasty outcomes in the future., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Cranioplasty is a common neurosurgical procedure with the goal of restoring skull integrity. Custom-made porous hydroxyapatite prostheses have long been used for cranial reconstruction in patients with traumatic brain injury. We present a large consecutive series of 2 groups of patients undergoing cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite custom bone and compare the adverse events (AEs) between the 2 groups., Methods: We examined a series of consecutive patients who underwent cranioplasty using custom-made porous hydroxyapatite implants following tumor resection and traumatic brain injury at a single center between March 2003 and May 2018. The implants were designed and produced according to the surgeon's specifications and based on the patient's computed tomography scan data obtained through a standardized protocol. AEs were recorded., Results: Information on 38 patients with tumor and 39 patients with traumatic brain injury was collected and analyzed. A significant difference in the timing of surgery was found between the 2 groups; single-stage surgery was performed in 84% of patients in the tumor versus 8% of those in the traumatic brain injury group (P < 0.0001). The rate of AEs was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.4309) and was not related to the timing of surgery., Conclusions: Custom-made hydroxyapatite cranioplasty is a solution for cranial reconstruction in patients with cranial tumors. The low incidence of AEs in a consecutive series of patients with either trauma or tumors demonstrates that these prostheses represent a safe solution independent of the characteristics of cases., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

After failing of autologous cranioplasty or when the bone flap is unavailable, the alloplastic (heterologous) materials are the choice for cranial reconstruction. No agreement has been reported about the material with a significant lower risk of septic complications. This is due to extremely heterogeneous prognostic factors related not only to the material used but also to the surgical procedures and/or to the timing of the procedure. More attention should be focused on the material whose characteristic could enable a delay in bacterial colonization, where an antibiotic therapy could be effective, without need of prosthesis removal. Four cases of severe septic complication following cranioplasty with porous hydroxyapatite (HA) prosthesis are presented. Patients were conservatively treated, without heterologous bone flap removal. All of our patients presented reasons for delaying HA cranioplasty removal: patients #1, 3, and 4 had an associated shunted hydrocephalus and the need for not removing the prosthesis was related to the predictable recurrence of overshunting and/or sinking skin flap syndrome. In patient #4, the revision surgery would have also damaged the microvascular flap with latissimus dorsi muscle used by plastic surgeon for skin reconstruction. In patient #2, the patient refused revision surgery. In all cases, systemic and/or radiological signs of infection were observed. In patient #2 the infective process surrounded completely the HA prosthesis, while it was located in the epidural region in patients #1 and 4. In patient #3, a surgical curettage of the infected wound was performed over the HA prosthesis. Following prosthesis retention management with antibiotic therapy, all patients revealed systemic and/or radiological signs of sepsis resolution at follow-up. The possibility to avoid a prosthesis removal with effective antibiotic treatment is mainly due to the combination of three factors: targeted antibiotic therapy, good anatomical area revascularization (resulting of an "in situ" intake of antibiotics), and the biomimetism of HA prosthesis. Further investigations in a larger number of cases need to confirm these observations.

Cranioplasty remains a difficult procedure for all craniofacial surgeons, particularly when concerning the reconstruction of large lacunae in the skull. Considering the significant clinical and economic impact of the procedure, the search for materials and strategies to provide more comfortable and reliable surgical procedures is one of the most important challenges faced by modern craniofacial medicine.The purpose of this study was to compare the available data regarding the safety and clinical efficacy of materials and techniques currently used for the reconstruction of the skull. Accordingly, the scientific databases were searched for the following keywords autologous bone, biomaterials, cranial reconstruction, cranioplasty, hydroxyapatite, polyetheretherketone, polymethylmethacrylate, and titanium. This literature review emphasizes the benefits and weaknesses of each considered material commonly used for cranioplasty, especially in terms of infectious complications, fractures, and morphological outcomes.As regards the latter, this appears to be very similar among the different materials when custom three-dimensional modeling is used for implant development, suggesting that this criterion is strongly influenced by implant design. However, the overall infection rate can vary from 0% to 30%, apparently dependent on the type of material used, likely in virtue of the wide variation in their chemico-physical composition. Among the different materials used for cranioplasty implants, synthetics such as polyetheretherketone, polymethylmethacrylate, and titanium show a higher primary tear resistance, whereas hydroxyapatite and autologous bone display good biomimetic properties, although the latter has been ascribed a variable reabsorption rate of between 3% and 50%.In short, all cranioplasty procedures and materials have their advantages and disadvantages, and none of the currently available materials meet the criteria required for an ideal implant. Hence, the choice of cranioplasty materials is still essentially reliant on the surgeon's preference.

Introduction: Large cranial defects still represent a challenge in neurosurgery. Currently different biomaterials are available for cranial reconstruction including titanium, acrylic mesh and different types of calcium phosphate-based bone grafts. The goal of surgery is a perfect fit of the implant without infection and absorption, and a good aesthetic result. This paper describes a surgical method for cranioplasty, using a customised porous hydroxyapatite (HA) prosthesis., Materials and Methods: Sixty patients treated surgically with a customised porous-HA prosthesis for large cranial defects, were followed retrospectively. A two-year follow-up was carried out with periodic visits and CT scans. Safety (the incidence of adverse events and fractures of the implant) and clinical performance (biological and cosmetic results) were evaluated., Results: Fifty one patients were followed-up, no rejection occurred and only one case of infection was recorded. Five patients had minor surgery-related complications, and no spontaneous implant fractures or mobilisation were reported. Three patients exhibited implant fractures as a result of trauma and all healed spontaneously. All patients showed a satisfactory clinical outcome with good cosmetic appearance in the early postoperative period and after a long-term follow-up., Conclusions: Cranioplasty performed with a customised porous-HA prosthesis gave a positive outcome, showing it to be an appropriate technique for use in large and complex cranial reconstruction., (Copyright © 2011 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Scalp reconstruction has always been a challenging task. In our case, we report the use of INTEGRA Dermal Regeneration Flap, together with a cranioplasty for complex scalp defect. We have obtained not only an appropriate coverage of the cranial bone, but also an optimal aesthetic result., Method: We present a 24-year-old patient with a history of severe cranial trauma with sinking of the frontal bone with dural laceration and large bilateral frontal lacerocontusive focus. First, he had undergone reconstruction with the aid of autologous bone, metallic mesh, and titanium plates at a different clinical center. He arrived to our attention with exposure of the fixation devices, as well as part of the titanium plate used for the primary reconstruction. His general conditions could not allow a complex reconstructive procedure such as microsurgical flaps. The use of INTEGRA allowed us to reach the goal of a good and appropriate reconstruction, without exposing the patient to a higher-risk procedure. After the creation of a custom-made cranial implant in porous hydroxyapatite, the patient has undergone cranial bone remodeling to reach a homogeneous contour of the forehead profile. After the positioning of the implant, a single-layer INTEGRA regeneration template has been placed between the implant itself and the hypotrophic and thinned skin layer., Conclusions: The postoperative result after 16 months allowed us to observe a normal forehead profile with a normal thickness, good skin texture, and well-hidden scars.