Search

The EAST coherent modes (CMs) during the inter-ELM phase are simulated by the electromagnetic six-field two-fluid module in BOUT++ framework. The fluctuation level of the electrostatic potential, electron pressure and density perturbations are comparable to the experiments, and the simulated electrostatic perturbation is around two orders of magnitude larger than the magnetic one in EAST CM. The frequency and poloidal wave number are consistent with experiments in the simulations of EAST CM equilibriums. The energy transfer between three-wave coupling indicates that the energy tends to transfer from medium-n to low-n modes in the early nonlinear phase, and the modes coupling effect in the nonlinear saturation phase is larger than that in the early nonlinear phase. Both the energy transfer and bispectral analysis show that the Ni fluctuation tends to generate the ‘single-mode’ coupling and Te tends to be ‘multiple-mode’, which indicates that the collapse of the density profile is larger than the electron temperature. The relative phase analysis is applied to evaluate whether the turbulence can extract the energy from density and temperature profiles. The result indicates that the density profile provides much more energy to drive the turbulence than electron temperature. The kinetic and magnetic energy transfer rates are used to understand the instability and turbulence driving mechanisms of the EAST CM. In the linear phase of the nonlinear simulation, the instability is driven by the peeling-ballooning mode and drift-Alfven wave (DAW), and the radial electric field and shear Alfven wave have large suppressing effects. The turbulence of EAST CM is a predominantly electrostatic mode, which corresponds to the Reynolds stress seven times larger than Maxwell stress. In addition, the effect of the electrostatic part in DAW is much larger than the electromagnetic one. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

By analyzing large quantities of discharges in the unfavorable ion drift direction, I-mode operation has been confirmed in the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak. During the L-mode to I-mode transition, the energy confinement is improvement substantially by the formation of a high-temperature edge pedestal, while the particle confinement remains almost identical to that in the L-mode. Similar with I-mode observations on other devices, the Er profiles obtained by the eight-channel Doppler backscattering system (DBS8) (Hu et al 2017 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88 073504) show a deeper edge Er well in the I-mode than that in the L-mode. Additionally a weak coherent mode (WCM) with the frequency range of 40–150 kHz is observed at the edge plasma with the radial extent of about 2–3 cm. WCM could be observed in both density fluctuation and radial electric field fluctuation, and the bicoherence analyses showed significant couplings between WCM and high frequency turbulence, implying that the Er fluctuation and the caused flow shear from WCM should play an important role during I-mode operation. In addition, a low-frequency oscillation with a frequency range of 5–10 kHz is always accompanied with WCM, where the geodesic acoustic model intensity decreases or disappears. The evidence shows that the a low-frequency oscillation may be a novel kind of limited cycle oscillation but further investigation is needed to explain the new properties such as the harmonics and obvious magnetic perturbations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The turbulence and flows at the plasma edge during the L–I–H, L–I–L and single-step L–H transitions have been measured directly using two reciprocating Langmuir probe systems at the outer midplane with several newly designed probe arrays in the EAST superconducting tokamak. The E × B velocity, turbulence level and turbulent Reynolds stress at ∼1 cm inside the separatrix ramp-up in the last ∼20 ms preceding the single-step L–H transition, but remain nearly constant near the separatrix, indicating an increase in the radial gradients at the plasma edge. The kinetic energy transfer rate from the edge turbulence to the E × B flows is significantly enhanced only in the last ∼10 ms and peaks just prior to the L–H transition. The E × B velocity measured inside the separatrix, which is typically in the electron diamagnetic drift direction in the L-mode, decays towards the ion diamagnetic drift direction in response to fluctuation suppression at the onset of the single-step L–H, L–I–L as well as L–I–H transitions. One important distinction between the L–I–H and the L–I–L transitions has been observed, with respect to the evolution of the edge pressure gradient and mean E × B flow during the I-phase. Both of them ramp up gradually during the L–I–H transition, but change little during the L–I–L transition, which may indicate that a gradual buildup of the edge pedestal and mean E × B flow during the I-phase leads to the final transition into the H-mode. In addition, the transition data in EAST strongly suggest that the divertor pumping capability is an important ingredient in determining the transition behaviour and power threshold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]