1. Improvement of production yield and extraction efficacy of recombinant protein by high endosperm-specific expression along with simultaneous suppression of major seed storage proteins
- Author
-
Kenji Sekikawa, Yuhya Wakasa, Fumio Takaiwa, and Kenjirou Ozawa
- Subjects
TGF-β ,0106 biological sciences ,0301 basic medicine ,Immunoblotting ,Rice endosperm ,Plant Science ,Endoplasmic Reticulum ,01 natural sciences ,Endosperm ,03 medical and health sciences ,RNA interference ,Glutelin ,Transforming Growth Factor beta ,Genetics ,Storage protein ,Prolamin ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,Microscopy, Confocal ,biology ,Seed Storage Proteins ,food and beverages ,Promoter ,Oryza ,General Medicine ,Plants, Genetically Modified ,Genetically modified rice ,Molecular farming ,Crop Production ,030104 developmental biology ,Biochemistry ,chemistry ,Seeds ,biology.protein ,Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel ,Oleosin ,ER stress ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Human transforming growth factor-β1 (hTGF-β1) was produced in transgenic rice seeds. To boost its production yield and to extract it simply, it was expressed under the control of seed-specific promoters along with the simultaneous suppression of endogenous seed storage proteins (SSPs) through RNA interference (RNAi). When driven by the 26 kDa α-globulin endosperm-specific promoter, it accumulated up to the markedly high level of 452 μg/grain. However, exchange with other seed-specific promoters such as 18 kDa oleosin and AGPase promoters resulted in remarkable reduction to the levels of 62 and 48 μg/grain, respectively, even though endogenous SSPs were reduced to the similar level. These production levels were almost similar to those (42 and 108 μg/grain) produced by the glutelin GluB-1 endosperm-specific promoter and the maize ubiquitin constitutive promoter without reduction of SSPs, respectively. When extracted from these transgenic rice seeds with reduced SSPs with various buffers, it could be solubilized with denaturant solution, which was in remarkable contrast with those without depressed SSPs which required further supplementation of reducing agent for extraction. This difference was associated with the fact that it was mainly deposited to ER-derived structures though self-aggregation or interaction with remaining prolamin via intermolecular disulfide bonds.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF