Search

Studies of cytoplasmic-nuclear trafficking of the glucocorticoid receptor in mammalian cells suggest that the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone system and the hsp90-binding immunophilin FKBP52 are involved in targeted movement of the receptor along microtubule tracts. Over the past few years, plant cells have been found to possess a similar multiprotein chaperone machinery. Plant cells also contain high molecular weight FKBPs that bind to plant hsp90 via a conserved protein interaction involving tetratricopeptide repeat domains. The hsp90/hsp70-based machinery and the plant FKBPs might be used to target the trafficking of signalling proteins in plants.

Protein import into chloroplasts is initiated by a binding interaction between a precursor protein and the surface of the outer envelope. The binding step was previously shown to be energy-dependent (Olsen, L. J., Theg, S. M., Selman, B. R., and Keegstra, K. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 6724-6729). We took advantage of the broad nucleotide specificity of the energy requirement for binding to investigate the site of the nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) requirement. GTP supported precursor binding to chloroplasts. It was not converted to ATP, as determined by direct ATP measurements, and was not transported across the inner envelope. Thus, GTP supported binding from either the intermembrane space or outside the outer membrane. To distinguish between an intermembrane space and an external NTP requirement, we experimentally manipulated the NTP levels inside and outside chloroplasts. Internally generated ATP was able to support binding in the presence of an external membrane-impermeant ATP trap. Therefore, since GTP supported binding from either the intermembrane space or outside the chloroplast, and ATP supported binding from either the intermembrane space or the stroma, we concluded that the site of NTP utilization for precursor binding to chloroplasts was the intermembrane space between the two envelope membranes.

The energy requirements for the import of nuclear-encoded proteins into isolated chloroplasts have been reinvestigated. We have shown that, in contrast to protein import into mitochondria, the translocation of the precursors to ferredoxin, plastocyanin (prPC) and the small subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (prSS) across all chloroplastic membranes is independent of a protonmotive force and requires only ATP. This extends previous works in which investigations were limited to prSS and demonstrates that our results are probably general to all chloroplastic protein precursors. Our results are particularly interesting for the import of prPC, since in addition to the two envelope membranes, this protein must traverse the energy-transducing thylakoid membranes en route to its proper location in the thylakoid lumen. This lack of involvement of a protonmotive force, specifically of a transmembrane electric potential, demonstrates that separate mechanisms operate during the import of proteins into chloroplasts and mitochondria. We also examined the question of whether ATP is utilized inside or outside of chloroplasts during protein import. Previous attempts to resolve this question have resulted in conflicting answers. We found, by two independent approaches, that ATP for protein import is utilized inside chloroplasts. The implications of these results on the possible mechanisms of protein import into chloroplasts are discussed.

One of the first steps in the transport of nuclear-encoded, cytoplasmically synthesized precursor proteins into chloroplasts is a specific binding interaction between precursor proteins and the surface of the organelle. Although protein translocation into chloroplasts requires ATP hydrolysis, binding is generally thought to be energy independent. A more detailed investigation of precursor binding to the surface of chloroplasts showed that ATP was required for efficient binding. Protein translocation is known to require relatively high levels (1 mM or more) of ATP. As little as 50-100 microM ATP caused significant stimulation of precursor binding over controls with no ATP. Several different precursors were tested and all showed increased binding upon addition of low levels of ATP. Nonhydrolyzable analogs of ATP did not substitute for ATP, indicating that ATP hydrolysis was required for binding. A protonmotive force was not involved in the energy requirement for binding. Other (hydrolyzable) nucleotides could substitute for ATP but were less effective at stimulating binding. Binding was stimulated by ATP generated inside chloroplasts even when an ATP trap was present to destroy external ATP. We conclude that internal ATP is required for stimulation of precursor binding to chloroplasts.