Search

Objective: This study aimed to review the effect of endometriosis on the prevalence of placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant patients and the surgical outcomes of pregnant patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa., Data Sources: In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was conducted on December 31, 2020, using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library., Study Eligibility Criteria: Comparative studies between pregnant women with and without endometriosis and studies that investigated the surgical outcomes of patients with and without endometriosis developing placenta previa were included., Methods: Here, 2 reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, completed data extraction, and assessed the reporting quality using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool., Results: Overall, 19 studies (from 2010 to 2020) met the inclusion criteria (98,463 pregnancies with endometriosis and 7,184,313 pregnancies without endometriosis). In the adjusted pooled analysis, endometriosis was associated with a higher rate of placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio, 3.17; 95% confidence interval, 2.58-3.89), whereas the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was similar between pregnant women with and without endometriosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.34). When the analysis was restricted to histologically confirmed endometriosis cases, the relationship of endometriosis with placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-10.30) and postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-3.34) was consistent with results from the nonrestricted analysis. There was no study that examined the surgical outcomes of patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa patients. However, there are 3 studies that examined the effect of endometriosis on surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery: 1 study showing that endometriosis was associated with increased intraoperative bleeding during emergent cesarean delivery; the other study showing that endometriosis was associated with an increased incidence of postpartum hemorrhage during cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.2), especially in primiparous women with singleton pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.0); and another study suggesting a significantly higher rate of hysterectomy (7.1%) and bladder injury (7.1%) in patients with endometriosis than in those without endometriosis., Conclusion: Endometriosis can potentially be associated with adverse surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery. Although there is a correlation between endometriosis and increased rate of placenta previa, the surgical outcomes of patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa remain understudied., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A diagnostic sign on magnetic resonance imaging, suggestive of posterior extrauterine adhesion (PEUA), was identified in patients with placenta previa. However, the clinical features or surgical outcomes of patients with placenta previa and PEUA are unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of placenta previa with PEUA and determine whether an altered management strategy improved surgical outcomes., Methods: This single institution retrospective study examined patients with placenta previa who underwent cesarean delivery between 2014 and 2019. In June 2017, we recognized that PEUA was associated with increased intraoperative bleeding; thus, we altered the management of patients with placenta previa and PEUA. To assess the relationship between changes in practice and surgical outcomes, a quasi-experimental method was used to examine the difference-in-difference before (pre group) and after (post group) the changes. Surgical management was modified as follows: (i) minimization of uterine exteriorization and adhesion detachment during cesarean delivery and (ii) use of Nelaton catheters for guiding cervical passage during Bakri balloon insertion. To account for patient characteristics, propensity score matching and multivariate regression analyses were performed., Results: The study cohort (n = 141) comprised of 24 patients with placenta previa and PEUA (PEUA group) and 117 non-PEUA patients (control group). The PEUA patients were further categorized into the pre (n = 12) and post groups (n = 12) based on the changes in surgical management. Total placenta previa and posterior placentas were more likely in the PEUA group than in the control group (66.7% versus 42.7% [P = 0.04] and 95.8% versus 63.2% [P < 0.01], respectively). After propensity score matching (n = 72), intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the PEUA group (n = 24) than in the control group (n = 48) (1515 mL versus 870 mL, P < 0.01). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that PEUA was a significant risk factor for intraoperative bleeding before changes were implemented in practice (t = 2.46, P = 0.02). Intraoperative blood loss in the post group was successfully reduced, as opposed to in the pre group (1180 mL versus 1827 mL, P = 0.04)., Conclusions: PEUA was associated with total placenta previa, posterior placenta, and increased intraoperative bleeding in patients with placenta previa. Our altered management could reduce the intraoperative blood loss.

We aimed to identify a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) feature that can predict posterior extrauterine adhesion (posterior adhesion) antenatally, in patients with placenta previa. We retrospectively reviewed patients with placenta previa who underwent a preoperative MRI examination of placenta accreta spectrum. We categorized the patients into two groups based on whether the cervix was anterior or posterior to a line perpendicular to the anatomical conjugate on the MRI. We projected the perpendicular line toward a straight line through the broad of the back on T2-weighted sagittal MRI images and measured the angle between this line and the line passing through the cervical canal. We analyzed the correlation of the cervical canal angle with the presence of posterior adhesions. Of the 96 patients analyzed, 71 patients had an anteverted cervix and 25 patients had a retroverted cervix. There were 21 posterior adhesions. The adhesion rate was significantly higher in patients with a retroverted cervix than those with an anteverted cervix (8.5% vs. 60%; p = 0.00). The cervical canal angle was ≤10° in 25 patients; of these 17 had adhesions (sensitivity, 81.0%; specificity, 89.3%; area under the curve, 0.887; 95% confidence interval, 0.792–0.981). This finding, labeled "positive horizontal cervix sign," may be a promising indicator of posterior adhesions in patients with placenta previa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]