Search

Abstract: The phase 3 ASPEN trial (NCT03053440) compared Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis), zanubrutinib and ibrutinib, in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Post-hoc biomarker analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing on pretreatment bone marrow samples from 98 patients treated with zanubrutinib and 92 patients treated with ibrutinib with mutated (MUT) MYD88 and 20 patients with wild-type (WT) MYD88 treated with zanubrutinib. Of 329 mutations in 52 genes, mutations in CXCR4 (25.7%), TP53 (24.8%), ARID1A (15.7%), and TERT (9.0%) were most common. TP53MUT, ARID1AMUT, and TERTMUT were associated with higher rates of CXCR4MUT (P < .05). Patients with CXCR4MUT (frameshift or nonsense [NS] mutations) had lower very good partial response (VGPR) and complete response rates (CR; 17.0% vs 37.2%, P = .020) and longer time to response (11.1 vs 8.4 months) than patients with CXCR4WT treated with BTKis. CXCR4NS was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 3.39; P = .017) in patients treated with ibrutinib but not in those treated with zanubrutinib (HR, 0.67; P = .598), but VGPR + CR rates were similar between treatment groups (14.3% vs 15.4%). Compared with ibrutinib, patients with CXCR4NS treated with zanubrutinib had a favorable major response rate (MRR; 85.7% vs 53.8%; P = .09) and PFS (HR, 0.30; P = .093). In patients with TP53MUT, significantly lower MRRs were observed for patients treated with ibrutinib (63.6% vs 85.7%; P = .04) but not for those treated with zanubrutinib (80.8% vs 81.9%; P = .978). In TP53MUT, compared with ibrutinib, patients treated with zanubrutinib had higher VGPR and CR (34.6% vs 13.6%; P < .05), numerically improved MRR (80.8% vs 63.6%; P = .11), and longer PFS (not reached vs 44.2 months; HR, 0.66; P = .37). Collectively, patients with WM with CXCR4MUT or TP53MUT had worse prognosis compared with patients with WT alleles, and zanubrutinib led to better clinical outcomes., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Zanubrutinib has been approved for treating patients with different lymphoproliferative disorders and now represents a significant breakthrough in treating relapsed/refractory and previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Because few systematic studies or comparative randomized clinical trials have been conducted, optimal use of zanubrutinib in approved indications may be challenging. This article presents the results of a group discussion among an ad hoc constituted panel of experts to identify and address unmet clinical needs (UCNs) in using zanubrutinib in patients with CLL. Key UCNs were selected according to the criterion of clinical relevance using the Delphi process. Panel members reviewed the results of first-line and upstream controlled trials in which the efficacy and toxicity profile of zanubrutinib and other BTK inhibitors were investigated in patients with CLL. Based on a critical discussion of data, the panel produced recommendations for using zanubrutinib and proposals for new studies to increase the evidence for the optimal treatment of patients with CLL. The recommendations given by the panel are intended for use not only by expert centers but, above all, by less experienced hematologists as well as general practitioners., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Mutations in BTK, PLCG2, and BCL2 have been reported in patients with progressive disease (PD) on continuous single-agent BTK or BCL2 inhibitor treatment. We tested for these mutations in samples from patients with PD after completion of first-line treatment with fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the phase II CAPTIVATE study., Patients and Methods: A total of 191 patients completed fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax (three cycles of ibrutinib then 12-13 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax). Genomic risk features [del(11q), del(13q), del(17p), trisomy 12, complex karyotype, unmutated IGHV, TP53 mutated] and mutations in genes recurrently mutated in CLL (ATM, BIRC3, BRAF, CHD2, EZH2, FBXW7, MYD88, NOTCH1, POT1, RPS15, SF3B1, XPO1) were assessed at baseline in patients with and without PD at data cutoff; gene variants and resistance-associated mutations in BTK, PLCG2, or BCL2 were evaluated at PD., Results: Of 191 patients completing fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax, with median follow-up of 38.9 months, 29 (15%) developed PD. No baseline risk feature or gene mutation was significantly associated with development of PD. No previously reported resistance-associated mutations in BTK, PLCG2, or BCL2 were detected at PD in 25 patients with available samples. Of the 29 patients with PD, 19 have required retreatment (single-agent ibrutinib, n = 16, or ibrutinib plus venetoclax, n = 3); 17 achieved partial response or better, 1 achieved stable disease, and 1 is pending response assessment., Conclusions: First-line fixed-duration combination treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax may mitigate development of resistance mechanisms associated with continuous single-agent targeted therapies, allowing for effective retreatment. See related commentary by Al-Sawaf and Davids, p. 471., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Aim ASPEN is a randomized, open-label, Phase III study comparing zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Materials & methods: Patient-reported outcomes were exploratory end points assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L VAS scores. Results: Overall, 201 patients (102 zanubrutinib; 99 ibrutinib) were enrolled. Clinically meaningful differences were observed in diarrhea and nausea/vomiting in both the intent-to-treat population and in patients attaining very good partial response (VGPR) in earlier cycles of treatment, as well as in long-term physical functioning and fatigue in patients achieving VGPR. Conclusion: Treatment with zanubrutinib was associated with greater improvements in health-related quality of life compared with ibrutinib in patients with WM and MYD88 mutations. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03053440 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) predominantly affects the elderly, limited data exists about the outcomes of over 80-year-old patients, usually underrepresented in clinical trials. We conducted a multicenter study enrolling 79 consecutive CLL patients ≥80 years at the time of frontline therapy, all treated with ibrutinib. Nearly 48% of cases exhibited unmutated IGHV genes, 32% 17p deletion, and 39.2% TP53 mutations; 63.3% displayed a cumulative illness rating scale (CIRS) > 6. The overall response rate on ibrutinib, computed in 74/79 patients (5 patients excluded for early withdrawal), was 89.9%. After a median follow-up of 28.9 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 42.5 and 51.8 months, respectively. CIRS>6 and temporary discontinuation of ibrutinib lasting for 7-30 days were the only parameters associated with a significantly shorter PFS and were both relevant in predicting a shorter PFS compared to patients with CIRS≤6 and therapy discontinuation ≤7 days. The most common grade≥3 adverse events were infections (25.5%), neutropenia (10.1%), and anemia (2.5%). Eighteen patients (22.8%) experienced a cardiovascular event, including grade-2 atrial fibrillation (n = 9; 11%), grade-2 hypertension (n = 5; 6%), heart failure (n = 3; 3%), and acute coronary syndrome (n = 1; 1%). Mild bleeding events were observed in 27 patients (34.2%). Ibrutinib was permanently discontinued in 26 patients due to progressive disease (n = 11, including 5 Richter's syndromes), secondary malignancies (n = 6), infections (n = 3), cardiac failure (n = 3), severe bleeding (n = 2), and sudden death (n = 1). In conclusion, our analyses confirmed the overall effectiveness and favorable safety profile of the ibrutinib-single agent therapeutic approach in CLL patients ≥80 years., (© 2024 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III iNNOVATE study showed sustained efficacy of ibrutinib-rituximab in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Here, we present the final analysis from iNNOVATE., Methods: Patients had confirmed symptomatic WM, either previously untreated or previously treated; patients with prior rituximab had at least a minor response to their last rituximab-based regimen. Patients were randomly assigned to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg plus rituximab or placebo plus rituximab (n = 75 per arm). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included response rate, time to next treatment, hemoglobin improvement, overall survival, and safety., Results: With a median follow-up of 50 (range, 0.5-63) months, median (95% CI) PFS was not reached (57.7 months to not evaluable) with ibrutinib-rituximab versus 20.3 months (13.0 to 27.6) with placebo-rituximab (hazard ratio, 0.250; P < .0001). PFS benefit was regardless of prior treatment status, MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status, or key patient characteristics. Higher response rates (partial response or better) were observed with ibrutinib-rituximab (76% v 31% with placebo-rituximab; P < .0001) and were sustained over time. Median time to next treatment was not reached with ibrutinib-rituximab versus 18 months with placebo-rituximab. More patients receiving ibrutinib-rituximab versus placebo-rituximab had sustained hemoglobin improvement (77% v 43%; P < .0001). Median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Ibrutinib-rituximab maintained a manageable safety profile; the prevalence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events of clinical interest generally decreased over time., Conclusion: In the final analysis of iNNOVATE with a median follow-up of 50 months, ibrutinib-rituximab showed ongoing superiority across clinical outcomes in patients with WM regardless of MYD88 or CXCR4 mutation status, prior treatment, and key patient characteristics., Competing Interests: Christian BuskeHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Janssen, BeiGene, Novartis, Pfizer, Incyte, AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Celltrion, MorphoSys, RegeneronConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Roche, Pfizer, BeiGene, Celltrion, AbbVie, Incyte, Regeneron, MorphoSys, NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: Roche, Janssen, BeiGene, Celltrion, AbbVie, Pfizer, Gilead SciencesResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech, Janssen, Celltrion, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen, Alessandra TedeschiConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, AbbVieSpeakers' Bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, BeiGene Judith TrotmanResearch Funding: BeiGene, Roche/Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, CelgeneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche/Genentech Ramón García-SanzHonoraria: Janssen, Takeda, Amgen, BeiGene, NovartisConsulting or Advisory Role: JanssenResearch Funding: Gilead Sciences, IncytePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: BIOMED-2 primersTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen, Takeda (I)Other Relationship: Spanish Society of Hematology (SEHH) David MacDonaldResearch Funding: Celgene, Servier Veronique LeblondHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Roche Pharma AG, BeiGene, Amgen, Janssen Oncology, AbbVie, MSD Oncology, LillyConsulting or Advisory Role: BeiGene, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Lilly, AbbVieSpeakers' Bureau: BeiGene, AstraZeneca, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Charles HerbauxHonoraria: Roche, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVieResearch Funding: TakedaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, Roche Jeffrey V. MatousConsulting or Advisory Role: Pharmacyclics, BeiGene Constantine S. TamHonoraria: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, Novartis, BeiGene, PharmacyclicsConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Loxo, Roche, AbbVieResearch Funding: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie Leonard T. HeffnerSpeakers' Bureau: Kite, a Gilead companyResearch Funding: Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Kite, a Gilead Company, ADC Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Loxo, Cellectar Marzia VarettoniConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Janssen, AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, Janssen Lia PalombaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Seres Therapeutics (I)Honoraria: Flagship Biosciences (I), Evelo Therapeutics (I), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (I), Therakos (I), Amgen (I), Merck (I), Seres Therapeutics (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: Flagship Biosciences (I), Novartis (I), Evelo Therapeutics (I), Jazz Pharmaceuticals (I), Therakos (I), Amgen (I), Merck (I), Seres Therapeutics (I), Kite, a Gilead Company, BeiGeneResearch Funding: Seres Therapeutics (I)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Intellectual Property Rights (I), Juno Intellectual Property Rights Chaim ShustikExpert Testimony: Janssen Oncology Efstathios KastritisHonoraria: Amgen, Genesis Pharma, Janssen Oncology, Takeda, Prothena, PfizerConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Janssen Oncology, Takeda, Genesis Pharma, Prothena, PfizerResearch Funding: Janssen Oncology, AmgenTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen Oncology, Genesis Pharma, Takeda, Pfizer Steven P. TreonConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen, Pharmacyclics, BeiGene, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers SquibbResearch Funding: Pharmacyclics, Bristol Myers Squibb, X4 Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, BeiGene, AbbViePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: My institution holds patents related to the use of MYD88 and CXCR4 testing for which a predetermined financial distribution to the laboratory and individuals is provided. I have not received any income to this date related to these patents.Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Janssen OncologyOther Relationship: Janssen, Pharmacyclics, BeiGene Jerry PingEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Bernhard HaunsEmployment: AbbVie/PharmacyclicsStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie Israel Arango-HisijaraEmployment: Janssen Oncology, Abbvie/PharmacyclicsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, AbbvieHonoraria: Janssen Oncology, Abbvie/Pharmacyclics Meletios A. DimopoulosHonoraria: Amgen, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Janssen-Cilag, Takeda, Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGeneNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: CAPTIVATE (NCT02910583), a randomized phase II study, evaluates minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided treatment discontinuation following completion of first-line ibrutinib plus venetoclax treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)., Methods: Previously untreated CLL patients age < 70 years received three cycles of ibrutinib and then 12 cycles of combined ibrutinib plus venetoclax. Patients in the MRD cohort who met the stringent random assignment criteria for confirmed undetectable MRD (Confirmed uMRD) were randomly assigned 1:1 to double-blind placebo or ibrutinib; patients without Confirmed uMRD (uMRD Not Confirmed) were randomly assigned 1:1 to open-label ibrutinib or ibrutinib plus venetoclax. Primary end point was 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate with placebo versus ibrutinib in the Confirmed uMRD population. Secondary end points included response rates, uMRD, and safety., Results: One hundred sixty-four patients initiated three cycles of ibrutinib lead-in. After 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax, best uMRD response rates were 75% (peripheral blood) and 68% (bone marrow). Patients with Confirmed uMRD were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 43) or ibrutinib (n = 43); patients with uMRD Not Confirmed were randomly assigned to ibrutinib (n = 31) or ibrutinib plus venetoclax (n = 32). Median follow-up was 31.3 months. One-year DFS rate was not significantly different between placebo (95%) and ibrutinib (100%; arm difference: 4.7% [95% CI, -1.6 to 10.9]; P = .15) in the Confirmed uMRD population. After ibrutinib lead-in tumor debulking, 36 of 40 patients (90%) with high tumor lysis syndrome risk at baseline shifted to medium or low tumor lysis syndrome risk categories. Adverse events were most frequent during the first 6 months of ibrutinib plus venetoclax and generally decreased over time., Conclusion: The 1-year DFS rate of 95% in placebo-randomly assigned patients with Confirmed uMRD suggests the potential for fixed-duration treatment with this all-oral, once-daily, chemotherapy-free regimen in first-line CLL., Competing Interests: William G. WierdaConsulting or Advisory Role: SanofiResearch Funding: GlaxoSmithKline/Novartis, AbbVie, Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Acerta Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Juno Therapeutics, Kite, a Gilead Company, Oncternal Therapeutics, Loxo, Xencor, miRagen, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Cyclacel John N. AllanHonoraria: AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, BeiGeneConsulting/Advisory Role: AbbVie/Genentech, Pharmacyclics, Ascentage Pharma, BeiGene, Janssen Oncology, Epizyme, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics, ADC TherapeuticsResearch Funding: Genentech, Janssen, Celgene, TG Therapeutics Tanya SiddiqiConsulting/Advisory Role: Juno Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, Pharmacyclics/JanssenSpeakers Bureau: Pharmacyclics/Janssen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb/CelgeneResearch Funding: Juno Therapeutics (Inst), Kite, a Gilead Company (Inst), Acerta Pharma (Inst), TG Therapeutics (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Oncternal Therapeutics (Inst) Thomas J. KippsEmployment: Moores Cancer CenterStock and Other Ownership Interests: Oncternal TherapeuticsHonoraria: Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Janssen, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, DAVAOncology, AstraZenecaConsulting/Advisory Role: AbbVie, Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Janssen, DAVAOncologySpeakers Bureau: Verastem/Pharmacyclics, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, AbbVie/Genentech, Gilead Sciences, DAVA PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Pharmacyclics/Janssen (Inst), Breast Cancer Research Foundation (Inst), Oncternal Therapeutics (Inst), Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (Inst), California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) (Inst), National Cancer Institute (Inst), NIH (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Cirmtuzumab was developed by Thomas J. Kipps in the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory and licensed by the University of California to Oncternal Therapeutics, Inc, which provided stock options and research funding to the Thomas J. Kipps laboratory. (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie/Pharmacyclics, Genentech/Roche, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Celgene, DAVAOncology, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, TG Therapeutics, Verastem, AstraZeneca Stephen OpatHonoraria: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Gilead Sciences, Mundipharma, Takeda, Merck, and CSL BehringConsulting/Advisory Role: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Celgene, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Takeda, Merck, Mundipharma, CSL BehringResearch Funding: AstraZeneca (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Merck (Inst), Epizyme (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Alessandra TedeschiConsulting/Advisory Role: Janssen, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, AbbVieSpeakers Bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, BeiGene Xavier C. BadouxHonoraria: Janssen/Pharmacyclics, AbbVie Bryone J. KussStock and Other Ownership Interests: Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (CSL)Honoraria: Roche, Janssen Oncology, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Merck, Mundipharma, Takeda, SandozConsulting/Advisory Role: AbbVie, Janssen Oncology, Kyowa Kirin International, AstraZenecaSpeakers Bureau: AstraZeneca, Janssen-Ortho Sharon JacksonHonoraria: AbbVie NZ LtdConsulting/Advisory Role: AbbVie NZSpeakers Bureau: AbbVie NZTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche NZ Carol MorenoConsulting/Advisory Role: Janssen Oncology, Abbott/AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BieGeneSpeakers Bureau: Janssen OncologyResearch Funding: AbbVie Ryan JacobsConsulting/Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Janssen Oncology, Secura Bio, Genentech, Adaptive Biotechnologies, ADC Therapeutics, TG TherapeuticsSpeakers Bureau: Pharmacyclics, Janssen Oncology, AbbVie, TG Therapeutics, AstraZenecaResearch Funding: TeneoBio (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), TG Therapeutics (Inst), MEI Pharma (Inst) John M. PagelConsulting/Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene, Loxo, MEI Pharma, TG Therapeutics, MorphoSys, Epizyme Ian FlinnConsulting/advisory role: AbbVie (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), TG Therapeutics (Inst), Verastem (Inst), Roche (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Kite, a Gilead Company (Inst), Janssen (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Takeda (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Juno Therapeutics (Inst), Unum Therapeutics (Inst), MorphoSys (Inst), Nurix (Inst), Shanghai Yingli Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Great Point Partners (Inst), Iksuda Therapeutics (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Century Therapeutics (Inst), Hutchison MediPharma (Inst), Servier (Inst), Vincerx (Inst)Research Funding: Acerta Pharma (Inst), Agios (Inst), Calithera Biosciences (Inst), Celgene (Inst), Constellation Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Genentech (Inst), Gilead Sciences (Inst), Incyte (Inst), Infinity Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Janssen (Inst), Karyopharm Therapeutics (Inst), Kite, a Gilead Company (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Pharmacyclics (Inst), Portola Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Roche (Inst), TG Therapeutics (Inst), Trillium Therapeutics (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), ArQule (Inst), BeiGene (Inst), Curis (Inst), Forma Therapeutics (Inst), Forty Seven (Inst), Merck (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Takeda (Inst), Teva (Inst), Verastem (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Juno Therapeutics (Inst), Unum Therapeutics (Inst), MorphoSys (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), IGM Biosciences (Inst), Loxo (Inst), Rhizen Pharmaceuticals (Inst), Triact Therapeutics (Inst) Yvonne PakEmployment: BridgeBio Pharma, AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: BridgeBio Pharma, AbbVie Cathy ZhouEmployment: Abbvie/PharmacyclicsStock and Other Ownership Interests: Abbvie/Pharmacyclics Edith Szafer-GlusmanStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Joi NinomotoEmployment: AbbVieStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie James P. DeanEmployment: PharmacyclicsStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie Danelle F. JamesEmployment: Abbvie/PharmacyclicsLeadership: Abbvie/PharmacyclicsStock and Other Ownership Interests: AbbVie/PharmacyclicsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: AbbVie/PharmacyclicsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Abbvie/Pharmacyclics Paolo GhiaHonoraria: AbbVie, BeiGene, Janssen Oncology, Gilead Sciences, Juno Therapeutics, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, ArQule, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Dynamo Therapeutics, MEI Pharma, Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca, Juno/Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Lilly, RocheConsulting/Advisory Role: AbbVie, BieGene, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Juno Therapeutics, ArQule, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Dynamo Therapeutics, MEI Pharma, Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca, MSD, Lilly, RocheResearch Funding: AbbVie, Janssen Oncology, Gilead Sciences, Sunesis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, AstraZeneca Constantine S. TamHonoraria: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVie, Novartis, BeiGene, PharmacyclicsConsulting/Advisory Role: Janssen, Loxo, Roche, BeiGene, AbbVieResearch Funding: Janssen-Cilag, AbbVieNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Purpose: The first report from the open-label substudy of the phase III iNNOVATE study (PCYC-1127; NCT02165397) demonstrated that single-agent ibrutinib was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with heavily pretreated, rituximab-refractory Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Results from the final analysis are now reported., Patients and Methods: Ibrutinib 420 mg was administered once daily to patients ( N = 31) who failed to achieve at least a minor response (MR) or who relapsed <12 months after their last rituximab-containing therapy. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR; MR or better) per independent review committee, hemoglobin improvement, overall survival (OS), and safety; serum IgM was also assessed., Results: After a median follow-up of 58 months (range: 9-61), median PFS was 39 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 25-not evaluable]; 60-month PFS rate was 40%. In MYD88 L265P /CXCR4 WHIM and MYD88 L265P /CXCR4 WT subtypes, median PFS was 18 months and not reached, respectively. In all patients, ORR was 87%; responses deepened over time with major response (≥ partial response) rates increasing from 61% at 6 months to 77% at 60 months. Median OS was not reached. Seventeen of 21 patients (81%) with baseline hemoglobin ≤11.0 g/dL had sustained hemoglobin improvement. Improvements in serum IgM levels were sustained, reaching a maximum median change of -37 g/L at 54 months. Ibrutinib maintained a manageable safety profile, with no new safety signals identified. There were no events of major hemorrhage or atrial fibrillation., Conclusions: In the final analysis from iNNOVATE, single-agent ibrutinib continued to show sustained efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated, rituximab-refractory Waldenström macroglobulinemia., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Anti-CD20 antibody treatments, such as obinutuzumab, have been associated with infusion-related reactions (IRRs). In the phase 3 iLLUMINATE study of ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, IRRs were substantially reduced with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. We prospectively analyzed inflammatory cytokines to evaluate the impact of ibrutinib on circulating cytokine levels following obinutuzumab infusion. In iLLUMINATE, ibrutinib or chlorambucil was given approximately 30-120 min before the first obinutuzumab infusion. Cytokines evaluated were IFNγ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and TNFα. Changes in peak cytokine levels from baseline (immediately before obinutuzumab) to post-obinutuzumab infusion were compared between arms and between patients with versus without IRRs using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Of 228 treated patients, 95 on ibrutinib-obinutuzumab (15 with IRRs, 80 without) and 88 on chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (45 with IRRs, 43 without) with cytokine data were included. Irrespective of IRR occurrence, median increase in cytokines was lower with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab for all cytokines (P < 0.01) except MIP-1β. Across treatment arms, post-obinutuzumab median increase in all cytokines except MIP-1β was greater in patients with versus without IRRs (P < 0.001). IL-6 and IL-8 elevations were associated with IRRs in both treatment arms. Among patients with IRRs, those receiving ibrutinib-obinutuzumab had lower post-obinutuzumab increases in IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and MCP-1 (P < 0.04) than patients receiving chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. For patients in the ibrutinib-treatment arm, we observed a reduction in both the rate of clinically apparent IRRs and the levels of IRR-related cytokines and chemokines. This observation supports an immunomodulatory mechanism of action for ibrutinib. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02264574.

Limited information is available on the efficacy of front-line bendamustine and rituximab (BR) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with reduced renal function or coexisting conditions. We therefore analyzed a cohort of real-world patients and performed a matched adjusted indirect comparison with a cohort of patients treated with ibrutinib. One hundred and fifty-seven patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) <70 mL/min and/or CIRS score >6 were treated with BR. The median age was 72 years; 69% of patients had ≥2 comorbidities and the median CrCl was 59.8 mL/min. 17.6% of patients carried TP53 disruption. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45 months; TP53 disruption was associated with a shorter PFS (P = 0.05). The overall survival (OS) at 12, 24, and 36 months was 96.2%, 90.1%, and 79.5%, respectively. TP53 disruption was associated with an increased risk of death (P = 0.01). Data on 162 patients ≥65 years treated with ibrutinib were analyzed and compared with 165 patients ≥65 years treated with BR. Factors predicting for a longer PFS at multivariable analysis in the total patient population treated with BR and ibrutinib were age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10, P < 0.01) and treatment with ibrutinib (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.93, P = 0.03). In a post hoc analysis of patients in advanced stage, a significant PFS advantage was observed in patient who had received ibrutinib (P = 0.03), who showed a trend for OS advantage (P = 0.08). We arrived at the following conclusions: (a) BR is a relatively effective first-line regimen in a real-world population of unfit patients without TP53 disruption, (b) ibrutinib provided longer disease control than BR in patients with advanced disease stage., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) have established therapeutic activity in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Zanubrutinib, a potent and selective BTK inhibitor, was evaluated in a phase 1/2 study in patients with WM who were either treatment-naïve (TN) or had relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. Patients had disease requiring treatment per International Workshop on Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (IWWM) criteria. Treatment was 160 mg of oral zanubrutinib twice daily (n = 50) or 320 mg once daily (n = 23). Efficacy endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and very good partial response/complete response (VGPR/CR) rates per IWWM-6 criteria (with modification of VGPR definition published previously). Between September 2014 and March 2018, 77 patients (24 TN and 53 R/R) began treatment. At a median follow-up of 36.0 months for patients with R/R disease and 23.5 months for TN, 72.7% remained on treatment. Reasons for treatment discontinuation included any adverse events in 13.0% of patients (1 treatment related), disease progression (10.4%), and other (3.9%). The ORR was 95.9%, and the VGPR/CR rate was 45.2%, which increased over time: 20.5% at 6 months, 32.9% at 12 months, and 43.8% at 24 months. Estimated 3-year progression-free survival rate was 80.5%, and overall survival rate was 84.8%. Adverse events of interest included contusion (32.5%, all grade 1), neutropenia (18.2%), major hemorrhage (3.9%), atrial fibrillation/flutter (5.2%), and grade 3 diarrhea (2.6%). Long-term treatment with single-agent zanubrutinib resulted in deep and durable responses in some patients with WM. The safety profile of long-term zanubrutinib therapy in these patients was acceptable. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02343120., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Zanubrutinib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK). In this first-in-human, open-label, multicenter, phase 1 study, patients in part 1 (3 + 3 dose escalation) had relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies and received zanubrutinib 40, 80, 160, or 320 mg once daily or 160 mg twice daily. Part 2 (expansion) consisted of disease-specific cohorts, including treatment-naive or relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). The primary end points were safety and tolerability, and definition of the maximum tolerated dose (part 1). Additional end points included pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy. Reported herein are results from 144 patients enrolled in the dose-finding and CLL/SLL cohorts. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in dose escalation. Median BTK occupancy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was >95% at all doses. Sustained complete (>95%) BTK occupancy in lymph node biopsy specimens was more frequent with 160 mg twice daily than 320 mg once daily (89% vs 50%; P = .0342). Consequently, 160 mg twice daily was selected for further investigation. With median follow-up of 13.7 months (range, 0.4-30.5 months), 89 CLL/SLL patients (94.7%) remain on study. Most toxicities were grade 1/2; neutropenia was the only grade 3/4 toxicity observed in >2 patients. One patient experienced a grade 3 subcutaneous hemorrhage. Among 78 efficacy-evaluable CLL/SLL patients, the overall response rate was 96.2% (95% confidence interval, 89.2-99.2). Estimated progression-free survival at 12 months was 100%. Zanubrutinib demonstrated encouraging activity in CLL/SLL patients, with a low incidence of major toxicities. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02343120., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), an incurable B-cell malignancy, is sensitive to Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition with ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor. Off-target effects of ibrutinib against TEC- and EGFR-family kinases are implicated in some adverse events. Patients with CXCR4 WHIM and MYD88 L265P mutations or who are MYD88 WT have less sensitivity to ibrutinib than those with MYD88 L265P and CXCR4 WT disease. Zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor with potent preclinical activity in WM and minimal off-target effects, showed sustained BTK occupancy in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with B-cell malignancies and promising responses in advanced WM. Described here is a head-to-head Phase III study comparing efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in WM patients. Effect of MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status will be assessed.

PURPOSE: The CAPTIVATE study investigated first-line ibrutinib plus venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 2 cohorts: minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided randomized discontinuation (MRD cohort) and Fixed Duration (FD cohort). We report outcomes of fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with high-risk genomic features [del(17p), TP53 mutation, and/or unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGHV)] in CAPTIVATE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received three cycles of ibrutinib 420 mg/day then 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax (5-week ramp-up to 400 mg/day). FD cohort patients (n = 159) received no further treatment. Forty-three MRD cohort patients with confirmed undetectable MRD (uMRD) after 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax received randomized placebo treatment. RESULTS: Of 195 patients with known status of genomic risk features at baseline, 129 (66%) had ≥1 high-risk feature. Overall response rates were >95% regardless of high-risk features. In patients with and without high-risk features, respectively, complete response (CR) rates were 61% and 53%; best uMRD rates: 88% and 70% (peripheral blood) and 72% and 61% (bone marrow); 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates: 88% and 92%. In subsets with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (n = 29) and unmutated IGHV without del(17p)/TP53 mutation (n = 100), respectively, CR rates were 52% and 64%; uMRD rates: 83% and 90% (peripheral blood) and 45% and 80% (bone marrow); 36-month PFS rates: 81% and 90%. Thirty-six-month overall survival (OS) rates were >95% regardless of high-risk features. CONCLUSIONS: Deep, durable responses and sustained PFS seen with fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax are maintained in patients with high-risk genomic features, with similar PFS and OS to those without high-risk features. See related commentary by Rogers, p. 2561.

PurposeThe phase II CAPTIVATE study investigated first-line treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in two cohorts: minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided randomized treatment discontinuation (MRD cohort) and fixed duration (FD cohort). We report tumor debulking and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk category reduction with three cycles of single-agent ibrutinib lead-in before initiation of venetoclax using pooled data from the MRD and FD cohorts.Patients and methodsIn both cohorts, patients initially received three cycles of ibrutinib 420 mg/day then 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax (5-week ramp-up to 400 mg/day).ResultsIn the total population (N = 323), the following decreases from baseline to after ibrutinib lead-in were observed: percentage of patients with a lymph node diameter ≥5 cm decreased from 31% to 4%, with absolute lymphocyte count ≥25 × 109/L from 76% to 65%, with high tumor burden category for TLS risk from 23% to 2%, and with an indication for hospitalization (high TLS risk, or medium TLS risk and creatinine clearance

We report long-term follow-up from the RESONATE-2 phase 3 study of the once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, which is the only targeted therapy with significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit in multiple randomized chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studies. Patients (≥65 years) with previously untreated CLL, without del(17p), were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (n = 136) or chlorambucil 0.5-0.8 mg/kg ≤12 cycles (n = 133). With up to 8 years of follow-up (range, 0.1-96.6 months; median, 82.7 months), significant PFS benefit was sustained for ibrutinib vs chlorambucil (hazard ratio [HR], 0.154; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.108-0.220). At 7 years, PFS was 59% for ibrutinib vs 9% for chlorambucil. PFS benefit was also observed for ibrutinib- vs chlorambucil-randomized patients with high-risk genomic features: del(11q) (HR, 0.033; 95% CI, 0.010-0.107) or unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (HR, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.065-0.192). OS at 7 years was 78% with ibrutinib. Prevalence of adverse events (AEs) was consistent with previous 5-year follow-up. Ibrutinib dosing was held (≥7 days) for 79 patients and reduced for 31 patients because of AEs; these AEs resolved or improved in 85% (67 of 79) and 90% (28 of 31) of patients, respectively. With up to 8 years of follow-up, 42% of patients remain on ibrutinib. Long-term RESONATE-2 data demonstrate sustained benefit with first-line ibrutinib treatment for CLL, including for patients with high-risk genomic features. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01722487 and #NCT01724346.

RESONATE-2 is a phase 3 study of first-line ibrutinib versus chlorambucil in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Patients aged ≥65 years (n = 269) were randomized 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg continuously or chlorambucil 0.5-0.8 mg/kg for ≤12 cycles. With a median (range) follow-up of 60 months (0.1-66), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits for ibrutinib versus chlorambucil were sustained (PFS estimates at 5 years: 70% vs 12%; HR [95% CI]: 0.146 [0.098-0.218]; OS estimates at 5 years: 83% vs 68%; HR [95% CI]: 0.450 [0.266-0.761]). Ibrutinib benefit was also consistent in patients with high prognostic risk (TP53 mutation, 11q deletion, and/or unmutated IGHV) (PFS: HR [95% CI]: 0.083 [0.047-0.145]; OS: HR [95% CI]: 0.366 [0.181-0.736]). Investigator-assessed overall response rate was 92% with ibrutinib (complete response, 30%; 11% at primary analysis). Common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (13%), pneumonia (12%), hypertension (8%), anemia (7%), and hyponatremia (6%); occurrence of most events as well as discontinuations due to AEs decreased over time. Fifty-eight percent of patients continue to receive ibrutinib. Single-agent ibrutinib demonstrated sustained PFS and OS benefit versus chlorambucil and increased depth of response over time.

The efficacy of ibrutinib has been demonstrated in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including as first-line therapy. However, outcomes after ibrutinib discontinuation have previously been limited to higher-risk populations with relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of ibrutinib-treated patients based on prior lines of therapy, including after ibrutinib discontinuation. Data were analyzed from two multicenter phase 3 studies of single-agent ibrutinib: RESONATE (PCYC-1112) in patients with R/R CLL and RESONATE-2 (PCYC-1115) in patients with treatment-naive (TN) CLL without del(17p). This integrated analysis included 271 ibrutinib-treated non-del(17p) patients with CLL (136 TN and 135 R/R). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached for subgroups with 0 and 1/2 prior therapies but was 40.6 months for patients with ≥3 therapies (median follow-up: TN, 36 months; R/R, 44 months). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in any subgroup. Overall response rate (ORR) was 92% in TN and 92% in R/R, with depth of response increasing over time. Adverse events (AEs) and ibrutinib discontinuation due to AEs were similar between patient groups. Most patients (64%) remain on treatment. OS following discontinuation was 9.3 months in R/R patients (median follow-up 18 months, n = 51) and was not reached in TN patients (median follow-up 10 months, n = 30). In this integrated analysis, ibrutinib was associated with favorable PFS and OS, and high ORR regardless of prior therapies in patients with CLL. The best outcomes following ibrutinib discontinuation were for patients receiving ibrutinib in earlier lines of therapy.

Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and targeted therapy with single-agent ibrutinib are both recommended first-line treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), although their outcomes have not been directly compared. Using ibrutinib data from the RESONATE-2 (PCYC-1115/1116) study conducted in patients ≥65 years without del(17p), we performed a cross-trial comparison with CIT data from published phase 3 studies in first-line treatment of CLL. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety data for ibrutinib (median follow-up 35.7 months) were evaluated alongside available CIT data. CIT regimens included: fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (CLL8, CLL10), bendamustine + rituximab (CLL10), obinutuzumab + chlorambucil and rituximab + chlorambucil (CLL11), and ofatumumab + chlorambucil (COMPLEMENT-1). Median age across studies was 61-74 years, with older populations receiving ibrutinib, obinutuzumab + chlorambucil, or rituximab + chlorambucil. Median follow-up varied across studies/regimens (range 14.5-37.4 months). Among all patients, PFS appeared longer with ibrutinib relative to CIT and OS appeared comparable. Relative to CIT studies that similarly excluded patients with del(17p) (CLL10) or enrolled older/less-fit patients (CLL11), PFS appeared favorable for ibrutinib in high-risk subgroups, including advanced disease, bulky lymph nodes, unmutated IGHV status, and presence of del(11q). Grade ≥ 3 infections ranged from 9% (ofatumumab + chlorambucil) to 40% (fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab), and was 25% with ibrutinib. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was 12% for ibrutinib and 26%-84% for CIT. Although definitive conclusions cannot be made due to inherent limitations of cross-trial comparisons, this report suggests that ibrutinib has a favorable benefit/risk profile and may potentially eliminate the need for chemotherapy in some patients. Randomized, comparative studies are needed to support these findings.

Results of RESONATE-2 (PCYC-1115/1116) supported approval of ibrutinib for first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Extended analysis of RESONATE-2 was conducted to determine long-term efficacy and safety of ibrutinib in older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. A total of 269 patients aged ≥65 years with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia without del(17p) were randomized 1:1 to ibrutinib (n=136) or chlorambucil (n=133) on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 12 cycles. Median ibrutinib treatment duration was 28.5 months. Ibrutinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus chlorambucil (median, not reached vs 15 months; hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.20; P

The first-in-class Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib has proven clinical benefit in B-cell malignancies; however, atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported in 6-16% of ibrutinib patients. We pooled data from 1505 chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma patients enrolled in four large, randomized, controlled studies to characterize AF with ibrutinib and its management. AF incidence was 6.5% [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.8, 8.5] for ibrutinib at 16.6-months versus 1.6% (95%CI: 0.8, 2.8) for comparator and 10.4% (95%CI: 8.4, 12.9) at the 36-month follow up; estimated cumulative incidence: 13.8% (95%CI: 11.2, 16.8). Ibrutinib treatment, prior history of AF and age 65 years or over were independent risk factors for AF. Multiple AF events were more common with ibrutinib (44.9%; comparator, 16.7%) among patients with AF. Most (85.7%) patients with AF did not discontinue ibrutinib, and more than half received common anticoagulant/antiplatelet medications on study. Low-grade bleeds were more frequent with ibrutinib, but serious bleeds were uncommon (ibrutinib, 2.9%; comparator, 2.0%). Although the AF rate among older non-trial patients with comorbidities is likely underestimated by this dataset, these results suggest that AF among clinical trial patients is generally manageable without ibrutinib discontinuation (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01578707, 01722487, 01611090, 01646021).

BackgroundChronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) primarily affects older persons who often have coexisting conditions in addition to disease-related immunosuppression and myelosuppression. We conducted an international, open-label, randomized phase 3 trial to compare two oral agents, ibrutinib and chlorambucil, in previously untreated older patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma.MethodsWe randomly assigned 269 previously untreated patients who were 65 years of age or older and had CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma to receive ibrutinib or chlorambucil. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent review committee.ResultsThe median age of the patients was 73 years. During a median follow-up period of 18.4 months, ibrutinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than did chlorambucil (median, not reached vs. 18.9 months), with a risk of progression or death that was 84% lower with ibrutinib than that with chlorambucil (hazard ratio, 0.16; P