Search

Several factors have influenced the increasing presence of peptides as an important class of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients. One is the continued development of synthetic methodologies for peptide synthesis. Herein, we investigated the Fmoc removal step, using the tea-bag strategy. In this regard, three different secondary amines: piperidine, 4-methylpiperidine, and piperazine, were evaluated. As a result of this study, 4-methyl piperidine showed to be an excellent alternative to the usually used piperidine in terms of purity and compliance with green chemistry principles as well., Work funded by Fondecyt, Chilean Grant 1170379.

The deprotection step is crucial in order to secure a good quality product in Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis. 9-Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) removal is achieved by a two-step mechanism reaction favored by the use of cyclic secondary amines; however, the efficiency of the reaction could be affected by side reactions and by-product formation. Several aspects have to be taken into consideration when selecting a deprotection reagent: its physicochemical behavior, basicity (pKa) and polarity, concentration, and time of reaction, toxicity and disposability of residues and, finally, availability of reagents. This report presents a comparison of the performance of three strategies for deprotection using microwave-assisted Fmoc peptide synthesis. Four peptide sequences were synthesized using Rink amide resin with a Liberty BlueTM automated synthesizer and 4-methylpiperidine (4MP), piperidine (PP), and piperazine (PZ) as Fmoc removal reagents. In the first instance all three reagents behaved similarly. A detailed analysis showed a correlation between the hydrophobicity and size of the peptide with the yield and purity of the obtained product. The three reagents are interchangeable, and replacement of piperidine could be advantageous regarding toxicity and reagent handling.