Search

Background and Objectives: Although dose optimization studies have been performed for piperacillin and tazobactam separately, a combined integral analysis is not yet reported. As piperacillin and tazobactam pharmacokinetics are likely to show correlation, a combined pharmacokinetic model should be preferred to account for this correlation when predicting the exposure. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics and evaluate different dosing regimens of piperacillin and tazobactam in critically ill patients using an integral population pharmacokinetic model in plasma and urine., Methods: In this observational study, a total of 39 adult intensive care unit patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam as part of routine clinical care were included. Piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations in plasma and urine were measured and analyzed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to predict the concentrations for different dosing strategies and different categories of renal function., Results: A combined two-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model for both piperacillin and tazobactam was developed, with an output compartment for the renally excreted fraction. The addition of 24-h urine creatinine clearance significantly improved the model fit. A dose of 12/1.5 g/24 h as a continuous infusion is sufficient to reach a tazobactam concentration above the target (2.89 mg/L) and a piperacillin concentration above the target of 100% f T >1×MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] ≤ 16 mg/L). To reach a target of 100% f T >5×MIC with an MIC of 16 mg/L, piperacillin doses of up to 20 g/24 h are inadequate. Potential toxic piperacillin levels were reached in 19.6% and 47.8% of the population with a dose of 12 g/24 h and 20 g/24 h, respectively., Conclusions: A regular dose of 12/1.5 g/24 h is sufficient in > 90% of the critically ill population to treat infections caused by Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with MICs ≤ 8 mg/L. In case of infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa with an MIC of 16 mg/L, there is a fine line between therapeutic and toxic exposure. Dosing guided by renal function and therapeutic drug monitoring could enhance target attainment in such cases., Gov Identifier: NCT03738683., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Sepsis is a common diagnosis in critical care with inpatient mortality rates up to 50%. Sepsis care is organized around source control, antibiotics, and supportive care. Drug disposition is deranged by changes in volume of distribution and regional blood flow, as well as multiple organ failure. Thus, assuring that each patient with sepsis attains pharmacokinetic targets is challenging. There is currently no commercially available FDA-approved assay to measure piperacillin-tazobactam, very commonly used as a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic in the intensive care unit (ICU)., Methods: Samples were prepared by ultrafiltration of plasma collected in lithium heparin Vacutainers. Separation was achieved by gradient elution on a C-18 column followed by UV detection at 214 nm. The method is validated in residual blood samples allowing investigators to exploit a waste product to develop insight into beta-lactam pharmacokinetics in the ICU., Results: Accuracy and precision were within the 25% CLIA error standard for other antibiotic assays. Free piperacillin concentrations were also in good agreement with total piperacillin concentrations measured in the same plasma by an assay in clinical use outside the United States., Conclusion: We describe a method for measuring piperacillin and tazobactam that meets clinical validation standards. Quick turnaround time and excellent accuracy on a low-cost platform make this method more than adequate for use as a routine therapeutic drug monitoring tool., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Piperacillin, in combination with tazobactam is a common first-line antibiotic used for the treatment of pleural infection, however its pleural pharmacokinetics and penetration has not previously been reported. The objective of this work was to develop and validate a rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for quantification of piperacillin (PIP) and tazobactam (TAZ). PIP and TAZ were extracted from both human plasma and pleural fluid samples by protein precipitation in methanol containing the internal standards (IS) piperacillin-d 5 (PIP-d 5 ) and sulbactam (SUL). Briefly, 5 μL of sample was mixed with 125 μL of methanol containing IS, vortexed and centrifuged. Supernatant (50 μL) was diluted into 500 μL of mobile phase containing 10 mM of ammonium bicarbonate in LCMS grade water and transferred to the autosampler tray. Electrospray ionization in positive mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) were used for PIP and PIP-d 5 at the transitions m/z 518.2 → 143.2 and m/z 523.2 → 148.2 respectively, and electrospray ionization in negative mode and MRM were used for TAZ and SUL at the transitions m/z 299.1 → 138.1 and m/z 232.4 → 140.1. The chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity BEH C-18 column with gradient elution of mobile phase containing 10 mmol/L ammonium bicarbonate in water and methanol. A linear range was observed over the concentration range of 0.25-352 mg/L and 0.25-50.5 mg/L for PIP and TAZ respectively. Complete method validation was performed according to US FDA guidelines for selectivity, specificity, precision and accuracy, LLOQ, matrix effects, recovery and stability, with all results within acceptable limits. This method was successfully applied to two patients with pleural infection and is suitable for further pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The treatment of infections in critically ill obese and morbidly obese patients is challenging because of the combined physiological changes that result from obesity and critical illness. The aim of this study was to describe the population pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in a cohort of critically ill patients, including obese and morbidly obese patients. Critically ill patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam were classified according to their body mass index (BMI) as nonobese, obese, and morbidly obese. Plasma samples were collected, and piperacillin concentrations were determined by a validated chromatographic method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics software. Thirty-seven critically ill patients (including 12 obese patients and 12 morbidly obese patients) were enrolled. The patients' mean ± standard deviation age, weight, and BMI were 50 ± 15 years, 104 ± 35 kg, and 38.0 ± 15.0 kg/m 2 , respectively. The concentration-time data were best described by a two-compartment linear model. The mean ± SD parameter estimates for the final covariate model were a clearance of 14.0 ± 7.1 liters/h, a volume of distribution of the central compartment of 49.0 ± 19.0 liters, an intercompartmental clearance from the central compartment to the peripheral compartment of 0.9 ± 0.6 liters · h -1 , and an intercompartmental clearance from the peripheral compartment to the central compartment of 2.3 ± 2.8 liters · h -1 A higher measured creatinine clearance and shorter-duration infusions were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving therapeutic piperacillin exposures in patients in all BMI categories. Piperacillin pharmacokinetics are altered in the presence of obesity and critical illness. As with nonobese patients, prolonged infusions increase the likelihood of achieving therapeutic concentrations., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.)

Objective: The study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of piperacillin (PIP) and tazobactam (TAZ) that explain pharmacokinetic variability and to propose optimized dosage regimens in patients with nosocomial infections., Methods: In total, 310 PIP and 280 TAZ concentration-time points were collected at steady state over multiple dosing intervals from 50 patients who received PIP/TAZ infused within 30 min or over 3 h. Drug analysis was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was employed to develop PPK model and 1000 Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the probability of target attainment (PTA) with a target time of non-protein-bound concentration above MIC > 50 % of the dosing interval., Results: A model with one-compartment model had the best predictive performance for the PPK model. The population estimates of PIP were 13.8 L/h (31.1 %) for clearance (CL) and 21.7 L (38 %) for volume of distribution (V). The population estimates of TAZ were 9.3 L/h (29.1 %) for CL and 16 L (35.3 %) for V. Influence of creatinine clearance (CLcr) and body weight were identified as important covariates for PIP/TAZ CL and V, respectively. A 30-min infusion of 4 g every 6 h achieved robust (≥90 %) PTAs for MIC ≤ 16 mg/L. As an alternative mode of administration, a 3-h infusion of 4 g every 6 h achieved robust PTAs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae., Conclusions: Prolonged infusions achieved better PTAs compared with shorter infusions at similar daily doses. This benefit was most pronounced for MICs between 16 and 40 mg/L.

Previous studies have demonstrated that pharmaceutical equivalence and pharmacokinetic equivalence of generic antibiotics are necessary but not sufficient conditions to guarantee therapeutic equivalence (better called pharmacodynamic equivalence). In addition, there is scientific evidence suggesting a direct link between pharmacodynamic nonequivalence of generic vancomycin and promotion of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. To find out if even subtle deviations from the expected pharmacodynamic behavior with respect to the innovator could favor resistance, we studied a generic product of piperacillin-tazobactam characterized by pharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic equivalence but a faulty fit of Hill's Emax sigmoid model that could be interpreted as pharmacodynamic nonequivalence. We determined the impact in vivo of this generic product on the resistance of a mixed Escherichia coli population composed of ∼99% susceptible cells (ATCC 35218 strain) and a ∼1% isogenic resistant subpopulation that overproduces TEM-1 β-lactamase. After only 24 hours of treatment in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model, the generic amplified the resistant subpopulation up to 20-times compared with the innovator, following an inverted-U dose-response relationship. These findings highlight the critical role of therapeutic nonequivalence of generic antibiotics as a key factor contributing to the global problem of bacterial resistance.

We have previously demonstrated the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) index best associated with the efficacy of tazobactam when used in combination with ceftolozane to be the percentage of the dosing interval during which tazobactam concentrations remained above a threshold value (%time>threshold). Using anin vitroinfection model and the same isogenic CTX-M-15-producingEscherichia colitriplet set genetically engineered to transcribe different levels ofblaCTX-M-15, herein we describe dose fractionation studies designed to evaluate the PK-PD index associated with tazobactam efficacy, when given in combination with piperacillin, and the impact of the presence of a different β-lactam agent, or differentblaCTX-M-15transcription levels, on the magnitude of the tazobactam PK-PD index necessary for efficacy. The recombinant strains demonstrated piperacillin MIC values of 128, >256, and >256 μg/ml for the low-, moderate-, and high-level CTX-M-15-producingE. colistrains, respectively. The MIC value for piperacillin in the presence of 4 μg/ml of tazobactam was 2 μg/ml for all three strains. The PK-PD index associated with tazobactam efficacy was confirmed to be %time>threshold, regardless of β-lactamase transcription (r(2)= 0.839). The tazobactam concentration thresholds, however, changed with the CTX-M-15 transcription level and were 0.25, 0.5, and 2 μg/ml for the low-, moderate-, and high-level CTX-M-15-producing strains, respectively (r(2)= 0.921, 0.773, and 0.875, respectively). The %time>threshold values for tazobactam necessary for net bacterial stasis and a 1- and 2-log10-unit CFU/ml decrease from baseline at 24 h were 44.9, 62.9, and 84.9%, respectively. In addition to verifying our previous study results, these results also demonstrated that the magnitude of bacterial-cell killing associated with a β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination is dependent on the amount of β-lactamase produced. These data provide important information for the development of β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combination agents., (Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Antibiotic dosing in septic shock patients poses a challenge for clinicians due to the pharmacokinetic (PK) variability seen in this patient population. Piperacillin-tazobactam is often used for empirical treatment, and initial appropriate dosing is crucial for reducing mortality. Accordingly, we determined the pharmacokinetic profile of piperacillin (4 g) every 8 h, during the third consecutive dosing interval, in 15 patients treated empirically for septic shock. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model to assess empirical dosing and to simulate alternative dosing regimens and modes of administration. Time above the MIC (T>MIC) predicted for each patient was evaluated against clinical breakpoint MIC for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 mg/liter). Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets evaluated were 50% fT>4×MIC and 100% fT>MIC. A population PK model was developed using NONMEM, and data were best described by a two-compartment model. Central and intercompartmental clearances were 3.6 liters/h (relative standard error [RSE], 15.7%) and 6.58 liters/h (RSE, 16.4%), respectively, and central and peripheral volumes were 7.3 liters (RSE, 11.8%) and 3.9 liters (RSE, 9.7%), respectively. Piperacillin plasma concentrations varied considerably between patients and were associated with levels of plasma creatinine. Patients with impaired renal function were more likely to achieve predefined PK/PD targets than were patients with preserved or augmented renal function. Simulations of alternative dosing regimens showed that frequent intermittent bolus dosing as well as dosing by extended and continuous infusion increases the probability of attaining therapeutic plasma concentrations. For septic shock patients with preserved or augmented renal function, dose increment or prolonged infusion of the drug needs to be considered. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02306928.)., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

The study objective was to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin and tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in obese and nonobese patients. Twenty-seven patients (total body weight [TBW], 60 to 211 kg; body mass index [BMI], 19.6 to 72.9 kg/m(2) ) received 4.5 or 6.75 g every 8 hours, infused over 4 hours, and serum concentrations were measured at steady state. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using NONMEM, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for three 4-hour dosing regimens to calculate probability of target attainment (PTA) at ≥50% fT>MIC.A 1-compartment linear-elimination model best fit the pharmacokinetic data for piperacillin and tazobactam. Creatinine clearance (CRCL), TBW, and BMI were significantly associated with piperacillin pharmacokinetics, and CRCL was significantly associated with tazobactam pharmacokinetics. Clearance and volume of distribution for piperacillin and tazobactam were significantly different between obese and nonobese patients (P < .05). At MICs ≤ 16 mg/L, PTA was >90% for dosing regimens ≥3.375 g every 8 hours in nonobese patients and ≥ 4.5 g every 8 hours in obese patients. Piperacillin and tazobactam pharmacokinetics are altered in obesity, and 4.5 g every 8 hours infused over 4 hours should be recommended for empiric therapy in obese patients., (© 2015, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

After demonstrating with diverse intravenous antibacterials that pharmaceutical equivalence (PE) does not predict therapeutic equivalence, we tested a single generic product of piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) in terms of PE, pharmacokinetics and in vitro/vivo pharmacodynamics against several pathogens in neutropenic mouse thigh, lung and brain infection models. A generic product was compared head-to-head against the innovator. PE was evaluated by microbiological assay. Single-dose serum pharmacokinetics were determined in infected mice, and the MIC/MBC were determined by broth microdilution. In vivo experiments were done in a blind fashion. Reproducibility was tested on different days using different infecting organisms and animal models. Neutropenic MPF mice were infected in the thighs with Staphylococcus aureus GRP-0057 or Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 and in the lungs or brain with Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 10031. Treatment started 2h (thigh and brain) or 14 h (lung) after infection and was administered every 3h over 24h (thigh and lung) or 48 h (brain). Both products exhibited the same MIC/MBC against each strain, yielded overlaid curves in the microbiological assay (P>0.21) and were bioequivalent (IC90 83-117% for AUC test/reference ratio). In vivo, the generic product and innovator were again undistinguishable in all models and against the different bacterial pathogens involved. The relevance of these neutropenic murine models of infection was established by demonstrating their accuracy to predict the biological response following simultaneous treatment with a generic product or the innovator of TZP. Therapeutic equivalence of the generic product was proved in every model and against different pathogens., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.)

Pulmonary infections in critically ill patients are common and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Piperacillin-tazobactam is a frequently used therapy in critically ill patients with pulmonary infection. Antibiotic concentrations in the lung reflect target-site antibiotic concentrations in patients with pneumonia. The aim of this study was to assess the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients administered standard piperacillin-tazobactam regimens. A population PK model was developed to describe plasma and intrapulmonary piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations. The probability of piperacillin exposures reaching pharmacodynamic end points and the impact of pulmonary permeability on piperacillin and tazobactam pulmonary penetration was explored. The median piperacillin and tazobactam pulmonary penetration ratios were 49.3 and 121.2%, respectively. Pulmonary piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations were unpredictable and negatively correlated with pulmonary permeability. Current piperacillin-tazobactam regimens may be insufficient to treat pneumonia caused by piperacillin-tazobactam-susceptible organisms in some critically ill patients.

Piperacillin in combination with tazobactam, a β-lactamase inhibitor, is a commonly used intravenous antibiotic for the empirical treatment of infection in intensive care patients, including burn patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for piperacillin in burn patients and to predict the probability of target attainment (PTA) using MICs and concentrations simulated from the PK model. Fifty burn patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam were enrolled. Piperacillin-tazobactam was administered via infusion for approximately 30 min at a dose of 4.5 g (4 g piperacillin and 0.5 g tazobactam) every 8 h. Blood samples were collected just prior to and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after the end of the infusion at steady state. The population PK model of piperacillin was developed using NONMEM. A two-compartment first-order elimination PK model was finally chosen. The covariates included were creatinine clearance (CLCR), day after burn injury (DAI), and sepsis. The final PK parameters were clearance (liters/h) (equal to 16.6 × [CLCR/132] + DAI × [-0.0874]), central volume (liters) (equal to 25.3 + 14.8 × sepsis [0 for the absence or 1 for the presence of sepsis]), peripheral volume (liters) (equal to 16.1), and intercompartmental clearance (liters/h) (equal to 0.636). The clearance and volume of piperacillin were higher than those reported in patients without burns, and the terminal half-life and PTA decreased with the increased CLCR. Our PK model suggests that higher daily doses or longer durations of infusion of piperacillin should be considered, especially for burn patients with a CLCR of ≥ 160 ml/min., (Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

This prospective pharmacokinetic study aimed to describe plasma and interstitial fluid (ISF) pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). Piperacillin/tazobactam (4g/0.5g) was administered every 8h and CVVHDF was performed as a 3-3.5L/h exchange using a polyacrylonitrile filter with a surface area of 1.05m(2). Serial blood (pre- and post-filter), filtrate/dialysate, urine and ISF concentrations were measured. Subcutaneous tissue ISF concentrations were determined using microdialysis. A total of 407 samples were collected. Median peak plasma concentrations were 210.5 (interquartile range=161.5-229.0) and 29.4 (27.9-32.0) mg/L and median trough plasma concentrations were 64.3 (49.0-68.9) and 12.3 (7.7-13.7) mg/L for piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively. The plasma elimination half-life was 6.4 (4.6-8.7) and 7.3 (4.6-11.8) h, volume of distribution 0.42 (0.29-0.49) and 0.32 (0.24-0.36) L/kg, total clearance 5.1 (4.2-6.2) and 3.8 (3.3-4.2) L/h and CVVHDF clearance 2.5 (2.3-3.1) and 2.5 (2.3-3.2) L/h for piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively. The tissue penetration ratio or ratio of area under the concentration-time curve of the unbound drug in ISF to plasma (unbound AUCISF/AUCplasma) was ca. 1 for both piperacillin and tazobactam. This is the first report of concurrent plasma and ISF concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam during CVVHDF. For the CVVHDF settings used in this study, a dose of 4.5g piperacillin/tazobactam administered evry 8h resulted in piperacillin concentrations in plasma and ISF >32mg/L throughout most of the dosing interval., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Piperacillin in combination with tazobactam is one of the most commonly used intravenous antibiotics. There is evidence for a possible saturable elimination of piperacillin. Therefore, the saturable elimination and its impact on the choice of optimal dosage regimens were quantified. In a randomized crossover study, 10 healthy volunteers received 1,500 mg and 3,000 mg of piperacillin as 5-min intravenous infusion. Population pharmacokinetics based on plasma and urine data were determined utilizing NONMEM and S-ADAPT. Probabilities of target attainment (PTAs) were compared for different models and dosage regimens, based on the target time of the non-protein-bound concentration above the MIC of at least 50% of the dosing interval. Total clearance of piperacillin was 18% (geometric mean ratio, 90% confidence interval, 11 to 24%) lower (P < 0.01), and renal clearance was 24% (9 to 37%) lower (P = 0.02) at the high compared to the low dose. The final model included first-order nonrenal elimination and parallel first-order and mixed-order renal elimination. Nonrenal clearance was 5.44 liter/h (coefficient of variation, 18%), first-order renal clearance was 4.42 liter/h (47%), and the maximum elimination rate of mixed-order renal elimination was 219 mg/h (84%), with a Michaelis-Menten constant of 36.1 mg/liter (112%). Compared to models with saturable elimination, a linear model predicted up to 10% lower population PTAs for high-dose short-term infusions (6 g every 8 h) and up to 4% higher population PTAs for low-dose continuous infusions (6 g/day). While renal elimination of piperacillin was saturable at therapeutic concentrations, the extent of saturation of nonrenal clearance was small. The influence of saturable elimination on PTAs for clinically relevant dosage regimens was relatively small.

Objectives: Appropriate antibiotic exposure at the site of infection is important for clinically effective therapy. This study compared the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam, which has potent in vitro activity against many Gram-negative pathogens causing nosocomial pneumonia, with that of piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult volunteers., Methods: In this Phase 1, open-label trial, 51 healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive three doses of either ceftolozane/tazobactam 1.5 g administered every 8 h via a 60 min infusion or piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g administered every 6 h via a 30 min infusion. Serial blood samples were obtained for determination of plasma drug concentrations. Bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage were performed at pre-specified timepoints in five subjects per timepoint in each treatment group to determine the ELF drug concentration. The penetration of individual analytes into the ELF was determined from the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve in ELF to that in plasma (AUC(ELF)/AUC(plasma))., Results: Plasma and ELF concentrations of ceftolozane, piperacillin and tazobactam increased rapidly, reaching maximal concentrations at the end of the infusion. Mean maximum concentration and AUC from time 0 to the end of the dosing interval (AUC(0-τ)) for ceftolozane in ELF were 21.8 mg/L and 75.1 mg·h/L, respectively. Corresponding values for piperacillin were 58.8 mg/L and 94.5 mg·h/L. The ELF/plasma AUC ratio for ceftolozane was 0.48 compared with 0.26 for piperacillin., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that ceftolozane penetrated well into the ELF following parenteral administration of ceftolozane/tazobactam.

With increasing antibiotic resistance in gram-negative pathogens, dosing strategies that optimize pharmacodynamic parameters of currently available antibiotics play an important role in treatment. The likelihood of success with piperacillin/tazobactam, a widely used broad-spectrum antibiotic, can be manipulated by increasing the amount of time that unbound drug concentrations remain above the pathogen's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). However, this success depends greatly on knowing the MIC value as well as accurately estimating the individual's pharmacokinetic parameters. Clinicians should carefully factor these variables into their decision-making process when considering prolonged infusion strategies with piperacillin/tazobactam.

Background: Prolonging the infusion of a beta-lactam antibiotic enhances the time in which unbound drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC)., Objective: To compare the pharmacodynamics of several dosing regimens of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by intermittent and prolonged infusion using pharmacokinetic data from hospitalized patients., Methods: Steady-state pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 13 patients who received piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g every 8 hours, infused over 4 hours. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 pts.) were performed to calculate pharmacodynamic exposures at 50% fT>MIC for 4 intermittent-infusion regimens (3.375 g every 4 and 6 h, 4.5 g every 6 and 8 h) and 4 prolonged-infusion regimens (2.25 g, 3.375 g, 4.5 g, and 6.75 g every 8 h [4-h infusion]) of piperacillin/tazobactam using pharmacokinetic data for piperacillin. Cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was calculated using MIC data for 6 gram-negative pathogens (Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection, 2004-2007), and probability of target attainment (PTA) was calculated at MICs ranging from 1 microg/mL to 64 microg/mL., Results: The CFR for 3.375 g every 4 hours (intermittent infusion) and 3.375-4.5 g every 8 hours (prolonged infusion) greater than or equal to 90.3% for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens, and Citrobacter spp. Increasing the prolonged-infusion dose to 6.75 g improved the CFR to greater than 90% for Enterobacter spp. For every regimen evaluated, the CFR was less than 90% for Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. At an MIC of 16 microg/mL, PTA was greater than 90% for one intermittent-infusion regimen (3.375 g every 4 h) and 3 prolonged-infusion regimens (> or = 3.375 g every 8 h), but no regimen achieved a PTA greater than 90% at an MIC of 64 microg/mL., Conclusions: At doses greater than or equal to 3.375 g every 8 hours, 4-hour infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam achieved excellent target attainment with lower daily doses compared with standard regimens at MICs less than or equal to 16 microg/mL.

Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) combination treatment with those of piperacillin (PIP) monotherapy against clinical gram-negative pulmonary isolates from US patients treated in intensive care units., Methods: Computer modeling was used to integrate national in vitro microbiologic data from 2002 with pharmacokinetic data from published studies in healthy volunteers. PTZ (3.375 g q4h, 3.375 g q6h, 4.5 g q6h, and 4.5 g q8h) and PIP (3 g q4h, 3 g q6h, 4 g q6h, and 4 g q8h) were modeled using Monte Carlo simulations. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) was determined for percentage of time that the free serum concentration remained above the MIC of >or=30% (bacteriostatic) and >or=50% (bactericidal). Because simulated comparisons with an artificially derived sample size were used, statistical methods were not applied., Results: Overall, 2584 gram-negative pulmonary isolates were evaluated, including Enterobacteriaceae (n = 1430), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 799), Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 179), and "other" (n = 176). The percents susceptible with PTZ and PIP were as follows: Enterobacteriaceae, 86% and 66%, respectively; P aeruginosa, 89% and 84%; and A baumannii, 47% and 34%. CFR rates with PTZ were numerically higher than those with PIP against Enterobacteriaceae (ranges, 86%-89% and 66%-73%, respectively) and A baumannii (47%-53% and 33%-42%), but not against P aeruginosa (79%-84% and 75%-81%)., Conclusion: Results from PK/PD models with Monte Carlo simulation suggested that susceptibility differences among these selected gram-negative isolates collected in 2002 may be of sufficient magnitude to result in notable PK/PD differences between PTZ and PIP.

Background: Penicillin-induced immune hemolytic anemia (IHA) is associated with immunoglobulin G antipenicillin detected by testing penicillin-coated red blood cells (RBCs). Antibodies to piperacillin, a semisynthetic penicillin, would be expected to react similarly; however, antipiperacillin can be detected by testing in the presence of the drug. Piperacillin is commonly used in combination with tazobactam, which causes nonimmunologic protein adsorption onto RBCs. In six cases of piperacillin-induced IHA, reactivity with piperacillin-coated RBCs was not similar to reactivity of antipenicillin with penicillin-coated RBCs., Study Design and Methods: Antipiperacillin was tested against piperacillin-coated RBCs prepared using different pH buffers. Plasma from blood donors and sera/plasma from patients were tested with piperacillin-coated, penicillin-coated, and uncoated RBCs. Hapten inhibition studies were performed using different concentrations of piperacillin. Donors' plasma were tested in the presence of piperacillin; sera from patients with IHA were tested in the presence of tazobactam., Results: Piperacillin required high pH for binding to RBCs. Agglutination of piperacillin-coated RBCs was observed in 91 percent of donors' and 49 percent of patients' plasma and was inhibited by piperacillin. In contrast to patients with IHA due to piperacillin, donors' plasma tested in the presence of piperacillin did not react. Tazobactam antibodies were not detected., Conclusion: A high percentage of donors' and patients' plasma contain an antibody to piperacillin or a chemically related structure detected by testing with piperacillin-coated RBCs. A diagnosis of piperacillin-induced IHA should not be made solely on the reactivity of a patient's plasma/serum with piperacillin- or piperacillin/tazobactam-coated RBCs; testing in the presence of piperacillin is more reliable.

Objectives: To determine the steady-state serum and alveolar concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam administered in continuous infusion to critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and various degrees of renal failure., Design: Prospective comparative study., Setting: An intensive care unit and research ward in a university hospital., Patients: Forty patients with microbiologically documented ventilator-associated pneumonia., Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive piperacillin/tazobactam daily continuous infusions of 12/1.5 g or 16/2 g after a loading dose of 4/0.5 g. The serum and alveolar piperacillin/tazobactam concentrations were determined at steady-state with high performance liquid chromatography., Measurements and Main Results: The median (interquartile) serum and alveolar piperacillin concentrations were respectively 25.3 mg/L (23.1-32.6) and 12.7 mg/L (6.7-18.0) for 12/1.5 g/day, and 38.9 mg/L (32.9-59.6) and 19.1 mg/L (14.0-21.5), respectively, for 16/2 g/day in patients with no/mild renal failure. In patients with moderate/advance renal failure, the median (interquartile) serum and alveolar piperacillin concentrations were 102.4 mg/L (97.4-112.6) and 44.1 mg/L (33.4-48.3), respectively, for 12/1.5 g/day, and 135.3 mg/L (119.5-146.2) and 54.9 mg/L (45.2-110.3), respectively, for 16/2 g/day. Our results show great variability in piperacillin/tazobactam concentrations, with an alveolar percentage penetration of 40-50% for piperacillin and 65-85% for tazobactam and a negative association between serum or alveolar concentrations and creatinine clearance., Conclusions: A target piperacillin serum concentration of at least 35-40 mg/L is probably required to provide alveolar concentrations exceeding the susceptibility breakpoint for gram-negative bacteria (16 mg/L) during ventilator-associated pneumonia. In patients with no/mild renal failure, a continuous daily dose of piperacillin/tazobactam 16/2 g allows reaching this target concentration, which might be not observed with 12/1.5 g/day. In patients with moderate/advanced renal failure, both dosages achieve serum concentrations far above the 35-40 mg/L threshold, suggesting that in that case, therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed in order to adjust the daily dose.

Objective: To report pharmacokinetic alterations and optimal dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam in an obese patient., Case Summary: A 39-year-old morbidly obese (weight 167 kg, body mass index 50 kg/m2) man was treated with piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 4 hours for recurrent cellulitis. The wound culture grew Groups A and B Streptococcus and rare Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Blood samples were obtained at steady-state from a peripheral venous catheter at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours after the start of the infusion. Population pharmacokinetics were generated from a previously published data set. The serum concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam obtained in the patient were compared with the 95% confidence interval from the representative population. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximal serum concentration, minimal serum concentration, average steady-state concentration, half-life, elimination rate constant, volume of distribution (V(d)), clearance, area under the curve at steadystate, and percent of time greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration (%t>MIC) were calculated and qualitatively compared between the sample and the population., Discussion: Substantial differences were noted in both the absolute values at the times of sample collection and the overall concentration-versus-time profile of both compounds. The morbidly obese individual compared with the population demonstrated a reduced average serum steady-state concentration: 39.8 mg/L versus 123.6 mg/L, an increased V(d): 54.3 L versus 12.7 L, and an increased half-life: 1.4 hours versus 0.6 hours, respectively. The %t >MIC of piperacillin for the patient, assuming MICs of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 mg/L, was 100%, 100%, 90.9%, 55.4%, 19.9%, 0%, and 0%, respectively., Conclusions: Pathogens with elevated MICs may require altered dosing schemes with piperacillin/tazobactam. Future studies are warranted to assess increased dosages, more frequent dosing intervals, or continuous infusion dosing schemes for obese individuals with serious infections.

An improved HPLC method was developed for the determination of piperacillin and tazobactam in human plasma and pharmacokinetic study in Chinese healthy volunteers. Piperacillin and tazobactam in human plasma were extracted by solid-phase extraction and separated on a C(18) column and detected at 220 nm. The mobile phase for piepracillin consisted of 0.01 mol/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate (pH = 4.65) and acetonitrile (71:29, v/v), and that for tazobactam was 0.05 mol/L sodium dihydrogen phosphate (pH = 4.45) and methanol (90:10, v/v). The method was linear in the range 0.25-320.00 microg/mL for piperacillin (r(2) = 0.995) and 0.25-64.00 microg/mL for tazobactam (r(2) = 0.994). The lower limit of quantification of both compounds was 0.25 microg/mL. The intra- and inter-day precisions of piperacillin and tazobactam at three concentrations were all less than 9.2% and accuracies were within the range 97.0-108.0%. The method was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in 12 volunteers who were intravenously given a dosage of 1.25, 2.50 and 3.75 g in three periods. The results showed that piperacillin sodium-tazobactom sodium (4:1) for injection in Chinese people fits linear dynamics, and the administred dosage can be adjusted with therapeutic effect., (Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Investigators who perform pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling with Monte Carlo simulation have historically not stratified microbiological data by culture site. This lack of stratification might be problematic if susceptibility patterns differ among sites and might lead to differences in PK-PD., Objective: This study compared the PK-PD of 2 antimicrobial regimens against 5 gram-negative bacterial species form 3 culture sites., Methods: This data analysis was performed at the Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas. Blood, pulmonary (ie, bronchial, endotracheal, lung, respiratory, sputum, and tracheal secretions), and wound distributions of MICs were extracted from the 2002 Intensive Care Unit Surveillance System database. Bacteria included Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The PK properties of piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g every 4 hours) and piperacillin (3 g every 4 hours) were obtained from studies in healthy volunteers. Monte Carlo simulation was used in 10,000 patients for each antimicrobial-bacteria-culture site combination. The cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for a free percentage time above the MIC of > or =50% was determined for each combination, and a clinically significant difference was defined a priori as > or =10%., Results: Data from 2408 pulmonary, 490 blood, and 242 wound isolates were included. For piperacillin/tazobactam, the CFR varied <10% by culture site in all 5 bacterial species. Site-specific differences were noted in MIC50 for piperacillin versus E cloacae and E coli and MIC90 for piperacillin/tazobactam versus K pneumoniae and P aeruginosa. Likewise, for piperacillin, the CFR was similar among the 3 culture sites for P aeruginosa. However, the CFR for piperacillin varied by > or =10% for A baumannii (blood > wound), E cloacae (pulmonary > blood), E coli (pulmonary and blood > wound), and K pneumoniae (wound > blood)., Conclusions: The PK-PD models based on PK properties found in healthy humans and site-specific MIC distributions in this study suggest that for piperacillin, culture-site differences subsequently resulted in CFR differences that exceeded a predetermined level of clinical significance. Furthermore, these data suggest that traditional reporting strategies for microbiological data (ie, MIC50 and MIC90) might fail to adequately characterize the MIC population.

Background/aim: Piperacillin-tazobactam is commonly used to treat infections in ICU patients. Controversial data have been published about the sieving/saturation coefficient (Sc/Sa) of piperacillin during continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT). The objective was to evaluate the Sc/Sa of piperacillin-tazobactam during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) using AN69 and polysulfone., Methods: Ringer lactate, BSA-containing Ringer lactate and plasma were circulated at 150 ml/min. The ultrafiltrate/dialysis flow was kept at 1,500 ml/min. A bolus was injected and samples were taken. Drugs were measured using HPLC. Sc/Sa was calculated according to standard formula., Results: Free passage of drugs through the membranes was reported with protein free solutions. In the presence of proteins the Sc/Sa lowered and correlated to protein free fraction. Polysulfone had a significantly higher permeability than AN69 during CVVH., Conclusion: Drug binding to albumin contributes to the decrease of the Sc/Sa of piperacillin but it does not completely justify the in vivo value obtained by some authors., (Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in the extracellular space fluid of inflamed soft tissues of six patients with diabetic foot infection using in vivo microdialysis and found similar penetration for piperacillin but not for tazobactam into inflamed and noninflamed soft tissue.

Objectives: We investigated the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin and tazobactam in hospitalized patients., Patients and Methods: A multicentre, randomized clinical trial was conducted in hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection. Patients received piperacillin/tazobactam administered by either continuous infusion (13.5 g over 24 h, n = 130) or intermittent infusion (3.375 g every 6 h, n = 132). NONMEM was used to perform population pharmacokinetic analysis in a subset of patients (n = 56) who had serum samples obtained at steady-state for drug concentration analyses. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify the breakpoints of piperacillin PK-PD indexes in 94 patients with causative pathogen's MIC., Results: A one-compartment model was applied to fit the data. Creatinine clearance and body weight were the most significant variables to explain patient variability in piperacillin and tazobactam clearance and volume of distribution. The infusion method had no influence on PK parameters. For patients (n = 30) receiving intermittent infusion in the pharmacokinetic study, mean Cmax and half-life were 122.22 mg/L and 1.17 h for piperacillin, and 15.74 mg/L and 1.81 h for tazobactam. For patients (n = 26) receiving continuous infusion in the pharmacokinetic study, mean steady-state concentration was 35.31 +/- 12.15 mg/L for piperacillin and 7.29 +/- 3.28 mg/L for tazobactam. As a result of a low rate of failures (<11%) observed in the trial and the low MICs for infecting pathogens, no association could be established between clinical/microbiological outcome and drug exposure., Conclusions: Intermittent infusion and continuous infusion of piperacillin and tazobactam provided sufficient drug exposure to treat those pathogens commonly implicated in intra-abdominal infections.

The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin/tazobactam (4 g/0.5 g every 6 or 8 hours, by 20-minute intravenous infusion) were studied in 14 patients with acute renal failure who underwent continuous venovenous hemofiltration with AN69 membranes. Patients were grouped according to severity (CL(CR) < or =10 mL/min, 10 < CL(CR) < or =50 mL/min, and CL(CR) > 50 mL/min). A noncompartmental analysis was performed. The sieving coefficient (0.78 +/- 0.28) was similar to the unbound fraction (0.65 +/- 0.24) for tazobactam, but it was significantly different (0.34 +/- 0.25) from the unbound fraction (0.78 +/- 0.14) for piperacillin. Extracorporeal clearance was 37.0% +/- 28.8%, 12.7% +/- 12.6%, and 2.8% +/- 3.2% for piperacillin in each group and 62.5% +/- 44.9%, 35.4% +/- 17.0%, and 13.1% +/- 8.0% for tazobactam. No patients presented tazobactam accumulation. In patients with CL(CR) < 50 mL/min, t(%)ss >MIC90 values were 100% for a panel of 19 pathogens, but in those with CL(CR) > 50 mL/min, t(%)ss >MIC90 indexes were 55.5% and 16.6% for pathogens with MIC90 values of 32 and 64. The extracorporeal clearance of piperacillin/tazobactam is clinically significant in patients with CL(CR) > 50 mL/min, in which the risk of underdosing and clinical failure is important and extra doses are required.

In the present study 24 hospitalized patients requiring empirical antibiotic treatment were randomly assigned to receive the beta-lactam antibiotic/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination piperacillin-tazobactam either as an intermittent or as a continuous infusion. According to pharmacokinetic modelling, the daily dose was reduced by 33% in patients receiving continuous infusion compared with intermittent infusion. Dose reduction because of impaired renal function was required in the intermittent dosing group for 5 of 12 patients compared with 1 of 12 patients in the continuous infusion group. However, the mean daily dose in the continuous group was 15% less than the intermittent infusion group. Mean serum concentrations of piperacillin were to 39.0 microg/ml after the end of bolus distribution, exceeding by far the minimal inhibitory concentration of the most clinically relevant pathogens. The corresponding mean value for tazobactam was 6.3 microg/ml. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling suggests that both treatment schemes should produce virtually identical anti-infective responses to sensitive, intermediate and resistant strains. In the present study the continuous infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam provided adequate antibacterial activity over the 24-h dosing period and offers the potential for a substantial reduction in the total daily dose.

A simple and rapid assay is developed for the simultaneous analysis of piperacillin and tazobactam in rabbit serum and tissue cage fluid (TCF). To eliminate endogenous interferences, a wavelength switch technique was applied, in which the programmable UV detector changed the monitoring wavelength from 218 to 254 nm at 10 min. After liquid-liquid extraction, sample analyses were performed on a C(18) column by gradient elution; the mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and phosphate buffer (0.014 m, pH 2.4). Owing to the limited amount of rabbit TCF available, a cross-validation of a proxy matrix was evaluated. The relative standard deviation of the between- and within-batch precision of both compounds was less than 5.1%; the relative error of the between- and within-batch accuracy was less than 7.3%. The recoveries of both compounds in serum and TCF were larger than 80%. This assay was successfully applied to simultaneously analyze piperacillin and tazobactam in rabbit serum and TCF samples.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling was used to study the impact of the pharmacokinetics of tazobactam on the antimicrobial effect of piperacillin-tazobactam combinations. An in vitro experiment using a novel dilution system was performed to compare the effects of two conditions of the combination therapy against Escherichia coli ATCC35218, a beta-lactamase producing bacterium. Both conditions simulated the same initial concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam, but different elimination half-lives for tazobactam. The killing and regrowth kinetics of E. coli clearly indicated that there is a difference in the antimicrobial effects when there is a difference in the pharmacokinetics of tazobactam in the combination therapy. The results show that for equal piperacillin exposure, different tazobactam half-lives will have a significant effect on antimicrobial outcome.

Objectives: The pharmacokinetic profile of antibiotics at the site of anti-infective action is one of the most important determinants of drug response, since it correlates with antimicrobial effect. Up to now, only limited information on the lung tissue pharmacokinetics of antibiotic agents has been available. The aim of this study was to measure, using a new microdialysis-based approach, antibiotic penetration into the extracellular space fluid of pneumonic human lung parenchyma., Patients and Methods: The lung penetration of a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam, substances with low protein binding, was determined in five patients suffering from pneumonia and metapneumonic pleural empyema. The condition was treated by decortication after lateral thoracotomy. Intra-, or post-operatively, respectively, two microdialysis probes were inserted into pneumonic lung tissue, and into healthy skeletal muscle to obtain reference values. Serum and microdialysis samples were collected at 20-min intervals for at last 8 h following i.v. administration of a single dose of 4 g piperacillin and 500 mg tazobactam., Results: The mean free interstitial concentration profiles of piperacillin in infected lung tissue and serum showed a maximal tissue concentration (Cmax) of 176.0 +/- 105.0 mg l-1 and 326.0 +/- 60.6 mg l-1, respectively. The mean AUC (area under the curve) for infected lung tissue was 288.0 +/- 167.0 mg.h l-1 and for serum 470.0 +/- 142.0 mg.h l-1. There was a statistically significant difference between AUC (lung) and AUC (serum) (P = 0.018) as well as between AUC (lung) and AUC (muscle) (P = 0.043). The intrapulmonary concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for most relevant bacteria for 4-6 h. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse events or microdialysis-associated side-effects were observed., Conclusion: This microdialysis technique enabled continuous tissue pharmacokinetic measurement of free, unbound anti-infective agents in the lung tissue of patients with pneumonia. The present data corroborate the use of piperacillin and tazobactam in the treatment of lung infections caused by extracellular bacteria and demonstrate the distribution of piperacillin and tazobactam in the interstitial space of pneumonic lung tissue.

The frequency of resistance to beta-lactams among nosocomial isolates has been increasing due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enteric bacilli. Although clinical outcome data are desirable, assessment of clinical efficacy has been limited due to the lack of a statistically meaningful number of well-documented cases. Since time above the MIC (T>MIC) is the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) measure that best correlates with in vivo activity of beta-lactams, a stochastic model was used to predict the probability of PK-PD target attainment ranging from 30 (P30) to 70% (P70) T>MIC, for standard dosing regimens of both piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL phenotypes. The P70/30 T>MIC for cefepime at 2 g every 12 h against E. coli and K. pneumoniae was 0.99/1.0 and 0.96/1.0 and for a regimen of 1 g every 12 h was 0.96/1.0 and 0.93/0.99, respectively. For piperacillin-tazobactam at 3.375 g every 4 h against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, the P70/30 T>MIC was 0.77/0.96 and 0.48/0.77 and for a regimen of 3.375 g every 6 h was 0.28/0.91 and 0.16/0.69, respectively. These data suggest that the probability of achieving T>MIC target attainment rates is generally higher with cefepime than with piperacillin-tazobactam for present-day ESBL-producing strains when one uses contemporary dosing regimens.

The pharmacokinetic profile of antibiotics at the site of antiinfective action is one of the most important determinants of drug response, since it correlates the antimicrobial effect. Up to now, only limited information on the lung tissue pharmacokinetics of antibiotic agents has been available. The aim of in-vivo microdialysis is to measure antibiotic penetration into the extracellular space fluid of normal or pneumonic human lung parenchyma. The lung penetration of cefpirom in elective thoracic surgery and piperacillin in septic thoracic surgery, substances with low protein binding, was measured. Intra-, or postoperatively, respectively, microdialysis probes were inserted into normal or pneumonic lung tissue and into healthy skeletal muscle to obtain reference values. Serum and microdialysis samples were collected at 20-minute intervals for at last 8 hours. The intrapulmonary concentrations of the antibiotics exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for most relevant bacteria for 4-6 hours. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse events or microdialysis-associated side effects were observed. This microdialysis technique enabled continuous tissue pharmacokinetic measurement of free, unbound anti-infective agents in the lung tissue, even in pneumonia.

Background: Although intermittent bolus dosing is currently the standard of practice for many antimicrobial agents, beta-lactams exhibit time-dependent bacterial killing. Maximizing the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for a pathogen is the best pharmacodynamic predictor of efficacy. Use of a continuous infusion has been advocated for maximizing the time above the MIC compared with intermittent bolus dosing., Objective: This study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam when administered as an intermittent bolus versus a continuous infusion against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae., Methods: Healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive piperacillin 3 g/ tazobactam 0.375 g q6h for 24 hours, piperacillin 6 g/tazobactam 0.75 g continuous infusion over 24 hours, and piperacillin 12 g/tazobactam 1.5 g continuous infusion over 24 hours. Five clinical isolates each of P aeruginosa and K pneumoniae were used for pharmacodynamic analyses., Results: Eleven healthy subjects (7 men, 4 women; mean +/- SD age, 28 +/- 4.7 years) were enrolled. Mean steady-state serum concentrations of piperacillin were 16.0 +/- 5.0 and 37.2 +/- 6.8 microg/mL with piperacillin 6 and 12 g, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam 13.5 g continuous infusion (piperacillin 12 g/tazobactam 1.5 g) was significantly more likely to produce a serum inhibitory titer > or = 1:2 against P aeruginosa at 24 hours than either the 6.75 g continuous infusion (piperacillin 6 g/tazobactam 0.75 g) or 3.375 g q6h (piperacillin 3 g/ tazobactam 0.375 g). There were no statistical differences against K pneumoniae between regimens. The median area under the inhibitory activity-time curve (AUIC) for the 13.5 g continuous infusion was higher than that for 3.375 g q6h and the 6.75 g continuous infusion against both P aeruginosa and Kpneumoniae (P < or = 0.007, 13.5 g continuous infusion and 3.375 g q6h vs 6.75 g continuous infusion against K pneumoniae). The percentage of subjects with an AUIC > or = 125 was higher with both 3.375 g q6h and the 13.5 g continuous infusion than with the 6.75 g continuous infusion against P aeruginosa and K pneumoniae (both, P < 0.001 vs 6.75 g continuous infusion against K pneumoniae)., Conclusions: Piperacillin 12 g/tazobactam 1.5 g continuous infusion consistently resulted in serum concentrations above the breakpoint for Enterobacteriaceae and many of the susceptible strains of P aeruginosa in this study in 11 healthy subjects. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to determine the appropriate dose of piperacillin/tazobactam.

The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin-tazobactam were investigated in eight anuric intensive care patients treated by continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD). The elimination half-life of piperacillin was 4.3 +/- 1.2 h, and that of tazobactam was 5.6 +/- 1.3 h. The contribution of CVVHD to the overall elimination was relevant (>25%) for both drugs.

When piperacillin/tazobactam has been used to treat hospitalized patients with serious infections, including nosocomial pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, it has usually been dosed at 3.375 g q4h to provide serum concentrations above commonly encountered organisms' MICs (T > MIC) for at least 40-50% of the dosing interval. Pharmacodynamic principles suggest that a similar efficacy can be realized with extended dosing intervals when a larger dose (e.g. 4.5 g q6h) is administered, which was the objective of this study. Twelve healthy volunteers, 29.4 +/- 8.9 years of age, were enrolled in this multiple-dose, open-labeled, randomized, two-period crossover study. Blood samples were collected after the third dose and concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam were determined with a validated HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic profiles were determined by noncompartment analysis. T > MIC of piperacillin was calculated for a range of MIC values. Piperacillin/tazobactam was well tolerated in 11 subjects who completed both regimens. The C(max), T(1/2), K, and AUC of P were significantly different according to a paired t test (p < 0.05) between two study regimens. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in tazobactam regimens were noted for C(max), and AUC. The piperacillin/tazobactam regimen of 4.5 g q6h achieved a 44% T > MIC for MIC values of < or = 16 microg/ml, while the 3.375-gram q4h regimen achieved 42% T > MIC, for MIC values of < or = 32 microg/ml. Dosage regimens for treating serious infections can be extended safely and effectively to 4.5 g q6h and obtain at least 40-50% T > MIC in the coverage of pathogens implicated with serious infections, including P. aeruginosa., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Study Objective: To compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of two dosing regimens for piperacillin-tazobactam against commonly encountered pathogens. The regimens compared were piperacillin 4.0 g-tazobactam 0.5 g administered every 8 hours, and piperacillin 3.0 g-tazobactam 0.375 g administered every 6 hours., Design: Multiple-dose, open-label, randomized, crossover study., Setting: Clinical research center at Hartford Hospital., Subjects: Twelve healthy volunteers., Intervention: The two dosing regimens for piperacillin-tazobactam were administered intravenously in crossover design. Blood was sampled after the third dose., Measurements and Main Results: Drug concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The percentage of time above minimum inhibitory concentration (%T>MIC) for piperacillin was calculated for a range of MIC values. The maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC0-tau), and total clearance of piperacillin differed significantly between the two study regimens, as did the Cmax, AUC0-tau, volume of distribution, and total clearance of tazobactam (p<0.05). The piperacillin 4.0 g-tazobactam 0.5 g regimen provided 40-50% T>MIC for MIC values 8-16 microg/ml; a similar value for the piperacillin 3.0 g-tazobactam 0.375 g regimen was 16-32 microg/ml., Conclusion: Although statistically significant differences in the pharmacodynamic profile were noted for the regimens, both provide adequate T>MIC against commonly encountered pathogens considered susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam. However, for treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, combination therapy or higher-dosage regimens (e.g., piperacillin 3.0 g-tazobactam 0.375 g every 4 hours, piperacillin 4.0 g-tazobactam 0.5 g every 6 hours, or continuous-infusion piperacillin 12 g-tazobactam 1.5 g/day) may be a prudent option when full MIC data are unavailable.

The degree of penetration of an antibiotic into the infected site is an important criterion for therapeutic success. This is particularly true for bone and joint infections. The association of piperacillin and tazobactam has been widely used in the treatment of serious infections including bone infections, but no study has been devoted to the subject of its diffusion into synovial tissue. Our objective was to quantify piperacillin/tazobactam synovial tissue penetration and to estimate the efficacy of the association against the microorganisms usually encountered in joint infections. In an open-label study, 6 subjects with similar age, weight, height and creatinine clearance, who were undergoing elective total hip replacement, received a single, parenteral, 4 g/500 mg dose of piperacillin/tazobactam. Plasma and synovial tissue samples were collected and analyzed by a validated HPLC method. The mean concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam 1.5 h after the initiation of infusion were 69.9 +/- 4.9 microg/mL and 7.7 +/- 0.3 microg/mL, respectively, in plasma and 37.1 +/- 2.1 microg/g and 2.8 +/- 0.4 microg/g, respectively, in synovial tissue. The synovial tissue/plasma ratios were 0.5 +/- 0.0 for piperacillin and 0.4 +/- 0.0 for tazobactam. The piperacillin/tazobactam ratios were 9.1:1 in plasma and 13.5:1 in synovial tissue. The concentrations achieved in synovial tissue are above the MICs of most of the susceptible pathogens usually involved in joint infections, which suggests that the piperacillin/tazobactam combination should be effective in the treatment of most joint infections caused by susceptible microorganisms.

The elimination of the piperacillin/tazobactam combination was studied in six patients with acute renal failure undergoing either continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) at 1 L/h and 2 L/h for 12 h. Piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 0.5 g was given iv on three successive treatment periods and their concentrations in plasma, ultrafiltrate/dialysate and urine were determined for 12 h after each dose. The elimination half-life of piperacillin during CVVH (7.7 +/- 2.3 h; mean +/- s.d.) was significantly longer than during CVVHDF 1 L/h (6.7 +/- 1.9 h) or 2 L/h (6.1 +/- 2.0 h) (P< 0.05). Corresponding values for tazobactam were 13.9 +/- 3.9, 11.6 +/- 3.3 and 9.4 +/- 2.4 h, respectively (P< 0.05). Total piperacillin clearance during CVVH (3.89 +/- 1.23 L/h) was significantly lower than during CVVHDF 1 L/h (5.06 +/- 1.68 L/h) or 2 L/h (5.48 +/- 2.11 L/h) (P< 0.05). The corresponding tazobactam clearance values were 2.42 +/- 0.75, 3.13 +/- 0.66 and 3.75 +/- 1.43 L/h, respectively. The mean 12 h elimination of piperacillin and tazobactam in ultrafiltrate/dialysate was 29% and 37% during CVVH, 42% and 57% during CVVHDF (1 L/h), and 46% and 69% during CVVHDF (2 L/h). We recommend 8 hourly dosing of patients with renal failure on CVVH or CVVHDF with dialysis flow rates of 1 or 2 L/h treated with piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 0.5 g.

A study was performed to further investigate the apparent instability of tobramycin when coadministered with piperacillin/tazobactam in subjects with renal impairment. Twenty-six otherwise healthy volunteers between 23 and 74 years of age were studied. Eight subjects had moderate renal impairment, 10 had mild renal impairment, and 8 had normal renal function. Each subject received single doses of piperacillin/tazobactam and tobramycin alone as well as combined doses in a randomized, three-way crossover design. The subjects with normal renal function also received combined doses of piperacillin and tobramycin. Considerable care was taken to protect against in vitro inactivation of plasma and urine samples after collection. No systematic changes in pharmacokinetic parameters were observed. It is concluded that piperacillin, either alone or with tazobactam, did not change the pharmacokinetics of tobramycin in subjects with renal impairment. The apparent in vivo inactivation of tobramycin in the presence of piperacillin or piperacillin/tazobactam reported by others may be an artifact of ex vivo inactivation.

A predictive parameter of beta-lactam therapeutic efficacy is the time (T > MIC) while antibiotic serum concentrations are above the MIC of suspected bacteriological agents. This led us to carry out a randomised open study to compare the usually used intermittent administration of Tazocin (three injections of 4 g/0.5 g a day) and continuous perfusion of 12 g/1.5 g a day by calculating these T > MIC. Patients from digestive reanimation department were randomised within two arms: continuous or intermittent administration. Sixteen takings of blood were executed over a forty-hour period. After liquid/liquid extraction, piperacillin and tazobactam serum concentrations were determined by HPLC with a reversed phase column (C18) and a UV spectrophotometry detection. Then, from the time-concentration curves we have evaluated the T > MIC for an enterobacteria (MIC = 8 micrograms/mL) and for Pseudomonas (MIC = 16 micrograms/mL). Concerning intermittent administration T > MIC were 74% (c > MICenterobacteria) and 62% (c > MICPseudomonas). These percentages in the continuous arm were 100% (c > MICenterobacteria) and 99% (c > MICPseudomonas). Tazobactam concentrations were low and even undetectable between each injection in the intermittent administration arm. This was not found within the continuous administration arm. In conclusion, for the intermittent administration, we observed some long periods occurring before each injection while antibiotic concentrations were under the MIC of most bacteria. During these same periods tazobactam concentrations were under the efficacy threshold. These periods were not observed within the continuous administration arm.

A multiple-dose, open-labelled, randomized, two period crossover human volunteer study was performed (i) to describe the pharmacokinetic profile and safety profile of piperacillin and tazobactam (P/T) administered 6.0/0.75 g and 8.0/1.0 g q12h and (ii) to characterize the pharmacodynamic profile of these regimens against a variety of common targeted pathogens. Blood samples were collected after the third dose and concentrations of P/T were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Pharmacokinetic profiles of P/T were determined by non-compartment analysis. Percentage time above the MIC (%T > MIC) of piperacillin was calculated for a range of MICs. In this study, no adverse events were attributed after multiple administrations of either 6.0/0.75 g or 8.0/1.0 g dose regimens. The peak concentration, half-life and area under the curve (AUC0-(0-tau)) of piperacillin were significantly different by a paired t-test (P < 0.05) between the two study regimens. The trough concentration, half-life and area under the curve (AUC0-(0-tau)) of tazobactam were substantially different from parameters reported previously for conventional regimens. The 8.0/1.0 g regimen provided 50% T > MIC for MICs < or =32 mg/L, while a similar value for the 6.0/0.75 g regimen was < or = 16 mg/L. High-dose P/T regimens with extended interval were well tolerated and provide adequate dynamic exposure for a variety of susceptible pathogens.

Production of beta-lactamases is the most common mechanism by which gram-negative bacteria express resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics. One successful method of circumventing the threat of plasmid-encoded beta-lactamases is to combine inhibitors of these enzymes with a penicillin. Currently, four inhibitor-penicillin combinations are in clinical use: ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin-tazobactam. Of these, ticarcillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam have the broadest spectra of activity that includes Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Many factors influence the activity and pharmacodynamics of these combinations, including potency of both agents, pharmacokinetics of the inhibitor, type and quantity of beta-lactamase produced by the target bacterium, and potential for the inhibitor to induce expression of chromosomal cephalosporinases in the target bacterium. Although ticarcillin-clavulanate and piperacillin-tazobactam have similar spectra of activity, they have many differences. Most notable are increased potency of piperacillin against Enterobacteriaceae and P aeruginosa, increased activity of piperacillin-tazobactam against gram-negative pathogens producing penicillin-sensitive enzyme (PSE)-class beta-lactamase or hyperproducing other plasmid-encoded beta-lactamases, and the more favorable pharmacokinetics of tazobactam. In the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections, the potential for clavulanate to induce expression of chromosomal cephalosporinase and antagonize antibacterial activity of ticarcillin is a concern, especially in patients who lack protective host defenses. These are not concerns with piperacillin-tazobactam.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal (IP) administration of the antibiotic combination piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) to patients on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with and without pseudomonas peritonitis., Design: Open-labeled study., Setting: The study was carried out in the CAPD unit of Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel., Patients and Methods: Six patients participated in the study, 4 had pseudomonas peritonitis, all were given an IP loading dose of 4 g/0.5 g PIP/TAZ. Twenty-four hours after the initial dose, a maintenance dose of 0.5 g/0.0625 g PIP/TAZ was administered with each dialysate exchange for a period of 1 week. The patients without peritonitis received only the loading dose. High performance liquid chromatography was used to determine the concentrations of PIPITAZ in plasma obtained at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 360, 480, 600, 720, and 1440 minutes after administration. Samples of the dialysate fluid for determination of PIP/TAZ concentration were collected at 6,10,14, 24, and 72, 120, and 168 hours., Results: After the loading dose, the highest plasma PIP concentration (Cmax) was 51.6 t 21.25 Lig/mL and appeared at 1.5 = 0.45 hours (t,,a). During the maintenance period plasma PIP concentration was 5.2 t 4.75 Lg/mL. Tazobactam was detected in the plasma of 1 patient only. The concentration of TAZ in the dialysate fluid during the maintenance period was 2.3 t 0.5 ig/mL., Conclusions: Piperacillin administered IP at 4 g reached plasma concentrations comparable to intravenous administration and considered therapeutic (above the MIC90 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) in CAPD patients with or without peritonitis. The maintenance dose, however, should be augmented. Tazobactam could not be detected in the plasma of most patients and the therapeutic implications of IP administration of TAZ cannot be directly correlated to intravenous administration.

The objective of this study was to determine the extent of biliary excretion of tazocillin, a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam administered as an intravenous infusion in a dose of 4 g of piperacillin and 0.5 g of tazobactam. In 10 patients, piperacillin and tazobactam levels were determined in serum, main bile duct bile, gallbladder bile, and gallbladder wall specimens harvested during a cholecystectomy procedure 1 h after completion of a tazocillin infusion. In five other patients, piperacillin and tazobactam levels were determined in bile collected from a main bile duct T-tube during 12 h following a tazocillin infusion given seven days after cholecystectomy. HPLC was used to assay both compounds. Piperacillin and tazobactam levels in the intraoperative specimens were as follows: 69.1 +/- 13.8 and 9.9 +/- 1.7 micrograms/ml, respectively, in the serum; 630 +/- 133 and 11.9 +/- 2.2 micrograms/ml, respectively, in the main bile duct bile; 342 +/- 114 and 7.7 +/- 2.3 micrograms/ml, respectively, in the gallbladder bile; and 49.3 +/- 20.2 and 2.9 +/- 0.6 micrograms/g, respectively, in the gallbladder wall. In the T-tube bile specimens, peak piperacillin and tazobactam levels were 358 +/- 281 and 9.9 +/- 3.3 micrograms/ml, respectively, after 1 h; total biliary excretion over 12 hours was 28.3 +/- 18.0 mg and 1.0 +/- 0.5 mg, i.e., 0.7 +/- 0.4% and 0.2 +/- 0.1% of the dose, respectively. The levels of piperacillin and tazobactam found in bile and gallbladder wall specimens in this study suggest that tazocillin may prove valuable for the prevention and treatment of biliary infections.

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was conducted to determine if piperacillin and tazobactam exhibited linear or nonlinear PKs and if incremental changes in the daily dosage of piperacillin affected tazobactam PKs. Four dosage groups were evaluated after multiple dosing regimens. Concentrations of drug in plasma and amounts in urine were best fitted by using a linear two-compartment PK model. No significant difference between dosing groups was seen for any piperacillin or tazobactam PK parameters. Both drugs exhibited linear PKs when given at usual clinical doses. Tazobactam PKs did not appear to be affected by the different dosing regimens of piperacillin.

The investigation of tissue penetration and distribution of antibiotics is of great importance, since infections occur mostly in the tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam, alone and in combination, by measuring total plasma and free interstitial concentrations, and to examine the relationship between free levels of both drugs in blood and those in the extracellular space. Piperacillin and tazobactam were administered, alone and in combination, to anaesthetized rats as a single iv bolus dose. Total plasma concentrations and free extracellular concentrations were quantified by HPLC. In-vivo microdialysis sampling was used to study the free tissue distribution patterns of both drugs. The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in plasma were consistent with a two-compartment body model. Piperacillin pharmacokinetics were not influenced by co-administration of tazobactam. Tazobactam's volumes of distribution and clearance were decreased by the co-administration of piperacillin and the area under the curve was significantly increased. Comparisons between calculated free concentrations in the peripheral compartment for both drugs and measured free extracellular concentrations revealed excellent agreement. For piperacillin and tazobactam, alone and in combination, predictions of the concentration-time profiles of free drug in the peripheral compartment can be made on the basis of plasma data.

Mathematical modeling methods were used to study pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of the antimicrobial combinations piperacillin plus ciprofloxacin and piperacillin plus tazobactam. Twelve healthy volunteers received the following treatments: piperacillin (4 g), ciprofloxacin (400 mg), piperacillin (4 g) plus ciprofloxacin (400 mg), and piperacillin (4 g) plus tazobactam (0.5 g), via intravenous infusion in a four-period crossover design. Serum drug concentrations were analyzed by means of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and inhibitory titers were performed against eight organisms. The pharmacodynamic response (growth or no growth) was modeled for each of the monotherapy courses using a Hill-type model where Emax was 1 (100% probability of no growth [P(NG)]), and EC50 was the concentration associated with a 50% P(NG). For piperacillin plus ciprofloxacin, P(NG) was a function of 1) plasma concentrations for both drugs; 2) EC50 values from the monotherapy courses; and 3) theta, an interaction term that accommodates synergy, additivity, or antagonism. For piperacillin/tazobactam, the serum ultrafiltrate area under the inhibitory curve was compared with that of piperacillin alone to determine the benefit of tazobactam. The interaction between piperacillin and ciprofloxacin was additive. The addition of tazobactam to piperacillin was beneficial against certain organisms. The model developed can be used to evaluate the activity of combination regimens against representative pathogens.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two multiple-dose regimens of piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h and 4.5 g every 8 h) were evaluated at steady state for 12 healthy adult volunteers. Inhibitory and bactericidal activities for the two regimens were determined with five American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) organisms (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacteroides fragilis). The percentage of time that plasma concentrations remained above the MIC (T > MIC) for each organism and dosage regimen was calculated. Areas under the inhibitory (AUIC0-24) and bactericidal activity (AUBC0-24) curves were calculated with the trapezoidal rule by using the reciprocal of the inhibitory and bactericidal titers determined for each dosage regimen. In order to assess the validity of predicted measures of bactericidal (AUC0-24/MBC) and inhibitory (AUC0-24/MIC) activity to determine bacteriological response to beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, AUC0-24/MBC and AUC0-24/MIC values were compared with measured AUBC0-24 and AUIC0-24 values. Total body clearance values were equivalent for piperacillin (183.96 +/- 22.66 versus 181.72 +/- 19.54 ml/min/1.73 m2, P > 0.05) and tazobactam (184.71 +/- 19.89 versus 184.87 +/- 18.35 ml/min/1.73 m2, P > 0.05) following the administration of the 3.375-g-every-6-h and 4.5-g-every-8-h dosages, respectively. Comparison of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) for piperacillin (967.74 +/- 135.56 microg x h/ml versus 978.88 +/- 140.96 microg x h/ml) and tazobactam (120.14 +/- 15.78 microg x h/ml versus 120.01 +/- 16.22 microg x h/ml) revealed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the 3.375-g-every-6-h and 4.5-g-every-8-h regimens, respectively. Both regimens provided T > MIC values of > 60% for all organisms tested. Measured values of bactericidal (AUBC) and inhibitory (AUIC) activity were significantly different (P < 0.05) from predicted values (AUC0-24/MBC and AUC0-24/MIC) for all organisms studied with the exception of the bactericidal activity for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Additionally, ATCC organisms possessing the same MICs and MBCs exhibited great differences in measured AUBC0-24 and AUIC0-24 values. Reasons for this difference may be inherent differences in organism specific susceptibility.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the in vitro antiinfective effect of piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TZB) combinations on Escherichia coli in simulations of free concentration time profiles of both drugs, similar to those obtained in human tissue after i.v. bolus administrations., Methods: An in vitro dilution model was used to expose E. coli ATCC 35218 (beta-lactamase producer) to various piperacillin-tazobactam concentration profiles obtained after i.v. bolus multiple dose, using different dose ratio combinations (1:4, 1:8, 1:16) and dosing regimens, ranging from once-a-day to 4 times a day. The antimicrobial effect was evaluated by determination of the number of bacteria over time. The concentration of PIP in the model was determined by HPLC., Results: A modified Emax model was used to describe the pharmacodynamic effect. The model was linked with the piperacillin concentrations determined experimentally to provide a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model. The EC50 for piperacillin alone averaged 5.66 +/- 0.29 micrograms/ml. The EC50 for all doses of piperacillin combined with 0.5 g of tazobactam were dose-dependent and averaged 1.70 +/- 0.56, 3.95 +/- 1.02, and 6.14 +/- 1.24 micrograms/ml for PIP 2, 4, and 8 g, respectively. By increasing the dose of TZB in combination with a fixed dose of PIP, a decreased EC50 was observed., Conclusions: The PK-PD model allowed a detailed evaluation of the dosing regimens investigated. The results suggested that for these combinations, 3 times a day administration is as effective as 4 times a day. Pharmacodynamic activity of the combinations can be prolonged by sufficiently high inhibitor concentrations.