Search

The STEP (Stability, Transport, Equilibrium, and Pedestal) integrated-modeling tool has been developed in OMFIT to predict stable, tokamak equilibria self-consistently with core-transport and pedestal calculations. STEP couples theory-based codes to integrate a variety of physics, including magnetohydrodynamic stability, transport, equilibrium, pedestal formation, and current-drive, heating, and fueling. The input/output of each code is interfaced with a centralized ITER-Integrated Modelling & Analysis Suite data structure, allowing codes to be run in any order and enabling open-loop, feedback, and optimization workflows. This paradigm simplifies the integration of new codes, making STEP highly extensible. STEP has been verified against a published benchmark of six different integrated models. Core-pedestal calculations with STEP have been successfully validated against individual DIII-D H-mode discharges and across more than 500 discharges of the H 98 , y 2 database, with a mean error in confinement time from experiment less than 19%. STEP has also reproduced results in less conventional DIII-D scenarios, including negative-central-shear and negative-triangularity plasmas. Predictive STEP modeling has been used to assess performance in several tokamak reactors. Simulations of a high-field, large-aspect-ratio reactor show significantly lower fusion power than predicted by a zero-dimensional study, demonstrating the limitations of scaling-law extrapolations. STEP predictions have found promising scenarios for an EXhaust and Confinement Integration Tokamak Experiment, including a high-pressure, 80%-bootstrap-fraction plasma. ITER modeling with STEP has shown that pellet fueling enhances fusion gain in both the baseline and advanced-inductive scenarios. Finally, STEP predictions for the SPARC baseline scenario are in good agreement with published results from the physics basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shaping effect on the plasma response to the externally applied resonant magnetic perturbation field is investigated for both DIII-D and MAST experiments, utilizing toroidal modeling. The plasma boundary shape is systematically varied ranging from single-null (SN) to double-null (DN) configurations, while other equilibrium quantities are kept largely unchanged. The relative amplitude of the computed plasma surface displacement, between the top/bottom of the torus and the outboard mid-plane, is identified as the most reliable indicator that distinguishes the plasma response between the SN and DN configurations. The underlying physics is the weakening of the edge-peeling component in the plasma response with increasing up-down symmetry of the plasma boundary shape. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]