1. The Effect of Aerobic Training and Increasing Nonexercise Physical Activity on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors
- Author
-
Damon L. Swift, Chelsey Solar, Tyara R. Nevels, Joshua E. McGee, Joseph A. Houmard, Angela Clark, Lesley D. Lutes, Patricia Brophy, and Savanna B Brewer
- Subjects
Blood Glucose ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Waist ,Physical fitness ,Pilot Projects ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Fitness Trackers ,law.invention ,Randomized controlled trial ,Weight loss ,law ,Weight Loss ,medicine ,Body Fat Distribution ,Humans ,Insulin ,Aerobic exercise ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Obesity ,Prospective Studies ,Exercise physiology ,Risk factor ,Exercise ,business.industry ,Cardiometabolic Risk Factors ,Middle Aged ,Lipids ,Confidence interval ,Exercise Therapy ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Sedentary Behavior ,Waist Circumference ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Physical Conditioning, Human - Abstract
PURPOSE Epidemiological studies suggest that sedentary behavior is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular mortality independent of meeting physical activity guidelines. However, limited evidence of this relationship is available from prospective interventions. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the combined effect of aerobic training and increasing nonexercise physical activity on body composition and cardiometabolic risk factors. METHODS Obese adults (N = 45) were randomized to 6 months of aerobic training (AERO), aerobic training and increasing nonexercise physical activity (~3000 steps above baseline levels; AERO-PA), or a control (CON) group. The AERO and AERO-PA groups performed supervised aerobic training (3-4 times per week). The AERO-PA group wore Fitbit One accelerometers and received behavioral coaching to increase nonexercise physical activity. RESULTS There was a larger increase in fitness in the AERO-PA group (0.27 L·min-1; confidence interval (CI), 0.16 to 0.40 L·min-1) compared with the AERO group (0.09 L·min-1; CI, -0.04 to 0.22 L·min-1) and the CON group (0.01; CI, -0.11 to 0.12 L·min-1). Although significant findings were not observed in the entire study sample, when the analysis was restricted to participants compliant to the intervention (n = 33), we observed significant reductions in waist circumference, percent weight loss, body fat, 2-h glucose, and 2-h insulin in comparison to the CON group (P < 0.05), but not the AERO group. Furthermore, linear regression models showed that change in steps was associated with 21% and 26% of the variation in percent weight loss and percent fat loss, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Increasing nonexercise physical activity with aerobic training may represent a viable strategy to augment the fitness response in comparison to aerobic training alone and has promise for other health indicators.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF