Search

Background and Purpose: Physiotherapy, with an emphasis on high intensity, individually tailored, and person-centered treatment, is an effective route for recovery after a stroke. No single approach, however, has been deemed paramount, and there is limited knowledge about the patient experience of assessment, goal-setting, and treatment in physiotherapy. In this study, we seek to report patient experiences of I-CoreDIST-a new physiotherapy intervention that targets recovery-and those of usual care. The purpose is to investigate how individuals with stroke experience the bodily and interactive course of physiotherapy during their recovery process., Methods: A qualitative study, nested within a randomized controlled trial, consisting of in-depth interviews with 19 stroke survivors who received either I-CoreDIST or usual care. Data were analyzed using systematic text condensation, and this analysis was informed by enactive theory., Results: Interaction with the physiotherapist, which was guided by perceived bodily changes, fluctuated between being, on the one hand, formal/explicit and, on the other, tacit/implicit. The experiences of participants in the intervention group and the usual care group differed predominantly with regards to the content of therapy sessions and the means of measuring progress; divergences in levels of satisfaction with the treatment were less pronounced. The perception of positive bodily changes, as well as the tailoring of difficulty and intensity, were common and essential features in generating meaning and motivation. An embodied approach seemed to facilitate sense-making in therapy situations. In the interaction between the participants and their physiotherapists, trust and engagement were important but also multifaceted, involving both interpersonal skills and professional expertise., Conclusion: The embodied nature of physiotherapy practice is a source for sense-making and meaning-construction for patients after a stroke. Trust in the physiotherapist, along with emotional support, is considered essential. Experiencing progress and individualizing approaches are decisive motivators., (© 2022 The Authors. Physiotherapy Research International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background : Group-based physiotherapy is effective for individuals with MS; nevertheless individualization within groups is questioned and little is known regarding individuals´ experiences with individualization in small groups. Objective : We aimed to explore the short- and long-term experiences of individuals with MS participating in a 6-week, group-based, individualized physiotherapy-intervention. Methods : Within a randomized controlled trial (RCT), 25 in-depth interviews with a strategic sample of 13 people (9 women; age 25-79 years old; European Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 1-6.5) were conducted at weeks 7 and 30 using systematic text condensation, with dynamic systems theory and phenomenology as analytical frameworks. Results : The main categories were: 1) movement control, orientation and insights: Bodily improvements were associated with targeted exercises, specific adjustments by the physiotherapist, emotional engagement and re-access to activities; and 2) the individual within the group: Equal distributions of one-to-one interactions and attention were important for experiencing success. Less attention and improvements turned attention toward own disability. Physical changes felt particularly emotional short term, implying that individuals' feelings of ownership and control of body and movement, new views of themselves and changed affordances in daily life were involved. Conclusion : Equally distributed attention and engagement, targeted exercises and hands-on adjustments resulting in visible and perceived bodily changes were experienced as key factors of individualization in small groups.

Background: Balance and trunk control are often impaired in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). Interventions addressing these issues are needed., Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the immediate and long-term effects of a 6-week individualized, group-based, comprehensive core stability intervention (GroupCoreDIST) with standard care on balance and trunk control in individuals with MS., Design: This study was a prospective, assessor-masked, randomized controlled trial., Setting: The GroupCoreDIST intervention was conducted by 6 physical therapists in 6 municipalities in Norway. Standard care included the usual care for individuals with MS in the same municipalities. Assessments at all time points took place at a Norwegian hospital., Participants: Eighty people with Expanded Disability Status scores of 1 to 6.5 participated in this trial., Intervention: Randomized, concealed allocation was used to assign the participants to the GroupCoreDIST intervention (n = 40) or to standard care (n = 40). The GroupCoreDIST intervention was conducted with groups of 3 participants (1 group had 4 participants), for 60 minutes 3 times per week., Measurements: Assessments were undertaken at baseline and at weeks 7, 18, and 30. Outcomes were measured with the Trunk Impairment Scale-Norwegian Version, Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Patient Global Impression of Change-Balance. Repeated-measures mixed models were used for statistical analysis., Results: One individual missed all postintervention tests, leaving 79 participants in the intention-to-treat analysis. GroupCoreDIST produced significant between-group effects on the mean difference in the following scores at 7, 18, and 30 weeks: for Trunk Impairment Scale-Norwegian Version, 2.63 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.89-3.38), 1.57 points (95% CI = 0.81-2.33), and 0.95 point (95% CI = 0.19-1.71), respectively; for Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test, 1.91 points (95% CI = 1.07-2.76), 1.28 points (95% CI = 0.42-2.15), and 0.91 points (95% CI = 0.04-1.77), respectively; and for Patient Global Impression of Change-Balance, 1.21 points (95% CI = 1.66-0.77), 1.02 points (95% CI = 1.48-0.57), and 0.91 points (95% CI = 1.36-0.46), respectively., Limitations: Groups were not matched for volume of physical therapy., Conclusions: Six weeks of GroupCoreDIST improved balance and trunk control in the short and long terms compared with standard care in individuals who were ambulant and had MS. The intervention is an effective contribution to physical therapy for this population., (© American Physical Therapy Association 2019.)