Search

Poecilostome cyclopoids are among the most morphologically diverse copepods, having established symbiotic relationships with teleosts, elasmobranchs and invertebrate hosts belonging to no fewer than 14 marine phyla. Many parasitic lineages display radically divergent body plans and on that basis have traditionally been placed at higher taxonomic rank than they deserve. The most recent example is the monotypic family Umazuracolidae, established for a derived fish parasite with bomolochiform affinities. Phylogenetic analysis of complete ssrDNA (18S) sequences of 44 species belonging to 21 families of cyclopoid copepods shows that there is no support for the familial distinctiveness of the Umazuracolidae. Both maximum parsimony tree reconstruction and Bayesian inference, operating under the GTR+I+Γ model of nucleotide substitution, unambiguously placed Umazuracola elongatus in the Taeniacanthidae within the predominantly fish parasitic bomolochiform complex, refuting the original suggestion of a shared most recent common ancestry with polychaete symbionts. The phylogenies also revealed that the bomolochiform families and the Clausidiidae (and allies) form a monophyletic group, the clausidiiform complex, with high nodal support under both methods. Bayesian inference suggested a diphyletic origin of the "Poecilostomatoida" with the clausidiiform family-group holding a basal position while the traditional cyclopoid families form a monophyletic group in apposition to a second poecilostomatoid clade; however, maximum parsimony results were equivocal, depending on outgroup selection. Scrutiny of the morphological characters diagnosing the monotypic families Tegobomolochidae and Tuccidae demonstrated that they merely represent derived lineages within more inclusive taxa, the former being related to a group of nostril-inhabiting genera within the Bomolochidae, the latter forming the sistergroup of Taeniacanthodes within the Taeniacanthidae. The taeniacanthid genus Makrostrotos occupies a position at the base of the bomolochiform complex and is fixed as the type of a new family, Makrostrotidae. Although both morphological and molecular evidence hint that the Bomolochidae is nested within a paraphyletic Taeniacanthidae, the status quo of maintaining both families is favoured here pending additional molecular data. The bomolochiform complex, comprising the Bomolochidae, Taeniacanthidae, Telsidae and Makrostrotidae, is attributed superfamilial rank as the Bomolochoidea. A recent controversial phylogenetic analysis of the poecilostomatoid families is shown to be flawed, being based on a dataset containing imperfect or misleading information, and characters whose states were wrongly assessed., (Copyright © 2011 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Phylogenetic analysis of newly obtained data from the complete small subunit rDNA (18S) nuclear gene of a wide range of copepods placed the enigmatic Pectenophilus ornatus firmly in the Cyclopoida. Both maximum parsimony tree reconstruction, and Bayesian analysis operating under the GTR + I + Γ model of nucleotide substitution, gave identical solutions and placed P. ornatus at the base of the poecilostome families, in apposition to the mytilicolid taxa. The recently suggested assignment to the Siphonostomatoida on the basis of a tubular mouth cone in the pygmy male was rejected not only by the molecular data but also by new morphological observations. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the appendage previously interpreted as the mandible was in reality the maxilla, the presumptive ‘labium’ only an intermaxillary outgrowth of the ventral cephalic sclerite bearing the widely separated paragnaths, and that there was no basal fusion between the labrum and the ‘posterior lip’ as in genuine siphonostomatoids. Absence of mandibles and their functional replacement by the anteriorly displaced maxillae is a unique and robust apomorphy for the Mytilicolidae and placed unequivocally P. ornatus in that family. The morphology of male Pectenophilus probably evolved as a result of global progenesis, involving early sexual maturation at the metanauplius stage and the complete cessation of somite and limb development. The molecular data were also employed to examine the relationships of two other highly modified parasitic families, the Xarifiidae (inhabiting hard corals) and the Chondracanthidae (parasitic on marine demersal fishes). Our analyses rejected the previously proposed relationship between Xarifiidae and Vahiniidae and strongly supported an Anchimolgidae + (Rhynchomolgidae + Xarifiidae) clade as sister group to the Sabelliphilidae within a monophyletic Lichomolgoidea. The obtained topology suggests that the common ancestor of this clade had already established a symbiotic relationship with scleractinian corals and that host switching occurred only secondarily in the Rhynchomolgidae, involving predominantly other cnidarian and occasionally noncnidarian hosts. Reassessment of the morphology of Parangium provided new evidence for a relationship with the xarifiids, rendering its current position in the Serpulidicolidae extremely unlikely. Both parsimony and Bayesian analyses revealed an unexpected but strongly supported relationship between the Chondracanthidae and Pseudanthessiidae. This result contrasts with earlier views advocating affinity to the Synapticolidae or Lichomolgidae, but was congruent with the previously unnoticed morphological similarity in antennary armature patterns in the first copepodid stage. The morphological grounds used to establish the Lernaeosoleidae were shown to be secondarily derived characters shared with one or several chondracanthid genera. Particularly the similarity between the Lernaeosoleidae and Markevitchielinus demonstrated that the former evolved from a mesoparasitic ancestor within the Chondracanthidae and consequently should sink as a synonym of the latter. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 87, 403–425. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Morphological evidence suggests harpacticoid copepods have recurrently entered into symbiosis with other crustaceans but only members of the family Cancrincolidae have successfully made the transition from marine habitats to semiterrestrial hosts. Cancrincolids are primarily amphi-Atlantic in distribution (with one outlier in the western Pacific) and typically inhabit the gill chambers of grapsoidean land crabs belonging to the families Grapsidae, Sesarmidae, Varunidae and Gecarcinidae. Morphologically, they are difficult to place because they exhibit unusual autapomorphies and the shared derived characters claimed to unite them with the primitively marine Ameiridae are equivocal. Both maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference solutions based on SSU rDNA gene sequences show topological congruence in placing the Cancrincolidae within the Ameiridae and in firmly resolving it as the sistergroup of taxa that have been reported as obligate or commensal associates of crayfish. This relationship is further supported by swimming leg sexual dimorphism and mandibular palp morphology. Morphological comparison with ameirid copepods revealed the majority of synapomorphies previously proposed in support of cancrincolid monophyly and familial distinctiveness can be attributed to heterochrony. The progressive evolution of cancrincolid associates appears to be largely concordant with the sequential adaptation to terrestriality by their grapsoidean hosts. The current amphi-Atlantic distribution of Cancrincola may suggest its possibly free-living ancestor had already assumed a virtually continuous distribution along the northern seaboard of Gondwana prior to the opening of the South Atlantic during the early Cretaceous, implying symbiotic relationships were established only much later when grapsoidean crabs started to emerge, radiate and diversify in the mid-Tertiary (15–35 mya). The adoption of semi-terrestriality in cancrincolid copepods can be viewed as yet another independent attempt (incursion) to colonize low-salinity environments by members of the family Ameiridae. The possible sistergroup relationships of the Ameiridae and the position of the genus Argestigens Willey are discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]