Search

Background: Permutation testing is often considered the "gold standard" for multi-test significance analysis, as it is an exact test requiring few assumptions about the distribution being computed. However, it can be computationally very expensive, particularly in its naive form in which the full analysis pipeline is re-run after permuting the phenotype labels. This can become intractable in multi-locus genome-wide association studies (GWAS), in which the number of potential interactions to be tested is combinatorially large. Results: In this paper, we develop an approach for permutation testing in multi-locus GWAS, specifically focusing on SNP–SNP-phenotype interactions using multivariable measures that can be computed from frequency count tables, such as those based in Information Theory. We find that the computational bottleneck in this process is the construction of the count tables themselves, and that this step can be eliminated at each iteration of the permutation testing by transforming the count tables directly. This leads to a speed-up by a factor of over 103 for a typical permutation test compared to the naive approach. Additionally, this approach is insensitive to the number of samples making it suitable for datasets with large number of samples. Conclusions: The proliferation of large-scale datasets with genotype data for hundreds of thousands of individuals enables new and more powerful approaches for the detection of multi-locus genotype-phenotype interactions. Our approach significantly improves the computational tractability of permutation testing for these studies. Moreover, our approach is insensitive to the large number of samples in these modern datasets. The code for performing these computations and replicating the figures in this paper is freely available at https://github.com/kunert/permute-counts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The genetic mechanisms of childhood development in its many facets remain largely undeciphered. In the population of healthy infants studied in the Growing Up in Singapore Towards Healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) program, we have identified a range of dependencies among the observed phenotypes of fetal and early childhood growth, neurological development, and a number of genetic variants. We have quantified these dependencies using our information theory-based methods. The genetic variants show dependencies with single phenotypes as well as pleiotropic effects on more than one phenotype and thereby point to a large number of brain-specific and brain-expressed gene candidates. These dependencies provide a basis for connecting a range of variants with a spectrum of phenotypes (pleiotropy) as well as with each other. A broad survey of known regulatory expression characteristics, and other function-related information from the literature for these sets of candidate genes allowed us to assemble an integrated body of evidence, including a partial regulatory network, that points towards the biological basis of these general dependencies. Notable among the implicated loci are RAB11FIP4 (next to NF1), MTMR7 and PLD5, all highly expressed in the brain; DNMT1 (DNA methyl transferase), highly expressed in the placenta; and PPP1R12B and DMD (dystrophin), known to be important growth and development genes. While we cannot specify and decipher the mechanisms responsible for the phenotypes in this study, a number of connections for further investigation of fetal and early childhood growth and neurological development are indicated. These results and this approach open the door to new explorations of early human development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Phenotypic variation, including that which underlies health and disease in humans, results in part from multiple interactions among both genetic variation and environmental factors. While diseases or phenotypes caused by single gene variants can be identified by established association methods and family-based approaches, complex phenotypic traits resulting from multi-gene interactions remain very difficult to characterize. Here we describe a new method based on information theory, and demonstrate how it improves on previous approaches to identifying genetic interactions, including both synthetic and modifier kinds of interactions. We apply our measure, called interaction distance, to previously analyzed data sets of yeast sporulation efficiency, lipid related mouse data and several human disease models to characterize the method. We show how the interaction distance can reveal novel gene interaction candidates in experimental and simulated data sets, and outperforms other measures in several circumstances. The method also allows us to optimize case/control sample composition for clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Quantitative genetics has evolved dramatically in the past century, and the proliferation of genetic data, in quantity as well as type, enables the characterization of complex interactions and mechanisms beyond the scope of its theoretical foundations. In this article, we argue that revisiting the framework for analysis is important and we begin to lay the foundations of an alternative formulation of quantitative genetics based on information theory. Information theory can provide sensitive and unbiased measures of statistical dependencies among variables, and it provides a natural mathematical language for an alternative view of quantitative genetics. In the previous work, we examined the information content of discrete functions and applied this approach and methods to the analysis of genetic data. In this article, we present a framework built around a set of relationships that both unifies the information measures for the discrete functions and uses them to express key quantitative genetic relationships. Information theory measures of variable interdependency are used to identify significant interactions, and a general approach is described for inferring functional relationships in genotype and phenotype data. We present information-based measures of the genetic quantities: penetrance, heritability, and degrees of statistical epistasis. Our scope here includes the consideration of both two- and three-variable dependencies and independently segregating variants, which captures additive effects, genetic interactions, and two-phenotype pleiotropy. This formalism and the theoretical approach naturally apply to higher multivariable interactions and complex dependencies, and can be adapted to account for population structure, linkage, and nonrandomly segregating markers. This article thus focuses on presenting the initial groundwork for a full formulation of quantitative genetics based on information theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dissecting the molecular basis of quantitative traits is a significant challenge and is essential for understanding complex diseases. Even in model organisms, precisely determining causative genes and their interactions has remained elusive, due in part to difficulty in narrowing intervals to single genes and in detecting epistasis or linked quantitative trait loci. These difficulties are exacerbated by limitations in experimental design, such as low numbers of analyzed individuals or of polymorphisms between parental genomes. We address these challenges by applying three independent high-throughput approaches for QTL mapping to map the genetic variants underlying 11 phenotypes in two genetically distant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, namely (1) individual analysis of >700 meiotic segregants, (2) bulk segregant analysis, and (3) reciprocal hemizygosity scanning, a new genome-wide method that we developed. We reveal differences in the performance of each approach and, by combining them, identify eight polymorphic genes that affect eight different phenotypes: colony shape, flocculation, growth on two nonfermentable carbon sources, and resistance to two drugs, salt, and high temperature. Our results demonstrate the power of individual segregant analysis to dissect QTL and address the underestimated contribution of interactions between variants. We also reveal confounding factors like mutations and aneuploidy in pooled approaches, providing valuable lessons for future designs of complex trait mapping studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]