Search

Introduction: Qualitative approaches based on drug causality assessment estimate the causal link between a drug and the occurrence of an adverse event from individual case safety reports. Quantitative approaches based on disproportionality analyses were developed subsequently to allow automated statistical signal detection from pharmacovigilance databases. This study assessed the potential value of causality assessment for automated safety signal detection., Methods: All drug-serious adverse event pairs with a positive rechallenge and a semiology suggestive of drug causality were identified in the French pharmacovigilance database (BNPV) from 2011 to 2017. The results were compared with those obtained from automated disproportionality analyses of the BNPV/World Health Organization (WHO) VigiBase ® , complemented by the list of signals validated by the WHO-UMC (Uppsala Monitoring Centre). Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs), Martindale ® , Meyler's ® and MedLINE ® were used as other sources of information for the purpose of comparison., Results: Of the 155 pairs of interest, 115 (74.2%) were also identified by another source of information. Since the individual case reporting in the BNPV, 23 (14.8%) of the adverse events (AEs) have been added to the SmPC, seven of which were not identified by disproportionality. Finally, 40 pairs were not identified by any other source of information, 13 of which were considered as potential new safety signals after analysis of case reports by pharmacovigilance experts. The signals identified by causality assessment involved antineoplastic and immunomodulatory drugs especially, in comparison with signals identified by WHO-UMC or by disproportionality within the BNPV., Conclusion: The approach therefore appears useful as an additional tool for safety signal detection, especially for antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents.

Addictovigilance in the French Public Health Code, in the section related to poisonous substances, refers to a monitoring system developed since 1990: control of psychoactive substances and products, with medicinal use or not, was completed by a specific system focused on evaluation and information on pharmacodependance in 1999. The French medicines agency (Agence du médicament) created in 1993 was involved in this monitoring system; pharmacodependance evaluation was added by law to the missions of the agencies that followed: the Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé missions (AFSSAPS, 1998) and the Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM, 2011). "Addictovigilance" first appears in French Law in 2017 whereas it was used by pharmacodependance centers and AFSSAPS since 2007. Legal definition of addictovigilance in the French Public Health Code testified to public authorities action against addictive behavior whatever products status, legal or not. The visibility of addictovigilance is growing on the Internet as well (ANSM website, web portal for reporting adverse health events)., (Copyright © 2018 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is increasingly treated using targeted therapies. Post-marketing safety of these agents is understudied, especially in the elderly., Objective: This study aimed to compare, according to age, the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of targeted therapies used for mCRC in real life., Patients and Methods: An extraction of VigiBase, which contains World Health Organization individual case safety reports (ICSRs), was performed. All ADR reports with aflibercept, bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab, or regorafenib used in CRC were considered. For all drugs, chi-square tests were used to compare frequencies of serious ADRs between patients aged ≥75 and <75 years. For selected ADRs and each drug, the drug-ADR association compared to other anticancer drugs was estimated through the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) in both age groups., Results: There were 21,565 ICSRs included, among which 74% were serious and 11% were fatal. Median age was 64 years (Inter Quartile Range = 56-71) and 15% of patients were aged ≥75; 57% were male. Serious ICSRs accounted for 47,292 ADRs. Neutropenia was not more reported in elderly for all drugs while diarrhea was more reported in elderly for panitumumab. Cardiac disorders were more reported in elderly patients, in particular heart failure, especially for bevacizumab, cetuximab, and regorafenib, as were respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders. Most of PRR were not different between the two groups, except encephalopathies, which were significantly associated with bevacizumab in the elderly only., Conclusions: ADRs related to targeted therapies used for mCRC treatment were different across age groups; yet, not systematically more reported or worse in elderly patients. Selected elderly patients could, therefore, be treated with these targeted therapies.

The methods for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions were developed in the 1970s and 1980s, alongside the development of pharmacovigilance. The French method is one of the earlier of these, following on from the pioneering works by Irey and Karch and Lasagna. Initially published in 1978, it was updated in 1985, and again in 2011. The main alterations to the original method are presented in tables annexed to this paper. The successive versions improved the presentation, provided more formalised definitions of the criteria for assessing causality, while at the same time ensuring the method remained easy to use. Causality assessment enables the causal link between a drug and the occurrence of an adverse reaction to be formalised and explained. It contributes to diagnosis, and to determining the action to be taken in case of an adverse drug reaction. It can contribute to the quality and the relevance of the data stored in pharmacovigilance databases., (Copyright © 2016 Société française de pharmacologie et de thérapeutique. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To test an automated method to decrease the number of false-positive (FP) signals of disproportionate reportings (SDRs) generated by co-prescription., Methods: Automated backward stepwise removal of reports concerning the drug associated with the highest ranked SDR for an event was tested for gastric and oesophageal haemorrhages (GOH), central nervous system haemorrhages and cerebrovascular accidents (CNSH), ischaemic coronary artery disorders and muscle pains (MP) using the reporting odds ratio in the French spontaneous reporting research database. After ranking SDRs detected in the complete dataset on the lower limit of the reporting odds ratio 95% confidence interval, reports concerning the drug with the highest ranked SDR were removed. In the dataset thus generated, SDRs were again identified, ranked and reports related to the drug involved in the newly highest ranked SDR removed. The process was repeated until no signal was detected. Initially detected SDRs eliminated using this technique were assessed regarding the summary of products characteristics and the literature to determine their FP nature., Results: Seventeen SDRs were successively eliminated for GOH, 37 for CNSH, 15 for ischaemic coronary artery disorders, and 36 for MP. Four were FP for GOH, 29 for CNSH, 7 for ACI and none were FP for MP. The positive predictive value of the backward stepwise removal procedure in identifying FP SDRs ranged from 0% (MP) to 78.4% (CNSH)., Conclusions: Although further adjustment is needed to improve the method presented herein, our results suggest that numerous FP signals because of co-prescription bias could be eliminated using an automated method., (Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: An updated probabilistic causality assessment method and the Liverpool algorithm presented as an improved version of the Naranjo algorithm, one of the most used and accepted causality assessment methods, have recently been proposed., Objective: In order to test the validity of the probabilistic method in routine pharmacovigilance, results provided by the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms, as well as the updated probabilistic method, were each compared with a consensual expert judgement taken as reference., Methods: A sample of 59 drug-event pairs randomly sampled from spontaneous reports to the French pharmacovigilance system was assessed by expert judgement until reaching consensus and by members of a pharmacovigilance unit using the updated probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms. Probabilities given by the probabilistic method, and categories obtained by both the Naranjo and the Liverpool algorithms were compared as well as their sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values., Results: The median probability for drug causation given by the consensual expert judgement was 0.70 (inter-quartile range, IQR 0.54-0.84) versus 0.77 (IQR 0.54-0.91) for the probabilistic method. For the Naranjo algorithm, the 'possible' causality category was predominant (61 %), followed by 'probable' (35 %), 'doubtful', and 'almost certain' categories (2 % each). Category distribution obtained with the Liverpool algorithm was similar to that obtained by the Naranjo algorithm with a majority of 'possible' (61 %) and 'probable' (30 %) followed by 'definite' (7 %) and 'unlikely' (2 %). For the probabilistic method, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.96, 0.56, 0.92 and 0.71, respectively. For the Naranjo algorithm, depending on whether the 'possible' category was considered in favour or in disfavour of drug causation, sensitivity was, respectively, 1 or 0.42, specificity 0.11 or 0.89, negative predictive value 1 or 0.22 and positive predictive value 0.86 or 0.95; results were identical for the Liverpool algorithm., Conclusion: The logistic probabilistic method gave results closer to the consensual expert judgment than either the Naranjo or Liverpool algorithms whose performance were strongly dependent on the meaning given to the 'possible' category. Owing to its good sensitivity and positive predictive value and by providing results as continuous probabilities, the probabilistic method seems worthy to use for a trustable assessment of adverse drug reactions in routine practice.

Purpose: To assess the prevalence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurring in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or other dementia in France., Methods: A cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted by the French network of the 31 regional pharmacovigilance centres on a given day. The subjects were selected by random draw to be a representative sample of French patients with dementia: consultations of dementia clinics, nursing-homes, acute and long care geriatric units, rehabilitation care geriatric units. The staff of each medical structure together with that of the pharmacovigilance centre defined a day for including the patients. Socio-demographic data, history, ADR and drugs given were registered., Results: There were 1332 subjects included, 51.1% living at home, 48.8% in institutions, aged 82.0 ± 8.0 years (46-108); 61.3% suffered from AD. Mean number of drugs was 6.3 ± 3.1. Anti-dementia drugs were given to 66.4% subjects. ADR prevalence was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.9-6.2) without a significant difference between at home and institutionalized patients. ADR consisted of gastro-intestinal (23.2%), central nervous system (17.4%) and psychiatric disorders (8.7%). Of the ADR, 31.9% were serious, and 47.8% preventable. The drugs most often involved were anti-dementia (28.9%), cardio-vascular (28.9%) and psychotropic drugs (26.4%, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antidepressants, neuroleptics)., Conclusion: This national scale study showed that iatrogenesis in patients with AD and related dementia can at times be serious and preventable. Therefore, special attention is required when prescribing psychotropic and anti-dementia drugs, as they are frequently used and induce half of the ADR in this population., (Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objective: Updating a logistic causality assessment method to improve its agreement with consensual expert judgment (CEJ)., Study Design and Setting: A random sample of 53 drug-event pairs from a pharmacovigilance database were evaluated independently by CEJ and by a group of experts in pharmacovigilance using the logistic method. Causes of disagreement between both approaches were analyzed, and changes in the assessment of some criteria of the logistic method were proposed and tested in models. The model giving results closest to the CEJ was retained and compared with the initial version on another set of drug-event pairs., Results: Finally, only the criterion "Search for nondrug cause" was changed into "Search for other causes." The assessment not investigated, possible other cause decreased the probability of drug causation instead of being neutral, whereas the assessment not applicable, not required remained neutral. This new version presents much improved specificity (0.56 vs. 0.33), relatively good sensitivity (0.96), and positive and negative predictive values (0.92 and 0.71)., Conclusion: The updated logistic method presented here improves the initial version that had poor specificity and tended to overestimate drug causation. This new version presents satisfactory characteristics to be used in routine pharmacovigilance., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Improving the detection of drug safety signals has led several pharmacovigilance regulatory agencies to incorporate automated quantitative methods into their spontaneous reporting management systems. The three largest worldwide pharmacovigilance databases are routinely screened by the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of proportional reporting ratio (PRR₀₂.₅), the 2.5% quantile of the Information Component (IC₀₂.₅) or the 5% quantile of the Gamma Poisson Shrinker (GPS₀₅). More recently, Bayesian and non-Bayesian False Discovery Rate (FDR)-based methods were proposed that address the arbitrariness of thresholds and allow for a built-in estimate of the FDR. These methods were also shown through simulation studies to be interesting alternatives to the currently used methods., Objective: The objective of this work was twofold. Based on an extensive retrospective study, we compared PRR₀₂.₅, GPS₀₅ and IC₀₂.₅ with two FDR-based methods derived from the Fisher's exact test and the GPS model (GPS(pH0) [posterior probability of the null hypothesis H₀ calculated from the Gamma Poisson Shrinker model]). Secondly, restricting the analysis to GPS(pH0), we aimed to evaluate the added value of using automated signal detection tools compared with 'traditional' methods, i.e. non-automated surveillance operated by pharmacovigilance experts., Methods: The analysis was performed sequentially, i.e. every month, and retrospectively on the whole French pharmacovigilance database over the period 1 January 1996-1 July 2002. Evaluation was based on a list of 243 reference signals (RSs) corresponding to investigations launched by the French Pharmacovigilance Technical Committee (PhVTC) during the same period. The comparison of detection methods was made on the basis of the number of RSs detected as well as the time to detection., Results: Results comparing the five automated quantitative methods were in favour of GPS(pH0) in terms of both number of detections of true signals and time to detection. Additionally, based on an FDR threshold of 5%, GPS(pH0) detected 87% of the RSs associated with more than three reports, anticipating the date of investigation by the PhVTC by 15.8 months on average., Conclusions: Our results show that as soon as there is reasonable support for the data, automated signal detection tools are powerful tools to explore large spontaneous reporting system databases and detect relevant signals quickly compared with traditional pharmacovigilance methods.

Purpose: In France, early detection of adverse effects does not currently involve any automatic signal detection method. The present objective was to assess the feasibility and measure the potential benefit of the incorporation of an automatic signal detection tool (GPS(pH0)) in the French pharmacovigilance system., Methods: GPS(pH0) was first applied to the data collected from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2008 and then to the data collected from 1 January 2000 to 31 March 2009. A total of 1,414 original signals were detected. They were shared out for further expertise among 32 centres, i.e. the 31 Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres and the French medicine agency (AFSSAPS) pharmacovigilance department., Results: The participating centres (n = 28) analysed 1,292 signals in May 2009. Overall, 277 signals whether known or unknown were thus considered worth following up. Half of the other 893 categorised signals were "well-known" (35.7%) and non-interpretable/non-pertinent signals (36.6%); 4% were not categorised because of a lack of time. Analysis of the signals was time-consuming, but the working time estimated by the participants was highly variable (median time: 6 h; minimum: 2 h maximum: 26 h)., Conclusions: The results of this study are in favour of the integration of an automated signal detection tool to complement the current pharmacovigilance activities. The Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical for drug classification poses difficulties in many situations; the international proprietary name might be more efficient. The variability observed in the time needed for analysis suggests that a standardised methodology should be employed. Overall, the findings of this prospective study will contribute to refining the signal management procedure to be implemented in the future.

Purpose: Fluindione is an oral vitamin K antagonist (indanedione derivative) exclusively marketed in France and Luxembourg, known to have immuno-allergic adverse effects such as hepatitis, fever or interstitial nephritis. A few cases of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) have been reported with fluindione. The aim of the present study was to investigate fluindione-induced DRESS cases reported in France and to describe their characteristics., Methods: We searched for potential cases of DRESS with fluindione reported in the French pharmacovigilance database since 2000., Results: Thirty-six cases of DRESS were included and concerned 17 women and 19 men. The mean age was 65 years (median: 68 years, range: 28-95 years). Kidneys and liver were the most frequent organs involved. Thirty-five cases were serious. In 5 cases, the effect was life-threatening. Most of the patients recovered. Fluindione was the only medicine suspected in 26 cases. Skin patch tests, performed in 10 cases, were positive with fluindione in 9 cases., Conclusions: Fluindione is not known to be a frequent cause of DRESS. However, the number of reports found is probably underestimated. The seriousness of DRESS, as all immuno-allergic adverse effects, contraindicates fluindione reintroduction. Coumarinic derivatives are the alternatives in patients who need oral anticoagulant treatment.

Background: Monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene‐related peptide or its receptor (CGRP‐mabs) are novel drugs for resistant migraine prophylaxis. As CGRP‐mabs cause inhibition of vasodilatation, their use is reserved to patients with no recent history of cardiovascular diseases. We report a case of myocardial infarction associated with erenumab. Case: A 57‐year‐old woman with a familial history of coronaropathy was first treated with erenumab 70 mg for 6 months and then increased to 140 mg. Almost 5 months after, the patient presented chest pain, increased troponin, and abnormal electrocardiogram. A myocardial infarction without coronarography abnormality was diagnosed through MRI. Conclusion: Further evidence is needed to assess the risk of myocardial infarction in patients treated with a CGRP‐mab. In patients over 40 years of age, the risk of coronary or cardiovascular events should be assessed using risk tables or algorithms to take into account cardiovascular risk factors. This may be complemented by appropriate examinations to measure the burden of coronary atherosclerosis, if necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: In 2017, concerns regarding adverse events (AEs) associated with the Mirena levonorgestrel intrauterine device were largely echoed in the media in France. This resulted in a tremendous reporting of AEs to pharmacovigilance centres. The aim of this study was to describe the reporting of AEs regarding Mirena in France and to study the impact of media coverage on this reporting. Methods: All cases reports involving Mirena recorded in the French national pharmacovigilance database from marketing (21 July 1995) until 04 August 2017 were extracted. To allow studying the influence of mediatisation, reports were described separately for the periods preceding and following the observed media coverage peak (15 May 2017). Results: Overall, 3224 reports were considered, 510 (15.8%) recorded before the media coverage peak, and 2714 (84.2%) after. Before the peak, 76.5% of reports originated from health professionals; median time‐to‐report was of 5.5 months (interquartile range: 1.7–18.6), and median number of AEs per report was 1 (range: 1–17). After the peak, 98.6% originated from patients; median time‐to‐report was 21 months (interquartile range: 8.1–45.5), and median number of AEs per report was 6 (range: 1–37). After the peak, most reports mentioned anxio‐depressive disorders (38.8 vs 10.6% before) or sexual disorders (47.3 vs 6.9%). Other emphasised AEs were weight increase (42.3 vs 10.2%) and pain (gastrointestinal, 19.1 vs 3.5%; musculoskeletal, 22.2 vs 4.5%). Conclusion: This study highlighted the importance of mediatisation impact on spontaneous reporting with changes concerning amounts of reports, type of reporter, and type of reported AEs. For Mirena, this led to generate signals regarding anxio‐depressive and sexual disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The French pharmacovigilance system is based on a network of 31 regional centres located in teaching hospitals and coordinated by the French Medicines Agency ("Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé" [Afssaps]). Since 1984, they have shared a common database of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that are spontaneously reported by healthcare professionals. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics of the reports and the reporting trends in the French pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting database from 1986 to 2001.Methods: All the reports from January 1986 to December 2001 were included. Drugs and ADRs were translated to anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) codes and MedDRA classifications, respectively.Results: The total number of reports was 197 580 over the 16-year period, with linearly increase over time. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the patients was 53 (34-70) and the male/female ratio was 0.82. The median (IQR) time between the date of occurrence of the ADR and the date of report was 73 days (34-166). The reporter was a specialist in 74% of the reports and a general practitioner in 17%. The annual rate of reporting according to medical demography strongly increased for the specialists, especially since 1994. At least one ADR was considered as serious in 44.8% of the reports. The ADRs were most frequently related to nervous system drugs (23%), followed by cardiovascular drugs (19%) and systemic anti-infectives (17%). The latter class had the fastest progression mostly due to antiretroviral therapy since 1996. According to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) coding, the system organ most often reported was skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (29%), followed by nervous system disorders (19%), gastrointestinal disorders (12%), blood and lymphatic system disorders (12%), vascular disorders (12%) and general disorders and administration site conditions (12%).Discussion: All spontaneous reporting systems are affected by under-reporting. One of their goals is to generate early signals, which might be more affected by reporting bias than by under-reporting. Some improvements should be made in the design of the French database, but data collected since 1986 constitute an essential tool for the routine work of the 31 pharmacovigilance centres.Conclusion: This first description of the data of the French pharmacovigilance database involving all drugs and ADRs shows an increasing tendency to reporting over time, especially in specialists and for systemic anti-infective drugs. The database that uses hierarchical international classifications for drugs and adverse reactions may be used for further studies and could be the basis for an automatic signal generation system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the incidence of hospital admissions related to adverse drug reactions ( ADRs) in France and the frequency of preventable ADRs in France, a prospective study was conducted among a representative randomly selected sample of medical wards in public hospitals between December 2006 and June 2007; all patients admitted during a 2-week period were included. An ADR-related hospitalization case was defined as a hospital admission because of an ADR, and an independent committee reviewed and validated all potential cases. Preventability was assessed using the French ADR preventability scale. Data were extrapolated to the population of France. Among 2692 admissions, 97 were related to an ADR (incidence 3.6%, 95% confidence interval, CI [2.8-4.4]). Patients admitted for an ADR were significantly older than those admitted for other reasons ( P < 0.001). A third (32.0%) of ADR-related hospitalizations were 'preventable', 16.5% 'potentially preventable'. Drug interactions accounted for 29.9% of ADR-related hospitalizations. The most frequent causes of ADR-related hospitalizations were vascular disorders (20.6%), mainly bleeding complications, central nervous system disorders (11.3%), gastrointestinal disorders, and general disorders (9.3%). Antithrombotic and antineoplastic agents were the most frequently involved (12.6% each), followed by diuretics and analgesics (9.0% each). Vitamin-K-antagonists ( VKAs) were the most common drugs associated with admission. The estimated annual number of ADR-related hospitalizations in France was 143 915 (95% CI [112 063-175 766]). ADRs were a significant cause of hospital admission in 2006-2007, in particular those due to VKAs. As new oral anticoagulants ( NOACs) have been marketed, more attention needs to be paid to ensure a safe use of antithrombotic agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few data are available on the clinical impact of drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Most of the studies are limited to the analysis of exposure to potential DDI or the targeted impact of the combination of a few drugs or therapeutic classes. The analysis of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports could be a mean to study generally the adverse effects identified due to a DDI. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of ADRs resulting from DDIs reported to the French Pharmacovigilance system and to identify the drugs most often implicated in these ADRs. Considering all ADR reports from January 01, 2012, to December 31, 2016, we identified all cases of ADR resulting from a DDI (DDI-ADRs). We then described these in terms of patients' characteristics, ADR seriousness, drugs involved (two or more per case), and ADR type. Of the 4,027 reports relating to DDI-ADRs, 3,303 were related to serious ADRs. Patients with serious DDI-ADRs had a median age of 76 years (interquartile range: 63–84); 53% were male. Of all serious DDI-ADRs, 11% were life-threatening and 8% fatal. In 36% of cases, the DDI causing the ADR involved at least three drugs. Overall, 8,424 different drugs were mentioned in the 3,303 serious DDI-ADRs considered. Altogether, drugs from the "antithrombotic agents" subgroup were incriminated in 34% of serious DDI-ADRs. Antidepressants were the second most represented therapeutic/pharmacological subgroup (5% of serious DDI-ADRs). Among the 3,843 ADR types reported in the 3,303 serious DDI-ADRs considered, the most frequently represented were hemorrhage (40% clinical hemorrhage; 6% biological hemorrhage), renal failure (8%), pharmacokinetic alteration (5%), and cardiac arrhythmias (4%). Hemorrhagic accidents are still an important part of serious ADRs resulting from DDIs reported in France. The other clinical consequences of DDIs seem less well identified by pharmacovigilance. Moreover, more than one-third of serious DDI-ADRs involved at least three drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]