Search

Resumen: Antecedentes y justificación: La estrategia de la aproximación concentración-dosis (C/D) y los distintos perfiles del tacrolimus (Tac), según los polimorfismos del citocromo P450 (CYPs) se centran en el metabolismo de Tac y se plantean como herramientas para el seguimiento de los pacientes trasplantados. El objetivo de este estudio es comparar la exposición al Tac analizado según ambas estrategias. Materiales y métodos: Se han incluido 425 pacientes trasplantados renales. El cálculo del cociente concentración Tac/dosis (C/D) permitió dividir la población en terciles y clasificar los pacientes según su tasa de metabolismo del Tac en tres grupos (rápida, intermedia y lenta). Con base en los polimorfismos del CYP3A4 y A5, los pacientes se agruparon en metabolizadores rápidos (portadores del CYP3A5*1 y CYP34A *1/*1), intermedios (CYP3A5*3/3 y CYP3A4*1/*1) y lentos (CYP3A5 *3/*3 y portadores del CYP3A4*22). Resultados: Al comparar los pacientes de cada grupo metabolizador según los dos criterios, coincidieron 47% (65/139) de los metabolizadores rápidos, 85% (125/146) de los intermedios y solo 12% (17/140) de los lentos. Se observaron concentraciones de Tac estadísticamente menores en los metabolizadores rápidos y concentraciones mayores en los lentos, comparándolos con el grupo intermedio según el cociente C/D o según polimorfismos. Los metabolizadores rápidos requirieron alrededor de 60% más de dosis de Tac que los intermedios a lo largo del seguimiento, mientras que los lentos aproximadamente 20% menos de dosis que los intermedios. Los metabolizadores rápidos clasificados por ambos criterios presentan un porcentaje mayor de veces con valores de concentración de Tac en sangre infraterapéuticos. Conclusión: La determinación del fenotipo metabolizador según los polimorfismos del CYP o bien cociente C/D permite distinguir los pacientes según su exposición al Tac. Probablemente la combinación de ambos criterios de clasificación sería una buena herramienta en el manejo de la dosificación de Tac para los pacientes trasplantados. Abstract: Background and justification: The strategy of the concentration–dose (C/D) approach and the different profiles of tacrolimus (Tac) according to the cytochrome P450 polymorphisms (CYPs) focus on the metabolism of Tac and are proposed as tools for the follow-up of transplant patients. The objective of this study is to analyse both strategies to confirm whether the stratification of patients according to the pharmacokinetic behaviour of C/D corresponds to the classification according to their CYP3A4/5 cluster metabolizer profile. Materials and methods: Four hundred and twenty-five kidney transplant patients who received Tac as immunosuppressive treatment have been included. The concentration/dose ratio (C/D) was used to divided patients in terciles and classify them according to their Tac metabolism rate (fast, intermediate, and slow). Based on CYP3A4 and A5 polymorphisms, patients were classified into three metabolizer groups: fast (CYP3A5*1 and CYP34A*1/*1 carriers), intermediate (CYP3A5*3/3 and CYP3A4*1/*1) and slow (CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A4*22 carriers). Results: When comparing patients included in each metabolizer group according to C/D ratio, 47% (65/139) of the fast metabolizers, 85% (125/146) of the intermediate and only 12% (17/140) of the slow also fitted in the homonym genotype group. Statistically lower Tac concentrations were observed in the fast metabolizers group and higher Tac concentrations in the slow metabolizers when compared with the intermediate group both in C/D ratio and polymorphisms criteria. High metabolizers required approximately 60% more Tac doses than intermediates throughout follow-up, while poor metabolizers required approximately 20% fewer doses than intermediates. Fast metabolizers classified by both criteria presented a higher percentage of times with sub-therapeutic blood Tac concentration values. Conclusion: Determination of the metabolizer phenotype according to CYP polymorphisms or the C/D ratio allows patients to be distinguished according to their exposure to Tac. Probably the combination of both classification criteria would be a good tool for managing Tac dosage for transplant patients.

Despite intensive monitoring of whole blood tacrolimus concentrations, acute rejection after kidney transplantation occurs during tacrolimus therapy. Intracellular tacrolimus concentrations could better reflect exposure at the site of action and its pharmacodynamics (PD). Intracellular pharmacokinetic (PK) profile following different tacrolimus formulations (immediate-release (TAC-IR) and extended-release (TAC-LCP)) remains unclear. Therefore, the aim was to study intracellular tacrolimus PK of TAC-IR and TAC-LCP and its correlation with whole blood (WhB) PK and PD. A post-hoc analysis of a prospective, open-label, crossover investigator-driven clinical trial (NCT02961608) was performed. Intracellular and WhB tacrolimus 24 h time-concentration curves were measured in 23 stable kidney transplant recipients. PD analysis was evaluated measuring calcineurin activity (CNA) and simultaneous intracellular PK/PD modelling analysis was conducted. Higher dose-adjusted pre-dose intracellular concentrations (C0 and C24) and total exposure (AUC0–24) values were found for TAC-LCP than TAC-IR. Lower intracellular peak concentration (Cmax) was found after TAC-LCP. Correlations between C0, C24 and AUC0–24 were observed within both formulations. Intracellular kinetics seems to be limited by WhB disposition, in turn, limited by tacrolimus release/absorption processes from both formulations. The faster intracellular elimination after TAC-IR was translated into a more rapid recovery of CNA. An Emax model relating % inhibition and intracellular concentrations, including both formulations, showed an IC50, a concentration to achieve 50% CNA inhibition, of 43.9 pg/million cells.

Introduction: Tacrolimus is the backbone immunosuppressant after solid organ transplantation. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window with large intra- and inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability leading to frequent over- and under-immunosuppression. While routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remains the standard of care, tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability may be influenced by circadian rhythms. Our aim was to analyze tacrolimus pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles on circadian rhythms comparing morning and night doses of a twice-daily tacrolimus formulation.Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis from a clinical trial to study the area under curve (AUC) and the area under effect (AUE) profiles of calcineurin inhibition after tacrolimus administration in twenty-five renal transplant patients. Over a period of 24 h, an intensive sampling (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 15, 20, and 24 h) was carried out. Whole blood and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations and calcineurin activity were measured by UHPLC-MS/MS.Results: Whole blood and intracellular AUC12–24 h and Cmax achieved after tacrolimus night dose was significantly lower than after morning dose administration (AUC0–12 h) (p < 0.001 for both compartments). AUE0–12 h and AUE12–24 h were not statistically different after morning and night doses. Total tacrolimus daily exposure (AUC0–24 h), in whole blood and intracellular compartments, was over-estimated when assessed by doubling the morning AUC0–12 h data.Conclusion: The lower whole blood and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations after night dose might be influenced by a distinct circadian clock. This significantly lower tacrolimus exposure after night dose was not translated into a significant reduction of the pharmacodynamic effect. Our study may provide conceptual bases for better understanding the TDM of twice-daily tacrolimus formulation.

Copyright of Nefrologia is the property of Revista Nefrologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The aim of the study is to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model and to investigate the influence of CYP3A5/CYP3A4 and ABCB1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the Tacrolimus PK parameters after LCP-Tac formulation in stable adult renal transplant patients. The model was developed, using NONMEM v7.5, from full PK profiles from a clinical study (n = 30) and trough concentrations (C0) from patient follow-up (n = 68). The PK profile of the LCP-Tac formulation was best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination, parameterized in elimination (CL/F) and distributional (CLD/F) clearances and central compartment (Vc/F) and peripheral compartment (Vp/F) distribution volumes. A time-lagged first-order absorption process was characterized using transit compartment models. According to the structural part of the base model, the LCP-Tac showed an absorption profile characterized by two transit compartments and a mean transit time of 3.02 h. Inter-individual variability was associated with CL/F, Vc/F, and Vp/F. Adding inter-occasion variability (IOV) on CL/F caused a statistically significant reduction in the model minimum objective function MOFV (p < 0.001). Genetic polymorphism of CYP3A5 and a cluster of CYP3A4/A5 SNPs statistically significantly influenced Tac CL/F. In conclusion, a PopPK model was successfully developed for LCP-Tac formulation in stable renal transplant patients. CYP3A4/A5 SNPs as a combined cluster including three different phenotypes (high, intermediate, and poor metabolizers) was the most powerful covariate to describe part of the inter-individual variability associated with apparent elimination clearance. Considering this covariate in the initial dose estimation and during the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) would probably optimize Tac exposure attainments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite intensive monitoring of whole blood tacrolimus concentrations, acute rejection after kidney transplantation occurs during tacrolimus therapy. Intracellular tacrolimus concentrations could better reflect exposure at the site of action and its pharmacodynamics (PD). Intracellular pharmacokinetic (PK) profile following different tacrolimus formulations (immediate-release (TAC-IR) and extended-release (TAC-LCP)) remains unclear. Therefore, the aim was to study intracellular tacrolimus PK of TAC-IR and TAC-LCP and its correlation with whole blood (WhB) PK and PD. A post-hoc analysis of a prospective, open-label, crossover investigator-driven clinical trial (NCT02961608) was performed. Intracellular and WhB tacrolimus 24 h time-concentration curves were measured in 23 stable kidney transplant recipients. PD analysis was evaluated measuring calcineurin activity (CNA) and simultaneous intracellular PK/PD modelling analysis was conducted. Higher dose-adjusted pre-dose intracellular concentrations (C0 and C24) and total exposure (AUC0–24) values were found for TAC-LCP than TAC-IR. Lower intracellular peak concentration (Cmax) was found after TAC-LCP. Correlations between C0, C24 and AUC0–24 were observed within both formulations. Intracellular kinetics seems to be limited by WhB disposition, in turn, limited by tacrolimus release/absorption processes from both formulations. The faster intracellular elimination after TAC-IR was translated into a more rapid recovery of CNA. An Emax model relating % inhibition and intracellular concentrations, including both formulations, showed an IC50, a concentration to achieve 50% CNA inhibition, of 43.9 pg/million cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Tacrolimus is the backbone immunosuppressant after solid organ transplantation. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window with large intra- and inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability leading to frequent over- and under-immunosuppression. While routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remains the standard of care, tacrolimus pharmacokinetic variability may be influenced by circadian rhythms. Our aim was to analyze tacrolimus pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles on circadian rhythms comparing morning and night doses of a twice-daily tacrolimus formulation. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis from a clinical trial to study the area under curve (AUC) and the area under effect (AUE) profiles of calcineurin inhibition after tacrolimus administration in twenty-five renal transplant patients. Over a period of 24 h, an intensive sampling (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 15, 20, and 24 h) was carried out. Whole blood and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations and calcineurin activity were measured by UHPLC-MS/MS. Results: Whole blood and intracellular AUC12–24 h and Cmax achieved after tacrolimus night dose was significantly lower than after morning dose administration (AUC0–12 h) (p < 0.001 for both compartments). AUE0–12 h and AUE12–24 h were not statistically different after morning and night doses. Total tacrolimus daily exposure (AUC0–24 h), in whole blood and intracellular compartments, was over-estimated when assessed by doubling the morning AUC0–12 h data. Conclusion: The lower whole blood and intracellular tacrolimus concentrations after night dose might be influenced by a distinct circadian clock. This significantly lower tacrolimus exposure after night dose was not translated into a significant reduction of the pharmacodynamic effect. Our study may provide conceptual bases for better understanding the TDM of twice-daily tacrolimus formulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]