Search

Tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. TAM is metabolized into the active secondary metabolite endoxifen (ENDO), primarily by CYP2D6. We aimed to investigate the effects of an African-specific CYP2D6 variant allele, CYP2D6*17, on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of TAM and its active metabolites in 42 healthy black Zimbabweans. Subjects were grouped based on CYP2D6 genotypes as CYP2D6*1/*1 or *1/*2 or *2/*2 (CYP2D6*1 or *2), CYP2D6*1/*17 or 2*/*17, and CYP2D6*17/*17. PK parameters for TAM and three metabolites were determined. The pharmacokinetics of ENDO showed statistically significant differences among the three groups. The mean ENDO AUC0-∞ in CYP2D6*17/*17 subjects was 452.01 (196.94) h·*ng/mL, and the AUC0-∞ in CYP2D6*1/*17 subjects was 889.74 h·ng/mL, which was 5-fold and 2.8-fold lower than in CYP2D6*1 or *2 subjects, respectively. Individuals who were heterozygous or homozygous for CYP2D6*17 alleles showed a 2- and 5-fold decrease in Cmax, respectively, compared to the CYP2D6*1 or *2 genotype. CYP2D6*17 gene carriers have significantly lower ENDO exposure levels than CYP2D6*1 or *2 gene carriers. Pharmacokinetic parameters of TAM and the two primary metabolites, N-desmethyl tamoxifen (NDT) and 4-hydroxy tamoxifen (4OHT), did not show any significant difference in the three genotype groups. The African-specific CYP2D6*17 variant had effects on ENDO exposure levels that could potentially have clinical implications for patients homozygous for this variant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We conducted a clinical study to determine the effect of efavirenz and ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of R‐ and S‐PZQ in healthy male participants. This was toward evaluating the risk of drug‐drug interactions, which may occur after PZQ administration to HIV patients on efavirenz or ritonavir containing regimens. A non‐randomized, open‐label, single‐dose, one sequence crossover study with 2 arms was conducted. We gave 26 healthy volunteers a single oral dose of 40 mg/kg PZQ followed by a daily oral dose of either 400 mg efavirenz or 100 mg ritonavir for 14 consecutive days. On day 14, they ingested a single 40 mg/kg dose of PZQ. We measured plasma levels up to 12 h on day 1 and day 14. Samples were analyzed by LC‐MS. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted in WinNonlin to determine the primary endpoints (plasma T1/2, Cmin, and AUC). Efavirenz had a significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of PZQ (p <.05), reducing the AUC by 4‐fold (1213.15 vs. 281.35 h·ng/ml for R‐PZQ and 5669 vs. 871.84 h·ng/ml for S‐PZQ). Ritonavir had no significant effect on R‐PZQ but increased the AUC 2‐fold for S‐PZQ (p <.05) (4154.79 vs. 7291.05 h·ng/ml). Using PZQ in HIV patients needs investigation, as there is a risk of both treatment failure and adverse effects because of induction and inhibition, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]