Search

Aims: Early clinical studies have indicated that the pharmacokinetics of Atuliflapon (AZD5718) are time and dose dependent. The reason(s) for these findings is(are) not fully understood, but pre‐clinical profiling suggests that time‐dependent CYP3A4 inhibition cannot be excluded. In clinical practice, Atuliflapon will be co‐administered with CYP3A4 substrates; thus, it is important to determine the impact of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of CYP3A4 substrates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Atuliflapon on the pharmacokinetics of a sensitive CYP3A4 substrate, midazolam, and to explore if the time‐/dose‐dependent effect seen after repeated dosing could be an effect of change in CYP3A4 activity. Methods: Open‐label, fixed‐sequence study in healthy volunteers to assess the PK of midazolam alone and in combination with Atuliflapon. Fourteen healthy male subjects received single oral dose of midazolam 2 mg on days 1 and 7 and single oral doses of Atuliflapon (125 mg) from days 2 to 7. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to assess this drug–drug interaction. Results: Mean midazolam values of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) to infinity were increased by 39% and 56%, respectively, when co‐administered with Atuliflapon vs. midazolam alone. The PBPK model predicted a 27% and 44% increase in AUC and a 23% and 35% increase in Cmax of midazolam following its co‐administrations with two predicted therapeutically relevant doses of Atuliflapon. Conclusions: Atuliflapon is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A4; this was confirmed by the validated PBPK model. This weak inhibition is predicted to have a minor PK effect on CYP3A4 metabolized drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: AZD5718, a 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein (FLAP) inhibitor, is in clinical development for treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study evaluated AZD5718 pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability in healthy male Japanese subjects. Methods: Four cohorts of eight Japanese subjects were randomized to receive oral doses of AZD5718 (60, 180, 360, and 600 mg) or matching placebo administered as a single dose on Day 1 and as once-daily doses from Day 3 to Day 10 in fasted conditions. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety data were collected. Results: The pharmacokinetics characteristics of AZD5718 in Japanese male subjects were similar to those reported in a previous study, and the pharmacokinetics were characterized as rapid absorption with median time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax) of 1–2 h Creatine-normalized urine maximum concentration (Cmax) with mean half-lives ranging from 8 to 21 h, and supra-proportional increase in exposure over the 60–600 mg dose range evaluated. Also, an increase in steady-state area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) compared to the first dose was observed. After both single and multiple doses of AZD5718, a clear dose/concentration-effect relationship was shown for urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) versus AZD5718 exposure with > 80 % inhibition at plasma concentrations in the lower nM range. No clinically relevant safety and tolerability findings were observed. Conclusions: The observed pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were similar to reported data for non-Japanese healthy subjects, which support further evaluation of AZD5718 at similar doses/exposures in Japanese and non-Japanese subjects for future evaluation in patients with CAD and CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Excessive activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) underlies the pathophysiology of heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Hyperkalemia risk limits the therapeutic use of conventional MR antagonists. AZD9977 is a nonsteroidal, selective MR modulator that may protect nonepithelial tissues without disturbing electrolyte balance. This phase I study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of multiple oral doses of AZD9977 in healthy volunteers. Twenty‐seven male participants aged 23–45 years were randomized 3:1 to receive oral AZD9977 or placebo for 8 days (with twice‐daily dosing on days 2–7), in dose cohorts of 50, 150, and 300 mg (AZD9977, n = 6 per cohort; placebo, n = 3 per cohort). Adverse events occurred in 4 of 18 participants receiving AZD9977 (22.2%) and 6 of 9 receiving placebo (66.7%), all of mild or moderate severity; none were serious or led to withdrawal. AZD9977 was rapidly absorbed, with median time of maximum concentration of 0.50–0.84 hours across dose groups. Area under the curve and maximum concentration were approximately dose proportional but elimination and accumulation terminal half‐life increased with dose. Steady‐state was reached after 3–4 days, with dose‐dependent accumulation of 1.2–1.7‐fold. Renal clearance was 5.9–6.5 L/hour and 24–37% of AZD9977 was excreted in the urine. Serum aldosterone levels increased dose dependently from days −1 to 7 in participants receiving AZD9977, but serum potassium levels and urinary electrolyte excretion were unchanged. AZD9977 was generally well‐tolerated with no safety concerns. Exploratory outcomes suggested reduced hyperkalemia risk compared with MR antagonists. These findings support further clinical development of AZD9977. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Myeloperoxidase activity can contribute to impaired vascular endothelial function and fibrosis in chronic inflammation‐related cardiovascular disease. Here, we investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the myeloperoxidase inhibitor, AZD4831. Methods: In this randomized, single‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase I, first‐in‐human study, healthy men in five sequential cohorts were randomized 3:1 to receive a single oral dose of AZD4831 (5, 15, 45, 135 or 405 mg) or placebo, after overnight fasting. After at least 7 days' washout, one cohort additionally received AZD4831 45 mg after a high‐calorie meal. Results: Forty men participated in the study (eight per cohort: AZD4831, n = 6; placebo, n = 2). AZD4831 distributed rapidly into plasma, with a half‐life of 38.2–50.0 hours. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) increased proportionally with dose (AUC0–∝ slope estimate 1.060; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9943, 1.127). Increases in maximum plasma concentration were slightly more than dose proportional (slope estimate 1.201; 95% CI 1.071, 1.332). Food intake reduced AZD4831 absorption rate but did not substantially affect overall exposure or plasma half‐life (n = 4). Serum uric acid concentrations decreased by 71.77 (95% CI 29.15, 114.39) and 84.42 (58.90, 109.94) μmol L−1 with AZD4831 135 mg and 405 mg, respectively. Maculopapular rash (moderate intensity) occurred in 4/30 participants receiving AZD4831 (13.3%). No other safety concerns were identified. Conclusions: AZD4831 was generally well tolerated, rapidly absorbed, had a long plasma half‐life and lowered uric acid concentrations after single oral doses in healthy men. These findings support the further clinical development of AZD4831. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: AZD9977 is the first mineralocorticoid receptor modulator in clinical development exerting similar organ protection as eplerenone with minimal urinary electrolyte effects in preclinical studies. The aim was to perform the initial clinical assessment of AZD9977. Methods: A first‐in‐human trial explored doses from 5 to 1200 mg. To study effects on urinary electrolyte excretion an additional randomized placebo controlled cross‐over four‐period clinical trial was performed. Twenty‐three healthy volunteers were administered fludrocortisone alone or in combination with AZD9977, eplerenone or both. AZD9977/eplerenone combination was given to assess if AZD9977 can attenuate eplerenone induced natriuresis. Results: AZD9977 at doses from 5 to 1200 mg was safe and well tolerated and pharmacokinetics were compatible with further development. AZD9977 exhibited similar effects on urinary ln [Na+]/[K+] as eplerenone when using fludrocortisone as mineralocorticoid receptor agonist, and the combination had an additive effect on ln [Na+K+]. Conclusions: The results in man contradict the results in rodent models driven by aldosterone, in which AZD9977 has minimal electrolyte effects. Future clinical studies with AZD9977 should be performed in presence of endogenous or exogenous aldosterone to assess potential benefit of AZD9977 in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: We evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of AZD5718, a novel 5‐lipooxygenase activating protein (FLAP) inhibitor, in a randomized, single‐blind, placebo‐controlled, first‐in‐human (FIH) study consisting of single and multiple ascending dosing (SAD and MAD) for 10 days in healthy subjects. Target engagement was measured by ex vivo calcium ionophore stimulated leukotriene B (LTB4) production in whole blood and endogenous leukotriene E (LTE4) in urine. No clinically relevant safety and tolerability findings were observed. The AZD5718 was rapidly absorbed and plasma concentrations declined biphasically with a mean terminal half‐life of 10–12 h. Steady‐state levels were achieved after ∼3 days. After both SADs and MADs, a dose/concentration‐effect relationship between both LTB4 and LTE4 vs. AZD5718 exposure was observed with concentration of half inhibition (IC50) values in the lower nM range. Based on obtained result, AZD5718 is considered as a suitable drug candidate for future evaluation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Aims: To investigate the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of the glucokinase activator AZD6370 after 1day of administration under fed and fasted conditions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: This was a two-part study. In Part A, patients received a single oral dose of AZD6370 (20, 60 or 180mg) or placebo in the fasted or fed states (both n =8). In Part B, patients (n =8) received placebo and a total dose of AZD6370 180mg given in one, two or four divided doses. Plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide changes versus placebo were assessed. Results: AZD6370 provided dose-dependent reductions in plasma glucose of up to 30% versus placebo in both fasted and fed patients (p <0.001 at 60 and 180mg doses). Insulin secretion increased with dose, but absolute increases were relatively small in the fasted versus fed state (0–4h). Dosing AZD6370 twice or four-times over 1day gave a smoother 24-h glucose profile than single-dose. AZD6370 was rapidly absorbed. Pharmacokinetics of AZD6370 were dose-independent and unaffected by food. AZD6370 was generally well tolerated. Conclusions: AZD6370 produced dose-dependent glucose reductions and increased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in patients with T2DM. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Tesaglitazar, is predominantly metabolized (to an acyl glucuronide of the parent compound) and 20% of given dose is found unchanged in the urine. • Acyl glucuronides are know to be unstable and can become hydrolysed back to parent compound, a phenomena called interconversion. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • A likely mechanism (interconversion) for the cause of the increased exposure of tesaglitazar in subjects with impaired renal function. • A possible modelling framework to evaluate interconversion without dosing of the metabolite based on the simultaneous analysis of plasma and urine data from a group of subjects with varying renal function. • A mechanistic understanding of the pharmacokinetic properties of tesaglitazar and its metabolite. AIMS To develop a mechanistic pharmacokinetic (PK) model for tesaglitazar and its metabolite (an acyl glucuronide) following oral administration of tesaglitazar to subjects with varying renal function, and derive an explanation for the increased plasma exposure of tesaglitazar in subjects with impaired renal function. METHODS Data were from a 6-week study in subjects with renal insufficiency and matched controls undergoing repeated oral dosing with tesaglitazar ( n = 41). Compartmental population PK modelling was employed to describe the PK of tesaglitazar and its metabolite, in plasma and urine, simultaneously. Two hypotheses were tested to investigate the increased exposure of tesaglitazar in subjects with renal functional impairment: tesaglitazar metabolism is correlated with renal function, or metabolite elimination is reduced in renal insufficiency, leading to increased hydrolysis (interconversion) to the parent compound via biliary circulation. RESULTS The hypothesis for interconversion was best supported by the data. The population PK model included first-order absorption, two-compartment disposition and separate renal (0.027 l h−1) and metabolic (1.9 l h−1) clearances for tesaglitazar. The model for the metabolite; one-compartment disposition with renal (saturable, Vmax = 0.19 μmol l−1 and K m = 0.04 μmol l−1) and nonrenal clearances (1.2 l h−1), biliary secretion (12 h−1) to the gut, where interconversion and reabsorption (0.8 h−1) of tesaglitazar occurred. CONCLUSION A mechanistic population PK model for tesaglitazar and its metabolite was developed in subjects with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. The model and data give insight into the likely mechanism (interconversion) of the increased tesaglitazar exposure in renally impaired subjects, and separate elimination and interconversion processes without dosing of the metabolite. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Methods Results Conclusions Mitiperstat is a novel, highly potent myeloperoxidase inhibitor being evaluated in patients with cardio‐metabolic disease (phase 2). These patients often have impaired renal function, which may affect mitiperstat pharmacokinetics. This study assessed mitiperstat pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability in participants with severe renal impairment and normal renal function, to inform inclusion of participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 in phase 3.Participants with severe renal impairment (eGFR ≥15 and <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) who were not on dialysis (n = 10) and group‐matched controls (eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 10) received a single mitiperstat 2.5 mg oral tablet. Blood samples were collected at intervals for 2 weeks and urine samples for 24 h post‐dose.Total apparent mitiperstat clearance was 10.83 L/h in the severe renal impairment cohort and 25.62 L/h in the control cohort. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve was 2.37‐fold higher (90% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79, 3.12) in the severe renal impairment cohort than in the control cohort, with longer elimination half‐life and similar maximum concentration. Non‐renal clearance was similar between the cohorts.Mitiperstat apparent clearance was approximately twofold lower in individuals with severe renal impairment than in those with normal renal function. Lower clearance was driven by reduced renal clearance; non‐renal clearance was similar. Mitiperstat was generally well tolerated by participants with severe renal impairment and normal renal function. These findings, together with efficacy and safety/tolerability data from phase 2b, will guide the dosing regimen for phase 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]