Search

Ticagrelor, a P2Y 12 receptor antagonist, has been highly recommended for use in acute coronary syndrome. The major active metabolite (AM) is similar to the parent drug, which exhibits antiplatelet activity. The inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) is used as an assay to demonstrate the anticoagulant efficacy of ticagrelor. In this study, we developed a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and its AM and combined this model with a pharmacodynamics model to reflect potential pharmacodynamic alterations in liver cirrhosis populations. The simulated results obtained using the PBPK model were validated by fold error values, which were all smaller than 2. Comparisons of exposure in different classifications of liver cirrhosis indicated that exposure to ticagrelor increased significantly with an increase in the degree of cirrhosis severity, whereas exposure to AM was decreased. The total concentration of ticagrelor and AM was related to the IPA included in the Sigmoid E max model. The PBPK model of ticagrelor and AM could predict the pharmacokinetics of all populations, and a combination of PD models was used to extrapolate for predicting unknown scenarios. Liver cirrhosis may result in prolonged IPA, depending on the severity degree of this disease. The combined PBPK model including IPA can reveal changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in populations affected by liver cirrhosis and indicate the risk potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To characterize ticagrelor exposure‐response relationship for platelet inhibition in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and a history of myocardial infarction (MI), using nonlinear mixed effects modelling and simulation. Methods: Platelet function data were integrated with plasma concentration data of ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR‐C1249010XX in a population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) model, based on two clinical studies. In the ONSET/OFFSET study, PK and platelet function were assessed in 123 CAD patients receiving placebo, ticagrelor (180 mg followed by 90 mg twice daily) or clopidogrel (600 mg followed by 75 mg once daily). In the PEGASUS‐TIMI 54 platelet function substudy, PK and platelet function were assessed during maintenance dosing in 180 prior MI patients receiving placebo, ticagrelor 60 mg or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. Results: Platelet inhibition by ticagrelor was described by a sigmoidal Emax model. On average, half maximal inhibition was reached at ticagrelor concentrations of 116 (RSE: 5.3%) nmol l–1. Simulations showed that near maximal platelet inhibition is achieved with both ticagrelor 60 and 90 mg twice daily. At simulated lower doses, platelet inhibition is overall reduced, more variable between patients, and show greater peak‐to‐trough variability. Ticagrelor antiplatelet response was similar between the studied patient populations. Conclusions: In patients with stable CAD or a history of MI, near maximal platelet inhibition is achieved with both ticagrelor 60 and 90 mg twice daily. At modelled doses <60 mg, the response is reduced overall, more variable between patients, and patients will display greater peak‐to‐trough variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ACT‐246475 is a selective and reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist inducing inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA). A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐design study was performed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of escalating single subcutaneous doses of ACT‐246475 (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, or 32 mg) in healthy male subjects (N = 8 per dose, 3:1 active:placebo ratio). Pharmacodynamic effects were assessed based on maximum platelet aggregation and P2Y12 reaction units using light transmission aggregometry and VerifyNow® assays, respectively. ACT‐246475 was safe and well tolerated up to 32 mg based on adverse event data and absence of clinically relevant changes in hematology, biochemistry, vital signs, and electrocardiogram variables. Median time to reach maximum plasma concentration was 0.5–0.75 hours, and geometric mean terminal half‐life ranged from 1.3 to 9.2 hours across the tested dose range. Exposure to ACT‐246475 was dose proportional across all dose groups. The maximal %IPA was reached within 30 minutes after subcutaneous administration of ACT‐246475. A dose‐dependent duration and extent of effect were observed based on area under the effect curve and maximum effect data. Similar results were observed for maximum platelet aggregation and P2Y12 reaction units. The %IPA was ≥85% at doses ≥2 mg. This level of %IPA was extended to at least 12 hours in the 32‐mg dose group. The safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacokinetic profile with quick onset and adequate duration of IPA support further investigation in patients with coronary artery disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel is currently the recommended treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). • Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with clopidogrel is insufficient, which increases the risk for recurrent ischaemic events. Therefore, there is a need for antiplatelet agents with improved IPA. • Ticagrelor (AZD6140) is a new antiplatelet agent in clinical development for reduction of thrombotic events in patients with ACS. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • This study assesses the optimal dosing schedule for ticagrelor in healthy volunteers and compares the degree of IPA with clopidogrel. • Our findings illustrate that the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor are predictable and are associated with consistent inhibition of platelet activity. • IPA with ticagrelor was greater and better sustained at high levels with twice daily ticagrelor than once daily regimens. AIM To determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of multiple oral doses of ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor antagonist, in healthy volunteers. METHODS This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending dose study. Thirty-two subjects received ticagrelor 50–600 mg once daily or 50–300 mg twice daily or placebo for 5 days at three dose levels in two parallel groups. Another group of 16 subjects received a clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose then 75 mg day−1, or placebo for 14 days. RESULTS Ticagrelor was absorbed with median tmax 1.5–3 h, exhibiting predictable pharmacokinetics over the 50–600 mg dose range. Mean Cmax and AUC for ticagrelor and its main metabolite, AR-C124910XX, increased approximately dose-proportionately (approximately 2.2- to 2.4-fold with a twofold dose increase) over the dose range. Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with ticagrelor was greater and better sustained at high levels with ticagrelor twice daily vs. once daily regimens. Throughout dosing, more consistent IPA was observed at doses ≥300 mg once daily and ≥100 mg twice daily compared with clopidogrel. Mean IPA with ticagrelor ≥100 mg twice daily was greater and less variable (93–100%, range 65–100%) than with clopidogrel (77%, range 11–100%) at trough concentrations. No safety or tolerability issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS Multiple dosing provided predictable pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and its metabolite over the dose range of 50–600 mg once daily and 50–300 mg twice daily with Cmax and AUC(0, t) increasing approximately dose-proportionally. Greater and more consistent IPA with ticagrelor at doses ≥100 mg twice daily and ≥300 mg once daily were observed than with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor at doses up to 600 mg day−1 was well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine prodrug metabolised to an active metabolite that binds irreversibly to the platelet P2Y12 receptor and inhibits adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation. We compared prasugrel pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability in healthy Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Caucasian subjects. In an open-label, single-centre, parallel-design study, 89 healthy subjects (25 Chinese, 20 Japanese, 22 Korean and 22 Caucasian) aged 20–65 years were given a prasugrel 60-mg loading dose (LD) followed by daily 10-mg maintenance doses (MD) for 7 days and then 5-mg MD for 10 days. Plasma concentrations of prasugrel’s active metabolite and inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (IPA) were determined. Mean exposure to prasugrel’s active metabolite in all treatment regimens was higher in each of the Asian groups than in the Caucasian group, although there was considerable overlap between individual exposure estimates in Asians and Caucasians. The mean IPA was also higher in Asians than in Caucasians following a prasugrel 60-mg LD, although the difference did not consistently achieve statistical significance. Prasugrel 10-mg or 5-mg MD produced statistically significantly higher IPA in each Asian group compared with that in the Caucasians. Prasugrel was well tolerated during the LD and MD regimens by all groups. Mean exposure to the prasugrel active metabolite following prasugrel 60-mg LD and during daily 10-mg or 5-mg MD was higher in each of the Asian groups than in the Caucasian group, which resulted in greater platelet inhibition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]