Search

An important goal of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action UNGAP (UNderstanding Gastrointestinal Absorption-related Processes, www.ungap.eu) is to improve standardization of methods relating to the study of oral drug absorption. Solubility is a general term that refers to the maximum achievable concentration of a compound dissolved in a liquid medium. For orally administered drugs, relevant information on drug properties is crucial during drug (product) development and at the regulatory level. Collection of reliable and reproducible solubility data requires careful application and understanding of the limitations of the selected experimental method. In addition, the purity of a compound and its solid state form, as well as experimental parameters such as temperature of experimentation, media related factors, and sample handling procedures can affect data quality. In this paper, an international consensus developed by the COST UNGAP network on recommendations for collecting high quality solubility data for the development of orally administered drugs is proposed., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

The absorption of oral drugs is frequently plagued by significant variability with potentially serious therapeutic consequences. The source of variability can be traced back to interindividual variability in physiology, differences in special populations (age- and disease-dependent), drug and formulation properties, or food-drug interactions. Clinical evidence for the impact of some of these factors on drug pharmacokinetic variability is mounting: e.g. gastric pH and emptying time, small intestinal fluid properties, differences in pediatrics and the elderly, and surgical changes in gastrointestinal anatomy. However, the link of colonic factors variability (transit time, fluid composition, microbiome), sex differences (male vs. female) and gut-related diseases (chronic constipation, anorexia and cachexia) to drug absorption variability has not been firmly established yet. At the same time, a way to decrease oral drug pharmacokinetic variability is provided by the pharmaceutical industry: clinical evidence suggests that formulation approaches employed during drug development can decrease the variability in oral exposure. This review outlines the main drivers of oral drug exposure variability and potential approaches to overcome them, while highlighting existing knowledge gaps and guiding future studies in this area., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Fluid sampling from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract has been applied as a valuable tool to gain more insight into the fluids present in the human GI tract and to explore the dynamic interplay of drug release, dissolution, precipitation and absorption after drug product administration to healthy subjects. In the last twenty years, collaborative initiatives have led to a plethora of clinical aspiration studies that aimed to unravel the luminal drug behavior of an orally administered drug product. The obtained drug concentration-time profiles from different segments in the GI tract were a valuable source of information to optimize and/or validate predictive in vitro and in silico tools, frequently applied in the non-clinical stage of drug product development. Sampling techniques are presently not only being considered as a stand-alone technique but are also used in combination with other in vivo techniques (e.g., gastric motility recording, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)). By doing so, various physiological variables can be mapped simultaneously and evaluated for their impact on luminal drug and formulation behavior. This comprehensive review aims to describe the history, challenges and opportunities of the aspiration technique with a specific focus on how this technique can unravel the luminal behavior of drug products inside the human GI tract by providing a summary of studies performed over the last 20 years. A section 'Best practices' on how to perform the studies and how to treat the aspirated samples is described. In the conclusion, we focus on future perspectives concerning this technique., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To measure the pH, buffer capacity, lipid content, bile acid content, and viscosity in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) lumen after a standard high-calorie, high-fat meal as well as the osmolality, lipid content and bile acid content in the aqueous phase of the gastric contents and the micellar phase of contents of the upper small intestine. To evaluate the implications of these findings for the composition of biorelevant media employed in vitro oral drug product performance testing representing the upper GI conditions after ingestion of the standard meal., Methods: Eight healthy male adult volunteers participated in a two-phase, crossover study in which a homogenized standard meal was administered to the antrum via the gastric port of a naso-gastro-intestinal tube. A glass of tap water and single paracetamol and danazol doses were administered to the antrum of the stomach 30 min after the initiation of meal administration (Pentafragka et al., 2020). Samples were aspirated from the antrum and the upper small intestine over the next four hours. The pH and the buffer capacity of the samples were measured immediately upon aspiration, while viscosity, osmolality, and presence of solubilizing agents were measured after storage at -70 °C., Results: The composition of gastric contents over time fluctuated less after the homogenized standard meal than after liquid meals with similar composition. Intra-subject variability of pH and buffer capacity in the stomach and in the upper small intestine was low. Mean viscosity values in the stomach at 100 s -1 were 80-800 times higher than in the fasted state for more than 3 h after the standard meal. In the upper small intestine, mean viscosity values at 100 s -1 were at least 100 times higher than in the fasted state for 4 h after the standard meal., Conclusions: Based on data collected in this study, Level I and Level II biorelevant media simulating the intragastric conditions after ingestion of a standard meal could be simplified whereas FeSSIF-V2 composition was confirmed to be representative of the composition of contents in the upper small intestine. Representative values of viscosity in the stomach and the upper small intestine and Level II composition of the aqueous phase of gastric contents, after the standard meal, are proposed for first time., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The absence of an intestinal absorption sink is a significant weakness of standard in vitro lipolysis methods, potentially leading to poor prediction of in vivo performance and an overestimation of drug precipitation. In addition, the majority of the described lipolysis methods only attempt to simulate intestinal conditions, thus overlooking any supersaturation or precipitation of ionizable drugs as they transition from the acidic gastric environment to the more neutral conditions of the intestine. The aim of this study was to develop a novel lipolysis method incorporating a two-stage gastric-to-intestinal transition and an absorptive compartment to reliably predict in vivo performance of lipid-based formulations (LBFs). Drug absorption was mimicked by in situ quantification of drug partitioning into a decanol layer. The method was used to characterize LBFs from four studies described in the literature, involving three model drugs (i.e., nilotinib, fenofibrate, and danazol) where in vivo bioavailability data have previously been reported. The results from the novel biphasic lipolysis method were compared to those of the standard pH-stat method in terms of reliability for predicting the in vivo performance. For three of the studies, the novel biphasic lipolysis method more reliably predicted the in vivo bioavailability compared to the standard pH-stat method. In contrast, the standard pH-stat method was found to produce more predictive results for one study involving a series of LBFs composed of the soybean oil, glyceryl monolinoleate (Maisine CC), Kolliphor EL, and ethanol. This result was surprising and could reflect that increasing concentrations of ethanol (as a cosolvent) in the formulations may have resulted in greater partitioning of the drug into the decanol absorptive compartment. In addition to the improved predictivity for most of the investigated systems, this biphasic lipolysis method also uses in situ analysis and avoids time- and resource-intensive sample analysis steps, thereby facilitating a higher throughput capacity and biorelevant approach for characterization of LBFs.

We evaluated the usefulness of quality control dissolution data collected with compendial Apparatus I and II, biorelevant dissolution data collected with compendial apparatus IV, and bioaccessibility data collected with the non-compendial tiny-TIM system in screening modified release formulations during the development of BCS Class I compounds using a Boehringer Ingelheim model experimental compound, A6197. Four products were investigated: an immediate release tablet, an extended release tablet, modified release mini-tablets, and extended release pellets. Data with modified release products collected with the compendial apparatus were evaluated vs. the average intraluminal dissolution estimated after deconvoluting clinical data collected in healthy adults. Data collected with the tiny-TIM system were evaluated vs. the average AUC and C max values estimated from the clinical data. Unlike with the quality control data collected with Apparatus I and II, data collected with Apparatus IV data and Level I biorelevant media adequately described the intraluminal dissolution process of the three modified release products. Data deviated less than 10% from the actual average deconvoluted intraluminal dissolution profiles, illustrating the usefulness of Apparatus IV biorelevant data in understanding the intraluminal dissolution process of BCS class I small molecules administered as modified release products in the fasted state. Total bioaccessibility data and maximum bioaccessibility data collected using the tiny-TIM and the immediate release tablet and the three modified release drug products correctly reproduced the ranking of A6197 AUC values (R 2  = 0.989) and C max values (R 2  = 0.962), respectively, illustrating tiny-TIM as a useful system for formulation selection of BCS class I small molecules administered in the fasted state., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Using the type of meal and dosing conditions suggested by regulatory agencies as a basis, this review has two specific objectives: first, to summarize our understanding on the impact of food intake on luminal environment and drug product performance and second, to summarize the usefulness and limitations of available in vitro and in silico methodologies for the evaluation of drug product performance after food intake., Key Findings: Characterization of the luminal environment and studies evaluating product performance in the lumen, under conditions suggested by regulatory agencies for simulating the fed state, are limited. Various in vitro methodologies have been proposed for evaluating drug product performance in the fed state, but systematic validation is lacking. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling approaches require the use of in vitro biorelevant data and, to date, have been used primarily for investigating the mechanisms via which an already observed food effect is mediated., Summary: Better understanding of the impact of changes induced by the meal administration conditions suggested by regulatory agencies on the luminal fate of the drug product is needed. Relevant information will be useful for optimizing the in vitro test methods and increasing the usefulness of PBPK modelling methodologies., (© 2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.)

The availability of in vitro tools that are constructed on the basis of a detailed knowledge of key aspects of gastrointestinal (GI) physiology and their impact on formulation performance and subsequent drug release behaviour is fundamental to the success and efficiency of oral drug product development. Over the last six years, the development and optimization of improved, biorelevant in vitro tools has been a cornerstone of the IMI OrBiTo (Oral Biopharmaceutics Tools) project. By bringing together key industry and academic partners, and by linking tool development and optimization to human studies to understand behaviour at the formulation/GI tract interface, the collaboration has enabled innovation, optimization and implementation of the requisite biorelevant in vitro tools. In this paper, we present an overview of the in vitro tools investigated during the collaboration and offer a perspective on their future use in enhancing the development of new oral drug products., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Dissolution testing is an important physiochemical test for the development of solid oral dosage forms, tablets, and capsules. As a quality control test, the dissolution test is used for assessment of drug product quality and is specified for batch release and regulatory stability studies. In vitro dissolution test results can often be correlated with the biopharmaceutical behavior of a product.This article provides a summary of views from major global agencies (Europe, Japan, United States), pharmacopoeias, academia, and industry. Based on available guidance and literature, this article summarizes highlights for development and validation of a suitable dissolution method, setting appropriate specifications, in vitro-in vivo comparison, and how to obtain a biowaiver., (Copyright © 2018 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Optimize adult fecal material composition for evaluating the clinical importance of bacterial degradation of therapeutic agents in the lower intestine (distal small intestine, D-SI and proximal colon, P-COL). Evaluate the usefulness of optimized fecal material in the evaluation of bacterial degradation of five model highly permeable drugs: two nitroreductase substrates (nitrendipine and nimodipine), three drugs for which published data indicate no impact of bacterial degradation on in vivo performance (levodopa, budesonide and rivaroxaban) and one prodrug (sulfasalazine, an azoreductase substrate) from which a locally acting on the mucosa of the lower intestine drug is derived (mesalamine)., Methods: 30 min and 95 min were used as point estimates of maximum bacterial degradation half-lives for bacterial degradation in D-SI or in P-COL, respectively, to be clinically important, i.e. for at least 20% reduction in absorption from D-SI or P-COL to occur. Optimization of fecal material was based on recently reported degradation profiles of metronidazole (a nitroreductase substrate) and olsalazine (an azoreductase substrate) in the lower intestine of healthy adults which are clinically important. Model compounds were tested in optimized fecal materials and data were evaluated vs. existing in vivo data in adults., Results: Simulated ileal bacteria (SIB) consisted of 5.5% (w/v) stools in normal saline and simulated colonic bacteria (SCoB) consisted of 8.3% (w/v) stools in normal saline. For all model compounds, data in SIB and SCoB were in line with available information in adults. [Degradation half-life in SIB/Degradation half-life in SCoB] ≈ [Stool content in SCoB/Stool content in SIB] ≈ 1.5, i.e. bacterial degradation in SIB could be predicted from bacterial degradation in SCoB., Conclusion: Data in SCoB only are useful for evaluating whether bacterial degradation in P-COL and in D-SI is likely to be clinically important for orally administered, highly permeable drugs or prodrugs which act locally after bacterial degradation. The usefulness of this approach in cases where enzymes other than nitroreductases or azoreductases are involved requires further confirmation., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the in vitro biorelevant gastrointestinal transfer (BioGIT) system in assessing the impact of dose and formulation on early exposure by comparing in vitro data with previously collected human plasma data of low solubility active pharmaceutical ingredients. Eight model active pharmaceutical ingredients were tested; Lu 35-138C (salt of weak base in a HP-beta-CD solution, three doses), fenofibrate (solid dispersion, tablet, two doses), AZD2207 EQ (salt of weak base, capsule, three doses), posaconazole (Noxafil® suspension, two doses), SB705498 (weak base, tablets vs. capsules), cyclosporine A (Sandimmun® vs. Sandimmun® Neoral), nifedipine (Adalat® capsule vs. Macorel® tablet), and itraconazole (Sporanox® capsule vs. Sporanox® solution). AUC 0-0.75h values were calculated from the apparent concentration versus time data in the duodenal compartment of the BioGIT system. Differences in AUC 0-0.75h values were evaluated versus differences in AUC 0-1h and in AUC 0-2h values calculated from previously collected plasma data in healthy adults. Ratios of mean AUC 0-0.75h , mean AUC 0-1h , and mean AUC 0-2h values were estimated using the lowest dose or the formulation with the lower AUC 0-0.75h value as denominator. The BioGIT system qualitatively identified the impact of dose and of formulation on early exposure in all cases. Log-transformed mean BioGIT AUC 0-0.75h ratios correlated significantly with log-transformed mean plasma AUC 0-1h ratios. Based on this correlation, BioGIT AUC 0-0.75h ratios between 0.3 and 10 directly reflect corresponding plasma AUC 0-1h ratios. BioGIT system is a valuable tool for the assessment of the impact of dose and formulation on early exposure to low solubility drugs.

Purpose: Characterize the contents of distal ileum and cecum in healthy adults under conditions simulating the bioavailability/bioequivelance studies of drug products in fasted and fed state., Methods: Twelve males participated in a two-phase crossover study. Phase I: subjects remained fasted overnight plus 4.5 h in the morning prior to colonoscopy. Phase II: subjects remained fasted overnight, consumed breakfast in the morning, and abstain from food until colonoscopy, 4.5 h after breakfast. Upon sampling, volume, pH and buffer capacity were measured; after ultracentrifugation, supernatant was physicochemically characterized and non-liquid particles diameter was measured., Results: In distal ileum, pH is ~8.1 and size of non-liquid particles is ~200 μm, regardless of dosing conditions; in fed state, liquid fraction was lower whereas osmolality and carbohydrate content were higher. In cecum, the environment was similar with previously characterized environment in the ascending colon; in fasted state, size of non-liquid particles is smaller than in distal ileum (~70 μm). Fluid composition in distal ileum is different from cecum, especially in fasted state., Conclusion: Differences in luminal environment between distal ileum and cecum may impact the performance of orally administered products which deliver drug during residence in lower intestine. Dosing conditions affect cecal environment more than in distal ileum.

The purpose was to propose two-stage single-compartment models for evaluating dissolution characteristics in distal ileum and ascending colon, under conditions simulating the bioavailability and bioequivalence studies in fasted and fed state by using the mini-paddle and the compendial flow-through apparatus (closed-loop mode). Immediate release products of two highly dosed active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), sulfasalazine and L-870,810, and one mesalamine colon targeting product were used for evaluating their usefulness. Change of medium composition simulating the conditions in distal ileum (SIFileum ) to a medium simulating the conditions in ascending colon in fasted state and in fed state was achieved by adding an appropriate solution in SIFileum . Data with immediate release products suggest that dissolution in lower intestine is substantially different than in upper intestine and is affected by regional pH differences > type/intensity of fluid convection > differences in concentration of other luminal components. Asacol® (400 mg/tab) was more sensitive to type/intensity of fluid convection. In all the cases, data were in line with available human data. Two-stage single-compartment models may be useful for the evaluation of dissolution in lower intestine. The impact of type/intensity of fluid convection and viscosity of media on luminal performance of other APIs and drug products requires further exploration., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.)

Background: Biorelevant media for evaluation of dosage form performance in the gastrointestinal lumen were first introduced in the late 1990s. Since then, a variety of additional media have been proposed, making it now possible to simulate most regions in the gastrointestinal tract in both prandial states. However, recent work suggests that the complexity and degree of biorelevance required to predict in-vivo release varies with the drug, dosage form and dosing conditions., Objective: The aim of this commentary was to establish which levels of biorelevant media are appropriate to various combinations of active pharmaceutical ingredient(s), dosage form and dosing conditions. With regard to their application, a decision tree for the selection of the appropriate biorelevant medium/media is proposed and illustrative case scenarios are provided. Additionally, media to represent the distal small intestine in both prandial states are presented., Conclusion: The newly proposed levels of biorelevance and accompanying decision tree may serve as a useful tool during formulation development in order to ensure high quality, predictive performance results without unnecessary complexity of media. In future work, further specific case examples will be evolved, which will additionally address the need to take gastrointestinal passage times and type and intensity of agitation into consideration., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

OrBiTo is a new European project within the IMI programme in the area of oral biopharmaceutics tools that includes world leading scientists from nine European universities, one regulatory agency, one non-profit research organization, four SMEs together with scientists from twelve pharmaceutical companies. The OrBiTo project will address key gaps in our knowledge of gastrointestinal (GI) drug absorption and deliver a framework for rational application of predictive biopharmaceutics tools for oral drug delivery. This will be achieved through novel prospective investigations to define new methodologies as well as refinement of existing tools. Extensive validation of novel and existing biopharmaceutics tools will be performed using active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), formulations and supporting datasets from industry partners. A combination of high quality in vitro or in silico characterizations of API and formulations will be integrated into physiologically based in silico biopharmaceutics models capturing the full complexity of GI drug absorption. This approach gives an unparalleled opportunity to initiate a transformational change in industrial research and development to achieve model-based pharmaceutical product development in accordance with the Quality by Design concept. Benefits include an accelerated and more efficient drug candidate selection, formulation development process, particularly for challenging projects such as low solubility molecules (BCS II and IV), enhanced and modified-release formulations, as well as allowing optimization of clinical product performance for patient benefit. In addition, the tools emerging from OrBiTo are expected to significantly reduce demand for animal experiments in the future as well as reducing the number of human bioequivalence studies required to bridge formulations after manufacturing or composition changes., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This review summarizes the current knowledge on anatomy and physiology of the human gastrointestinal tract in comparison with that of common laboratory animals (dog, pig, rat and mouse) with emphasis on in vivo methods for testing and prediction of oral dosage form performance. A wide range of factors and methods are considered in addition, such as imaging methods, perfusion models, models for predicting segmental/regional absorption, in vitro in vivo correlations as well as models to investigate the effects of excipients and the role of food on drug absorption. One goal of the authors was to clearly identify the gaps in today's knowledge in order to stimulate further work on refining the existing in vivo models and demonstrate their usefulness in drug formulation and product performance testing., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This review focuses on the evolution and current status of biorelevant media and hydrodynamics, and discusses the usefulness of biorelevant performance testing in the evaluation of specific dosage form related lumenal processes., Key Findings: During the last 15 years our knowledge of the gastrointestinal environment (including the lower gut) has improved dramatically and biorelevant media composition and, to a lesser extent, biorelevant hydrodynamics, have been refined. Biorelevant dissolution/release testing is useful for the evaluation of formulation and food effects on plasma levels after administration of immediate release dosage forms containing low solubility compounds and after administration of extended release products. Lumenal disintegration times of immediate release dosage forms and the bile acid sequestering activity of resins in the lumen can also be successfully forecasted with biorelevant in vitro testing., Summary: Biorelevant in-vitro performance testing is an important tool for evaluating intralumenal dosage form performance. Since the formulation of new active pharmaceutical ingredients for oral delivery is more challenging than ever before, efforts to improve the predictability of biorelevant tests are expected to continue., (© 2012 The Authors. JPP © 2012 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.)

The suitability of various media to forecast the solubility of ketoconazole and dipyridamole in the fed stomach at various periods after meal administration was evaluated. Solubilities were measured with the shake-flask method in gastric fluids aspirated 30, 60 and 120 min after administration of 500 ml Ensure plus to healthy fasted adults, in three sets of simulated gastric fluids based on milk, and in simple aqueous buffered media. Simple aqueous buffered media vastly underestimated the intragastric solubility of model compounds in the fed state. When using undigested milk-based media, the solubilities of model compounds in aspirates were also underestimated by a factor of 2.5-27. Solubility in milk digested with pepsin was useful for estimating the intragastric solubility of ketoconazole (within 20%) but overestimated the intragastric values of dipyridamole by a factor of 2-19. For both drugs, the solubility in milk digested with pepsin and lipase predicted the solubility in aspirates collected 60 min after meal administration, whereas at other times it overestimated the intragastric solubility (by a factor of <5). Both the use of biorelevant media and simulation of intragastric digestion are necessary for the prediction of drug solubility in the fed stomach. Milk digested with pepsin and lipase enabled the estimation of the intragastric solubility of dipyridamole and ketoconazole at 1 h after meal intake. Simulation of vesicle/micellar structures seems to be key for the prediction of intragastric solubility in the fed stomach.

Purpose: To explore the effect of the nutritional state on the solubilizing properties of human intestinal fluids (HIF) on a time-after-food administration basis., Methods: HIF were collected in fractions of 30 min from five volunteers in the fasted, fed and fat-enriched fed state. In vitro solubility of five BCS class II drugs (danazol, diazepam, nifedipine, ketoconazole, indomethacin) was assessed in the intestinal fractions and simulated intestinal fluids., Results: Solubilities in intestinal fractions were characterized by high time- and subject-dependent variability. For the non-ionized drugs, solubility in early intestinal fractions was higher in both fed states compared to the fasted state, and in the fat-enriched fed state compared to the fed state. Solubility in simulated intestinal fluids did not sufficiently predict the solubilizing capacity of the early postprandial phase. Solubility in HIF was shown to be determined by a complex interplay of various intraluminal parameters. For the ionized drugs, pH played a significant role for indomethacin (R (2) = 0.86); for the partly ionized ketoconazole other intraluminal parameters were also important., Conclusions: Solubilizing capacity of HIF in the fed state is strongly time-dependent. Intraluminal dissolution may, therefore, vary with drug arrival time in the small intestine and constitute a source of variability in intestinal drug absorption.

Solubilities measured in water are not always indicative of solubilities in the gastrointestinal tract. The use of aqueous solubility to predict oral drug absorption can therefore lead to very pronounced underestimates of the oral bioavailability, particularly for drugs which are poorly soluble and lipophilic. Mechanisms responsible for enhancing the luminal solubility of such drugs are discussed. Various methods for estimating intra-lumenal solubilities are presented, with emphasis on the two most widely implemented methods: determining solubility in fluids aspirated from the human gastrointestinal tract, and determining solubility in so-called biorelevant media, composed to simulate these fluids. The ability of the biorelevant media to predict solubility in human aspirates and to predict plasma profiles is illustrated with case examples.

Purpose: To measure the solubility of four drugs in human gastric aspirates, canine gastric aspirates (CGF) and simulated gastric fluids in order to propose a medium for estimating intragastric drug solubility relevant to a bioavailability study in the fasted state., Materials and Methods: Intragastric environment after administration of water to healthy fasted adults and to healthy fasted dogs (this study) was initially characterized. Solubilities were then measured with the shake-flask method in gastric fluid aspirated after the administration of water to healthy fasted adults and to healthy fasted dogs, in various simulated gastric fluids, i.e. SGF(SLS), SGF(Triton), FaSSGF, FaSSGF(NaCl), and in various HCl solutions with pH values ranging from 1.2 to 2.9., Results: In all cases, FaSSGF performed better than canine aspirates, SGF(SLS), SGF(Triton), or FaSSGF(NaCl) in predicting solubility in HGF. However, its superiority over HCl pH 1.6 was not clear. For ketoconazole, dipyridamole, miconazole, and felodipine deviations of solubility data in FaSSGF from solubility data in HGF were non-significant, 34, -39 and 252%, respectively, whereas the corresponding deviations of data in HCl pH 1.6 from data in HGF were non-significant, 24, 70, and 130%, respectively., Conclusions: Combining data in FaSSGF and HCl pH 1.6 is comparatively the most efficient way to get an estimate of drug solubility in the fasting gastric contents during a bioavailability study. However, accurate estimation of intragastric solubility is limited by the changing environment during intragastric residence of solid particles and the degree of simulation of intragastric composition.

In this study, the importance of accurate simulation of fasting gastric environment for the assessment of the absorption process of two model lipophilic compounds, GR253035X (weak base) and atovaquone (non-ionizable), was assessed. Dissolution profiles were constructed in previously proposed simulated gastric fluids and in a new medium that comprises only of components that have been recovered from the fasting stomach. Dissolution data obtained in a more physiologically relevant medium led to better correlation between the simulated and actual intralumenal dissolution vs. time profiles for GR253035X. In contrast, accurate simulation of gastric environment did not affect the simulated plasma profile of atovaquone. Accurate simulation of the fasting gastric contents may be crucial for the assessment of the absorption profile of lipophilic weak bases.

The objectives of this study were twofold. First, to clarify the applicability of the similarity factor, f(2), the difference factor, f(1), and the Rescigno index, xi(i), in the comparison of cumulative drug vs. time data sets. Second, to assess the possibility for these indices to be used on a confidence interval basis. Theoretical profiles as well as errorless and errant cumulative % data sets were simulated using the Weibull function. At various variability levels, 12-fold and 3-fold replicated reference and test data sets were generated from the errant data sets. The 90% confidence intervals were constructed for the median of the index (non-parametric confidence intervals, NPCIs) and for the evaluated index based on the 5th and 95th percentiles of 1000 index values estimated from bootstrapped samples (bootstrapped confidence intervals, BSCIs). It was observed that at low variability levels, i.e. when mean data sets can be used, all indices could be used for the comparison of cumulative data sets. At high variability levels, only the BSCIs of f(2) included the actual index value for the 12-fold replicated data sets. However, deviations of the low limits of NPCIs of f(2) from the actual index values were similar to corresponding deviations of BSCIs. When 3-fold replicated data sets were used, both NPCIs and BSCIs of all indices were generally reliable but much larger than that of 12 replications. In conclusion, the time period for the evaluation of the indices cannot be theoretically justified because indices change continuously with time. Cutoff points for their evaluation must be decided on a case-by-case basis. If theoretically possible, evaluation of the indices should be done by using areas. With highly variable data, BSCIs are preferred because compared to NPCIs they are less dependent on the number of replications. When n=12, BSCIs of f(2) are comparatively more reliable. When n=3, BSCIs of the indices tested in this study have similar performances.

Purpose: To quantitatively compare in vitro dissolution data in biorelevant and compendial media, to investigate whether in vitro differences are reflected in the simulated plasma profile and to specify under which circumstances prediction of the plasma profile of orally administered lipophilic drugs can be achieved., Methods: Previously published dissolution data from seven products of four lipophilic drugs were compared using the first order model, the RRSBW distribution, and a model based on the Noyes-Whitney theory. Simulated plasma profiles were then obtained using a model-dependent approach. Simulated and observed plasma profiles were compared with the difference factor, f1., Results: No model consistently provided the best fit to the in vitro data, which varied significantly with medium composition. Prediction of the plasma profile was possible (9.6 < or = f1 < or = 34.2) in seven out of eleven cases., Conclusions: Although prediction of the plasma profile of lipophilic drugs solely on the basis of in vitro data remains an ambitious target, this study shows that the plasma profile of a lipophilic drug can be predicted with appropriate in vitro dissolution data, provided that the absolute bioavailability of the drug is known and the drug has dissolution limited absorption.

Purpose: In this paper we seek to verify the differences in dissolution behavior between class I and class II drugs and to evaluate the suitability of two new physiologically based media, of Simulated Gastric Fluid (SGF) and of milk for their ability to forecast trends in the in vivo performance of class II compounds and their formulations., Methods: Dissolution behavior of two class I drugs, i.e. acetaminophen and metoprolol, and of three class II drugs, i.e. danazol, mefenamic acid and ketoconazole, was studied with USP Apparatus 2 in water, SGF, milk, Simulated Intestinal Fluid without pancreatin (SIFsp) and in two media simulating the small intestinal contents in the fed (FeSSIF) and fasted (FaSSIF) states, respectively., Results: Class I powders dissolved rapidly in all media tested. Acetaminophen dissolution in milk was slow from one tablet formulation, in all other cases dissolution was more than 85% complete in 15 minutes. The dissolution rate of metoprolol was shown to be dependent on formulation and manufacturing method, and one of the three tablet formulations did not meet compendial specifications (80%/30 minutes). Dissolution behavior of class II drugs was greatly affected by choice of medium. Dissolution from a capsule formulation of danazol proved to be dependent on the concentration of solubilizing agents, with a the 30-fold increase in percentage dissolved within 90 minutes upon changing from aqueous media without surfactants to FaSSIF. Use of FeSSIF or milk as the dissolution medium resulted in an even greater increase in percentage dissolved, 100 and 180-fold respectively. Dissolution of the weak acid mefenamic acid from a capsule formulation is dependent on both pH and bile salt concentration, which leads to an offset between increased bile salt concentration and lower pH in the fed state compared to the fasted state medium. The weak base ketoconazole showed complete dissolution from a tablet formulation in Simulated Gastric Fluid without pepsin (SGFsp) within 30 minutes, 70% dissolution in 2 hours under fed state simulated upper jejunal conditions but only 6% dissolution in 2 hours under fasted state conditions., Conclusions: As predicted, dissolution of class II drugs proved to be in general much more dependent on the medium than class I drugs. With the array of compendial and physiological media available, it should be possible to design a suitable set of tests to predict the in vivo dissolution of both class I and II drugs from immediate release formulations.

Dissolution tests are used for many purposes in the pharmaceutical industry: in the development of new products, for quality control and, to assist with the determination of bioequivalence. Recent regulatory developments such as the Biopharmaceutics Classification Scheme have highlighted the importance of dissolution in the regulation of post-approval changes and introduced the possibility of substituting dissolution tests for clinical studies in some cases. Therefore, there is a need to develop dissolution tests that better predict the in vivo performance of drug products. This could be achieved if the conditions in the gastrointestinal tract were successfully reconstructed in vitro. The aims of this article are, first, to clarify under which circumstances dissolution testing can be prognostic for in vivo performance, and second, to present physiological data relevant to the design of dissolution tests, particularly with respect to the composition, volume, flow rates and mixing patterns of the fluids in the gastrointestinal tract. Finally, brief comments are made in regard to the composition of in vitro dissolution media as well as the hydrodynamics and duration of the test.