Search

Important information gaps remain on the efficacy and safety of drugs in children. Pediatric drug development encounters several ethical, practical, and scientific challenges. One barrier to the evaluation of medicines for children is a lack of innovative methodologies that have been adapted to the needs of children. This article presents our successful experience of pediatric microdose and microtracer studies using (14) C-labeled probes in Europe to illustrate the strengths and limitations of these approaches., (© 2015 ASCPT.)

The background to human microdosing or Phase 0 studies is reviewed, focusing particularly on the information that such studies can provide in the context of exploratory clinical development. Examples are provided of the microdose-validation studies known as the Consortium for Resourcing and Evaluating AMS Microdosing trial and EU Microdosing AMS Partnership Programme, which demonstrated that there was good dose proportionality between microdose and pharmacological dose pharmacokinetics. When microdosing was applied to ten development drugs, it was found that all ten molecules showed dose proportionality between the microdose and the pharmacological dose. The majority of microdose studies have used accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) analysis and only these studies that are considered here; AMS provides information on all metabolites, even if these are minor. There is now sufficient scientific data to justify microdose studies being routinely conducted as part of the drug-development process.

Background: Microdosing studies (human Phase 0) are used to select drug candidates for Phase I clinical trials on the basis of their pharmacokinetic properties, using subpharmacologic doses (maximum 100 microg). There are questions as to whether pharmacokinetic data obtained at these low doses will predict those at the clinically relevant dose., Objective: To review the current literature on microdosing and assess how well microdose data have predicted the pharmacokinetics obtained at a therapeutic dose., Methods: All data published in the peer reviewed literature comparing pharmacokinetics at a microdose with a therapeutic dose were reviewed, excluding those studies aimed at imaging., Conclusions: Of the 18 drugs reported, 15 demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics within a factor of 2 between a microdose and a therapeutic dose. Therefore, data that support the utility of microdosing are beginning to emerge.

There is an increasing recognition within the pharmaceutical industry of the importance of the ADME studies in drug registration. Consequently, there has been a drive in recent times to conduct the ADME studies as early as possible in the development programme. There are, however, regulatory barriers, particularly in the administration of radiotracers to human volunteers, which place limitations on the timing of the ADME studies. Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), a technology new to the pharmaceutical industry, is an ultrasensitive technique for measuring tracers such as (14)C. Using AMS, it is possible to lower the radioactive dose administered to humans to a point where many regulatory authorities consider it insignificant. With the removal of the regulatory hurdles, ADME data can be obtained much earlier in the development process. Tracers such as (14)C can be administered in minute amounts in the first in man studies (Phase I), or even in a preregulatory study known as microdosing (or human Phase 0). AMS also enables other studies such as absolute bioavailability to be conducted earlier if required.

The process of early clinical drug development has changed little over the past 20 years despite an up to 40% failure rate associated with inappropriate drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics of candidate molecules. A new method of obtaining human metabolism data known as microdosing has been developed which will permit smarter candidate selection by taking investigational drugs into humans earlier. Microdosing depends on the availability of two ultrasensitive 'big-physics' techniques: positron emission tomography (PET) can provide pharmacodynamic information, whereas accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) provides pharmacokinetic information. Microdosing allows safer human studies as well as reducing the use of animals in preclinical toxicology.

A comparison has been made between accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) analysis and liquid scintillation counting (LSC) of plasma, urine and faecal samples containing 14C-labelled drugs. In an in vitro study in which human plasma was spiked (the term spiked is used in Section 2.6) with 14C-Fluconazole (14C-FL) over a concentration range of 0.1-2.5 dpm/ml, a correlation coefficient of 0.999 was determined for AMS analysis versus extrapolated LSC data. No significant day to day (or inter-day)variation was seen (P < 0.05 by ANOVA). Coefficients of variation for these analyses ranged from 2.68 to 6.50%. In vivo studies in which rats were given a high (11.5 microCi/kg) or low (18.1 nCi/kg) radioactive dose (to model an exposure of 0.9 microSievert to man) of 14C-Fluticasone propionate(14C-FP) showed that there was also a good correspondence between AMS and LSC data. A mass balance study in a single the faeces by 96 h; less than 1% of the administered dose was excreted in the urine. The limit of reliable measurement of drug related material, above background concentrations, by AMS analysis in this study was approximately 0.1 dpm/ml for plasma, 0.01 dpm/ml for urine without any sample extraction or concentration and 0.01 dpm/ml for faecal extracts. The data reported here demonstrate that AMS is an ultrasensitive and reliable method for analysing 14C-labelled drugs in human and animal body fluids.