Search

Aim: To investigate effect of patient age, gender, comorbidities and surgeon on refractive outcomes following cataract surgery., Methods: Study population: patients on UK national ophthalmic cataract database on cataract operations undertaken between 1 April 2010 and 31 August 2018. Variables examined included gender, age, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, high myopia, inherited retinal disease, optic nerve disease, uveitis, pseudoexfoliation, vitreous opacities, retinal pathology, cataract type, previous surgery and posterior capsular rupture. A multivariate normal cross-classified model was fitted to the refractive outcome using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods with diffuse priors to approximate maximum likelihood estimation. A MCMC chain was generated with a burn-in of 5000 iterations and a monitoring chain of 50 000 iterations., Results: 490 987 cataract operations were performed on 351 864 patients by 2567 surgeons. Myopic and astigmatic errors were associated with posterior capsule rupture (-0.38/+0.04×72), glaucoma (-0.10/+0.05×95), previous vitrectomy (-0.049/+0.03×66) and high myopia (-0.07/+0.03×57). Hyperopic and astigmatic errors were associated with diabetic retinopathy (+0.08/+0.03×104), pseudoexfoliation (+0.07/+0.01×158), male gender (+0.12/+0.05×91) and age (-0.01/+0.06×97 per increasing decade). Inherited retinal disease, optic nerve disease, previous trabeculectomy, uveitis, brunescent/white cataract had no significant impact on the error of the refractive outcome. The effect of patient gender and comorbidity was additive. Surgeons only accounted for 4% of the unexplained variance in refractive outcome., Conclusion: Patient comorbidities and gender account for small but statistically significant differences in refractive outcome, which are additive. Surgeon effects are very small., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To describe the relationships between axial length and intraoperative complications in patients undergoing cataract surgery., Design: Cohort analysis of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database (RCOphth NOD)., Setting: 110 National Health Service Trusts in England, Health Boards in Wales, Independent Sector Treatment Centres and Guernsey., Participants: 820 354 patients, aged 18 years or older, undergoing cataract surgery. Eligible operations were those from centres with at least 50 operations with a recorded axial length measurement and age at surgery between 1 April 2010 and 31 August 2019., Interventions: Phacoemulsification where the primary intention was cataract surgery alone., Outcome Measures: Posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and other recorded intraoperative complications., Results: 1 211 520 eligible operations were performed by 3210 surgeons. The baseline axial length was <21 mm (short eyes) for 17 170 (1.4%) eyes, 21-28 mm (medium eyes) for 1 182 513 (97.6%) eyes and >28 mm (long eyes) for 11 837 (1.0%) eyes. The median age at surgery was younger for patients with long eyes than those with short or medium eyes. The rate of any intraoperative complication was higher for short eyes than medium or long with complication rates of 4.5%, 2.9% and 3.3%, respectively (p<0.001). PCR occurred in 1.40% surgeries overall, and in 1.53%, 1.40% and 1.61% of short, medium and long eyes, respectively (p=0.043, not significant at the 1% level)., Conclusions: Overall PCR rates for cataract surgery in RCOphth NOD contributing centres are lower than previously reported and there is little change in PCR rates by axial length. Short eyes were more likely to have an intraoperative complication than medium or long eyes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

PRéCIS:: A large cohort undergoing cataract extraction was retrospectively analyzed to ascertain the degree of real-world intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in normal eyes and those with glaucoma, and a predictive formula was developed., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define the real-world degree of IOP reduction after cataract extraction to guide its role as an isolated intervention for glaucoma., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out of clinical data collected in 8 clinical sites in the United Kingdom from an electronic medical record system between January 2006 and May 2015. A total of 20,508 eyes without known pathology and 2251 eyes from patients with glaucoma undergoing phacoemulsification and intraocular lens insertion were included. Eyes with intraoperative complications, undergoing additional procedures, axial lengths outside 22 to 26.5 mm, preoperative IOP under 6 mm Hg or over 30 mm Hg, and copathology, except for amblyopia or glaucoma, were excluded. The main outcome measure was the change in preoperative IOP compared with the next recorded visit for up to 12 weeks., Results: In eyes without pathology, the mean reduction in IOP was 1.40 mm Hg (±3.74) compared with 1.03 (±5.02), P-value <0.001, in eyes with a diagnosis of glaucoma. A multiple linear regression model identified preoperative IOP, a glaucoma diagnosis, preoperative corrected visual acuity, age, and axial length as determinants of IOP reduction. The model was validated against an independent cohort., Conclusions: We quantify mean IOP reduction achieved in a real-world setting from cataract surgery alone. In glaucomatous eyes where angle closure is not differentiated, phacoemulsification alone yields only a modest reduction of IOP.

Purpose: To compare methods for evaluating refractive outcomes after cataract surgery to detect outliers., Design: Case series database study of the evaluation of diagnostic technology., Participants: Consecutive patients who had uneventful cataract operations over a 5-year period., Methods: The intended and postoperative refractive outcome and differences between these were analyzed as a spherical equivalent, cylinder, and spherocylinder. The average keratometry and differences between steep and flat keratometric meridians were used to calculate the intended refractive error., Main Outcome Measures: Outliers were defined as patients for whom the difference between the intended and postoperative refractive errors was more than 3 standard deviations (SDs) away from the mean., Results: A total of 9000 patients were included. Twelve patients had missing data and were excluded. The mean intended refractive outcome was -0.12+0.12×2 (95% lower confidence limit [LCL], -1.94+1.06×44; 95% upper confidence limit [UCL], +0.77+1.05×140). The actual postoperative refractive error was -0.30+0.47×6 (95% LCL, -2.36+1.31×36; 95% UCL, +1.00+1.18×148) with a difference from the intended of -0.18+0.35×7 (95% LCL, -1.91+1.22×38; 95% UCL, +0.75+1.09×145). Treating the components of the refractive error independently, outliers were observed in 82 eyes (0.91%) based on the sphere, 46 eyes (0.51%) based on the spherical equivalent, 115 eyes (1.28%) based on treating the cylinder as a scalar, and 76 eyes (0.85%) based on treating the cylinder as a vector. When the differences between the intended and postoperative refractive errors were calculated as a compound spherocylinder, outliers were observed for 233 eyes (2.59%)., Conclusions: Treating the intended refractive outcome as a spherocylinder improves the precision for detecting clinically significant refractive outliers., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the clinical results of conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery., Setting: Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom., Design: Single-center prospective randomized interventional case-controlled trial., Methods: Patients undergoing cataract surgery were randomized to receive either CPS or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The surgery was performed with a femtosecond laser (Lensx), and all operations were performed with a gravity-fluidics torsional phacoemulsification machine (Infiniti). The visual acuity, refraction, central corneal thickness (CCT), central foveal thickness (CFT), endothelial cell loss, and rates of intraoperative and postoperative events were recorded. Quality of life outcomes were measured with the EuroQOL 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) and patient-reported quality of vision was assessed with a cataract surgery patient-reported outcome measures questionnaire (Cat-PROM5)., Results: The study comprised 400 eyes of 400 patients who had CPS (n = 200) or femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (n = 200). Seven patients (3.5%) in the femtosecond laser-assisted group were not able to complete the treatment and received CPS. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]) 0.15 ± 0.21 (SD) and 0.15 ± 0.19 logMAR after CPS and femtosecond laser-assisted surgery, respectively (P = 1.0); the pinhole-corrected visual acuity was 0.04 ± 0.12 and 0.04 ± 0.12, respectively (P = 1.0); the increase in CCT was 13 ± 19 μm and 15 ± 25 μm, respectively (P = .5); and the endothelial cell loss was 9.7 ± 13.7 % and 10.2% ± 13.7, respectively (P = .76). The manifest refraction spherical equivalent error was -0.14 ± 0.60 diopters (D) after CPS and -0.12 ± 0.60 D after femtosecond laser-assisted surgery (P = .74); the mean change in CFT was 9 ± 35 μm and 6 ± 35 μm, respectively (P = .55); and the rate of posterior capsule rupture was 3% and 0%, respectively (P = .03)., Conclusions: This study confirms the nonsignificant differences between 2 treatment modalities, notwithstanding a significant reduction in posterior capsule ruptures in the femtosecond laser-assisted surgery group., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To define theoretical correction factors for second-eye intraocular lens (IOL) power adjustment based on first eye refractive prediction error (PE)., Design: Database study., Participants: We included 2129 patients who underwent bilateral sequential phacoemulsification cataract surgery with the same IOL model., Methods: Retrospectively calculated PEs (Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SRK/T) were analyzed for association between paired eyes, examining the effect of interocular differences in axial length (AL) and corneal power. A range of correction factors (CF) derived from the first eye PE were applied to the second eye PE using optimized and non-optimized IOL constants (IOLCs)., Main Outcome Measures: Second eye mean absolute error (MAE)., Results: Prediction errors of paired eyes were correlated. Interocular corneal power differences exceeding 0.60 diopters (D) were associated with a weaker correlation but interocular AL differences did not affect the correlation. When a 50% CF was applied to second eyes of patients with a first eye PE between ±0.50 and ±1.50 D, it improved refractive outcomes from 30%, 56%, and 92% to 42%, 75%, and 96% within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D, respectively, and reduced the MAE from 0.49 to 0.37 D (P<0.0001). For first eye PE below ±0.50 D, a 50% CF reduced the MAE from 0.32 to 0.30 D (P<0.00001). A 50% CF also reduces second eye MAE for eyes with nonoptimized IOLCs., Conclusions: A 50% CF reduces second eye PE when either first eye optimized PE is within ±1.50 D or when nonoptimized IOLCs are used. The correlation is weaker when interocular corneal power differences are >0.60 D., (Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess the benefits of intraocular lens (IOL)-constant optimization for IOLMaster biometry on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery for all surgeons and individual surgeons, define acceptable levels of error in IOL-constant optimization, and calculate the minimum number of eyes required for IOL-constant optimization., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, United Kingdom., Design: Database study., Methods: Hypothetical prediction errors were retrospectively calculated on prospectively collected data extracted from electronic medical records using manufacturers' and optimized IOL constants with Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas for 2 IOLs. The acceptable IOL-constant optimization error margins, personalized IOL constants for individual surgeons, and minimum sample sizes for IOL-constant optimization were evaluated., Results: Optimization of IOL constants reduced the mean absolute errors from 0.66 diopters (D) and 0.52 D to 0.40 D and 0.42 D for the Sofport AO IOL and Akreos Fit IOL, respectively. The percentage of eyes within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, and ±1.00 D of target refraction improved from for both IOL models. The IOL-constant errors exceeding 0.09 for the Hoffer Q, 0.09 for the Holladay 1, and 0.15 for the SRK/T produced inferior outcomes. Differences in personalized IOL constants between most surgeons were clinically insignificant. Calculating IOL constants to within 0.06, 0.06, and 0.10 for the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T, respectively, required 148 to 257 eyes., Conclusions: Optimizing IOL constants for IOLMaster biometry substantially improved refractive outcomes, far exceeding any additional benefit of personalizing IOL constants for individual surgeons., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes., (Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess how intraocular lens (IOL) formula choice affects refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using IOLMaster biometry., Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, United Kingdom., Design: Database study., Methods: Hypothetical prediction errors were retrospectively calculated on prospectively collected data from electronic medical records using optimized Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, and SRK/T formulas (Sofport AO and Akreos Fit IOLs) across a range of 0.5 mm or 1.0 mm axial length (AL) subgroups., Results: In short eyes, the Hoffer Q had the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) for ALs from 20.00 to 20.99 mm. The Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 had a lower MAE than the SRK/T for ALs from 21.00 to 21.49 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in MAE for ALs from 21.50 to 21.99 mm. In medium eyes, there were no statistically significant differences in MAE for any IOL formula for ALs from 22.00 to 23.49 mm. For ALs from 23.50 to 25.99 mm, there was a trend toward lower MAEs for the Holladay 1, with statistically significant differences in 2 subgroups. In long eyes, the SRK/T had the lowest MAE, with statistically significant differences for ALs of 27.00 mm or longer., Conclusions: The Hoffer Q performed best for ALs from 20.00 to 20.99 mm, the Hoffer Q and Holladay 1 for ALs from 21.00 to 21.49 mm, and the SRK/T for ALs of 27.00 mm or longer. Using optimized constants, refractive outcomes of 40%, 75%, and 95% within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.50 D, and ±1.00 D, respectively, were achievable., Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosure is found in the footnotes., (Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Higher or equal rates of mortality are associated with cataract surgery compared with the general population. Cataract surgery has advanced, and the clinical characteristics of the patient undergoing cataract surgery have changed., Aims: To reinvestigate survival following cataract surgery., Method: Survival data were gathered up to the end of 2006 on 933 consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery between December 2000 and February 2001. These data were compared with national and regional mortality figures, and standardised mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated., Results: After adjusting for age and sex, there was a statistically significant reduced mortality compared with national (SMR = 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99)) and regional figures (SMR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.98))., Conclusion: All previous studies found decreased survival among cataract surgery cohorts. These data differ from data at earlier times, as cataract surgery seems to be associated with increased survival. This illustrates the need for continual re-evaluation of accepted medical knowledge in the light of changes in practice and population demographics.