Search

Purpose: Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) are generally treated with systemic chemotherapy. When PM has disappeared because of chemotherapy, radical gastrectomy (so-called conversion surgery) is usually performed. We have previously reported the efficacy of conversion surgery, but there are no reports examining the efficacy of palliative gastrectomy for patients with residual PM after chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of palliative surgery for gastric cancer patients with PM who still have residual peritoneal dissemination after chemotherapy., Methods: Twenty-five gastric cancer patients with PM confirmed by laparoscopy and who had received chemotherapy but who still had residual PM were included in this study. Among the 25 patients, palliative surgery was performed in 20 patients (PS group) and chemotherapy was continued in 5 patients (CTx group), and their therapeutic outcomes were compared., Results: In the PS group, total and distal gastrectomies were performed. Clavien-Dindo grade I postoperative complications occurred in two patients (10%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Postoperative chemotherapy was performed all cases. In the PS group, the median survival time (MST) reached 22.5 months, with 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates of 95% and 45%, respectively, whereas in the CTx group, the MST was 15.8 months, and the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 60% and 0%, respectively. The PS group had significantly longer OS than the CTx group (P=0.044)., Conclusions: Palliative surgery is safe and may prolong survival in gastric cancer patients with residual PM after chemotherapy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy, in which an anticancer drug is administered directly into the abdominal cavity through an intraperitoneal access port(IP port), is one of the treatment options for advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Herein, we report a case of sheath-like obstruction of the entire catheter of the IP port due to tissue reaction within a short period of time after IP port implantation. The case was a 35-year-old woman with advanced type 4 gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination. The IP port was placed and intravenous and intraperitoneal chemotherapy using S-1 plus paclitaxel was started. However, in the middle of the second course, the entire catheter was covered with a fibrous capsule and a sheath-like obstruction occurred, so the IP port was removed and a new IP port was reinserted. One of the IP port troubles is obstruction, but such short-term and special obstruction is rare, and the cause is considered to be a foreign body reaction of the catheter.

Purpose: The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) remains dismal with standard systemic chemotherapy. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy with paclitaxel (PTX) has local effects on intra-abdominal cancer cells. According to this phenomenon, we have developed regimens combining single i.p. PTX administration with systemic chemotherapy. This treatment strategy is very promising; however, the effect of "conversion surgery" in patients responding to this chemotherapy is unclear. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients with PM., Methods: We enrolled 52 gastric cancer patients with PM who were treated with single i.p. PTX plus systemic chemotherapy between 2005 and 2015. Conversion surgery was performed where PM was eliminated by combination chemotherapy., Results: Among 52 gastric cancer patients, the disappearance of PM was confirmed in 33 patients (63.5%). Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed in all these patients. Histological response of grade ≥ 1b was achieved in 13 patients (39%). Clavien-Dindo grade II postoperative complications occurred in three patients (9%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The median survival time and 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the 33 patients who underwent conversion surgery were 30.7 months and 78.8%, 36.3%, and 24.2%, respectively, and those of the 19 patients who did not undergo surgery were 12.5 months and 52.6%, 5.2%, and 0%, respectively., Conclusion: Conversion surgery is safe and may prolong survival for gastric cancer patients with PM who have responded to single i.p. PTX plus systemic chemotherapy., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel had been considered a promising option to treat peritoneal metastasis, the most frequent pattern of recurrence in gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy, but its safety and efficacy after gastrectomy had not been fully explored., Methods: A phase II randomized comparison of postoperative intraperitoneal (IP) vs. intravenous (IV) paclitaxel was conducted. Patients with resectable gastric linitis plastica, cancer with minimal amount of peritoneal deposits (P1), or cancer positive for the peritoneal washing cytology (CY1) were eligible. After intraoperative confirmation of the above disease status and of resectability, patients were randomized to be treated either by the IP therapy (paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 delivered intraperitoneally on days 0, 14, 21, 28, 42, 49, and 56) or the IV therapy (80 mg/m 2 administered intravenously using the identical schedule) before receiving further treatments with evidence-based systemic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 2-year survival rate., Results: Of the 86 patients who were randomized intraoperatively, 83 who actually started the protocol treatment were eligible for analysis (n = 39, IP group; n = 44, IV group). The 2-year survival rate of the IP and IV groups was 64.1% (95% CI 47.9-76.9) and 72.3% (95% CI 56.3-83.2%), respectively (p = 0.5731). The IP treatment did not confer significant overall or progression-free survival benefits, and was associated with particularly poor performance in patients with residual disease, including the CY1 P0 population., Conclusions: We were unable to prove superiority of the IP paclitaxel over IV paclitaxel delivered after surgery to control advanced gastric cancer with high risk of peritoneal recurrence.

Aim: To conduct a phase II study of single intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of paclitaxel followed by paclitaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (PCS) chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (PM)., Patients and Methods: Staging laparotomy was performed to confirm PM. Initially, patients received i.p. paclitaxel. Beginning 7 days later, PCS was given every 3 weeks followed by second-look laparoscopy. Primary and secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) rate, and response rate and patient safety, respectively., Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled. The overall response rate was 70.5% (12/17). Grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia and leukopenia. After chemotherapy, PM disappearance was confirmed in 11 patients. Gastrectomy was eventually performed in 11 patients. The 1-year OS rate was 82.4% and the median survival time was 23.9 months considering the overall cohort., Conclusion: Combination chemotherapy with i.p. paclitaxel and PCS is well tolerated and effective in patients with gastric cancer with PM., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: A preliminary study evaluating the feasibility of single intraperitoneal (IP) administration of paclitaxel followed by paclitaxel and cisplatin with S-1 (PCS) systemic chemotherapy for cytology-positive (CY1) gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: Staging laparoscopy was performed to confirm CY1 and P0 status. Initially, patients received IP paclitaxel. Beginning 7 days later PCS was given every 3 weeks followed by second-look laparoscopy., Results: Nine patients were enrolled. The toxic effects of IP and systemic chemotherapy were acceptable. After chemotherapy, 8 patients converted from CY1P0 to CY0P0 and 1 patient from CY1P0 to CY1P1. Gastrectomy was performed on 8 patients except for the CY1P1 patient. Four patients were alive without recurrence. The 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 76% and 65%, respectively., Conclusion: Combination chemotherapy with IP paclitaxel and sequential PCS is safe and may be effective for CY1 gastric cancer., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is common after curative resection of gastric cancer. Intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel (PTX) is known to control ovarian peritoneal metastases., Patients and Methods: Patients with either linitis plastica or T4 cancer with high risk of peritoneal metastasis or recurrence but whose cancer was considered resectable were preregistered. After their cancer had been confirmed intraoperatively as resectable, the patients were randomized into either group A (PTX at 60 mg/m 2 intraperitoneally on the day of surgery and on days 14, 21, 28, 42, 49, and 56) or group B (PTX at 80 mg/m 2 administered intravenously by the identical schedule) before being treated by evidence-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was the 2-year survival rate. Safety, the secondary end point, was also analyzed. The study has been registered as UMIN000002957., Results: Of 177 preregistered patients, 83 underwent treatment (39 by intraperitoneal administration and 44 by intravenous administration). There was no difference in patient demographics between the two groups. The incidences of surgical complications were similar between the groups, except for transient bowel obstruction observed exclusively in group A. The relative dose intensity of PTX was 81.4 % for group A and 76.3 % for group B. There was one death due to pulmonary thrombosis and a case of anaphylaxis that led to termination of the protocol treatment (group B). Other adverse events were mild and manageable., Conclusions: Intraperitoneal administration of PTX from the day of gastrectomy did not result in a higher incidence of surgical complications and adverse reactions when compared with intravenous administration of PTX.

Although the treatment of gastric cancer improves the clinical outcomes, the survival of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis is still very poor. Effective drugs against peritoneal metastasis, coupled with new therapeutic modalities, are needed to improve the prognoses of these patients. Paclitaxel and TS-1 are candidate drugs for peritoneal metastasis, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy and targeted therapy are potential new therapeutic modalities. Two phase II studies using TS-1 and intraperitoneal and systemic paclitaxel for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis showed respectable survival results. In addition, peritoneal metastatic lesions showed high levels of epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (ECAM) and very low levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), thus indicating that an anti-ECAM monoclonal antibody, catumaxomab, would be effective against gastric cancer-derived peritoneal metastasis. Although catumaxomab and intraperitoneally administered paclitaxel are not generally used in Japan at present, these treatment strategies might therefore be effectively used in Japan in the near future.

Intraperitoneally administrated epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (EpCAM) monoclonal antibody is a therapeutic agent in patients with malignant effusion in several types of carcinoma. However, the role of EpCAM in peritoneal metastasis (PM) lesions and primary lesions of gastric cancer (GC) is still unclear. Therefore, in this study, we investigated EpCAM expression in GC patients with PM. We investigated the expression of EpCAM in 35PM lesions and 104 biopsy samples as primary lesions. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using the Ventana Benchmark XT (Roche Diagnostics) system. EpCAM expression was evaluated by calculating the total immunostaining score, which is the product of the proportion score and the intensity score. Overexpression was defined as a total score greater than 4. All PM specimens showed overexpression of EpCAM, and GC cells in both the surface layer and the deep layer of the PM showed a high expression of EpCAM. Meanwhile, in the biopsy sample, the expression of EpCAM ranged from none to strong. The EpCAM score results for PM specimens and biopsy samples were 11.0 ± 2.0 and 6.9 ± 3.9, respectively. The difference between the scores was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The intraperitoneally administrated EpCAM antibody might have a anti-cancer effect in PM lesions of GC. Additionally, it can be assumed that only GC cells which express a high level of EpCAM might metastasize to the peritoneum.

Aim: Patients with scirrhous carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract frequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis-particularly of the peritoneal extension type (PET), which has a bad prognosis. We developed a novel animal model, suitable for testing treatments for PET., Material and Methods: In order to develop the model, we scraped the entire peritoneum of Fischer 344 rats with sterile cotton swabs and injected 1 × 10(6) cells of the RCN-9 cell type into the peritoneal cavity., Results: In the novel experimental model, RCN-9 cells adhered only to the exposed basement membrane. The submesothelial layer and fibroblasts in the submesothelial layer grew and increased to a maximum at day 7, then decreased during late-phase peritoneal carcinomatosis. At day 14, RCN-9 cells coated the peritoneum in a manner similar to PET., Conclusion: We successfully established a novel animal model of peritoneal carcinomatosis that mimics clinicopathological features of PET. Fibroblasts in the submesothelial layer potentially play an important role in peritoneal carcinomatosis.

The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis is very poor. Recent findings suggest that use of trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody-based agent that targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), may improve the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with HER2 overexpression and/or gene amplification. However, whether these mechanisms of HER2 upregulation are present in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis is unclear. The status of HER2 expression in a cohort of samples obtained from 35 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis was investigated using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. In 18 cases, we also investigated the influence of induction chemotherapy on HER2 overexpression. The frequency of HER2 overexpression and gene amplification was 2.9 % (1/35) in peritoneal metastatic lesions. There was concurrence in HER2 status in the samples examined prior to and following induction of chemotherapy. Most samples from the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis did not show HER2 amplification and/or overexpression. Although our study size was small, these results suggest that trastuzumab, which is critically dependent on HER2 expression, might not be an effective agent for these patients. Consequently, other therapeutic approaches for these patients must be developed.

Background: We conducted a phase II study involving a single administration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel followed by sequential systemic chemotherapy with S-1+ paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis., Methods: Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled. Paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was administered intraperitoneally at staging laparoscopy. Within 7 days, patients received systemic chemotherapy with S-1 (80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14) plus paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8), followed by 7-days rest. The responders to this chemotherapy underwent second-look laparoscopy, and gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was performed in patients when the disappearance of peritoneal metastasis had been confirmed. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival rate., Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. All patients were confirmed as having localized peritoneal metastasis by staging laparoscopy. Eventually, gastrectomy was performed in 22 patients. The median survival time of the total patient population and those patients in which gastrectomy was performed was 21.3 and 29.8 months, respectively. The overall response rate was 65.7 % for all patients. The frequent grade 3/4 toxic effects included neutropenia and leukopenia., Conclusions: Sequential intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 was well tolerated in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Aim: A preliminary study with the aim of evaluating the safety and efficacy of a single intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel, combined with intravenous administration of paclitaxel plus S-1, was carried out in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis., Patients and Methods: Paclitaxel was administered intraperitoneally at 80 mg/m(2). After one to two weeks, S-1 was administered at 80 mg/m(2)/day for 14 consecutive days, followed by seven days' rest. Paclitaxel was administered intravenously at 50 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. The safety, pharmacokinetic analysis and efficacy of this therapy were investigated., Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. The toxic effects of the intraperitoneal chemotherapy were mild. The toxic effects with the systemic chemotherapy were acceptable. The ratio of (AUC peri)/(AUC pla) was 1065:1 in the pharmacokinetic analysis. The one-year overall survival rate was 10/15 (66.7%)., Conclusion: A single intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel combined with intravenous administration of paclitaxel plus S-1 is a well-tolerated and feasible treatment for patients with gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and cytological efficacy against free intraperitoneal cancer cells of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) with paclitaxel after gastrectomy with en-bloc D2 lymph node dissection (GD2) in cases of gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and/or positive cytological findings in peritoneal washings (CFPW)., Methods: Twenty-one patients with gastric cancer with PC and/or positive CFPW who underwent GD2 were treated with early, post-operative, intraperitoneal paclitaxel. Intra-chemotherapeutic toxicity and operative complication were measured using the common toxicity criteria of the National Cancer Institute, version 3.0. Intraperitoneal and plasma paclitaxel concentrations were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography assay., Results: Grade 3 anemia occurred in two patients (9.5%) and neutropenia was observed in three patients (14.3%). No grade 4 toxicity was observed. A grade 2 operative complication was a superficial surgical site infection (4.8%) that was treated with antibiotics. Cytologically, no viable cancer cells were observed in the intra-abdominal fluid 24 hr after intraperitoneal administration of paclitaxel. The intraperitoneal/plasma area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio was 596.9:1., Conclusion: IPC with paclitaxel after GD2 is a safe and cytologically effective treatment modality for free intraperitoneal cancer cells. However, additional data are required to determine the effect on survival., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Owing to its peculiar pharmacological characteristics, paclitaxel attains substantial intra-peritoneal concentration for a prolonged period when delivered intra-peritoneally, and is active against peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer. It is also considered promising against disseminated gastric cancer. However, the fact that the intra-peritoneal paclitaxel has not been approved in Japan has rendered its evaluation by a formal clinical trial impossible. The authors designed a randomized phase II trial using the Kodo Iryo Hyoka system, a new system to legally test an yet unapproved mode of treatment. It is hoped that this trial will result in a breakthrough in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer.

To determine the safety profile and activity of IP docetaxel combined with S-1 for patients with peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer, a multi-centric phase I/II study has started. Patients with histologically confirmed peritoneal dissemination by laparoscopy or laparotomy were eligible to participate in this study, but the patients with a large amount of malignant ascites were excluded. In phase I part, the patients received variable doses of intraperitoneal docetaxel on day 1 and day 15 and 80 mg/m2 of daily oral S-1 on days 1-14 every 4 weeks. Phase I part determines the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD), and phase II part evaluates a safe successful execution. The response rate of peritoneal dissemination was explored as the secondary endpoint. After 2 cycles, peritoneal tumor response was assessed according to the new criteria of Society for the Study of Peritoneal Dissemination in Gastric Cancer. The response criteria included the following: a decrease in ascites and change in cytology negative; at least a 50% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of peritoneal tumor using photographs of peritoneal lesions taken to confirm an objective response before and after the treatment.