Search

Home hemodialysis (HD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) have advantages over HD in hospitals or HD centers. Home therapies are generally less expensive and give patients greater mobility and freedom for work, school, family, and recreational activities. Technological advances have made it possible to complement APD with devices for remote monitoring (RM) of the patient. With them, objective information generated in the APD device is collected and sent to repositories "in the cloud" for analysis or at the time decided by the health team. With APD+RM, it is possible to monitor therapeutic compliance, effective dialysis time, ultrafiltration volumes, inflow and outflow patterns of dialysis fluid, and patient actions to respond to alarms that indicate deviations from the parameters set by the nephrologist. The results of APD+RM show good acceptance by the patient, nephrologists, and nurses, treatment adherence has improved, hospitalizations and technique failure have decreased, and some aspects of quality of life have improved. However, there is a lack of controlled clinical trials that reliably demonstrate lower mortality and comorbidity due to specific causes.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) modalities affect solute removal differently. However, the impacts of switching PD modalities on serum levels of biomarkers of different sizes are not known. Our objective was to analyze whether a change in the PD modality associates with the levels of two routine biochemical laboratories. In this multicentric prospective cohort study. we selected all patients who remained on a PD modality for at least 6 months and switched PD modality. Patients were also required to be treated with the same PD modality for at least 3 months before and after the modality change. The primary outcome was change in potassium and phosphate serum levels. We identified 737 eligible patients who switched their PD modality during the study. We found mean serum phosphate levels increased during the 3 months after switching from CAPD to APD and conversely decreased after switching to from APD to CAPD. In contrast, for potassium the difference in the mean serum levels was comparable between groups switching from CAPD to APD, and vice versa. In conclusion, CAPD seems to be as efficient as APD for the control of potassium serum levels, but more effective for the control of phosphate serum levels. The effect of a higher removal of middle size molecules as result of PD modalities in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes should be further explored., Competing Interests: ’AR is employed by Baxter Healthcare. MG, JWL, TLS and DP are students at Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná. JWL is employed by Fresenius Medical Care. GY, PB and SCR have no conflict to declare. TPM, RPF are employed by Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná and are recipients of scholarships from the Brazilian Council for Research (CNPq), received consulting fees from Astra Zeneca and Baxter Healthcare, and speaker honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Lilly-Boehringer, Baxter and Takeda. RPF is employed by Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, and receives research grants, consulting fees, and honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Novo Nordisc, Akebia, and Fresenius Medical Care. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Background: N-terminal fragment of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a marker of both fluid volume overload and myocardial damage, and it has been useful as a predictor of mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It has been suggested that continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and haemodialysis (HD) may have different effects on fluid volume and blood pressure control; however, whether the independent predictive value of NT-proBNP for mortality is preserved when analysed in conjunction with fluid overload and dialysis modality is not clear., Methods: A prospective multicentre cohort of 753 prevalent adult patients on CAPD, APD and HD was followed up for 16 months. Plasmatic levels of NT-proBNP, extracellular fluid volume/total body water ratio (ECFv/TBW) and traditional clinical and biochemical markers for cardiovascular damage risk were measured, and their role as predictors of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was analysed., Results: NT-proBNP level, ECFv/TBW and other cardiovascular damage risk factors were not evenly distributed among the different dialysis modalities. NT-proBNP levels and ECFv/TBW were correlated with several inflammation, malnutrition and myocardial damage markers. Multivariate analysis showed that NT-proBNP levels and ECFv/TBW were predictors of both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, independently of dialysis modality and the presence of other known clinical and biochemical risk factors., Conclusions: NT-proBNP is a reliable predictor of death risk independently of the effect of dialysis modality on fluid volume control, and the presence of other clinical and biochemical markers recognized as risk factors for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. NT-pro-BNP is a good predictor of mortality independently of fluid volume overload and dialysis modality.

Latin America is a heterogeneous region comprised of 20 countries, former colonies of European countries, in which Latin-derived languages are spoken. According to the Latin American Society of Nephrology and Hypertension/Sociedad Latino Americana de Nefrologia e Hipertensión (SLANH), the acceptance rate for renal replacement therapy is 103 new patients per million population. In Latin America, hemodialysis is the predominant form of replacement therapy for end-stage renal disease; however, some countries employ peritoneal dialysis (PD) in 30% or more patients. In particular, Mexico is the country with the largest PD utilization in the world, and furthermore, it is estimated that approximately 25% of the world's PD population may be found Latin America. Data concerning clinical practice and long-term outcome of PD in Latin America are scarce, although regional registries are increasing in number and quality. In this review article, we present an overview of the situation of PD in several countries of Latin America, based on the registry of the SLANH, national registries, and personal communication with PD experts from different countries.

Abstract: Objectives: Few studies have examined hospitalization costs for unplanned initiation of peritoneal dialysis (PD). We used data from a health care facility in Mexico to examine first hospitalization costs associated with the unplanned initiation of PD. Methods: Descriptive analyses focusing on initial hospitalization costs during the unplanned initiation of PD were conducted. In addition, multivariate regression models examined the association of costs with requiring urgent hemodialysis (HD) at the time of starting PD, and the association of driving distance with requiring urgent HD. Results: Of 195 patients hospitalized in 2010 for PD catheter placement, 51 patients met criteria for unplanned PD initiation and 25 of them required urgent HD prior to PD initiation. Ninety-two percent of the patients received 90% or greater government subsidy of hospital costs. Average inpatient costs for the first hospitalization related to the unplanned initiation of PD were 64,174 Mexican Pesos (MXN) (US $4,657). Costs were 78,683 MXN ($5,710) per patient for those requiring urgent HD and 50,225 MXN ($3,645) for those who did not, a difference (P<0.05) of roughly 28,000 MXN ($2,032), and regression results were similar. In addition, long driving distance to the institution was significantly associated with requiring urgent HD. Conclusions: Our findings highlight potential cost savings to payers for developing better strategies to manage PD starts in Mexico and should help inform policy regarding oversight and coverage of low-income patients at risk of dialysis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]