Search

Background: Palliative gastrointestinal (GI) surgery potentially relieves distressing symptoms arising from intestinal obstruction (IO) in patients with advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). As surgery is associated with significant morbidity risks in advanced cancer patients, it is important for surgeons to select patients who can benefit the most from this approach. Hence, we aim to determine predictors of morbidity and mortality after palliative surgery in patients with PC. In addition, we evaluate the utility of the UC Davis Cancer Care nomogram (UCDCCn) and develop a simplified model to predict short-term surgical mortality in these patients. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with IO secondary to PC undergoing palliative GI surgery was performed. Logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of 30-day morbidity and mortality after surgery. UCDCCn was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) for discriminatory power and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test for calibration. Our simplified model was developed using logistic regression and evaluated using cross-validation. Results: A total of 254 palliative GI surgeries were performed over a 10-year duration. The 30-day morbidity and mortality were 43% (n = 110) and 21% (n = 53), respectively. Preoperative albumin, age, and emergency nature of surgery were significant independent predictors for 30-day morbidity. A simplified model using preoperative Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status and albumin (AUC = 0.71) achieved better predictive power than UCDCCn (AUC = 0.66) for 30-day mortality. Conclusion: Good ECOG status and high preoperative albumin levels were independently associated with good short-term outcomes after palliative GI surgery. Our simplified model may be used to conveniently and efficiently select patients who stand to benefit the most from surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to determine pre‐ and peri‐operative parameters with significant predictive value for post‐operative outcomes in patients with recurrent colorectal cancer presenting as peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS‐HIPEC), and to develop a novel prognostic scoring system for prediction of survival outcomes. Methods: A single‐institution review of prospectively collected data from all patients who underwent CRS‐HIPEC between October 2005 and October 2017 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify significant parameters for prediction of post‐CRS‐HIPEC disease‐free survival and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 278 patients underwent CRS‐HIPEC, of whom 72 were for peritoneal carcinomatosis from recurrent colorectal cancer. Disease‐free interval (DFI; P = 0.006), peritoneal cancer index (PCI; P = 0.001) and left upper quadrant disease (P = 0.023) were significant independent predictors of 3‐year OS. DFI (0.007), PCI (P < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (BL; P = 0.001) were significant independent predictors of 5‐year OS. PCI and BL were significant independent predictors of both 3‐year (P = 0.026, PCI; P = 0.009, BL) and 5‐year (P = 0.002, PCI; P = 0.011, BL) disease‐free survival. Predictive models were developed for risk stratification of OS. Conclusion: PCI, DFI, left upper quadrant disease and BL have significant predictive value for post‐CRS‐HIPEC outcomes. Risk stratification models allow for more prudent patient selection and ultimately more accurate prognostication of post‐operative outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is increasingly used in peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) management. This modality is criticized for its high morbidity and mortality. We evaluate the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing this procedure in our institution. Methods: A review of our institution's database was performed. All patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC between July 2011 and March 2018 were divided into three groups: no, low-grade, and high-grade complications. Prognostic factors were determined with Cox regression, while morbidity risk factors were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. Results: 225 consecutive patients underwent CRS/HIPEC. The most common primary cancer types were colorectal (35.1%), appendiceal (25.8%), and ovarian (22.2%). Median age was 55 years old (range 14–77), and patients were typically female (68.0%). 38.7% developed low-grade complications and 14.7% had high-grade complications. No 30-day mortality was observed. Different tumor origins are associated with significant differences in overall survival (p < 0.001). Patients without complications had significantly better survival than those with high-grade complications (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15–0.81, p < 0.001). Males were more likely to develop low-grade complications (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.31–8.30, p = 0.011). Intra-operative blood loss was associated with greater odds of developing any post-operative complications (OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.0003–1.002, p = 0.007; and OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001–1.002, p < 0.001, for low and high grade, respectively). Conclusion: Presence of high-grade complication was associated with poorer survival in patients after CRS/HIPEC. Pre-operative careful assessment of patients is pivotal to ensure favorable patient outcome following this complex procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improve survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastases. However, only some patients who are potentially eligible for the procedure are considered and referred to the appropriate surgical department. By studying the trends of patients being considered for CRS and HIPEC in our centre, we hope to better understand the demographics of our patient cohort and the attitudes of physicians involved towards CRS and HIPEC. Methods: Patients who were presented and discussed at our institution’s multidisciplinary tumour board (MDTB) for consideration of CRS and HIPEC, between 5 January 2011 and 16 December 2015, were identified from the institutional database and included in the study. Patient demographics and clinico-pathological data were retrospectively collected from electronic records and clinical charts. Results: A total of 407 patients were presented at the MDTB for consideration of CRS and HIPEC. Referrals were most commonly from oncology-related departments (65.8%, n = 268). This was followed by referrals from other hospitals (15.0%, n = 61), overseas self-referrals (12.0%, n = 49) and non-oncologic departments within the same institution (7.1%, n = 29). Referrals made by oncology-related departments and overseas self-referrals showed an increasing trend over the years. Of the patients discussed, 197 patients (48.4%) were recommended for CRS and HIPEC, and 134 (68.0%) successfully underwent the procedure. Conclusions: There is growing acceptance of CRS and HIPEC in patients and oncologic-related departments. However, consideration of this procedure as a treatment option remains low in non-oncologic departments. Dissemination of information and well-defined clinical recommendations may help physicians identify and select potentially eligible patients for consideration of CRS and HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: CRS and HIPEC confer survival benefit in selected patients with peritoneal metatases (PM). Accurate preoperative assessment of disease burden and exclusion of distant metastases are crucial in selecting the appropriate patient. We evaluate the utility of PET-CT scans in comparison with CT and MRI scans in patients considered for CRS and HIPEC. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients who had been discussed for CRS and HIPEC between January 2011 and December 2015, at our institutional multidisciplinary tumour board. Patients who underwent PET-CT scan were included. Results of PET-CT were compared against traditional imaging. Patient and tumour factors were analysed to identify those who were most likely to benefit from PET imaging. Results: Four hundred and seven patients were considered for CRS and HIPEC. PET-CT was performed for 128(31.4%) patients: being the only imaging modality in 37 and used as an adjunct in 91. In the latter group, it was not beneficial in 58 patients as it provided no additional information (n = 33) or showed lesions of minimal FDG uptake (n = 25). In 33 patients, PET-CT provided definitive answers for indeterminate lesions seen on CT and MRI, confirmed the diagnosis of peritoneal disease in 10 patients (30.3%), identified extra-peritoneal disease and/or nodal metastases in 15 (45.5%) and excluded peritoneal disease in 8 (24.2%). The usefulness of PET-CT was predicted by tumour histology (p = .009), with non-mucinous tumours benefitting the most. Conclusion: Our results suggest that PET-CT can be used as an adjunct to CT and/or MRI scans, when lesions on the CT/MRI scans are indeterminate, and that it is most useful in patients with non-mucinous tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is increasingly being treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with or without early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC). We compared the morbidities, overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) between two groups of patients who underwent CRS and HIPEC alone and with EPIC at our institution.Methods: A retrospective review of 111 patients with PC who were treated with CRS + HIPEC or CRS + HIPEC + EPIC in a single institution between January 2008 and April 2014 was performed. EPIC with 5-fluorouracil or paclitaxel was utilised, depending on the primary tumour.Results: Patients who received EPIC had a higher proportion of grade III and above post- operative complications (58% versus 25%;p = 0.048) and a longer duration of hospitalisation (16 days versus 13 days;p = 0.019) than patients without EPIC. There were no significant OS and DFS differences between the EPIC and no EPIC groups (log-rankp = 0.231 andp = 0.144, respectively).Conclusion: The use of EPIC after CRS + HIPEC for PC potentially results in increased morbidity and longer hospitalisation, and is unlikely to affect survival outcomes. Based on our experience, EPIC is not recommended after CRS and HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) is a widely established scoring system that describes disease burden in isolated colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CPC). Its significance may be diminished with complete cytoreduction. We explore the utility of the recently described Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS) and compare its prognostic value against PCI. Methods. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and survival less than 18 months (18 MS). Results. Fifty patients underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for CPC from 2003 to 2014, with 98% achieving complete cytoreduction. Median OS was 28.8 months (95% CI, 18.0–39.1); median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.7–13.9). Univariate analysis showed that higher PCI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03–1.20) and PFS (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03–1.14). Conversely, PSDSS was not associated with either endpoint. Multivariate analysis showed that PCI, but not PSDSS, was predictive of OS and PFS. PCI was also able to discriminate survival outcomes better than PSDSS for both OS and PFS. There was no association between 18 MS and either score. Conclusion. PCI is superior to PSDSS in predicting OS and PFS and remains the prognostic score of choice in CPC patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]