1. Multi-vendor reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI using a near-identical sequence: Implications for multi-center studies
- Author
-
Mutsaerts, Henri JMM, van Osch, Matthias JP, Zelaya, Fernando O, Wang, Danny JJ, Nordhøy, Wibeke, Wang, Yi, Wastling, Stephen, Fernandez-Seara, Maria A, Petersen, ET, Pizzini, Francesca B, Fallatah, Sameeha, Hendrikse, Jeroen, Geier, Oliver, Günther, Matthias, Golay, Xavier, Nederveen, Aart J, Bjørnerud, Atle, and Groote, Inge R
- Subjects
Biomedical Imaging ,Clinical Research ,Neurosciences ,Adult ,Artifacts ,Cerebral Arteries ,Cerebrovascular Circulation ,Echo-Planar Imaging ,Female ,Humans ,Image Processing ,Computer-Assisted ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Male ,Motion ,Multicenter Studies as Topic ,Perfusion ,Reference Standards ,Reproducibility of Results ,Spin Labels ,Young Adult ,Arterial spin labeling ,Cerebral blood flow ,Inter-vendor ,Repeatability ,Reproducibility ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Psychology and Cognitive Sciences ,Neurology & Neurosurgery - Abstract
IntroductionA main obstacle that impedes standardized clinical and research applications of arterial spin labeling (ASL), is the substantial differences between the commercial implementations of ASL from major MRI vendors. In this study, we compare a single identical 2D gradient-echo EPI pseudo-continuous ASL (PCASL) sequence implemented on 3T scanners from three vendors (General Electric Healthcare, Philips Healthcare and Siemens Healthcare) within the same center and with the same subjects.Material and methodsFourteen healthy volunteers (50% male, age 26.4±4.7years) were scanned twice on each scanner in an interleaved manner within 3h. Because of differences in gradient and coil specifications, two separate studies were performed with slightly different sequence parameters, with one scanner used across both studies for comparison. Reproducibility was evaluated by means of quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) agreement and inter-session variation, both on a region-of-interest (ROI) and voxel level. In addition, a qualitative similarity comparison of the CBF maps was performed by three experienced neuro-radiologists.ResultsThere were no CBF differences between vendors in study 1 (p>0.1), but there were CBF differences of 2-19% between vendors in study 2 (p0.1) but one of the ROIs (p
- Published
- 2015