Search

Background: Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes. Previous trials showed the agreement between iFR and FFR is approximately 80%, however the details of discordance pattern remain to be elucidated., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1024 consecutive intermediate stenotic lesions for which functional evaluation using both iFR and FFR were performed between January 2015 and June 2016. The lesions were classified into 4 groups according to iFR and FFR concordance [(iFR+/FFR+) and (iFR-/FFR-)] or discordance [(iFR+/FFR-) and (iFR-/FFR+)]., Results: Our study evaluated 451 lesions, 264 lesions (58.5%) from men and 187 lesions (41.5%) from women. iFR was similar between women and men, however FFR was significantly higher in women than men. The rate of discordance between iFR and FFR was 21.3% (iFR+/FFR- 12.4% and iFR-/FFR+ 8.9%) in overall cohort. The prevalence of overall concordance and discordance were similar between men and women, however iFR+/FFR- discordance was significantly higher in women (17.1% vs. 9.1%) whereas iFR-/FFR+ discordance was significantly higher in men (11.3% vs. 4.8%). In multivariable analysis, female sex and older age were significantly associated with iFR+/FFR- discordance (odds ratio 1.88 and 1.48, respectively). Conversely, younger age, higher stenosis, and concomitant chronic total occlusion were independent predictors for iFR-/FFR+ discordance (odds ratio 0.67, 1.82, and 4.32, respectively)., Conclusions: Despite similar prevalence of overall concordance and discordance between men and women, iFR+/FFR- discordance was higher in women and iFR-/FFR+ discordance was higher in men. Multivariable analysis showed female sex to be independent predictor of iFR+/FFR- discordance., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background/purpose: Diabetes portends an increased risk of adverse early and late outcomes in patients undergoing PCI. In this study, we aimed to investigate if the adverse effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on early and late PCI outcomes is reduced with drug-eluting (DES) compared to bare-metal (BMS) stents., Methods/materials: We reviewed the Mount Sinai Beth Israel Hospital first PCI experience for multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD, 1998-2009). Patients were excluded if they had single-vessel CAD, emergency, no stent, prior bypass graft or myocardial infarction <24h. Diabetes-effect was derived from 9-year all-cause mortality and re-intervention risk-adjusted hazard ratios [AHR (95% confidence intervals)] for DES (N=2679; 48% three-vessel; 39% DM) and BMS (N=2651; 40% three-vessel; 33% DM) and then stratified based on stent (DES/BMS) and vessel disease (two/three)., Results: Diabetes-effect on mortality was lower for DES (AHR DM/NoDM =1.41 [1.14-1.74]) versus BMS (AHR DM/NoDM =1.71 [1.50-2.01]), but this was predominantly driven by two-vessel patients. This diabetes effect was similar for first (DES1: AHR DM/NoDM =1.43 [1.14-1.79]) and second (DES2: AHR DM/NoDM =1.53 [0.77-3.07]) generation DES. Re-intervention comparisons were similarly increased by diabetes in all sub-cohorts., Conclusions: Our analysis of a large real-world PCI series indicates that diabetes is associated with worse 9-year mortality irrespective of stent type, albeit this is mitigated to varying degrees with DES, particularly in DES2 and in case of 2-vessel disease. A complementary stent-effect analysis confirmed DES-to-BMS and DES2-to-DES1 superiority in both diabetics and non-diabetics., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the early days of coronary angioplasty, follow-up coronary angiography was often performed to assess restenosis. Angiographic restenosis has been shown to be associated with worse clinical outcomes, though the exact causality has yet to be determined. Numerous studies have repeatedly demonstrated that routine follow-up coronary angiography increases the incidence of target lesion revascularization without a clear reduction in mortality or myocardial infarction. Despite the lack of proven benefit of angiographic follow-up, routine follow-up coronary angiography is still being performed in certain countries and facilities. There are several factors that might explain the lack of benefit of angiographic follow-up: 1) lower incidence of stent failure in the current drug-eluting stent era has attenuated the net clinical benefit of follow-up angiography. 2) Angiographic restenosis might not lead to myocardial ischemia. 3) Patients that do have functionally significant restenosis are often referred for coronary angiography due to clinical indications such as intractable angina. 4) Absence of restenosis at the time of follow-up angiography does not exclude future restenosis. The absence of proven benefit in unselected populations does not necessarily preclude the presence of benefit in selected population, and there may be a subgroup of patients who can benefit from angiographic follow-up such as those with a large myocardial ischemic territory or those at very high risk of restenosis. Until there is more clinical evidence with respect to follow-up angiography, the decision of whether or not to perform it routinely in selected high-risk population should entail an in-depth discussion with the patient., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background/purpose: Stent thrombosis is an infrequent yet one of the most feared complications after stent implantation. Stent thrombosis most commonly manifests as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, thus the data regarding non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) resulting from stent thrombosis are still sparse. The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence and outcomes of NSTEMI resulting from stent thrombosis., Methods/materials: We performed a retrospective analysis of 378 consecutive NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography. Patients were divided into those with and without stent thrombosis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome was the incidence of large myocardial infarction defined as a peak troponin I value greater than 90th percentile of the entire study population (26.5 μg/L)., Results: Among 378 patients with NSTEMI, 12 (3.2%) patients had angiographically confirmed definite stent thrombosis. With respect to the timing of stent thrombosis, 2 patients had early, 3 had late and 7 had very-late stent thrombosis. Patients with stent thrombosis had a higher incidence of large myocardial infarction (33% vs. 9%, p = 0.02) and a higher albeit statistically insignificant peak troponin value (interquartile, 4.62 [0.19-64.0] μg/L vs. 1.21 [0.14-7.12] μg/L, p = 0.25) compared to those without stent thrombosis. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (8% vs. 2%, p = 0.2)., Conclusions: Stent thrombosis accounted for 3.2% cases of NSTEMI in our cohort of patients and patients with NSTEMI resulting from stent thrombosis had a higher incidence of large myocardial infarction., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Radial artery access is a mainstay in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. However, there is uncertainty on the comparison of right versus left radial access for coronary procedures. We thus undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing right versus left radial access for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures., Methods: Pertinent studies were searched in CENTRAL, Google Scholar, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Scopus, together with international conference proceedings. Randomized trials comparing right versus left radial (or ulnar) access for coronary diagnostic or interventional procedures were included. Risk ratios (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were computed to generate point estimates (95% confidence intervals)., Results: A total of 5 trials (3210 patients) were included. No overall significant differences were found comparing right versus left radial access in terms of procedural time (WMD=0.99 [-0.53; 2.51]min, p=0.20), contrast use (WMD=1.71 [-1.32; 4.74]mL, p=0.27), fluoroscopy time (WMD=-35.79 [-3.54; 75.12]s, p=0.07) or any major complication (RR=2.00 [0.75; 5.31], p=0.49). However, right radial access was fraught with a significantly higher risk of failure leading to cross-over to femoral access (RR=1.65 [1.18; 2.30], p=0.003) in comparison to left radial access., Conclusions: Right and left radial accesses appear largely similar in their overall procedural and clinical performance during transradial diagnostic or interventional procedures. Nonetheless, left radial access can be recommended especially during the learning curve phase to reduce femoral cross-overs., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bifurcation lesions at the time of emergent PCI for STEMI are relatively common. However, there are little data regarding their significance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of bifurcation lesions in the setting of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Methods: In 391 patients who underwent primary and rescue PCI, the clinical characteristics, procedural success, and in-hospital cardiac events were compared retrospectively between the patients with and without bifurcation lesions. The PCI strategy was at the discretion of the operator., Results: The culprit artery involved a bifurcation lesion in 54/391 (14%) patients. The baseline clinical characteristics between the groups with and without bifurcation lesions were similar. The majority of bifurcation lesions (81%) were seen in the left anterior ascending (LAD) artery. All lesions were treated with the provisional stenting approach, and only 2 (3%) patients required 2 stents. There were no difference in the procedural success and the final TIMI-3 flow, but PCI of bifurcation lesion required higher amount of contrast use. There was no in-hospital MACE in the bifurcation group. The peak cardiac enzyme, left ventricular function, and length of stay were similar in these 2 groups., Conclusions: Bifurcation lesions are relatively common in emergent PCI for STEMI involving the LAD. It can be safely treated with a provisional stenting approach, and the immediate outcome is similar to non-bifurcation lesions., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Terminal T wave inversions (TTWI) indicate advanced stages of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The present study investigated whether TTWI predict unfavorable in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients treated with urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed with consecutive 188 STEMI cases undergoing urgent PCI. The primary endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiac event (MACE), and the secondary endpoints were ST resolution (STR) after PCI and length of stay (LOS)., Results: TTWI on presentation were independently associated with higher incidence of in-hospital MACE (adjusted OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-7.0; p=0.03), inadequate STR (adjusted OR 5.5; 95% CI 2.1-14.3; p=0.01), and longer LOS (adjusted mean increase 4.1 days; 95% CI 0.3-7.9; p=0.03). TTWI predicted these outcomes better than patient-reported ischemic time or pathologic Q waves., Conclusions: TTWI on presentation are an independent risk factor for poor inpatient prognosis among patients presenting with STEMI undergoing urgent PCI., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coronary artery occlusion is an uncommon but life-threatening complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Both low coronary artery height and externally mounted stented bioprosthesis present an increased risk for coronary artery occlusion, and various prevention strategies have been recommended. We present an 86-year-old woman with failed surgical bioprosthesis, concomitant obstructive ostial right coronary artery (RCA) lesion, and low coronary ostial heights who underwent simultaneous TAVR and percutaneous coronary intervention of ostial RCA. Due to suprannular valve expansion after post-dilation, the RCA ostium was compromised, and a novel stent tunnel was created under the native leaflets towards the left coronary sinus to maintain RCA perfusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effect of oral beta-blocker therapy on long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who are treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and who have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains unclear.Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies evaluating the effect of oral beta-blocker therapy in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI and who had preserved LVEF. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Randomized controlled trials and the observational studies that reported an adjusted hazard ratio (or hazard ratio in the propensity score-matched patients) with follow-up duration equal to or more than 6 months were included. Pooled hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random effect model.Results: No randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Seven observational studies totaling 10 857 patients met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up duration ranged from 6 months to 5.2 years. Preserved LVEF was defined as 40% in 4 studies and 50% in 3 studies. Based on the pooled estimate, oral beta-blocker therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (combined hazard ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97).Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that oral beta-blocker therapy is associated with decreased all-cause mortality in patients with STEMI who are treated with primary PCI and who have preserved LVEF. This supports the current American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association 2013 Guideline for the Management of STEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]