Search

Background: Despite the detailed imaging information provided by optical coherence tomography (OCT) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), clinical benefits of this imaging technique in this setting remain uncertain. The aim of the OCCUPI trial was to compare the clinical benefits of OCT-guided versus angiography-guided PCI for complex lesions, assessed as the rate of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year., Methods: This investigator-initiated, multicentre, randomised, open-label, superiority trial conducted at 20 hospitals in South Korea enrolled patients aged 19-85 years for whom PCI with drug-eluting stents was clinically indicated. After diagnostic angiography, clinical and angiographic findings were assessed to identify patients who met the criterion of having one or more complex lesions. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive PCI with OCT guidance (OCT-guidance group) or angiography guidance without OCT (angiography-guidance group). Web-response permuted-block randomisation (mixed blocks of four or six) was used at each participating site to allocate patients. The allocation sequence was computer-generated by an external programmer who was not involved in the rest of the trial. Outcome assessors were masked to group assignment. Patients, follow-up health-care providers, and data analysers were not masked. PCI was done according to conventional standard methods with everolimus-eluting stents. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or ischaemia-driven target-vessel revascularisation), 1 year after PCI. The primary analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The margin used to establish superiority was 1·0 as a hazard ratio. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03625908) and is completed., Findings: Between Jan 9, 2019, and Sept 22, 2022, 1604 patients requiring PCI with drug-eluting stents for complex lesions were randomly assigned to receive either OCT-guided PCI (n=803) or angiography-guided PCI (n=801). 1290 (80%) of 1604 patients were male and 314 (20%) were female. The median age of patients at randomisation was 64 years (IQR 57-70). 1588 (99%) patients completed 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint occurred in 37 (5%) of 803 patients in the OCT-guided PCI group and 59 (7%) of 801 patients in the angiography-guided PCI group (absolute difference -2·8% [95% CI -5·1 to -0·4]; hazard ratio 0·62 [95% CI 0·41 to 0·93]; p=0·023). Rates of stroke, bleeding events, and contrast-induced nephropathy were not significantly different across the two groups., Interpretation: Among patients who required drug-eluting stent implantation for complex lesions, OCT guidance resulted in a lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year compared with angiography guidance. These findings indicate the existence of a therapeutic benefit of OCT as an intravascular imaging technique for PCI guidance in patients with complex coronary lesions., Funding: Abbott Vascular and Cardiovascular Research Center., Translation: For the Korean translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests S-JH reports speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, ChongKunDang, Hanmi, and Viatris; and participation on the data safety monitoring board of the IVUS-DCB trial. S-JL reports research grants and speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, ChongKunDang, and Sam Jin Pharmaceutical. JHH reports consulting and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. J-WL reports consulting fees from Genoss; speaker fees from Yuhan, Boryoung, Sam Jin Pharmaceutical, ChongKunDang, Korea United Pharm, HK inno.N, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Amgen, Sanofi, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, Biosensors, Dong-A ST, and JW Pharmaceutical; and participation on the data safety monitoring board of the Rescue-SHOCK trial. J-SK reports grants from Sam Jin Pharmaceutical, Yuhan, Daiichi-Sankyo, Biosensors, and Qualitech Korea and proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular. Y-GK reports research grants from Medtronic, Korea United Pharm, Cook Medical, Boston Scientific, Otsuka Korea, Dong-A ST, Sam Jin Pharmaceutical, Cordis, HK inno.N, and GC Biopharma. M-KH reports research grants, paid to their institution, from Sam Jin Pharmaceutical and ChongKunDang and honoraria for lectures from Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences. YJ reports research grants, paid to their institution, from Abbott Vascular. B-KK reports research grants and speaker or consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Yuhan, Sam Jin Pharmaceutical, ChongKunDang, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Genoss, CGBIO, MicroPort, Daewoong Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Bayer Korea, DIO Medical, Hanmi, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Introduction and Objectives: Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) yields clinical outcomes comparable to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. However, there is a scarcity of data comparing the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided and IVUS-guided PCI in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to compare the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided vs IVUS-guided PCI for patients with AMI in the era of second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES)., Methods: We identified 5260 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with a second-generation DES for AMI under IVUS or OCT guidance from pooled data derived from a series of Korean AMI registries between 2011 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization., Results: A total of 535 (10.2%) and 4725 (89.8%) patients were treated under OCT and IVUS guidance, respectively. The 1-year target lesion failure rates were comparable between the OCT and IVUS groups before and after propensity score matching (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.42-2.05, P=.84). The OCT utilization rate did not exceed 5% of total patients treated with second-generation DES implantation during the study period. The primary factors for the selection of OCT over IVUS were the absence of chronic kidney disease, non-left main vessel disease, single-vessel disease, stent diameter <3mm, and stent length ≤ 25mm., Conclusions: OCT-guided PCI in patients with AMI treated with a second-generation DES provided comparable clinical outcomes for 1-year target lesion failure compared with IVUS-guided PCI., (Copyright © 2023 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

The benefits of intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the clinical context of cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. We aimed to investigate the impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with AMI and CS. From the pooled data based on a series of Korean AMI registries during 2011-2020, we identified 1418 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent (DES) for AMI and CS. The primary endpoint was the 1-year rate of target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization. In total, 294 (20.7%) and 1124 (79.3%) underwent IVUS-guided and angiography-guided PCI with second generation DES implantation, respectively. The 1-year TLF was not significantly different between groups after IPTW analysis (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.65-1.34, p = 0.70). Additionally, the adjusted landmark analysis for TLF at 30 days and between 30 days and 1 year after PCI demonstrated no significant difference between the groups. In conclusion, in patients with AMI and CS who underwent PCI with second-generation DES, IVUS-guided PCI did not improve the 1-year TLF compared with angiography-guided PCI.Registration: URL:  http://cris.nih.go.kr . KCT0000863 and KCT0008355., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it remains unclear whether the treatment efficacy of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) depends on the type of P2Y12 inhibitor., Objective: To assess the risks and benefits of ticagrelor monotherapy or clopidogrel monotherapy compared with standard DAPT after PCI., Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, TCTMD, and the European Society of Cardiology website were searched from inception to September 10, 2023, without language restriction., Study Selection: Included studies were randomized clinical trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with DAPT on adjudicated end points in patients without indication to oral anticoagulation undergoing PCI., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Patient-level data provided by each trial were synthesized into a pooled dataset and analyzed using a 1-step mixed-effects model. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Individual Participant Data., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary objective was to determine noninferiority of ticagrelor or clopidogrel monotherapy vs DAPT on the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in the per-protocol analysis with a 1.15 margin for the hazard ratio (HR). Key secondary end points were major bleeding and net adverse clinical events (NACE), including the primary end point and major bleeding., Results: Analyses included 6 randomized trials including 25 960 patients undergoing PCI, of whom 24 394 patients (12 403 patients receiving DAPT; 8292 patients receiving ticagrelor monotherapy; 3654 patients receiving clopidogrel monotherapy; 45 patients receiving prasugrel monotherapy) were retained in the per-protocol analysis. Trials of ticagrelor monotherapy were conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America; trials of clopidogrel monotherapy were all conducted in Asia. Ticagrelor was noninferior to DAPT for the primary end point (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.74-1.06; P for noninferiority = .004), but clopidogrel was not noninferior (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.01-1.87; P for noninferiority > .99), with this finding driven by noncardiovascular death. The risk of major bleeding was lower with both ticagrelor (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62; P < .001) and clopidogrel monotherapy (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.81; P = .006; P for interaction = 0.88). NACE were lower with ticagrelor (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86, P < .001) but not with clopidogrel monotherapy (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28; P = .99; P for interaction = .04)., Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ticagrelor monotherapy was noninferior to DAPT for all-cause death, MI, or stroke and superior for major bleeding and NACE. Clopidogrel monotherapy was similarly associated with reduced bleeding but was not noninferior to DAPT for all-cause death, MI, or stroke, largely because of risk observed in 1 trial that exclusively included East Asian patients and a hazard that was driven by an excess of noncardiovascular death.

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy with a potent P2Y 12 inhibitor coupled with aspirin for 1 year is the recommended treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). As an alternative, monotherapy with a P2Y 12 inhibitor after a short period of dual antiplatelet therapy has emerged as a bleeding reduction strategy., Methods: We pooled individual patient data from randomized trials that included patients with ACS undergoing PCI treated with an initial 3-month course of dual antiplatelet therapy followed by ticagrelor monotherapy versus continued ticagrelor plus aspirin. Patients sustaining a major ischemic or bleeding event in the first 3 months after PCI were excluded from analysis. The primary outcome was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding occurring between 3 and 12 months after index PCI. The key secondary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were generated using Cox regression with a one-stage approach in the intention-to-treat population., Results: The pooled cohort (n=7529) had a mean age of 62.8 years, 23.2% were female, and 55% presented with biomarker-positive ACS. Between 3 and 12 months, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 or 5 bleeding compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin (0.8% versus 2.1%; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.24-0.56]; P <0.001). Rates of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke were not significantly different between groups (2.4% versus 2.7%; hazard ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.68-1.21]; P =0.515). Findings were unchanged among patients presenting with biomarker-positive ACS., Conclusions: Among patients with ACS undergoing PCI who have completed a 3-month course of dual antiplatelet therapy, discontinuation of aspirin followed by ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced major bleeding without incremental ischemic risk compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin., Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD42023449646., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Baber received honoraria/consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr Mehran reports institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Affluent Medical, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, AtriCure Inc, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi Sankyo, Duke, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia, I-Laser, Janssen, Magenta, MedAlliance, Medscape, Mediasphere, Medtelligence, Medtronic, MJH Healthcare, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Protembis, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Transverse Medical Inc, Vivasure, and Zoll; personal fees from Affluent Medical, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Daiichi Sankyo Brasil, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Esperion Science/Innovative Biopharma, Europa Group/Boston Scientific, Gaffney Events, Educational Trust, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, J-CalC, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Vectura, VoxMedia, IQVIA, McVeigh Global, Overcome, Primer Healthcare of New Jersey, Radcliffe, SL Solutions, TARSUS Cardiology, and WebMD; equity <1% in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, and ControlRad (spouse); participation in the scientific advisory board of the American Medical Association, the Women in Innovations Committee of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Innovation, and the faculty of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation; and honoraria from JAMA Cardiology (associate editor) and the American College of Cardiology (board of trustees member; SC member, CTR Program). Dr Dangas has received consulting fees and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca; consulting fees from Biosensors; and previously held stock in Medtronic. Dr Cao has received consulting fees from Terumo. The other authors report no relationships relevant to the content of this article.

Background: Stopping aspirin within 1 month after implantation of a drug-eluting stent for ticagrelor monotherapy has not been exclusively evaluated for patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ticagrelor monotherapy after <1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is noninferior to 12 months of ticagrelor-based DAPT for adverse cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome., Methods: In this randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial, 2850 patients with acute coronary syndrome who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation at 24 centers in South Korea were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ticagrelor monotherapy (90 mg twice daily) after <1 month of DAPT (n=1426) or 12 months of ticagrelor-based DAPT (n=1424) between April 24, 2019, and May 31, 2022. The primary end point was the net clinical benefit as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding at 1 year after the index procedure in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary end points were the individual components of the primary end point., Results: Among 2850 patients who were randomized (mean age, 61 years; 40% ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction), 2823 (99.0%) completed the trial. Aspirin was discontinued at a median of 16 days (interquartile range, 12-25 days) in the group receiving ticagrelor monotherapy after <1 month of DAPT. The primary end point occurred in 40 patients (2.8%) in the group receiving ticagrelor monotherapy after <1-month DAPT, and in 73 patients (5.2%) in the ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT group (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.37-0.80]; P <0.001 for noninferiority; P =0.002 for superiority). This finding was consistent in the per-protocol population as a sensitivity analysis. The occurrence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the ticagrelor monotherapy after <1-month DAPT group compared with the 12-month DAPT group (1.2% versus 3.4%; hazard ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20-0.61]; P <0.001)., Conclusions: This study provides evidence that stopping aspirin within 1 month for ticagrelor monotherapy is both noninferior and superior to 12-month DAPT for the 1-year composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding, primarily because of a significant reduction in major bleeding, among patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving drug-eluting stent implantation. Low event rates, which may suggest enrollment of relatively non-high-risk patients, should be considered in interpreting the trial., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03797651., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.-K.H. has received institutional research grants from Sam Jin Pharmaceutical and Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical, and speaker fees from Medtronic and Edward Lifesciences. Y.J. has received institutional research grants from Biotronik and Hanmi. B.-K.K. received speaker fees from Medtronic and Abbott Vascular. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Background: The optimal antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery within 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not yet established., Methods: Patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery within 1 year after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation were included from a multicenter prospective registry in Korea. The primary endpoint was 30-day net adverse clinical event (NACE), including all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and major bleeding events. Covariate adjustment using propensity score was performed., Results: Among 1130 eligible patients, 708 (62.7%) continued APT during non-cardiac surgery. After propensity score adjustment, APT continuation was associated with a lower incidence of NACE (3.7% vs 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.89; P = .019) and MACE (1.1% vs 1.9%; adjusted OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12-0.99; P = .046), whereas the incidence of major bleeding events was not different between the 2 APT strategies (1.7% vs 2.6%; adjusted OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.25-1.50; P = .273)., Conclusions: The APT continuation strategy was chosen in a substantial proportion of patients and was associated with the benefit of potentially reducing 30-day NACE and MACE with similar incidence of major bleeding events, compared with APT discontinuation. This study suggests a possible benefit of APT continuation in non-cardiac surgery within 1 year of second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there are no data regarding the benefits of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients., Methods and results: This study used data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, a large, multicenter prospective cohort. We evaluated 1,759 patients with AMI and CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , and patients were classified into 2 groups: with and without IVUS. The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) at 3 years. The hazard ratio (HR) of TLF according to eGFR was also analyzed. A total of 1,759 patients with AMI and CKD who underwent IVUS-guided PCI (19.2%) had a significantly lower risk of TLF at 3 years (8.9% vs. 15.3%; HR 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38 to 0.81; P=0.002) than those who underwent angiography-guided PCI, regardless of their eGFR and the presence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The results were consistent after confounder adjustment and inversed probability weighting., Conclusions: In patients with CKD and AMI who underwent PCI with 2nd-generation DES implantation, the use of IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in 3-year TLF and showed consistently favorable outcomes regardless of eGFR and ESRD.

Background: After a brief period of dual antiplatelet therapy, P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy in the absence of aspirin effectively reduces bleeding without increasing recurrent ischemia in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In addition, early anti-inflammatory therapies may have clinical benefits in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients., Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of ticagrelor or prasugrel P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy combined with colchicine immediately after PCI in patients with ACS., Methods: This was a proof-of-concept pilot trial. ACS patients treated with drug-eluting stents were included. On the day after PCI, low-dose colchicine (0.6 mg daily) was administered in addition to ticagrelor or prasugrel maintenance therapy, whereas aspirin therapy was discontinued. The primary outcome was any stent thrombosis at 3 months. The key secondary outcomes were platelet reactivity measured by the VerifyNow assay (Accriva) before discharge and a reduction in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) over 1 month., Results: We enrolled 200 patients, 190 (95.0%) of whom completed the 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome occurred in 2 patients (1.0%): 1 definite and 1 probable stent thrombosis. The level of platelet reactivity overall was 27 ± 42 P2Y 12 reaction units, and only 1 patient had high platelet reactivity (>208 P2Y 12 reaction units). The hs-CRP levels decreased from 6.1 mg/L (IQR: 2.6-15.9 mg/L) at 24 hours after PCI to 0.6 mg/L (IQR: 0.4-1.2 mg/L) at 1 month (P < 0.001), and the prevalence of high-inflammation criteria (hs-CRP ≥2 mg/L) decreased from 81.8% to 11.8% (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In ACS patients undergoing PCI, it is feasible to discontinue aspirin therapy and administer low-dose colchicine on the day after PCI in addition to ticagrelor or prasugrel P2Y 12 inhibitors. This approach is associated with favorable platelet function and inflammatory profiles. (Mono Antiplatelet and Colchicine Therapy [MACT]; NCT04949516)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Korea. Dr Jeong has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and Han-mi Pharmaceuticals; and has received research grants or support from Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, Han-mi Pharmaceuticals, Sam-jin Pharmaceuticals, Biotronik, and U and I Corporation. Dr Gorog has received institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Werfen, Medtronic, Bayer, and Alpha MD; and has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca. Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Vectura; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co, Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The RACING (randomized comparison of efficacy and safety of lipid-lowering with statin monotherapy versus statin/ezetimibe combination for high-risk cardiovascular diseases) trial examined the effects of combination therapy with moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy., Objectives: This observational study was conducted to evaluate the impact of 2 treatment strategies used in the RACING trial in clinical practice., Methods: After stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting, a total of 72,050 patients who were prescribed rosuvastatin after drug-eluting stent implantation were identified from a nationwide cohort database: 10,794 patients with rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (combination lipid-lowering therapy) and 61,256 patients with rosuvastatin 20 mg monotherapy. The primary endpoint was the 3-year composite event of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary artery revascularization, hospitalization for heart failure treatment, or nonfatal stroke in accordance with the RACING trial., Results: Combination lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a lower occurrence of the primary endpoint (11.6% vs 15.2% for those with high-intensity statin monotherapy; HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.70-0.79; P < 0.001). Compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy, combination lipid-lowering therapy was associated with fewer discontinuations of statin (6.5% vs 7.6%; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78-0.94: P < 0.001) and a lower occurrence of new-onset diabetes requiring medication (7.7% vs 9.6%; HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72-0.88; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In clinical practice, combination lipid-lowering therapy with ezetimibe and moderate-intensity statin was associated with favorable clinical outcomes and drug compliance in patients treated with drug-eluting stent implantation. (CONNECT DES Registry; NCT04715594)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Korea. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; data collection, management, statistical analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: Evidence for the role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high ischemic risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is lacking. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients at high ischemic risk of AMI., Methods: Among 13 104 patients with AMI enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health, we selected 8890 patients who underwent successful PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and classified them into 2 groups based on whether or not they were at high ischemic risk or not, defined as any of the following: number of stents implanted ≥ 3, 3 vessels treated, ≥ 3 lesions treated, total stent length> 60mm, left main PCI, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. The primary outcome was target lesion failure including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 3 years., Results: In 4070 AMI patients at high ischemic risk, IVUS-guided PCI (21.6%) was associated with a significantly lower risk of target lesion failure at 3 years (6.7% vs 12.0%; HR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.41-0.72; P <.001) than angiography-guided PCI. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment, inversed probability weighting, and propensity score matching., Conclusions: In patients at high ischemic risk of AMI who underwent PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation, use of IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in 3-year target lesion failure. iCreaT study No. C110016., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: We sought to explore the sex differences in clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor monotherapy after ticagrelor-based 3-month versus 12-month dual-antiplatelet therapy., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the TICO trial (Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3 Months in the Patients Treated With New Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome; n=3056)-a randomized controlled trial for patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with drug-eluting stent. The primary outcome was a net adverse clinical event (composite of major bleeding, death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target-vessel revascularization) 1 year after drug-eluting stent implantation. Secondary outcomes included major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events., Results: There were 27.3% (n=628) women in the TICO trial; they were older with lower body mass index and higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease than men. Compared with men, women had higher risk of net adverse clinical events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89 [95% CI, 1.34-2.67]), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.07-2.68]), and major bleeding (HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.25-3.35]). Among the groups stratified by sex and dual-antiplatelet therapy strategy, the incidences of primary and secondary outcomes were significantly different and the highest in women with ticagrelor-based 12-month dual-antiplatelet therapy ( P <0.001). There was no significant heterogeneity in the impact of treatment strategy on the risks of primary and secondary outcomes between both sexes. Ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome in women (HR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26-0.85]; P =0.02) and comparable in men (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.52-1.14]; P =0.19) without significant interaction ( P for interaction, 0.18)., Conclusions: After percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome, women demonstrated worse clinical outcomes than men. Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy was associated with significantly lower risk of net adverse clinical events in women without sex interaction., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Introduction and Objectives: There are scarce data on the optimal duration and prognostic impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation drug-eluting stents for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the practice pattern and long-term prognostic effect of DAPT duration in patients undergoing PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease., Methods: Using individual patient-level data from the IRIS-MAIN and KOMATE registries, 1827 patients undergoing PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease with valid information on DAPT duration were included. The efficacy outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis) and the safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding., Results: DAPT duration was <6 months (n=273), 6 to 12 months (n=477), 12 to 24 months (n=637), and ≥ 24 months (n=440). The median follow-up duration was 3.9 [interquartile range, 3.01-5.00] years. Prolonged DAPT duration was associated with lower incidences of MACE. In multigroup propensity score analysis, adjusted HR for MACE were significantly higher for DAPT <6 months and DAPT 6 to 12 months than for DAPT 12 to 24 months (HR, 4.51; 95%CI, 2.96-6.88 and HR 1.92; 95%CI, 1.23-3.00). There was no difference in HR for major bleeding among the assessed groups., Conclusions: DAPT duration following PCI for LMCA disease is highly variable. Although the duration of DAPT should be considered in the context of the clinical situation of each patient, <12 months of DAPT was associated with higher incidence of MACE. Registration identifiers: NCT01341327; NCT03908463., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) is still debated. The current study, using the totality of existing evidence, evaluated the impact of an abbreviated DAPT regimen in HBR patients., Methods and Results: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to search randomized clinical trials comparing abbreviated [i.e. very-short (1 month) or short (3 months)] with standard (≥6 months) DAPT in HBR patients without indication for oral anticoagulation. A total of 11 trials, including 9006 HBR patients, were included. Abbreviated DAPT reduced major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding [risk ratio (RR): 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.94; I2 = 28%], major bleeding (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.99, I2 = 0%), and cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.95, I2 = 0%) compared with standard DAPT. No difference in all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis was observed. Results were consistent, irrespective of HBR definition and clinical presentation., Conclusion: In HBR patients undergoing PCI, a 1- or 3-month abbreviated DAPT regimen was associated with lower bleeding and cardiovascular mortality, without increasing ischaemic events, compared with a ≥6-month DAPT regimen., Study Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021284004., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The effects of hypertension on long-term outcomes according to glycemic status in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after successful implantation of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have not been fully investigated. In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 11,911 patients were classified into 6 groups according to their glycemic status and presence or absence of hypertension. The major outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), or any revascularization. In patients without hypertension, the major outcomes were similar between the normoglycemia and prediabetes groups. However, MACE, all-cause death, cardiac death (CD), Re-MI rates were higher in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than in normoglycemic patients. Additionally, Re-MI was higher in patients with T2DM than in prediabetic patients. In patients with hypertension, although the major outcomes were similar between the prediabetes and T2DM groups, in both the prediabetes and T2DM groups, MACE, all-cause death, and CD rates were higher than those in the normoglycemia group. During a 2-year follow-up, the comparable harmful effects of hypertension in patients with AMI and prediabetes or T2DM were observed. Effective blood pressure and glucose control should be strengthened to reduce mortality in these patients.

Background: It remains unclear whether P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy preserves ischemic protection while limiting bleeding risk compared with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Objectives: We sought to assess the effects of P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1-month to 3-month DAPT vs standard DAPT in relation to PCI complexity., Methods: We pooled patient-level data from randomized controlled trials comparing P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy and standard DAPT on centrally adjudicated outcomes after coronary revascularization. Complex PCI was defined as any of 6 criteria: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length >60 mm, or chronic total occlusion. The primary efficacy endpoint was all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The key safety endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding., Results: Of 22,941 patients undergoing PCI from 5 trials, 4,685 (20.4%) with complex PCI had higher rates of ischemic events. The primary efficacy endpoint was similar between P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy and DAPT among patients with complex PCI (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.64-1.19) and noncomplex PCI (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.76-1.09; P interaction  = 0.770). The treatment effect was consistent across all the components of the complex PCI definition. Compared with DAPT, P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy consistently reduced BARC 3 or 5 bleeding in complex PCI (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31-0.84) and noncomplex PCI patients (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37-0.64; P interaction  = 0.920)., Conclusions: P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1-month to 3-month DAPT was associated with similar rates of fatal and ischemic events and lower risk of major bleeding compared with standard DAPT, irrespective of PCI complexity. (PROSPERO [P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy Versus Standard Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Revascularization: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials]; CRD42020176853)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by institutional support of the Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, which had no role in the data analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report. Dr Mehran has received grants from Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, BMS, CSL Behring, DSI, Medtronic, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and OrbusNeich; has received personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific, Medscape/WebMD, Siemens Medical Solutions, PLx Opco Inc/dba PLx Pharma Inc, Roivant Sciences, Sanofi, and Medtelligence (Janssen Scientific Affairs); has other financial relationships with Abbott Laboratories, Abiomed, The Medicines Company, Spectranetics/Philips/Volcano Corp, and Watermark Research Partners, outside the submitted work; has received nonfinancial support from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and has other relationships with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb. Drs Branca and Heg are affiliated with CTU Bern, University of Bern, which has a staff policy of not accepting honoraria or consultancy fees. However, CTU Bern is involved in design, conduct, or analysis of clinical studies funded by not-for-profit and for-profit organizations such as pharmaceutical and medical device companies provide direct funding to some of these studies. Dr Kimura has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, outside the submitted work. Dr Hahn has received grants or contracts from Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, Abbott Vascular, Biotronik, and Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. Dr Windecker has received research, travel, or educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Guerbet, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp & Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, and V-Wave; serves as unpaid advisory board member and/or unpaid member of the steering/executive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences, Janssen, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, V-Wave and Xeltis; and is a member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Gibson has received research or grant funding from CSL Behring, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Corporation, and SCAD Alliance; has received consulting fees from Amarin, Amag Pharmaceuticals, Angel Medical Corporation, Anthos Therapeutics, AstraZenca, Bayer Corporation Bioclinica, Boston Clinical Research Institute, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Caladrius Biosciences, Cardiovascular Clinical Science Foundation, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, CeleCor Therapeutics, CSL Behring, CytoSorbents Medical, Inc, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Eidos Therapeutics, EXCITE International, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Inari, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Johnson & Johnson Corporation, MD Magazine, MedImmune, Medtelligence, MedTrace, Merck Microport, Micodrop, LLC, Novo Nordisk, Paratek, PERT Consortium, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PHRI, PLxPharma, Revance Therapeutics, SCAI, Smart Medics, Somahlution, and Web MD; and has received personal fees from UpToDate in Cardiovascular Medicine, and other from Absolutys, nference, and Dyad Medical, outside the submitted work. Dr Watanabe has received honoraria for lectures from Abbott Medical Japan, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, and Kowa, outside the submitted work. Dr Zhu has received grants from AstraZeneca and Chugaipharma; and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, Medtronic, and Chugaipharma, outside the submitted work; and has received nonfinancial support from Medtronic. Dr Vranckx has received consulting fees or honoraria from Bayer AG, Daiichi-Sankyo, Servier, Bristol Myers Squibb-Pfizer, Menarini, and CSL Behring; has participated data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Novartis; and his institution has received research grants from Daiichi-Sankyo and Medtronic. Dr Serruys has received personal fees from SMT, Philips, Xeltis, Novartis, and Merillife, outside the submitted work. Dr Dangas has received grants from AstraZeneca, during the conduct of the study, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Bayer, outside the submitted work; and has received personal fees from Biosensors and Boston Scientific. Dr McFadden has received personal fees from Cardialysis BV, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, outside the submitted work. Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co, Merck, Novartis, Osprey Medical, Renal Guard Solutions, and Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Valgimigli has received grants from Terumo; and has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFlow, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals LTD, Universität Basel, Department. Klinische Forschung, Bristol Myers Squibb SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Because limited data are available, the present study investigated 2-year major clinical outcomes after angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prediabetes after successful implantation of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs)., Methods: Overall, 2932 patients with AMI and prediabetes were classified into two groups - the ACEIs group (n = 2059) and the ARBs group (n = 873). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of patient- -oriented composite outcome (POCO), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), or any repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoint was definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST)., Results: The cumulative incidences of POCO (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.020; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.740-1.404; p = 0.906), all-cause death (aHR: 1.394; 95% CI: 0.803-2.419; p = 0.238), Re-MI (aHR: 1.210; 95% CI: 0.626-2.340; p = 0.570), any repeat revascularization (aHR: 1.150; 95% CI: 0.713-1.855; p = 0.568), and ST (aHR: 1.736; 95% CI: 0.445-6.766; p = 0.427) were similar between the groups. These results were confirmed after propensity score-adjusted analysis., Conclusions: In this study, patients with AMI and prediabetes who received ACEIs or ARBs showed comparable clinical outcomes during the 2-year follow-up period.

Background: The long-term prognostic implication of platelet reactivity after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not clearly known., Objectives: The impacts of platelet reactivity from the PTRG-DES consortium were assessed., Methods: The primary endpoint was the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke. Key secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and net adverse clinical events (NACE), including MACCE and bleeding., Results: Between 2003 and 2018, a total of 11,714 patients were enrolled and grouped into tertiles according to P2Y 12 reaction units (PRUs): high PRUs (≥253), intermediate PRUs (188-252), and low PRUs (<188). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of the primary outcome were significantly different across the groups; the high-PRU group showed the highest MACCE rate at 5 years (12.9%, 11.1%, and 7.0% in high-, intermediate-, and low-PRU groups, respectively; P < 0.001), as well as at 1 year (P < 0.001). The high-PRU group had the greatest KM estimates of all-cause death (8.2%, 5.9%, and 3.7%, respectively; P < 0.001) at 5 years without significant differences of major bleeding, and resultant of a higher KM estimates of NACE (15.7%, 13.6%, and 9.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). A PRU ≥252, the best cutoff value, was strongly related to MACCE (HR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.11-1.74; P = 0.003) and all-cause death at 5 years after PCI (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.04-1.94; P = 0.026). The optimal cutoff value of aspirin reaction units predicting the MACCE occurrence was ≥414 and was significantly associated with 5-year MACCE occurrence or all-cause death (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: In this large-scale cohort, high PRU was significantly associated with occurrence of MACCE, all-death death, and NACE at 5 years, as well as 1 year after PCI. (PTRG-DES Consortium [PTRG]; NCT04734028)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was designed by the principal investigator and executive committee and was sponsored by the Korean Society of Intervention Cardiology. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, analyses, data interpretation, or preparing the manuscript. Dr Jeong has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sanofi, Han-mi Pharmaceuticals, and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals; and has received research grants or support from Yuhan Pharmaceuticals and U&I Corporation. Dr Joo has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Han-mi Pharmaceuticals, Samjin, Dong-A, HK inno.N Pharmaceuticals, and DIO Medical. Dr Song has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sanofi, Bayer Korea, and Samjin Pharmaceutical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Smoking is linked with increased risk of cardiovascular events among diabetic patients. Prediabetes is associated with increased risk for microvascular and macrovascular complications. We compared the 2-year clinical outcomes of current smoking between prediabetic and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Methods: A total of 5161 AMI patients who were currently smoking were classified into normoglycemia (group A: 1,416), prediabetes (group B: 1,740), and T2DM (group C: 2,005) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction and any repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoint was the occurrence of stent thrombosis (ST) and stroke., Results: The cumulative incidences of all primary and secondary endpoints including MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.150; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.891-1.484; P = 0.284), ST, and stroke were similar between group B and group C. The cumulative incidences of MACEs (aHR: 1.385; 95% CI: 1.007-1.904; P = 0.045) and all-cause death or MI were significantly higher in group B than in group A. The cumulative incidences of MACEs (aHR: 1.572; 95% CI: 1.157-2.137; P = 0.004), all-cause death, Re-MI, and all-cause death or MI were significantly higher in group C than in group A., Conclusions: Current smoking leads to worse clinical outcomes in patients with AMI and prediabetes, and thus, similarly to T2DM patients, more attention and more intensive treatment strategy including quitting smoking would be advantageous., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement The authors have no financial or other conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve patient symptoms, but it remains controversial whether it impacts subsequent clinical outcomes., Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we queried PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases (last search: September 15, 2021). We investigated the impact of CTO-PCI on clinical events including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), stroke, subsequent coronary artery bypass surgery, target-vessel revascularization, and heart failure hospitalizations. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effects model., Results: A total of 58 publications with 54,540 patients were included in this analysis, of which 33 were observational studies of successful vs failed CTO-PCI, 19 were observational studies of CTO-PCI vs no CTO-PCI, and 6 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In observational studies, but not RCTs, CTO-PCI was associated with better clinical outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality, MACE, and MI were 0.52 (95% CI, 0.42-0.64), 0.46 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58), 0.66 (95% CI, 0.50-0.86), respectively for successful vs failed CTO-PCI studies; 0.38 (95% CI, 0.31-0.45), 0.57 (95% CI, 0.42-0.78), 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-0.99), respectively, for observational studies of CTO-PCI vs no CTO-PCI; 0.72 (95% CI, 0.39-1.32), 0.69 (95% CI, 0.38-1.25), and 1.04 (95% CI, 0.46-2.37), respectively for RCTs., Conclusions: CTO-PCI is associated with better subsequent clinical outcomes in observational studies but not in RCTs. Appropriately powered RCTs are needed to conclusively determine the impact of CTO-PCI on clinical outcomes.

Background: Antiplatelet therapy deescalation has been suggested as an alternative to standard treatment with potent dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1 year in low bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention to mitigate the increased risk of bleeding. Whether this strategy preserves the ischemic and survival benefits of potent DAPT is uncertain., Methods: We performed a pairwise meta-analysis in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention treated with either 1-year standard potent DAPT versus deescalation therapy (potent DAPT for 1-3 months followed by either reduced potency DAPT or ticagrelor monotherapy for up to 1 year). Randomized trials comparing standard DAPT versus deescalation therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and proceedings of international meetings. The primary end point was 1-year all-cause mortality., Results: The meta-analysis included 6 trials in which 20 837 patients were randomized to potent DAPT for 1 to 3 months followed by deescalation therapy for up to 1 year (n=10 392) or standard potent DAPT for 1 year (n=10 445). Deescalation therapy was associated with lower 1-year rates of all-cause mortality compared with standard therapy (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.95]; P =0.02). Deescalation therapy was also associated with lower rates of major bleeding (odds ratio, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48-0.72]; P <0.0001), with no significant difference in major adverse cardiac events (major adverse cardiovascular events; odds ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.77-1.04]; P =0.14)., Conclusions: In low bleeding risk patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, compared with 1-year of potent DAPT, antiplatelet therapy deescalation therapy after 1 to 3 months was associated with decreased mortality and major bleeding with similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Since optical coherence tomography (OCT) was first performed in humans two decades ago, this imaging modality has been widely adopted in research on coronary atherosclerosis and adopted clinically for the optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention. In the past 10 years, substantial advances have been made in the understanding of in vivo vascular biology using OCT. Identification by OCT of culprit plaque pathology could potentially lead to a major shift in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Detection by OCT of healed coronary plaque has been important in our understanding of the mechanisms involved in plaque destabilization and healing with the rapid progression of atherosclerosis. Accurate detection by OCT of sequelae from percutaneous coronary interventions that might be missed by angiography could improve clinical outcomes. In addition, OCT has become an essential diagnostic modality for myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Insight into neoatherosclerosis from OCT could improve our understanding of the mechanisms of very late stent thrombosis. The appropriate use of OCT depends on accurate interpretation and understanding of the clinical significance of OCT findings. In this Review, we summarize the state of the art in cardiac OCT and facilitate the uniform use of this modality in coronary atherosclerosis. Contributions have been made by clinicians and investigators worldwide with extensive experience in OCT, with the aim that this document will serve as a standard reference for future research and clinical application., (© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: The impact of 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by aspirin monotherapy according to clinical presentation has not been elucidated., Aims: This study aimed to compare the impact of 1-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy after polymer-free drug-coated stent (PF-DCS) implantation (1-month DAPT after PF-DCS) vs 6-12-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy after biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) implantation (6-12-month DAPT after BP-DES) according to clinical presentation., Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the One-Month DAPT trial. The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularisation, and stroke) and major bleeding., Results: Among 1,828 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), 1-month DAPT after PF-DCS resulted in lower rates of the primary outcome than 6-12-month DAPT after BP-DES (3.9% vs 6.5%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.90; p=0.012). However, among 1,192 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the rates of the primary outcome were not significantly different between the two therapy groups (5.6% vs 3.6%; HR 1.57, 95% CI: 0.91-2.70; p=0.102) and a significant interaction was observed between therapy and clinical presentation regarding the primary outcome (P int =0.005). A significant interaction was observed in MACCE (P int =0.016), but not in major bleeding (P int =0.276)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation for non-complex lesions, the benefits of 1-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy for a composite of ischaemic and bleeding outcomes were found in patients with stable CAD, but not in those with ACS., Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT02513810.

Background Despite the clinical benefits to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), most patients with coronary artery disease undergo angiography-guided PCI alone in the real-world setting. We sought to investigate the procedural characteristics of IVUS-guided PCI and their clinical outcomes, as compared with angiography-guided PCI. Methods and Results This was a cohort study using patient-level data from the IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions) and ULTIMATE (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All-Comers Coronary Lesions) clinical trials. A total of 2848 patients with 3872 native coronary lesions were included and procedural characteristics assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were compared between IVUS and angiography guidance. Stent-to-reference vessel diameter ratio (ie, QCA stent sizing) was greater (1.11±0.16 versus 1.07±0.14, P <0.001) and high-pressure postdilation was more frequently performed (83.7% versus 75.4%, P <0.001) with IVUS guidance, whereas residual stent edge dissections were more frequent in lesions treated with IVUS guidance (4.6% versus 0.7%, P <0.001). Given the dissection risk, optimal QCA stent sizing for IVUS guidance was a stent-to-QCA reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1.1 to <1.3. Among 1424 patients (1969 lesions) treated with angiography guidance, QCA stent sizing <1.0 was observed in 651 (33.1%) lesions, while QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 was observed in only 526 (26.7%) lesions. Under angiography guidance, patients with both QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 and high-pressure postdilation (235 of 1424, 16.5%) had a lower risk of 3-year target lesion failure compared with others (hazard ratio, 0.532; 95% CI, 0.293-0.966 [ P =0.038]). Conclusions IVUS-guided PCI resulted in larger QCA-assessed stent sizing and more frequent postdilation with high-pressure inflations. These procedures may further improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI without IVUS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01308281 (IVUS-XPL); NCT02215915 (ULTIMATE).

Background and Aims: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not clearly established. This study purposed to compare clinical outcomes of patients with 6-12 (standard) versus 12-24 months (prolonged) DAPT according to CKD., Methods: Using a nationwide, claim-based database, we retrospectively evaluated association between DAPT duration and clinical outcomes including death, composite ischemic event, and composite bleeding event between 1 and 3 years after PCI. CKD was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Of 73,941 eligible patients, 13,425 (18.2%) had CKD and 49,019 (66%) were prescribed prolonged DAPT. Prolonged DAPT had no significant impact on the risk of clinical outcomes in patients with normal renal function., Results: In patients with CKD, prolonged DAPT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.95) and composite ischemic events (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.96) and a higher risk of composite bleeding events (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37). Benefit of prolonged DAPT on reducing composite ischemic event increased significantly in patients with worsened renal dysfunction (p interaction  = 0.02) while there was no significant interaction between its bleeding risk and renal dysfunction (p interaction  = 0.22)., Conclusions: While standard DAPT would be recommended in patients with normal renal function, tailored decision for DAPT duration would be considered in those with CKD to balance between ischemic and bleeding risks., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: We evaluated the 2-year clinical outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who received newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES)., Methods: Overall, 18,875 acute myocardial infarction patients were divided into two groups: CKD (STEMI, n = 1707; NSTEMI, n = 1648) and non-CKD (STEMI, n = 8660; NSTEMI, n = 6860). The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), any repeat coronary revascularization, and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), was evaluated., Results: After multivariable-adjusted analysis, in the CKD group, the MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.365, p = 0.004), all-cause death (aHR: 1.503, p = 0.004), noncardiac death (non-CD; aHR: 1.960, p = 0.004), and all-cause death or MI rates (aHR: 1.458, p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group. In the non-CKD group, the non-CD rate (aHR: 1.78, p = 0.006) was also higher in the NSTEMI group. The CD, re-MI, any repeat revascularization, and ST rates were similar between groups. In the CKD group, from 6 months to 2 years after the index procedure, all-cause death, non-CD, and all-cause death or MI rates were significantly higher in the NSTEMI group than in the STEMI group. These results may be related to the higher non-CD rate in the NSTEMI group., Conclusions: In the era of contemporary newer-generation DES, NSTEMI showed a relatively higher non-CD rate than STEMI in both CKD and non-CKD groups., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background and Aims: Because of paucity of published data, we evaluated the 2-year major clinical outcomes between early invasive (EI) and delayed invasive (DI) strategies according to the stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), who underwent a successful newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Methods: A total of 8241 NSTEMI patients were recruited from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR). Based on baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; ≥90, 60-89, 30-59, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), the patients were classified into groups A (n = 3498), B (n = 3109), C (n = 1178), and D (n = 1178). Thereafter, these 4 groups were sub-classified into the EI and DI groups. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent MI (re-MI), and any repeat revascularization, were evaluated., Results: After multivariable-adjusted and propensity score-adjusted analyses, the cumulative incidence of MACE (group A, p = 0.139 and p = 0.103, respectively; group B, p = 0.968 and p = 0.608, respectively; group C, p = 0.111 and p = 0.196, respectively; group D, p = 0.882 and p = 0.571, respectively), all-cause death, re-MI, and any repeat revascularization was similar between the EI and DI groups in the 4 different renal function groups., Conclusions: In the era of newer-generation DES, EI and DI strategies showed comparable major clinical outcomes in patients with NSTEMI and CKD during a 2-year follow-up period. However, to confirm these results, further randomized, large-scale, long-term follow-up studies are needed., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background The role of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still unclear in patients with acute myocardial infarction acute myocardial infarction. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term impact of IVUS-guided PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods and Results Among a total of 13 104 patients with acute myocardial infarction, enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health, we selected patients who underwent PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. The primary outcome was the risk of target lesion failure at 3 years. Among the study population, 1887 patients (21.0%) underwent IVUS-guidance, and 7120 patients (79.0%) underwent angiography-guidance for second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of target lesion failure at 3 years (4.8% versus 8.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.73; P <0.001) compared with angiography-guided PCI. The difference was driven mainly by a lower risk of cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction. The results were consistent after confounder adjustment by multiple sensitivity analyses. Moreover, quartile analysis of volume of IVUS use showed that higher IVUS use was associated with a decreased risk of 3-year target lesion failure (adjusted HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.75; P <0.001 for quartile 1 versus 4; P <0.001 for trend comparison across all quartiles). Conclusions In patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent PCI with second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation, the use of IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in 3-year target lesion failure, mainly driven by hard end points, such as cardiac death and target vessel myocardial infarction.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether side branch (SB) wire jailing before main vessel (MV) stenting could prevent SB occlusion after the 1-stent strategy for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention., Background: The benefits of SB wire jailing in the 1-stent strategy remain unclear., Methods: From the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry, 1,890 patients with bifurcation lesions who underwent the 1-stent strategy using second-generation drug-eluting stents were identified and classified into 2 groups according to the use of SB wire jailing: wire jailing (n = 819) and non-wire jailing (n = 1,071). The incidence of SB occlusion (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3) and target lesion failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) was compared., Results: The incidence of final SB occlusion was not significantly different between wire jailing (1.8%) vs non-wire jailing (2.9%; P = 0.182). However, wire jailing at the SB was a significant protective factor for SB occlusion after MV stenting on multivariate analysis and was significantly associated with a lower incidence of SB occlusion in patients with significant stenoses (≥60%) at the SB (5.1% vs 11.3%; odds ratio: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.19-0.89; P = 0.028) or MV (3.1% vs 6.2%; odds ratio: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24-0.95; P = 0.039). During follow-up (median 52 months), the incidence of target lesion failure was not significantly different between wire jailing and non-wire jailing (7.6% vs 6.3%; P = 0.343)., Conclusions: During bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention with the 1-stent strategy, wire jailing at the SB was associated with a lower rate of final SB occlusion following MV stenting in patients with severe stenoses at the SB or MV but not with overall bifurcation lesions. Long-term clinical outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by the Korean Bifurcation Club, Korean Society of Interventional Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The 2-year clinical outcomes according to pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and reperfusion timing were investigated in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who received newer-generation drug-eluting stents. A total of 7506 NSTEMI patients were divided into 2 groups: early (PCI ≤ 24 hours: n = 6398; pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 [n = 2729], pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 [n = 3669]) and delayed (PCI > 24 hours: n = 1108; pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 [n = 428], pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 [n = 680]) invasive groups. Major adverse cardiac events were defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization. All-cause death ( P = 0.005 and 0.009, respectively) and cardiac death ( P = .003 and 0.046, respectively) were significantly higher in pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 patients than in pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 patients both in the early and delayed invasive groups. In pre-PCI TIMI 0/1 patients, all-cause death rate was significantly higher in the delayed group ( P = .023). In pre-PCI TIMI 2/3 patients, the clinical end point was similar between the 2 groups. An early invasive strategy is preferred to a delayed invasive strategy in reducing all-cause death in patients with pre-PCI TIMI 0/1. However, in patients with pre-PCI TIMI 2/3, both treatment strategies are acceptable.

Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate long-term cardiac survival benefit for intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- versus angiography-guided long drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Background: Although the long-term benefit of IVUS guidance for DES implantation has been reported from recent randomized trials, this benefit was primarily driven by the reduction in repeat revascularization. Thus, it remains uncertain whether IVUS guidance improved survival during long-term follow-up., Methods: We pooled the data of 2 randomized trials (IVUS-XPL [Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions] and ULTIMATE [Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All-Comers Coronary Lesions]) and compared IVUS guidance versus angiography guidance in 2,577 patients with long lesions treated with an implanted stent length ≥28 mm. The primary end point was cardiac death at 3 years., Results: A 3-year clinical follow-up was completed in 96%. The primary end point of cardiac death occurred in 12 patients (1.0%) in the IVUS-guided group vs 28 patients (2.2%) in the angiography-guided group (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.84; P = 0.011). In addition, target lesion-related myocardial infarction occurred in 3 patients (0.2%) in the IVUS-guided group and in 9 patients (0.7%) in the angiography-guided group (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.09-1.22; P = 0.081), stent thrombosis developed in 3 patients (0.2%) in the IVUS-guided group and 9 patients (0.7%) in the angiography-guided group (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.09-1.23; P = 0.082), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization was observed in 47 patients (3.8%) in the IVUS-guided group and 80 patients (6.5%) in the angiography-guided group (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.40-0.82; P = 0.002)., Conclusions: In this post hoc pooled patient-level analysis, the use of IVUS-guided long DES implantation compared with angiography-guided stent implantation improved long-term patient cardiac survival., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Supported by the Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Korea. Dr Mintz has received honoraria (lecture fees) from Boston Scientific, Philips/Volcano, Abiomed, and Medtronic. Dr Chen has received lecture fees from Microport, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Optimal timing and strategy of antiplatelet monotherapy after dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisting of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor for patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still being debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT after PCI on mortality., Methods and Results: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PubMed to search for ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT comparing conventional DAPT in patients who underwent PCI. Three randomized trials encompassing 26 143 patients [ticagrelor monotherapy after 1-3 months of DAPT (n = 13 062) vs. conventional therapy (n = 13 081)] were included. The efficacy endpoint of all-cause mortality was significantly lower with the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. the conventional therapy group [risk ratio (RR) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.98; P = 0.03; I2 = 0%; number needed to treat for benefit (NNTB) = 320]. The safety endpoint of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding was also significantly lower with the ticagrelor monotherapy group vs. the conventional therapy group (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.92; P = 0.01; I2 = 65%; NNTB = 156). There were no significant differences in ischaemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. The favourable effects of the ticagrelor monotherapy vs. the conventional therapy on all-cause mortality and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding were consistent in the subset of patients presenting acute coronary syndromes (n = 15 157)., Conclusion: Ticagrelor monotherapy after short-term DAPT of 1-3 months was associated with decreased all-cause mortality and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding not offset by increase of cardiac death, ischaemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Limited data are available comparing the combined effects of statins and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) between patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and those with non-STEMI (NSTEMI). We compared the effects of statins combined with RASI in STEMI and NSTEMI patients after stent implantation during a long-term follow-up period., Methods: A total of 21,890 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients who underwent successful stent implantation and who received statins with RASI were enrolled. They were separated into the STEMI group (n = 12,490) and the NSTEMI group (n = 9400). The major clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization., Results: Two propensity score-matched (PSM) groups (5891 pairs, n = 11782, C-statistic = 0.821) were generated. Even though the cumulative incidences of MACE, re-MI, total repeat revascularization were similar between the two groups, the cumulative incidences of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.407; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.106-1.790; p = 0.005) and cardiac death (HR 1.311; 95% CI 1.983-1.749; p = 0.046) were significantly higher in the NSTEMI group., Conclusions: In this study, statin with RASI combination therapy was more beneficial to the STEMI patients than to the NSTEMI patients in reducing all-cause death and cardiac death.

Background: The beneficial effects of statin and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (RASI) are well-known. In this retrospective cohort study, 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between monotherapy and combination therapy with statin and RASI in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients after stent implantation., Methods: A total of 17,414 STEMI patients were enrolled and divided into the three groups (group A: 2448 patients, statin alone; group B: 2431 patients, RASI alone; and group C: 12,535 patients, both statin and RASI). The principal clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization., Results: After adjustment, the cumulative incidences of MACEs in group A (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.337; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.064-1.679; p = 0.013) and in group B (aHR 1.375; 95% CI 1.149-1.646; p = 0.001) were significantly higher than in group C. The cumulative incidence of all-cause death in group A was significantly higher than that in group C (aHR 1.539; 95% CI 1.014-2.336; p = 0.043). The cumulative incidences of any repeat revascularization (aHR 1.317; 95% CI 1.031-1.681; p = 0.028), target lesion vascularization, and target vessel vascularization in group B were significantly higher than in group C., Conclusions: A statin and RASI combination therapy significantly reduced the cumulative incidence of MACEs compared with a monotherapy of these drugs. Moreover, the combination therapy showed a reduced all-cause death rate compared with statin monotherapy, and a decreased repeat revascularization rate compared with RASI monotherapy.

Background: The contribution of sex as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease still remains controversial. The present study investigated the impact of sex on long-term clinical outcomes in Korean acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with a history of current smoking on admission after drug-eluting stents (DESs)., Methods: A total of 12,565 AMI patients (male: n = 11,767 vs. female: n = 798) were enrolled. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) comprising all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization were the primary outcomes that were compared between the two groups. Probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST) was the secondary outcome., Results: After adjustment, the early (30 days) cumulative incidences of MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.457; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.021-2.216; p = 0.035) and all-cause death (aHR: 1.699; 95% CI: 1.074-2.687; p = 0.023) were significantly higher in the female group than in the male group. At 2 years, the cumulative incidences of all-cause death (aHR: 1.561; 95% CI: 1.103-2.210; p = 0.012) and Re-MI (aHR: 1.800; 95% CI: 1.089-2.974; p = 0.022) were significantly higher in the female group than in the male group. However, the cumulative incidences of ST were similar between the two groups (aHR: 1.207; 95% CI: 0.583-2.497; p = 0.613)., Conclusions: The female group showed worse short-term and long-term clinical outcomes compared with the male group comprised of Korean AMI patients with a history of current smoking after successful DES implantation. However, further studies are required to confirm these results.

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the impact of poststent optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, including severe malapposition, on long-term clinical outcomes., Background: Suboptimal OCT findings following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are highly prevalent; however, their clinical implications remain controversial., Methods: Of the patients registered in the Yonsei OCT registry, a total of 1,290 patients with 1,348 lesions, who underwent OCT immediately poststenting, were consecutively enrolled for this study. All patients underwent implantation of drug-eluting stents. Poststent OCT findings were assessed to identify predictors of device-oriented clinical endpoints (DoCE), including cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) or stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Significant malapposition criteria associated with major safety events (MSE) were also investigated, such as cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, or stent thrombosis., Results: The median follow-up period was 43.0 months (interquartile range [IQR] 21.4 to 56.0 months). The incidence rates of stent edge dissection, tissue prolapse, thrombus, and malapposition after intervention were not associated with occurrence of DoCE. However, patients with significant malapposition (total malapposition volume [TMV] ≥7.0 mm 3 ] exhibited more frequent MSE. A smaller minimal stent area (MSA) was identified as an independent predictor for DoCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.43]; p = 0.045). Malapposition with TMV ≥7.0 mm 3 was found to be an independent predictor of MSE (HR: 6.12 [95% CI: 1.88 to 19.95]; p = 0.003). Follow-up OCT at 3, 6, or 9 months after PCI showed that poststent TMV ≥7.0 mm 3 was related to a greater occurrence of late malapposition and uncovered struts., Conclusions: Although most suboptimal OCT findings were not associated with clinical outcomes, a smaller MSA was associated with DoCE, driven mainly by TLR, and significant malapposition with TMV ≥7.0 mm 3 was associated with more MSE after PCI. (Yonsei OCT [Optical Coherence Tomography] Registry for Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Coronary Stenting; Yonsei OCT registry; NCT02099162)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This research was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (20012442, MultiPhase Implant with Biodegradable and Magnetic Features for Biological Flow Organs), funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea), by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2017R1A2B2003191) and the Cardiovascular Research Center (Seoul, Korea). Dr. Jung-Sun Kim has received proctoring fees from Abbott Vascular and Occlutech. Dr. Guagliumi is a consultant for St. Jude Medical and Boston Scientific; and has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and St. Jude Medical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are 2 competing approaches to optimize drug-eluting stent implantation: angiography-guided routine postdilation or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance., Methods: From the pooled data of 2 randomized trials, IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions) and ULTIMATE (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All-Comers Coronary Lesions), that compared IVUS- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation, we compared 1037 patients (1265 lesions) with IVUS-guided postdilation, 905 patients (1170 lesions) with angiography-guided postdilation, and 383 patients (397 lesions) with angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation without postdilation as a reference group; all patients required ≥28 mm long stents. The primary end point was composite of cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 3 years., Results: Postintervention quantitative coronary angiography-based minimum lumen diameter was not different between the angiography guidance with postdilation versus the angiography guidance without postdilation group (2.5±0.4 mm versus 2.5±0.4 mm; P =0.367). However, it was larger in the IVUS guidance with postdilation versus the angiography guidance without postdilation group (2.6±0.5 mm versus 2.5±0.4 mm; P =0.046), and also in the IVUS guidance with postdilation versus the angiography guidance with postdilation group (2.6±0.5 mm versus 2.5±0.4 mm; P <0.001). The rate of the primary end point was not different between the angiography guidance with postdilation versus the angiography guidance without postdilation group (8.6% versus 9.8%; hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.58-1.29]; P =0.473). However, it was lower after IVUS guidance with postdilation versus angiography guidance without postdilation (4.5% versus 9.8%; hazard ratio, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.28-0.68]; P <0.001) and also after IVUS guidance with postdilation versus angiography guidance with postdilation (4.5% versus 8.6%; hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.35-0.74]; P <0.001)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing long drug-eluting stent implantation, IVUS-guided postdilation was associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes, unlike angiography-guided postdilation.

Abstract: We compared the 2-year major clinical outcomes between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) in patients who are current smokers who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). The availability of data in this regard is limited.A total of 8357 AMI patients were included and divided into 2 groups: the STEMI group (n = 5124) and NSTEMI group (n = 3233). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI), or coronary repeat revascularization. The secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of the individual components of MACE and stent thrombosis (definite or probable).After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, 2 PSM groups (2250 pairs, C-statistics = 0.795) were generated. In the PSM patients, both for 1 month and at 2 years, the cumulative incidence of MACE (P = .183 and P = .655, respectively), all-cause death, cardiac death, re-MI, all-cause death or MI, any repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis (P = .998 and P = .341, respectively) was not significantly different between the STEMI and NSTEMI groups. In addition, these results were confirmed using multivariate analysis.In the era of contemporary newer-generation DESs, both during 1 month and at 2 years after index PCI, the major clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the STEMI and NSTEMI groups confined to the patients who are current smokers. However, further research is needed to confirm these results., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The comparative clinical outcomes between prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in older adults with AMI in the era of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) are limited. We investigated the 2-year clinical outcomes of these patients., Methods: A total of 5492 AMI patients aged ≥65 years were classified into three groups according to their glycemic status: normoglycemia (group A: 1193), prediabetes (group B: 1696), and T2DM (group C: 2603). The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis (ST)., Results: The primary and secondary outcomes cumulative incidences were similar between the prediabetes and T2DM groups. In both the prediabetes and T2DM groups, the cumulative incidences of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.373; p = 0.020 and aHR: 1.479; p = 0.002, respectively) and all-cause death or MI (aHR: 1.436; p = 0.022 and aHR: 1.647; p = 0.001, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the normoglycemia group. Additionally, the cumulative incidence of all-cause death in the T2DM group was significantly higher than that in the normoglycemia group (aHR, 1.666; p = 0.003)., Conclusions: In this retrospective study, despite the 2-year clinical outcomes of the patients with prediabetes and T2DM in the older adults were worse than those in the normoglycemia group; they were similar between the prediabetes and T2DM groups. Hence, comparable treatment strategies should be strengthened between prediabetes and T2DM in older adults with AMI., Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

[Figure: see text].

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to test whether the success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) increased with pre-procedural coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)., Background: Coronary CTA provides valuable information before and during CTO-PCI. However, there are no randomized data that explore whether coronary CTA increases its success rate., Methods: In this multicenter, randomized trial, a total of 400 patients with CTO were randomized to receive PCI with pre-procedural coronary CTA (coronary CTA-guided group; n = 200) or without coronary CTA (angiography-guided group; n = 200) between January 2014 and September 2019. The primary endpoint was the successful recanalization rate, a final TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) grade ≥2, and ≤30% residual stenosis on the final angiogram., Results: A total of 10 operators performed PCI. Successful recanalization was achieved in 187 patients (93.5%) in the coronary CTA-guided group and in 168 patients (84.0%) in the angiography-guided group (absolute difference, 9.5% [95% confidence interval: 3.4% to 15.6%]; p = 0.003). When comparing the success rates according to the Multicenter CTO Registry of Japan score (J-CTO), the coronary CTA guidance was favored over the angiography-guidance in the subset of J-CTO ≥2 versus in the subset of J-CTO <2 (p interaction = 0.035). Coronary perforations occurred in 2 (1%) and 8 patients (4%) in the coronary CTA- and angiography-guided groups, respectively (p = 0.055). Periprocedural myocardial infarction was not observed in the coronary CTA-guided group, whereas it occurred in 4 patients (2%) in the angiography-guided group (p = 0.123). Total procedure and fluoroscopic times were not different. There were no differences between the groups in the occurrences of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization at 1 year., Conclusions: Pre-procedural coronary CTA-guidance for CTO resulted in higher success rates with numerically fewer immediate periprocedural complications such as coronary perforations or periprocedural myocardial infarction than angiography guidance. Higher success rates were more prominently observed in patients with CTO who had a high J-CTO score than those who did not. (Role of CT Scan for the Successful Recanalization of Chronic Total Occlusion; a Randomized Comparison Between 3D CT-guided PCI vs. Conventional Treatment [CT-CTO Trial]; NCT02037698)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This work was supported by grants from the Korea Health Technology Research & Development Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute and funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (No. HI17C0882, HI16C2211, and HI15C2782), the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation funded by the Korean government (No. 2015M3A9C6031514), and the Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Korea. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is a well-established drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) strategy, there are minimal data regarding the association of neointimal burden on optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after DCB and adverse clinical events. This study aimed to investigate the clinical impact of neointimal burden measured with OCT in patients with DES ISR after DCB angioplasty., Methods: From 2010 through 2013, a total of 122 patients with 122 ISR lesions were treated with DCB, which was preceded and followed by OCT examination. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE, a composite occurrence of cardiovascular cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], or target lesion revascularization [TLR]) were evaluated., Results: MACE occurred in 27 patients (4 nonfatal MIs and 23 TLRs) during the follow-up (median: 55.3 months, interquartile range 43.1-66.0). The mean lumen area was significantly smaller (3.21 ± 2.42 mm 2 vs. 4.80 ± 2.53 mm 2 , p = .005) and the mean percentage of neointimal volume derived by OCT was greater (49.3 ± 9.2% vs. 38.3 ± 17.5%, p = .006) in patients with MACE before DCB angioplasty. The pre-procedural mean percentage of neointimal volume (cut-off 50%, area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve = 0.644, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.531-0.758, p = .022) and post-procedural mean percentage of neointimal volume (cut-off 25%, area under ROC curve = 0.659, 95% CI = 0.546-0.773, p = .012) were identified as significant parameters to predict MACE., Conclusion: The OCT-derived mean percentages of neointimal volume before and after DCB angioplasty can be important parameters for predicting future MACE in patients with DES ISR., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Uncertainty remains regarding the associations of angiographic optimization and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) optimization after new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation., Methods: From four randomized trials comparing outcomes between IVUS and angiography-guidance for long or chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, 1396 patients who underwent IVUS-guided new-generation DES implantation were enrolled. Of these, 1112 patients (80%) met angiographic optimization criteria (postprocedural diameter stenosis, ≤20%) and were further classified into the matched (same results for angiographic optimization and IVUS optimization) and the mismatched group (opposite results for angiographic optimization and IVUS optimization) according to the meeting of IVUS optimization criteria (minimal stent area, ≥5.5 mm2 or ≥80% of mean reference lumen area). The major adverse clinical events (MACE) were compared., Results: Of 1112 patients with angiographic optimization, 675 patients met the IVUS optimization criteria (61%; matched), but 437 patients (39%; mismatched) failed to meet IVUS optimization criteria (false-positive rate = 76%). On multivariate analyses, age >60 years, reference vessel diameter ≤2.7 mm, left circumflex artery and lesion length ≥33 mm were significant predictors for the mismatched. When comparing the 12-month MACE rates, the mismatched group (6.8%) showed a significantly higher rate than the matched group (1.5%; hazard ratio = 2.62; 95% confidence interval = 1.20-5.72; P = 0.012), mainly driven by a higher target-vessel revascularization rate (6.4 vs 1.4%; P = 0.021)., Conclusion: Despite meeting angiographic optimization criteria in long or CTO lesions, more than one-third of the patients with IVUS-guided new-generation DES implantation failed to meet the IVUS optimization criteria and had worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, IVUS optimization should be considered for patients who had predictors of mismatch., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The authors developed a global chronic total occlusion crossing algorithm following 10 steps: 1) dual angiography; 2) careful angiographic review focusing on proximal cap morphology, occlusion segment, distal vessel quality, and collateral circulation; 3) approaching proximal cap ambiguity using intravascular ultrasound, retrograde, and move-the-cap techniques; 4) approaching poor distal vessel quality using the retrograde approach and bifurcation at the distal cap by use of a dual-lumen catheter and intravascular ultrasound; 5) feasibility of retrograde crossing through grafts and septal and epicardial collateral vessels; 6) antegrade wiring strategies; 7) retrograde approach; 8) changing strategy when failing to achieve progress; 9) considering performing an investment procedure if crossing attempts fail; and 10) stopping when reaching high radiation or contrast dose or in case of long procedural time, occurrence of a serious complication, operator and patient fatigue, or lack of expertise or equipment. This algorithm can improve outcomes and expand discussion, research, and collaboration., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Wu has received research funding from Abiomed, OrbusNeich, Asahi Intecc; has received consulting honoraria from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular; is a member of the board of directors for APCTO Club; and holds stock in Abbott Vascular. Dr Brilakis has received consulting and speaker honoraria from Abbott Vascular, the American Heart Association (associate editor, Circulation), Amgen, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation (board of directors), ControlRad, CSI, Ebix, Elsevier, GE Healthcare, InfraRedx, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; has received research support from Regeneron and Siemens; is an owner of Hippocrates; and is a shareholder in MHI Ventures. Dr Mashayekhi has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Asahi Intecc, AstraZeneca, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardinal Health, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Teleflex, and Terumo. Dr Tsuchikane is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, Nipro, and Kaneka. Dr Avran has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Terumo, Alvimedica, and OrbusNeich. Dr Azzalini has received consulting fees from Abiomed and Teleflex. Dr Buller is global medical director of Teleflex. Dr Burke is a shareholder in Egg Medical and MHI Ventures. Dr Croce has received grants from Abbott, Takeda, Teleflex, and CSI; has received consulting honoraria from Abbott, BSCI, Biotronik, Philips, Abiomed, CSI, Takeda, and Cordis; and holds stock in Dyad Medical. Dr Damas de los Santos is a proctor, speaker, and consultant for Boston Scientific, Terumo, Abbott Vascular, and Biotronik. Dr Dens has consultancy contracts with Abbott, Boston Scientific, IMDS, Terumo, Topmedical (a distributor for Asahi); and is a chronic total occlusion proctor for Boston Scientific and Topmedical (Asahi). Dr di Mario has received research grants from Abbott, Amgen, Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Edwards, Medtronic, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Egred has received chronic total occlusion proctorship fees, speaker fees, honoraria, and grants from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Philips, Spectranetics, Vascular Perspectives, Merrill, Biotronik, and AstraZeneca. Dr Elbarouni has received speaker fees from Teleflex and Bayer. Dr ElGuindy has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo. Dr Escaned has received personal fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Terumo, and Phillips. Dr Furkalo has a proctoring agreement with Medtronic; and has received speaker honoraria from Sanofi. Dr Garbo is a proctor and consultant for Philips Volcano, Boston Europe, Terumo Italy, and Europe Teleflex. Dr Hall has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic, OpSens Medical, and the Cardiovascular Innovations Foundation. Dr Hanna Quesada has received honoraria from Boston Scientific. Dr Harb is a consultant for Medtronic and Cardinal Health; and has received speaker honoraria from Cardinal Health and Terumo. Dr Harding has received speaker and consultancy fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Bio-Excel, and Asahi Intecc. Dr Hatem is a member of the Speakers Bureau for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Teleflex. Dr Hoye has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Sanofi. Dr Jaber has received proctoring fees from Abbott; and has received consulting, advisory board, and institutional funds from Medtronic. Dr Jaffer conducts sponsored research for Canon, Siemens, Teleflex, and Shockwave; is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Siemens, Biotronik, and Magenta Medical; and holds equity interest in Intravascular Imaging. Dr Jussila has a proctoring contract with Boston Scientific and EPS Vascular. Dr Kalyanasundaram has received fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Terumo. Dr Kandzari has received institutional research grant support from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Medtronic, Teleflex, and OrbusNeich; Dr Karmpaliotis has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific; and holds equity in Saranas, Soundbite, and Traverse Vascular. Dr Kassem has received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, GE, and Abiomed. Dr Khatri has received institutional research grant from Asahi Intecc and honoraria or consulting fees from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Terumo. Dr Kornowski is a founder of NitiLoop. Dr Lamelas has received proctoring fees from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Lim has received educational support and honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Kaneka, Biotronik, Alvimedica, Terumo, and Medtronic. Dr Lo has received speaker and proctoring honoraria from Bio-Excel, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Terumo; and is a member of Medtronic’s advisory board. Dr Lombardi has received royalties and is a consultant for Asahi Intecc; is a consultant for Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Siemens, and Teleflex; and his spouse is an employee of Philips. Dr Maran is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Philips. Dr Moses has received funding from Orchestra Biomedical and Ostial Corporation. Dr Munawar has received speaker and proctorship honoraria from Asahi Intecc, Terumo, Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Toray, and Phillips. Dr Oksnes has proctoring contracts with Boston Scientific and EPS Vascular. Dr Olivecrona has received lecture honoraria from Abbott and Biotronik; and has received proctoring honoraria from EPS Vascular and Terumo. Dr Patel is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Terumo, and Chiesi; and is a proctor for Medtronic. Dr Quadros has received honoraria from Boston Scientific; and has received research funding from Boston and Terumo. Dr Abi Rafeh is a proctor and consultant for Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Shockwave Medical. Dr Råmunddal has received consulting honoraria from EPS Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Abbott Vascular. Dr Riley is an advisory board and Speakers Bureau member for and has received consulting honoraria from Boston Scientific, Asahi Intecc, and Medtronic. Dr Saghatelyan has received proctoring and speaker honoraria from Asahi Intecc and Terumo. Dr Spaedy is a consultant for Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular. Dr Stone has received speaker or other honoraria from Cook and Terumo; is a consultant to Valfix, TherOx, Vascular Dynamics, Robocath, HeartFlow, Gore, Ablative Solutions, Miracor, Neovasc, V-Wave, Abiomed, Ancora, MAIA Pharmaceuticals, Vectorious, Reva, Matrizyme, Cardiomech, Elucid Bio, and Occlutech; and holds equity or options with Ancora, Cagent, Applied Therapeutics, the Biostar family of funds, SpectraWave, Orchestra Biomed, Aria, Cardiac Success, the MedFocus family of funds, and Valfix. Dr Tammam has a proctorship agreement with Terumo. Dr Tremmel has received honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific. Dr Wollmuth has received consulting, speaker, and proctoring honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Abiomed, Asahi Intecc, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Cardiovascular Systems, Medtronic, and Philips. Dr Ybarra has received consulting and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular Canada and SoundBite Medical Solutions. Dr Yeh has received research grants from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Cook, BD Bard, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Philips; and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Shockwave Medical, and Zoll. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether 1 month of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by aspirin monotherapy after polymer-free drug-coated stent (PF-DCS) implantation is noninferior to 6 to 12 months of DAPT after biodegradable-polymer drug-eluting stent (BP-DES) implantation., Background: It is necessary to determine the optimal minimal duration of DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: In this trial, 3,020 patients with coronary artery disease considered for PCI for noncomplex lesions were randomized to 1-month DAPT after PF-DCS (n = 1,507) or 6- to 12-month DAPT after BP-DES (n = 1,513). The primary endpoint was the 1-year composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke, or major bleeding (noninferiority hypothesis margin of 3%)., Results: The primary endpoint occurred in 88 patients (5.9%) in the 1-month DAPT after PF-DCS group and 98 patients (6.5%) in the 6- to 12-month DAPT after BP-DES group (absolute difference -0.7%; upper limit of 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval: 1.33%; P < 0.001 for noninferiority). The occurrence of major bleeding was not different (1.7% vs 2.5%; P = 0.136). There was no difference in the occurrence of stent thrombosis (0.7% vs 0.8%; P = 0.842)., Conclusions: Among patients who underwent PCI for noncomplex lesions, 1-month DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy after PF-DCS implantation was noninferior to 6- to 12-month DAPT after BP-DES implantation for the 1-year composite of cardiovascular events or major bleeding. The present findings need to be interpreted in the setting of different types of stents according to antiplatelet strategy. (A Randomized Controlled Comparison Between One Versus More Than Six Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Biolimus A9-Eluting Stent Implantation; NCT02513810)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Center (Seoul, South Korea) and funded by grants from DIO, Cardinal Health Korea, and Terumo Corporation. No funder or sponsor had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Because of a paucity of published data, we compared the 2-year major clinical outcomes between pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI) thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0/1 (pre-TIMI flow grade [pre-TIMI] 0/1) group and pre-PCI TIMI flow grade 2/3 (pre-TIMI 2/3) group in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who underwent successful implantation of newer-generation drug-eluting stent.A total of 7506 NSTEMI patients were divided into 2 groups: pre-TIMI 0/1 group (n = 3157) and pre-TIMI 2/3 group (n = 4349). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis (ST).After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis, 2 PSM groups (2473 pairs, n = 4946, C-statistic = 0.684) were generated. Major adverse cardiac events (hazard ration [HR], 1.294; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.065-1.572; P = .009), all-cause death (HR, 1.559, P = .003), cardiac death (HR: 1.641, P = .005), and all-cause death or MI (HR: 1.531, P = .001) rates were significantly higher in the pre-TIMI 0/1 group than in the pre-TIMI 2/3 group. Moreover, these differences were more prominent during the first 1 month after the index PCI. However, the cumulative incidences of recurrent myocardial infarction, any revascularization, and ST were similar between the 2 groups.Among a contemporary cohort of NSTEMI, these data suggest that the presence of a pre-PCI patency of the infarct-related artery showed better mortality reduction capacity than those with a lack of patency., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

[Figure: see text].

Background: Pre-stenting intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) assessment is helpful for appropriate stent sizing and determination of the stent landing zone during percutaneous coronary intervention., Aims: The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of pre-stenting IVUS evaluation on procedural and clinical outcomes for diffuse lesions treated with drug-eluting stents (DES)., Methods: In four randomised trials comparing IVUS- and angiography-guided DES placement, a total of 1,396 patients who underwent DES implantation with IVUS guidance were identified. Pre-stenting IVUS assessment was performed in 905 patients along with post-stenting IVUS (65%; pre-stenting IVUS(+) group). Post-stenting IVUS evaluation alone was conducted on 491 patients (35%; pre-stenting IVUS(-) group)., Results: The pre-stenting IVUS(+) group had a larger angiographic minimal lumen diameter and IVUS-derived minimal stent area (MSA) than did the pre-stenting IVUS(-) group. After adjusting, these findings were consistent. The one-year composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation did not differ between the groups. In subgroup analysis, the pre-IVUS(+) group was significantly favoured over the pre-IVUS(-) group in the subset of patients with acute myocardial infarction and lesions with small vessels in terms of larger MSA, and in the subset of patients with chronic total occlusions in terms of better clinical outcomes., Conclusions: Pre-stenting IVUS assessment prior to DES placement was associated with better acute procedural outcomes, though this did not translate into one-year clinical outcomes in the context of post-stenting IVUS assessment. Visual summary. Acute and one-year outcomes of pre-stenting intravascular ultrasound: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Objective: The comparative long-term clinical outcomes between patients with prediabetes and diabetes in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) who were undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are not well known. We therefore compared the 2-year clinical outcomes in such patients., Methods: A total of 2963 patients with NSTEMI and MVD [normoglycemia (group A, n = 629), prediabetes (group B, n = 802), and diabetes (group C, n = 1532)] were evaluated. The primary outcomes were the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis., Results: The cumulative incidence of MACE as well as for death or MI in group B and C were similar when compared to each other. However, they (P = 0.048 and P = 0.017, respectively and P = 0.022 and P = 0.001, respectively) were significantly higher than in group A. The cumulative incidence of all-cause death in group B (P = 0.042) and all-cause death and cardiac death in group C (P = 0.001 and P = 0.028, respectively) were significantly higher than in group A. However, those of all-cause death, cardiac death, Re-MI, any repeat revascularization, and ST were not significantly different between groups B and C., Conclusion: In this study, patients with NSTEMI and MVD who underwent successful implantation of newer-generation DES and were prediabetic had worse outcomes compared to normoglycemics and comparable to those with diabetes., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

We investigated the effects of stent generation on 2-year clinical outcomes between prediabetes and diabetes patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A total of 13,895 AMI patients were classified into normoglycemia (group A: 3673), prediabetes (group B: 5205), and diabetes (group C: 5017). Thereafter, all three groups were further divided into first-generation (1G)-drug-eluting stent (DES) and second-generation (2G)-DES groups. Patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCOs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any repeat revascularization were the primary outcome. Stent thrombosis (ST) was the secondary outcome. In both prediabetes and diabetes groups, the cumulative incidences of POCOs, any repeat revascularization, and ST were higher in the 1G-DES than that in the 2G-DES. In the diabetes group, all-cause death and cardiac death rates were higher in the 1G-DES than that in the 2G-DES. In both stent generations, the cumulative incidence of POCOs was similar between the prediabetes and diabetes groups. However, in the 2G-DES group, the cumulative incidences of Re-MI and all-cause death or MI were significantly higher in the diabetes group than that in the prediabetes group. To conclude, 2G-DES was more effective than 1G-DES in reducing the primary and secondary outcomes for both prediabetes and diabetes groups.