Search

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the influence of ezetimibe in addition to atorvastatin on plaque composition in patients with first-time ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction treated with primary percutaneous intervention.Methods: Eighty-seven patients were randomized (1:1) to ezetimibe 10mg or placebo in addition to Atorvastatin 80mg. Intravascular ultrasound with iMap was performed at baseline and after 12months in a non-infarct-related artery. Primary endpoint was change in necrotic core (NC). Secondary endpoints were total atheroma volume (TAV) and percentage atheroma volume (PAV).Results: NC did not change significantly: ezetimibe group 24.9 (11.9, 51.3) mm3 to 24.9 (15.3, 54.5) mm3, p=0.76, placebo group 29.4 (16.3, 78.5) mm3 to 32.0 (16.0, 88.7) mm3, p=0.30, (p=0.35 between groups). TAV was reduced in the ezetimibe group only: ezetimibe (200.0 (135.6, 311.9) mm3 to 189.3 (126.4, 269.1) mm3, p<0.001) compared to placebo group (218.4 (163.5, 307.9) mm3 to 212.2 (149.9, 394.8) mm3, p=0.07) (p=0.56 between groups). PAV was reduced in the ezetimibe group only (40.1±8.6% to 39.2±9.0%, p=0.036) compared to placebo group (43.3±9.4% to 42.2±10.7%, p=0.07), p=0.91 between groups.Conclusions: Ezetimibe in addition to atorvastatin therapy did not influence NC content, but was associated with regression of coronary atherosclerosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Stenting-induced edge dissections (ED) can be assessed in detail by optical coherence tomography (OCT). This study sought to investigate the incidence, morphological characteristics, and spontaneous healing course of OCT-identified EDs following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patient-population. Methods Acute vessel wall injury at the 5-mm stent adjacent distal and proximal reference segments was assessed by post-procedure OCT and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in n = 97 NSTEMI-patients (n = 97 lesions). Six months OCT follow-up was available in 82 patients (including 35 untreated post-procedure EDs). Results The overall incidence of post-procedure OCT-detected ED was 38 per 97 patients (39.2%), and 47 per 182 stent edges (25.8%). None of the EDs were angiographically visualizable, while 10 (21.3%) were visible on concomitant IVUS-analysis. Morphologically, there was a significant difference in plaque type present at ED-edges vs. non-ED-edges when assessed with OCT; (1) lipid-rich and calcified plaques: 80.9% vs. 57.0%, (2) fibrous plaques: 17.0% vs. 26.7%, and (3) normal coronary vessels: 2.1% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.01. Plaqueburden, assessed by IVUS, was substantially larger at ED-containing borders: 54.5 ± 10.0% vs. 43.7 ± 11.6%, p = 0.01. Three dissections (8.6%) were incompletely healed at 6-month OCT follow-up. None of the EDs caused cardiac events during the 6-month follow-up, however, 1 ED-patient had target lesion revascularization with PCI and DES-implantation in extension of the scheduled OCT-control. Conclusions OCT-detected EDs were frequent after stent implantation due to NSTEMI, and the majority of these EDs healed without leading to an adverse prognosis at 6 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The purpose of a bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) is to provide radial support during coronary healing. In this study, coronary artery healing after optical coherence tomography (OCT)- versus angiography-guided magnesium BRS (MBRS) implantation in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is compared.Methods: 75 patients were randomized 1:1 to OCT- or angiography-guided implantation of a MBRS with protocolled pre- and post-dilation. In the OCT-guided group, prespecified criteria indicating additional intervention were (1) scaffold under-expansion, (2) strut malapposition, (3) edge dissection, and (4) residual stenosis at distal or proximal reference segments. The primary endpoint was OCT-derived healing stage at 6 months.Results: At 6 months, there was no difference in average healing stage between OCT- and angiography-guided intervention (4.6 [interquartile range (IQR): 4.5-4.7] versus 4.5 [IQR: 4.3-4.7]; p = 0.54). The MBRSs were completely resolved in 77.0% [IQR: 68.5-85.5] versus 76.5% [IQR: 67.9-85.5]; (p = 0.97). Minimal lumen area (MLA) was reduced at 6 months in both the OCT- (32.3%; p < 0.01) and the angiography-guided group (21.3%; p < 0.01), however OCT-guided implantation was associated with a greater reduction of total lumen volume (-27.1 ± 32.5 mm3 versus -5.0 ± 32.9 mm3; p < 0.01) and MLA (-2.3 ± 1.6 mm2 vs. -1.4 ± 1.4 mm2; p = 0.02).Conclusions: In NSTEMI patients, OCT-guidance with protocolled pre- and post-dilation of MBRS implantation showed similar healing pattern at 6 months compared to angiography-guidance alone.Clinical Trial Registration: The Coronary Artery Healing Process after Optical Coherence Tomography Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Magmaris Bioresorbable Scaffold in Patients with Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: (HONEST) trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03016624. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) is a relatively new approach in treating coronary artery stenosis. The initial results of the first commercially available scaffolds consisting of a backbone of poly-L-lactide raised safety concerns related to delayed resorption and healing. The magnesium alloy-based scaffold degrades via bio-corrosion within months, whereas it often takes several years for polymer scaffolds to degrade. The aim of the study was to assess the healing stage by optical coherence tomography (OCT) after 6 months in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarct (NSTEMI) randomized to OCT or angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of a magnesium sirolimus-eluting Magmaris scaffold (Magmaris; Biotronik, Bülach, Switzerland). Methods: We analyzed the healing process by comparing OCT at baseline and after 6 months. Five stages of healing were defined with stage 1 being the least healed and stage 5 demonstrating complete resorption and healing with no visible scaffold/remnant. The primary end point is a calculated healing score that is based on 5 subtypes of healing stage: (1) malapposed, (2) uncovered with no detection of smooth surface tissue on top of struts or remnants, (3) covered protruding, (4) covered embedded, and (5) complete healing with a smooth neointimal surface and no sign of struts or visible remnants assessed by OCT 6 months after the index procedure. Results: The impact of OCT-guided compared to angiography-guided scaffold implantation will be illuminated. Conclusion: The present study will provide new information on midterm healing properties of the magnesium BRS in patients with NSTEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a new method to identify lipid core plaque (LCP). The LCP and vascular response were assessed with NIRS to examine whether LCP was compressed or redistributed during percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation.Methods: In 25 patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) NIRS acquisition was performed after predilation, stent implantation with nominal pressure and high-pressure post-dilation with a non-compliant balloon. The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measures included volumes of external elastic membrane (EEM), lumen and plaque+media. The NIRS measures included lipid core burden index (LCBI) and maximum value of LCBI for any of the 4-mm segment (maxLCBI4mm).Results: From predilation to stent implantation and post-dilation EEM volume increased from 337±124mm3 to 369±136mm3 and to 397±144mm3 (p<0.001), while plaque volume decreased from 225±84mm3 to 202±85mm3 and to 192±81mm3 (p<0.001). Plaque shift to the proximal reference segment was found in 40% of the lesions. The maxLCBI4mm decreased significantly from predilation to stent implantation (492±235 to 208±193 (p<0.001), whereas post dilation did not cause any further significant reduction. Also LCBI decreased significantly from predilation to stent implantation (173±103 to 68±67, p<0.001), without any further significant reduction during post-dilation. The LCBI did neither in the proximal nor in the distal reference segments change significantly during stent implantation or post-dilation.Conclusion: Lumen enlargement was caused by vessel expansion, plaque compression and longitudinally plaque redistribution. Lipid-core burden at the stented segment was decreased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long-term safety and efficacy for everolimus-eluting stents (EES) versus those of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) are unknown.Objectives: This study compared 5-year outcomes for EES with those for SES from the SORT OUT IV (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials with Clinical Outcome) trial.Methods: Five-year follow-up was completed for 2,771 patients (99.9%). Primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and definite stent thrombosis.Results: At 5-years, MACE occurred in 14.0% and 17.4% in the EES and SES groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66 to 0.97; p = 0.02). The MACE rate did not differ significantly within the first year (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.19; p = 0.79), but from years 1 through 5, the MACE rate was lower with EES (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.90; p = 0.006; p interaction = 0.12). Definite stent thrombosis was lower with EES (0.4%) than with SES (2.0%; HR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.46), with a lower risk of very late definite stent thrombosis in the EES group (0.2% vs. 1.4%, respectively; HR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.53). When censoring the patients at the time of stent thrombosis, we found no significant differences between the 2 stent groups for MACE rates (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.08; p = 0.23), target lesion revascularization (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.27; p = 0.55), and MI (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.36; p = 0.72).Conclusions: At 5-year follow-up, MACE rate was significantly lower with EES- than with SES-treated patients, due largely due to a lower risk of very late definite stent thrombosis. (Randomized Clinical Comparison of the Xience V and the Cypher Coronary Stents in Non-selected Patients With Coronary Heart Disease [SORT OUT IV]; NCT00552877). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: There are limited head-to-head randomized data on patient-related versus stent-related outcomes for everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). Background: In the SORT OUT IV (Scandinavian Organization for Randomized Trials With Clinical Outcome IV) trial, comparing the EES with the SES in patients with coronary artery disease, the EES was noninferior to the SES at 9 months. Methods: The primary endpoint was a composite: cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), definite stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization. Safety and efficacy outcomes at 2 years were further assessed with specific focus on patient-related composite (all death, all MI, or any revascularization) and stent-related composite outcomes (cardiac death, target vessel MI, or symptom-driven target lesion revascularization). A total of 1,390 patients were assigned to receive the EES, and 1,384 patients were assigned to receive the SES. Results: At 2 years, the composite primary endpoint occurred in 8.3% in the EES group and in 8.7% in the SES group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 to 1.22). The patient-related outcome: 15.0% in the EES group versus 15.6% in the SES group, (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.15), and the stent-related outcome: 5.2% in the EES group versus 5.3% in the SES group (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.35) did not differ between groups. Rate of definite stent thrombosis was lower in the EES group (0.2% vs. 0.9%, (HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.80). Conclusions: At 2-year follow-up, the EES was found to be noninferior to the SES with regard to both patient-related and stent-related clinical outcomes. (The SORT OUT IV TRIAL [SORT OUT IV]; NCT00552877) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]