Search

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate determinants of reperfusion within recommended time limits (timely reperfusion) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients, exploring the impact of geography, patient characteristics and socio-economy., Design: National register-based cohort study., Setting: Multilevel logistic regression models were applied to examine the associations between timely reperfusion and residency in hospital referral areas and municipalities, patient characteristics, and socio-economy., Participants: 7607 Norwegian ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients registered in the Norwegian Registry of Myocardial Infarction during 2015-2018., Main Outcome Measures: The odds of timely reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or fibrinolysis., Results: Among 7607 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients in Norway, 56% received timely reperfusion. The Norwegian goal is 85%. While 81% of the patients living in the Oslo hospital referral area received timely reperfusion, only 13% of the patients living in Finnmark did so.Patients aged 75-84 years had lower odds of timely reperfusion than patients below 55 years of age (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.87). Patients with moderate or high comorbidity had lower odds than patients without (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.95 and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.84). More than 2 hours from symptom onset to first medical contact gave lower odds than less than 30 min (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72). 1-2 hours of travel time to a PCI centre (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.49) and more than 2 hours (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.30) gave substantially lower odds than less than 1 hour of travel time., Conclusions: The varying proportion of patients receiving timely reperfusion across hospital referral areas implies inequity in fundamental healthcare services, not compatible with established Norwegian health policy. The importance of travel time to PCI centre points at the expanded use of prehospital pharmacoinvasive strategy to obtain the goals of timely reperfusion in Norway., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: There is limited knowledge about the use of invasive treatment and mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. We therefore wanted to compare rates of invasive treatment and 30-day mortality between AMIs in patients with PCa and AMIs in the general Norwegian male population., Methods: Norwegian population-based registry data from 2013 to 2019 were used in this cohort study to identify AMIs in patients with a preceding PCa diagnosis. We compared invasive treatment rates and 30-day mortality in AMI patients with PCa to the same outcomes in all male AMI patients in Norway. Invasive treatment was defined as performed angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Standardized mortality (SMR) and incidence ratios, and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between PCa risk groups and invasive treatment., Results: In 1,018 patients with PCa of all risk groups, the total rates of invasive treatment for AMIs were similar to the rates in the general AMI population. In patients with ST-segment elevation AMIs, rates were lower in metastatic PCa compared to localized PCa (OR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04-0.49). For non-ST-segment elevation AMIs, there were no differences between PCa risk groups. The 30-day mortality after AMI was lower in PCa patients than in the total population of similarly aged AMI patients (SMR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.97)., Conclusion: Except for patients with metastatic PCa experiencing an ST-segment elevation AMI, PCa patients were treated as frequent with invasive treatment for their AMI as the general AMI population. 30-day all-cause mortality was lower after AMI in PCa patients compared to the general AMI population., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce target lesion revascularization (TLR) with no effect on mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in native vessels. Randomized stent studies in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) are few and the reported effects are ambiguous. The Norwegian Coronary Stent Trial study is the first to randomize lesions to percutaneous coronary intervention in native vessels and SVG., Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the rate of mortality, MI, and TLR across stent and vessel types., Methods: In this substudy, 6,087 patients with a single lesion in native vessels and 164 in SVG were followed for 5 years., Results: MI was more frequent in SVG (subdistributional hazard ratio [SHR] 4.95 (3.75-6.54, p < 0.001), but not affected by stent type. In the first 500 days, DES reduced TLR in native vessels (SHR 0.21 (0.15-0.30) p < 0.001) and SVG (SHR 0.18 (0.04-0.80) p = 0.02). Thereafter, DES and BMS were equivalent in native vessels, but DES had a higher TLR rate than BMS in SVG (SHR 3.31 (1.23-8.94) p = 0.02). After 5 years, the TLR rate was still significantly lower for DES in native vessels (3.2% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001) but not in SVG (21.4% vs. 18. 4%)., Conclusion: In SVG, no difference in TLR between DES and BMS was observed after 5 years in contrast to persistent benefit in native vessels. The high rate of TLR and MI in SVG makes treatment of native vessels a preference whenever feasible and better treatment options for SVG are warranted., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Bleeding is a concern after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We herein report the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding in the Norwegian Coronary Stent Trial (NORSTENT)., Materials and Methods: NORSTENT was a randomized, double blind, pragmatic trial among patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary disease undergoing PCI during 2008-11. The patients (N = 9,013) were randomized to receive either a drug-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent, and were treated with at least nine months of DAPT. The patients were followed for a median of five years, with Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 major bleeding as one of the safety endpoints. We estimated cumulative incidence of major bleeding by a competing risks model and risk factors through cause-specific Cox models., Results: The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 2.3%. Independent risk factors for major bleeding were chronic kidney disease, low bodyweight (< 60 kilograms), diabetes mellitus, and advanced age (> 80 years). A myocardial infarction (MI) or PCI during follow-up increased the risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1-29-2.15)., Conclusions: The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding in NORSTENT was higher than reported in previous, explanatory trials. This analysis strengthens the role of chronic kidney disease, advanced age, and low bodyweight as risk factors for major bleeding among patients receiving DAPT after PCI. The presence of diabetes mellitus or recurrent MI among patients is furthermore a signal of increased bleeding risk., Clinical Trial Registration: Unique identifier NCT00811772; http://www.clinicaltrial.gov., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction is treated with reperfusion, either in the form of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or thrombolytic therapy. The choice of treatment depends on transport time to the nearest PCI centre. Norway's geography means that thrombolytic therapy will be appropriate for many patients. Irrespective of treatment choice, it is important to avoid delays. We wished to compare the outcomes of primary PCI and thrombolytic therapy in our healthcare region and to examine whether reperfusion therapy was administered within the recommended time window., Material and Method: Using registry data and patient medical records, we compared the outcomes of primary PCI and thrombolytic therapy in cases of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Central Norway Regional Health Authority in the period 2015-16. The outcomes analysed were 30-day mortality, ejection fraction measured by echocardiography during the hospital stay, incidence of bleeding complications, and time from diagnosis to start of treatment., Results: The study population comprised 648 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Of these, 382 were treated with primary PCI and 266 received thrombolytic therapy. The 30-day mortality was 5.5 % in the primary PCI group and 5.6 % in the thrombolysis group (p = 1.0). There were no significant differences in ejection fraction and no cases of serious bleeding. In 45 % of the total population, reperfusion therapy was started later than recommended in guidelines., Interpretation: There was no statistically significant difference in mortality or ejection fraction when comparing primary PCI and thrombolytic therapy in an unselected population with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Many patients experienced delayed start of treatment . It is important to take action to reduce delays at all stages of the therapeutic chain. Thrombolytic therapy should be considered when it is unclear whether transport time to a PCI centre will exceed that recommended in guidelines.