Search

Targeted mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic assays, such as multiplexed multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-MS assays, enable sensitive and specific quantification of proteotypic peptides as stoichiometric surrogates for proteins. Efforts are underway to expand the use of MRM-MS assays in clinical environments, which requires a reliable strategy to monitor proteolytic digestion efficiency within individual samples. Towards this goal, extended stable isotope-labeled standard (SIS) peptides (hE), which incorporate native proteolytic cleavage sites, can be spiked into protein lysates prior to proteolytic (trypsin) digestion, and release of the tryptic SIS peptide (hT) can be monitored. However, hT measurements alone cannot monitor the extent of digestion and may be confounded by matrix effects specific to individual patient samples; therefore, they are not sufficient to monitor sample-to-sample digestion variability. We hypothesized that measuring undigested hE, along with its paired hT, would improve detection of digestion issues compared to only measuring hT. We tested the ratio of the SIS pair measurements, or hE/hT, as a quality control (QC) metric of trypsin digestion for two MRM assays: a direct-MRM (398 targets) and an immuno-MRM (126 targets requiring immunoaffinity peptide enrichment) assay, with extended SIS peptides observable for 54% (216) and 62% (78) of the targets, respectively. We evaluated the quantitative bias for each target in a series of experiments that adversely affected proteolytic digestion (e.g., variable digestion times, pH, and temperature). We identified a subset of SIS pairs (36 for the direct-MRM, 7 for the immuno-MRM assay) for which the hE/hT ratio reliably detected inefficient digestion that resulted in decreased assay sensitivity and unreliable endogenous quantification. The hE/hT ratio was more responsive to a decrease in digestion efficiency than a metric based on hT measurements alone. For clinical-grade MRM-MS assays, this study describes a ready-to-use QC panel and also provides a road map for designing custom QC panels., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapies are revolutionizing cancer care, producing durable responses and potentially cures in a subset of patients. However, response rates are low for most tumors, grade 3/4 toxicities are not uncommon, and our current understanding of tumor immunobiology is incomplete. While hundreds of immunomodulatory proteins in the tumor microenvironment shape the anti-tumor response, few of them can be reliably quantified. To address this need, we developed a multiplex panel of targeted proteomic assays targeting 52 peptides representing 46 proteins using peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry. We validated the assays in tissue and plasma matrices, where performance figures of merit showed over 3 orders of dynamic range and median inter-day CVs of 5.2% (tissue) and 21% (plasma). A feasibility study in clinical biospecimens showed detection of 48/52 peptides in frozen tissue and 38/52 peptides in plasma. The assays are publicly available as a resource for the research community., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Whiteaker, Lundeen, Zhao, Schoenherr, Burian, Huang, Voytovich, Wang, Kennedy, Ivey, Lin, Murillo, Lorentzen, Thiagarajan, Colantonio, Caceres, Roberts, Knotts, Reading, Kaczmarczyk, Richardson, Garcia-Buntley, Bocik, Hewitt, Murray, Do, Brophy, Wilz, Yu, Ajjarapu, Boja, Hiltke, Rodriguez and Paulovich.)