1. Purity assignment for peptide certified reference materials by combining qNMR and LC-MS/MS amino acid analysis results: application to angiotensin II.
- Author
-
Melanson JE, Thibeault MP, Stocks BB, Leek DM, McRae G, and Meija J
- Subjects
- Angiotensin II analysis, Angiotensin II standards, Bayes Theorem, Hydrolysis, Models, Chemical, Reference Standards, Reproducibility of Results, Trifluoroacetic Acid analysis, Amino Acids analysis, Angiotensin II chemistry, Chromatography, Liquid methods, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy methods, Peptides standards, Tandem Mass Spectrometry methods
- Abstract
The purity value assignment of metrologically traceable peptide reference standards requires specialized primary methods. Conventionally, amino acid analysis by isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) following peptide hydrolysis is employed as a reference method. By contrast, quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance (qNMR) spectroscopy allows for quantitation of intact peptides, thus eliminating potential bias due to hydrolysis. Both methods are susceptible to interference from related peptide impurities, which need to be accurately measured and accounted for. The mass balance approach has also been employed for peptide purity measurements, whereby the purity is defined by the sum of the mass fraction of all impurities identified. Ideally, results from these three orthogonal methods can be combined for final purity assignment of peptide reference standards. Here we report a novel strategy for correcting both LC-MS/MS and
1 H-qNMR results for related peptide impurities and combining results from both methods using a Bayesian statistical approach using mass balance results as prior knowledge. The mass balance method relied on a validated19 F-qNMR method to measure the trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) counter-ion, considered an impurity in this case at nearly 25% by mass. Using a candidate certified reference material (CRM) for angiotensin II, excellent agreement was achieved with the three methods. The final purity value assignment of the candidate CRM was 691 ± 9 mg/g (k = 2).- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF