1. Exenatide therapy and the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in a privately insured population.
- Author
-
Romley JA, Goldman DP, Solomon M, McFadden D, and Peters AL
- Subjects
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 complications, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 epidemiology, Exenatide, Female, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage, Incidence, Logistic Models, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Pancreatic Neoplasms epidemiology, Pancreatitis epidemiology, Peptides administration & dosage, Retrospective Studies, Risk Assessment, United States epidemiology, Venoms administration & dosage, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 drug therapy, Hypoglycemic Agents adverse effects, Insurance, Health statistics & numerical data, Pancreatic Neoplasms chemically induced, Pancreatitis chemically induced, Peptides adverse effects, Venoms adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: Postmarketing reports have linked exenatide use with acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer, but a definitive relationship has yet to be established., Subjects and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes with employer-provided health insurance from 2007 to 2009. Multivariate models estimated the association between exenatide use and acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. We required at least 1 year of exenatide exposure in the pancreatic cancer analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted that quasirandomized exenatide use based on patient out-of-pocket costs., Results: Among 268,561 patients included in the acute pancreatitis analysis, only 2.6% used exenatide. Hospitalization for acute pancreatitis was rare (0.247% of patients). In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, patients who did not use exenatide were more likely to be hospitalized for acute pancreatitis (0.249% vs. 0.196% in unadjusted analysis), but the difference was not statistically significant in either analysis (P = 0.22 and P = 0.70, respectively). Among 209,306 patients in the pancreatic cancer analysis, 0.070% were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, and 0.88% had at least 1 year of continuous exenatide exposure prior to the diagnosis. Those with exenatide exposure had higher rates of pancreatic cancer compared with those without (0.081% vs. 0.070% in unadjusted analysis). In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.80 and P = 0.46, respectively). In sensitivity analyses, results were similar., Conclusions: We found no association between exenatide use and either hospitalization for acute pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer in a large sample of privately insured U.S. patients.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF