Search

Background: Pediatric regulations enacted in both Europe and the USA have disrupted the pharmaceutical industry, challenging business and drug development processes, and organizational structures. Over the last decade, with science and innovation evolving, industry has moved from a reactive to a proactive mode, investing in building appropriate structures and capabilities as part of their business strategy to better tackle the challenges and opportunities of pediatric drug development. Methods: The EFGCP Children's Medicines Working Party and the IQ Pediatric working group have joined their efforts to survey their member company representatives to understand how pharmaceutical companies are organized to fulfill their regulatory obligations and optimize their pediatric drug development programs. Results: Key success factors and recommendations for a fit-for-purpose Pediatric Expert Group (PEG) were identified. Conclusion: Pediatric structures and expert groups were shown to be important to support optimization of the development of pediatric medicines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Joining the Food and Drug Administration/University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation Workshop to discuss and identify solutions to optimize pediatric drug development and, in particular, to address the question as to whether we are ready to incorporate pediatric ontogeny into modeling was the opportunity to share learnings, confront ideas, and present examples of studies performed in industry and academia. This was not only the opportunity to reflect on the experience and the knowledge so far within the current regulatory framework but also to look at the future and explore new and future approaches as well as best practices with the use of modeling and simulation and extrapolation as part of pediatric development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The accuracy of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model prediction in children, especially those younger than 2 years old, has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to characterize the pediatric predictive performance of the PBPK approach for 10 drugs extensively metabolized by CYP1A2 (theophylline), CYP2C8 (desloratidine, montelukast), CYP2C9 (diclofenac), CYP2C19 (esomeprazole, lansoprazole), CYP2D6 (tramadol), and CYP3A4 (itraconazole, ondansetron, sufentanil). Model performance in children was evaluated by comparing simulated plasma concentration–time profiles with observed clinical results for each drug and age group. PBPK models reasonably predicted the pharmacokinetics of desloratadine, diclofenac, itraconazole, lansoprazole, montelukast, ondansetron, sufentanil, theophylline, and tramadol across all age groups. Collectively, 58 out of 67 predictions were within 2‐fold and 43 out of 67 predictions within 1.5‐fold of observed values. Developed PBPK models can reasonably predict exposure in children age 1 month and older for an array of predominantly CYP metabolized drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article How is the Pharmaceutical Industry Structured to Optimize Pediatric Drug Development? Existing Pediatric Structure Models and Proposed Recommendations for Structural Enhancement, written by Thomas Severin et al. was originally published electronically on the publisher's internet portal on February 6, 2020 without open access. With the author(s)' decision to opt for Open Choice the copyright of the article changed on April 22, 2020 to © The Author(s) 2020 and the article is forthwith distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]