Search

We utilized the multicenter Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative (PAC3) 2017 and 2019 surveys to describe practice variation in therapy availability and changes over a 2-year period. A high acuity therapies (ATs) score was derived (1 point per positive response) from 44 survey questions and scores were compared to center surgical volume. Of 31 centers that completed the 2017 survey, 26 also completed the 2019 survey. Scores ranged from 11 to 34 in 2017 and 11 to 35 in 2019. AT scores in 2019 were not statistically different from 2017 scores (29/44, IQR 27–32.5 vs. 29.5/44, IQR 27–31, p = 0.9). In 2019, more centers reported initiation of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in Acute Care Cardiology Unit (ACCU) (19/26 vs. 4/26, p < 0.001) and permitting continuous CPAP/BiPAP (22/26 vs. 14/26, p = 0.034) compared to 2017. Scores in both survey years were significantly higher in the highest surgical volume group compared to the lowest, 33 ± 1.5 versus 25 ± 8.5, p = 0.046 and 32 ± 1.7 versus 23 ± 5.5, p = 0.009, respectively. Variation in therapy within the ACCUs participating in PAC3 presents an opportunity for shared learning across the collaborative. Experience with PAC3 was associated with increasing available respiratory therapies from 2017 to 2019. Whether AT scores impact the quality and outcomes of pediatric acute cardiac care will be the subject of further investigation using a comprehensive registry launched in early 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology Collaborative (PAC3) was established in 2014 to understand systems and clinical practices in cardiac care delivered outside the intensive care unit with a focus on outcomes, quality improvement, and patient safety. An initial PAC3 project was a comprehensive survey to understand unit structure, practices, and resource utilization across the collaborative. Methods: The survey consisted of 126 stem questions. Many questions had branching logic for positive responses leading to 412 total possible response fields. Questions were categorized into domains: demographics, staffing, resources and therapies, and standard care practices. Five supplemental questions addressed patient and surgical volume variables. Responses were recorded and stored in a REDCap database. Results: Surveys were completed by 31 (91%) of 34 member centers. A majority (19, 61%) of centers have a single, dedicated cardiac acute care unit (ACU), which is contiguous or on the same floor as the ICU in 15 (48%). A nurse staffing ratio of 3:1 is employed in 71% of centers and 26 (84%) reported having a resource nurse. Centralized wireless rhythm monitoring is used in 26 (84%) centers with 14 (54%) staffed continuously. Table 1 shows the use of various high-acuity therapies. Figure 1 illustrates the varied use of protocols and procedures in this population. Conclusions: The PAC3 hospital survey is the most thorough effort to understand systems and clinical care practices in the cardiac ACU to date. It demonstrates notable heterogeneity and varied practice patterns amongst units. Further study may identify a combination of structure and services that can enhance efficiency, safety, and patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]