Search

Background: Coadministration of a bacterial adjuvant with oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been suggested as a potential treatment for food allergy., Objective: To evaluate a combined therapy comprising a probiotic together with peanut OIT., Methods: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 and peanut OIT (probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy [PPOIT]) in children (1-10 years) with peanut allergy. The primary outcome was induction of sustained unresponsiveness 2 to 5 weeks after discontinuation of treatment (referred to as possible sustained unresponsiveness). Secondary outcomes were desensitization, peanut skin prick test, and specific IgE and specific IgG4 measurements., Results: Sixty-two children were randomized and stratified by age (≤5 and >5 years) and peanut skin test wheal size (≤10 and >10 mm); 56 reached the trial's end. Baseline demographics were similar across groups. Possible sustained unresponsiveness was achieved in 82.1% receiving PPOIT and 3.6% receiving placebo (P < .001). Nine children need to be treated for 7 to achieve sustained unresponsiveness (number needed to treat, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06-1.59). Of the subjects, 89.7% receiving PPOIT and 7.1% receiving placebo were desensitized (P < .001). PPOIT was associated with reduced peanut skin prick test responses and peanut-specific IgE levels and increased peanut-specific IgG4 levels (all P < .001). PPOIT-treated participants reported a greater number of adverse events, mostly with maintenance home dosing., Conclusion: This is the first randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating the novel coadministration of a probiotic and peanut OIT and assessing sustained unresponsiveness in children with peanut allergy. PPOIT was effective in inducing possible sustained unresponsiveness and immune changes that suggest modulation of the peanut-specific immune response. Further work is required to confirm sustained unresponsiveness after a longer period of secondary peanut elimination and to clarify the relative contributions of probiotics versus OIT., (Copyright © 2014 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: History and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD) are risk factors for peanut allergy. Recent evidence suggests that children can become sensitized to food allergens through an impaired skin barrier. Household peanut consumption, which correlates strongly with peanut protein levels in household dust, is a risk factor for peanut allergy., Objective: We sought to assess whether environmental peanut exposure (EPE) is a risk for peanut sensitization and allergy and whether markers of an impaired skin barrier modify this risk., Methods: Peanut protein in household dust (in micrograms per gram) was assessed in highly atopic children (age, 3-15 months) recruited to the Consortium of Food Allergy Research Observational Study. History and severity of AD, peanut sensitization, and likely allergy (peanut-specific IgE, ≥5 kUA/mL) were assessed at recruitment into the Consortium of Food Allergy Research study., Results: There was an exposure-response relationship between peanut protein levels in household dust and peanut skin prick test (SPT) sensitization and likely allergy. In the final multivariate model an increase in 4 log2 EPE units increased the odds of peanut SPT sensitization (1.71-fold; 95% CI, 1.13- to 2.59-fold; P = .01) and likely peanut allergy (PA; 2.10-fold; 95% CI, 1.20- to 3.67-fold; P < .01). The effect of EPE on peanut SPT sensitization was augmented in children with a history of AD (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.26-3.09; P < .01) and augmented even further in children with a history of severe AD (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.30-4.47; P < .01); the effect of EPE on PA was also augmented in children with a history of AD (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.31-4.18; P < .01)., Conclusion: Exposure to peanut antigen in dust through an impaired skin barrier in atopically inflamed skin is a plausible route for peanut SPT sensitization and PA., (Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Peanut allergy is a major cause of anaphylaxis. Regulation of immune responses to peanut allergen, particularly why sensitization does not usually progress to allergic reactions, is not well investigated. Most studies focus exclusively on serologic responses and individuals with peanut allergy., Objective: We sought to determine the existence, prevalence, and nature of peanut-specific, T cell-dependent cytokine and chemokine responses of adults who eat peanut without having symptoms., Methods: We developed systems to examine specific immunity in peanut-tolerant individuals who had (1) negative histories and negative peanut skin test responses, (2) negative histories and positive peanut skin test responses, and (3) clinically apparent peanut allergy. After primary culture of PBMCs restimulated with whole peanut extract, we quantified responses characteristic of TH1 (IFN-gamma and CXCL10) and TH2-like immunity (IL-5, IL-13, CCL17, and CCL22) using ultrasensitive ELISAs. Antigen-presenting cell costimulatory requirements (CD4, HLA-DR, CD80/86, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 [CTLA4] Ig) were determined., Results: T cell-dependent, peanut-specific IL-5, IL-13, and CCL22 were common in peanut-tolerant individuals, regardless of whether they had positive or negative skin test responses. These were blocked by anti-CD4 and were dependent on CD28/CD86 costimulation. None of the 70 individuals studied had demonstrable IFN-gamma or CXCL10 responses to peanut. All demonstrated TH1 and TH2 responses to the ubiquitous recall antigen streptokinase., Conclusions: Qualitatively similar and quantitatively increasing peanut-specific TH2 responses in the consistent absence of putatively protective TH1 immunity were found in both peanut-tolerant individuals and those with peanut allergy., Clinical Implications: The continuum of responses between individuals with negative and individuals with positive skin test results, rather than TH1 versus TH2 bias, might be important in peanut allergy.

Purpose of Review: Peanut allergy is among the most serious, life-threatening food sensitivities, and recent studies indicate increasing prevalence, particularly among children. Our objective is to highlight recent advances in the immunology and treatment of peanut allergy., Recent Findings: Peanut sensitization may be both a Th1- and Th2-driven process, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) may play a role in regulating the response intensity. Preliminary work shows that the food matrix is important in the immune response to peanut and that purified peanut allergens may have little intrinsic stimulatory capacity. Studies characterizing peanut allergens have revealed Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 as the most potent allergens, but Ara h 3 may be more allergenic than previously thought. There appears to be a relationship between the diversity of IgE-binding patterns and the severity of clinical symptoms. Multiple novel approaches to treatment are being investigated, which include traditional Chinese medicine, various forms of modified immunotherapy and the use of adjuvants in modified immunotherapy., Summary: By understanding the immunologic response to peanut and the roles of the major peanut allergens, it may be possible to predict those at risk for severe reactions, prevent peanut sensitization and effectively treat those already sensitized.

Purpose of Review: Food allergy is a major cause of life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. Peanut allergy is the most serious of the hypersensitivity reactions to foods due to its persistence and high risk of severe anaphylaxis. Currently, strict avoidance of the allergenic food and ready access to self-injectable epinephrine is the 'standard of care' for food allergy. Based on extensive characterization of food allergens and a better understanding of the immunological mechanisms underlying allergic disease, promising therapeutic modalities for food allergy treatment and prevention are being developed., Recent Findings: Immunotherapeutic strategies include peptide immunotherapy, mutated protein immunotherapy and DNA immunization, which all strive to decrease the deleterious Th2 response. Another approach already in clinical trials for peanut allergy is the anti-IgE therapy which prevents circulating IgE from binding to effector cells, consequently decreasing clinical symptoms after peanut ingestion. In order to be applicable, these strategies must be well tolerated, inexpensive and easily administered. Realistic treatment options would likely involve a combination of different approaches., Summary: Food allergy affects approximately 4-6% of children and 3-4% of adults. Peanut allergy can be devastating as reactions range from urticaria to severe anaphylactic shock and death. The only preventive measure for peanut allergy is strict avoidance of the incriminating food. It is likely immunotherapy will be available in the near future as a well tolerated and effective therapy for treating peanut allergy. The use of the anti-IgE therapy in conjunction with other immunotherapy would possibly be the best treatment option in the future.

Food allergy is a major cause of life-threatening hypersensitive reactions. Food-induced anaphylaxis is the most common reason for a person to present to the emergency department for treatment of the anaphylactic reaction. Avoiding the allergenic food is the only currently available method for sensitized patients to prevent further reactions. Strict avoidance of specific foods is accepted treatment of food-induced allergic reactions but is often an unrealistic therapeutic strategy for the treatment and prevention of food-induced hypersensivity reactions for the many reasons. Desirable therapeutic strategies for the treatment and prevention of the food allergies must be safe, relatively inexpensive, and easily administered. Recent advances in the understanding of the immunological mechanisms underlying allergic disease and better characterization of food allergens have greatly expanded the potential therapeutic option for future use. Several different forms of immunodulatory therapies are currently under investigation: peptide immunotherapy, mutated protein immunotherapy, allergen DNA immunization, vaccination with immunostimulatory DNA sequences, and anti-immunoglobulin E-therapy.

Background: Peanut allergy (PNA) is a life-threatening food allergy for which there is no definitive treatment., Objective: We investigated the long-term immunomodulatory effect of heat-killed Escherichia coli producing engineered (mutated) Ara h1, 2, and 3 (HKE-MP123) administered rectally (pr) in a murine model of PNA., Methods: Peanut-allergic C3H/HeJ mice received 0.9 (low dose), 9 (medium dose), or 90 (high dose) microg HKE-MP123 pr, HKE-containing vector (HKE-V) alone, or vehicle alone (sham) weekly for 3 weeks. Mice were challenged 2 weeks later. A second and third challenge were performed at 4-week intervals., Results: After the first challenge, all 3 HKE-MP123 and HKE-V-treated groups exhibited reduced symptom scores (P <.01,.01,.05,.05, respectively) compared with the sham-treated group. Interestingly, only the medium- and high-dose HKE-MP123-treated mice remained protected for up to 10 weeks after treatment accompanied by a significant reduction of plasma histamine levels compared with sham-treated mice (P <.05 and.01, respectively). IgE levels were significantly lower in all HKE-MP123-treated groups (P <.001), being most reduced in the high-dose HKE-MP123-treated group at the time of each challenge. IL-4, IL-13, IL-5, and IL-10 production by splenocytes of high-dose HKE-MP123-treated mice were significantly decreased (P <.01;.001,.001, and.001, respectively), and IFN-gamma and TGF-beta production were significantly increased (P <.001 and.01, respectively) compared with sham-treated mice at the time of the last challenge., Conclusions: Treatment with pr HKE-MP123 can induce long-term "downregulation" of peanut hypersensitivity, which might be secondary to decreased antigen-specific T(H)2 and increased T(H)1 and T regulatory cytokine production.

Reactions to peanut proteins by certain sensitive members of the population can result in dramatic and potentially catastrophic consequences. While peanut is not the only food known to cause allergies, it is the one that is most closely monitored. To address concerns related to peanut in food products, four commercial test kits have been developed to quantitatively analyze for peanut protein in finished products. This manuscript describes a study undertaken to compare these kits on reference samples of dark and milk chocolate containing known amounts of peanut. The results are mixed with the data suggesting that all kits were suitable for qualitative screening but were not suitable for general quantitative assays.